ABSTRACT
AIMS: To investigate the effects of a pharmacotherapy (orlistat) plus lifestyle management (OLM) intervention on weight loss in Mexican American women with and without metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODS: One hundred and seven female participants aged 21-65 years and of Mexican origin were randomized to either OLM or a wait-list control group (WLC) for one year. The lifestyle interventions were tailored to exhibit features of the Mexican culture. Within each group, subjects with MS were compared to those without MS to assess whether its presence mitigates weight loss. Risk factors for MS also were assessed. RESULTS: Participants with MS in the OLM group experienced significant decreases in weight and body mass index (BMI) as compared to participants without MS. Participants with MS in the OLM group and who completed the study lost 9.3+/-7.5 kg (20.5+/-16.5 lb) as compared to participants with MS in the WLC group, who only lost 0.2+/-3.1 kg (0.4+/-6.8 lb). Further, participants with MS in the OLM group who completed the study experienced a 3.1+/-3.9 kg/m2 decrease in BMI whereas participants with MS in the WLC group only experienced a 0.1+/-1.2 kg/m2 decrease in BMI. No changes in other MS risk factors were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS experienced significant weight loss and decreases in BMI as a result of a lifestyle and pharmacotherapy intervention.
Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Exercise , Lactones/therapeutic use , Metabolic Syndrome/therapy , Obesity/therapy , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Life Style , Metabolic Syndrome/blood , Metabolic Syndrome/ethnology , Mexican Americans , Middle Aged , Obesity/blood , Obesity/ethnology , Orlistat , Overweight , Risk Factors , Weight LossABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a culturally appropriate lifestyle intervention combined with orlistat in producing weight loss with obese Mexican-American women. SUBJECTS: Mexican-American women (N=108), aged 21-65 y, with a body mass index (BMI) > or =27 kg/m(2) were randomized to 1 y of treatment with orlistat and a culturally tailored lifestyle modification intervention (OLM; n=56) or a wait-list control group (WLC; n=52). DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, open-label 12-month study. Orlistat was dosed at 120 mg, three times per day. The OLM intervention included behavior modification, a low-fat (< or =30% of total daily calories) diet, and moderate physical activity (> or =150 min/week). MEASUREMENT: Primary outcomes included changes in body weight (kg), BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, glucose, and lipids. RESULTS: A total of 72 (37 OLM, 35 WLC) and 66 participants (32 OLM, 34 WLC) completed the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. Repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant time x treatment interaction (Wilks' lambda=12.61; P<0.001), indicating that OLM-treated patients achieved significant weight loss relative to the WLC group during the study (mean percentage weight loss+/-s.e.m.; -8.1%+/-1.2 vs -1.6%+/-0.7 at 6 months and -8.8%+/-1.5 vs -0.2%+/-1.0 at 12 months, respectively). OLM-treated patients also experienced significant reductions in waist circumference, low-density-lipoprotein, and total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of an intervention combining orlistat and lifestyle modification with Mexican-American women, a population with substantial risk for obesity.
Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Behavior Therapy , Lactones/therapeutic use , Obesity/therapy , Weight Loss , Adult , Aged , Anti-Obesity Agents/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lactones/adverse effects , Life Style , Lipase/antagonists & inhibitors , Mexican Americans , Middle Aged , Obesity/diet therapy , Obesity/ethnology , Orlistat , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Treatment RefusalABSTRACT
There has been considerable debate regarding the value of programmed electrical stimulation in patients who present with asymptomatic, or minimally symptomatic, nonsustained VT. Unfortunately, there has never been a sufficiently large study of an untreated group of patients to make any sense of the issue. We culled the literature for reports published between 1986 and 1990 that met certain minimum requirements, the most important of which were adequate patient profiling and outcome data. The survey identified 12 studies of 926 patients, mean age 61 years, with a 5:1 male preponderance. Underlying heart disease was coronary in 818 patients, including 665 who had experienced previous but not recent myocardial infarctions. Of these, 302 (33%) had inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias (monomorphic VTs in 264). Eighty-three percent of these patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs compared to only 13% of the noninducible group (p less than 0.0001). Sudden death or a sustained arrhythmic event occurred in 54 (18%) of the 302 patients in the inducible group compared with 46 (7%) of the 624 in the noninducible group (p less than 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive accuracies of the test were 54%, 70%, 18%, and 93%, respectively. Thus a patient with an inducible sustained arrhythmia who manifests nonsustained VT is two and a half times as likely to have a major arrhythmic event, but a negative result bodes well for the patient. However, widespread application of the technique cannot be recommended until these results are confirmed in a large, prospective study in which antiarrhythmic therapy is controlled.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Tachycardia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tachycardia/diagnosisABSTRACT
This article provides theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence that international migration decisions are influenced by relative as well as absolute income considerations. Potential gains in absolute income through migration are likely to play an important role in households' migration decisions, but international migration by household members who hold promise for success as labor migrants can also be an effective strategy to improve a household's income position relative to others in the household's reference group. The findings reported in this article provide empirical support for the hypothesis that relative deprivation plays a significant role in Mexico-to-U.S. migration decisions. The findings also suggest that this migration is an effective mechanism for achieving income gains in households that send migrants to the U.S. and that households wisely choose as migrants those of their members who are most likely to provide net income gains.