Lessons learned from a cluster of immunization errors in newborns.

Background: Vaccines are safe and effective, but adverse reactions can occur. Immunization errors (IEs) are one of the types of adverse events following immunization. The Moroccan Pharmacovigilance Centre (MPC) received a cluster of IEs from a maternity university hospital (MUH) regarding six newborns who were inadvertently administered rocuronium instead of hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine. The newborns experienced respiratory distress and one had a fatal outcome. Objectives: The study aimed to describe the investigation findings, the underlying causes, and contributing factors of the IEs cluster, and proposed risk minimization actions. Design: We carried out a descriptive analysis of the cluster of IEs related to the HepB vaccine reported to the MPC. Methods: An investigation was conducted by the Ministry of Health according to the World Health Organization guidance. The root cause analysis was performed to identify underlying causes and contributing factors that lead to IE occurrence. Results: The cluster analysis showed that the main contributing factors were the look-alike rocuronium and HepB vaccine packaging, the first-time running HepB vaccination for newborns in the MUH, the lack of a full-time pharmacist, and the unsafe storage of rocuronium and vaccines. The administration of Sugammadex to the newborns followed by their transfer to the neonatal care unit resulted in the recovery of five of the six newborns. Proposed recommendations included (1) raising awareness of healthcare professionals to the risk related to look-alike medications, (2) training nurses to ensure vaccination to implement procedures related to immunization practices, (3) nomination of a full-time pharmacist, (4) reassessment of the safety of drug storage and dispensing at the hospital pharmacy, particularly for high-alert medications. Conclusion: Reporting IEs, particularly serious ones, allows us to identify causes and contributing factors that led to their occurrence. Lessons learned from errors are key to take risk minimization actions to improve vaccine safety worldwide.

Adverse drug reactions to chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycin in COVID-19 in-patients: data from intensive pharmacovigilance in Morocco, 2020.

In Morocco, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin have been used off-label for COVID-19 treatment. This study aimed to describe the distribution, nature and seriousness of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the two drug combinations in COVID-19 in-patients. We conducted a prospective observational study based on intensive pharmacovigilance in national COVID-19 patients' management facilities from April 1 to June 12, 2020. Hospitalized patients treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin and who experienced ADRs during their hospital stay were included in the study. The causality and seriousness of the ADRs were assessed using the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre method and the agreed criteria in the ICH guideline (E2A) respectively. A total of 237 (51.7%) and 221 (48.3%) COVID-19 in-patients treated respectively with chloroquine + azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin experienced 946 ADRs. Serious ADRs occurred in 54 patients (11.8%). Gastrointestinal system was most affected both in patients taking chloroquine + azithromycin (49.8%) or hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin (54.2%), followed by nervous system and psychiatric. Eye disorders were more frequent in patients receiving chloroquine + azithromycin (10.3%) than those receiving hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin (1.2%). Cardiac ADRs accounted for 6.4% and 5.1% respectively. Chloroquine + azithromycin caused more ADRs by patients than hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin (2.6 versus 1.5 ADRs/patient). Causality assessment was possible for 75.7% of the ADRs. Diabetes was identified as a risk factor for serious ADRs (ORa 3.56; IC: 95% 1.5-8.6). The off-label use of the two drug combinations in COVID-19 in-patients according to the national therapeutic protocol seems to be safe and tolerable. ADRs were mainly expected. However, precaution should be taken in using the drugs in diabetic patients to prevent the risk of serious ADRs.

Monitoring the safety of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic and seasonal vaccines in Morocco.

Background: A vaccination campaign against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 was implemented in Morocco between November 2009 and April 2010. Overall, 705,883 subjects were vaccinated by Pandemrix, Arepanrix, and Panenza. The adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) data comparison was made with the 2014/2015 seasonal influenza vaccination campaign that was specifically investigated. Aim: To evaluate the safety of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine and to compare it to that of 2014 seasonal influenza vaccine. Methods: During the pandemic vaccination campaign, the Morocco Pharmacovigilance Centre reinforced passive AEFI surveillance with an active and prospective monitoring programme of 1000 immunized people over 6 months at 10 randomly selected vaccination centres. For the 2014/2015 seasonal vaccination campaign, AEFI data were collected from spontaneous notifications. Results: Active monitoring of 2009 pandemic collected 771 AEFI reports, corresponding to an AEFI incidence rate of 77.1% with vaccination by either Pandemrix or Arepanrix vaccine in 95% of cases. Reported AEFI were most frequently local (37.7%), general (29.5%), and neurological reactions (20.3%). Most of the AEFI (95.5%) were observed during the first 48 hours after vaccination, and the remainder within 2 weeks. None of the reported AEFI were serious case. The highest rate of notification was documented for health professionals, followed by patients with diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases. Concerning passive surveillance, the AEFI notification rate was significantly higher for the 2009/2010 pandemic vaccine (3.1 vs 1.2 per 10,000). However, there was no significant difference between pandemic and seasonal vaccination with regards to the serious adverse events (SAE) notification rate (0.3 vs 0.2 per 10,000). Conclusion: Data analysis indicates that the vaccines used against 2009 pandemic influenza in Morocco have a satisfactory safety profile, similar to the seasonal influenza vaccine with the exception of local reactions as observed previously in other countries.

