Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(7): 831-838, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31984604

ABSTRACT

AIM: Training in colorectal surgery across Europe is not yet standardized. The European Board of Surgical Qualification (EBSQ) coloproctology examination has been held annually since 1998. The aims of this study were to illustrate the current situation of coloproctology specialization in Europe and to analyse the EBSQ examinations held over the last 20 years. METHOD: A survey, focused on current training and education in colorectal surgery in Europe, was conducted among all national representatives of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) in 2018. Candidate demographics (1998-2018) and the results of the EBSQ examination (2007-2018) were analysed. RESULTS: In Europe, there are currently 26 national colorectal societies, 27 national annual colorectal meetings, 16 national specialized training programmes and 13 national colorectal fellowships. Six countries have board certification in colorectal surgery and five a dedicated examination. During the last 20 years, 475 candidates from 29 countries, of whom 88 (19%) were women, passed the EBSQ examination. The pass rate was higher in younger applicants (< 42 years, P = 0.01). The success rate was higher for candidates with academic experience (more than five publications or presentations) and with an academic title (thesis) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgical training is still not standardized in Europe, although efforts have been made to recognize colorectal surgery as an independent speciality. The number of holders of the EBSQ Diploma has increased over the years, demonstrating the acceptance of the examination among European surgeons. Young candidates with an academic profile are the most successful.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Surgeons , Europe , Female , Humans
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 22(10): 3147-3150, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29863260

ABSTRACT

The current case report is about spontaneous non-traumatic rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) in a 53-year-old woman with no particular medical history. An emergent laparotomy with splenectomy was required, unfortunately without success as the patient died. SAA is the most common visceral artery aneurysm. Most of SAA remain asymptomatic and are discovered incidentally on imaging. The overall risk of rupture increases with the size of SAA, especially when above 2 cm. Initial presentation of SAA has been associated with acute rupture and hemodynamic instability leading to substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured/pathology , Splenic Artery/pathology , Aneurysm, Ruptured/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Fatal Outcome , Female , Humans , Laparotomy , Middle Aged , Rupture, Spontaneous , Splenectomy , Splenic Artery/growth & development , Splenic Artery/surgery
3.
Br J Surg ; 104(6): 669-678, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28407227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a minimally invasive approach under investigation as a novel treatment for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of various origins. The aim was to review the available evidence on mechanisms, clinical effects and risks. METHODS: This was a systematic review of the literature on pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy published between January 2000 and October 2016. All types of scientific report were included. RESULTS: Twenty-nine relevant papers were identified; 16 were preclinical studies and 13 were clinical reports. The overall quality of the clinical studies was modest; five studies were prospective and there was no randomized trial. Preclinical data suggested better distribution and higher tissue concentrations of chemotherapy agents in PIPAC compared with conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy by lavage. Regarding technical feasibility, laparoscopic access and repeatability rates were 83-100 and 38-82 per cent. Surgery-related complications occurred in up to 12 per cent. Postoperative morbidity was low (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3-5 events reported in 0-37 per cent), and hospital stay was about 3 days. No negative impact on quality of life was reported. Histological response rates for therapy-resistant carcinomatosis of ovarian, colorectal and gastric origin were 62-88, 71-86 and 70-100 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: PIPAC is feasible, safe and well tolerated. Preliminary good response rates call for prospective analysis of oncological efficacy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aerosols , Carcinoma/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Epidemiologic Methods , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Pressure , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 43(6): 1102-1109, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28431896

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced as novel treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Only proper patient selection, stringent safety protocol and careful surgery allow for a secure procedure. We hereby report the essentials for safe implementation. METHODS: All consecutive procedures within 20 months after PIPAC implementation were analyzed with regards to practical and surgical aspects. Special emphasis was laid on modifications of technique and safety measures during the implementation process with systematic use of a dedicated checklist. Further, surgical difficulty was documented by use of a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: 127 PIPAC procedures were performed in 58 patients from January 2015 until October 2016. 81% of patients had at least one previous laparotomy. Median operation time was 91 min (87-103) for the first 20 cases, 93 min (IQR 88-107) for PIPAC21-50, and 103 min (IQR 91-121) for the following 77 procedures. Primary and secondary non-access occurred in 3 patients (2%), all of them having prior hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Using open Hasson technique, one single