Construction and analysis of a database for medication errors in a pharmacovigilance centre-the Moroccan experience.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to describe the epidemiological profile of medication errors (MEs) reported to the Moroccan Pharmacovigilance Center (MPVC), to determine factors associated with serious MEs, and to describe signals related to them. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective descriptive analysis of MEs reported to the MPVC from 2006 to 2016 and a secondary analysis of the seriousness of MEs with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The reports were sorted by demographic profile and by ME and ADR characteristics. For signal detection, a quantitative approach was adopted, and the root cause analysis was completed. Epi info 7 software was used to perform descriptive and analytical statistics. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1618 ME reports were retrieved. The proportion of MEs associated with serious ADRs was 23.9%. The factors statistically associated with serious MEs were as follows: (i) the age group 16 years old and less (p < 0.001), (ii) the gender (p = 0.01), (iii) the administration and the prescription stages (p < 0.001), and (iv) the ME types related to inappropriate schedule of drug administration, drug prescribing error (p < 0.001), and incorrect drug administration dosage form (p = 0.04). Fourteen signals related to MEs were detected, for which risk minimization actions were implemented. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a ME unit within the MPVC was an opportunity to further improve the pharmacovigilance centre performance and consequently its contribution to medication safety. The lessons learned from MEs should be shared through pharmacovigilance networks and with institutions involved in medication safety for synergistic results to achieve patient safety worldwide.

NAT2 Genotypes in Moroccan Patients with Hepatotoxicity Due to Antituberculosis Drugs.

AIM: Isoniazid (INH) is the most effective drug used as a first-line tuberculosis (TB) treatment besides rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. It is also the most commonly associated with hepatotoxicity. Differences of toxicity induced by INH have been attributed to genetic variability of the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) gene which encodes a drug-metabolizing enzyme. The aim of this study was to characterize the acetylation profile of patients who developed hepatotoxicity after TB treatment by genotyping NAT2 polymorphisms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 42 Moroccan patients who developed hepatotoxicity after TB treatment and 163 Moroccan controls without TB. We genotyped four selected variants of the NAT2 gene (NAT2*5, NAT2*6, NAT2*7, and NAT2*14) by Sanger sequencing for patients and real-time polymerase chain reaction for controls. RESULTS: The majority of patients had NAT2 genotypes previously described as slow acetylators including NAT2*5/*5, NAT2*5/*6, NAT2*6/*6, and NAT2*6/*14 (78%) and none were genotyped as rapid acetylators. Controls were slow, intermediate, and rapid acetylators with frequencies of 72.39%, 21.48%, and 6.13%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no fast acetylator genotypes found among the patients having INH-hepatotoxicity. This finding suggests that the slow acetylator phenotype may contribute to the development of TB treatment hepatotoxicity.

First line anti-tuberculosis induced hepatotoxicity: incidence and risk factors.

In our days, tuberculosis, whet ever its localization, became a curable disease. The cornerstone is a 6 month course of isoniazid, rifampicine and pyrazinamide. All of the three first line antituberculosis drugs may induce hepatic damage which may have negative consequences for treatment outcome. Several risk factors were associated with the development of antituberculosis- drug-induced hepatotoxicity (ATDH). A retrospective study was conducted from July 2014 to March 2015 regarding all therapeutic drug-monitoring requests sent to the Laboratory of Poison Control and Pharmacovigilance Centre of Morocco. 142 patients diagnosed with active tuberculosis were included in study. Plasma peak levels of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide were analyzed in plasma samples after 2 to 3 hours of administration of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Logistic regression was used to identify the ATDH risk factors. The incidence of ATDH was found 24.6% (35 patients out of 142). Intergroup differences in the plasma levels were statistically significant for isoniazid (p=0.036). ATDH was found to be associated with combined form of anti-TB drugs (p=0.002, COR=13.1, AOR= 13.5) and plasma concentration of INH superior to 2mg/l (p=0.045, COR=1.3, AOR= 1.4).age, gender, alcohol intake and smoking status were not significantly associated with ATDH. The finding of 24.6% incidence of hepatotoxicity is extremely high. Many factors can be associated with the development of ATDH such as genetic factors, combined forms of treatment and plasma peak levels.

Pharmacovigilance and moroccan tuberculosis public program: current situation.

The objective of this work is to demonstrate the interest of integration of pharmacovigilance in Moroccan Tuberculosis Control Program (MTCP). Design and Data Collection. The integration of pharmacovigilance in MTCP was conducted in October 2012 with the Global Fund support. We compared the reports notified before and after this integration (period 1: January 2010-October 2012; period 2: October 2012-December 2013). The detection of signals was based on the Information Component available in VigiMine. We used the SPSS version 10.0 and MedCalc version 7.3 for data analysis. Results. The average number of spontaneous reports increased from 3.6 to 37.4 cases/month (P < 10(-3)). The average age was 40.7 ± 17.5 years; the sex ratio was 0.8. Hepatic reactions (32.7%) predominated during the first period, while skin reactions (24.1%) were in the second period (P = 10(-4)), and 40.9% of cases in the first period were serious against 15.8% in second period (P = 0.003). Nine signals were generated (hepatic enzyme increase, cholestasis, jaundice, arthralgia, acne, lower limb edema, pruritus, skin rashes, and vomiting). Conclusion. The integration of pharmacovigilance in Moroccan Tuberculosis Control Program improved the management of ADRs and detected new signals of antituberculosis drugs.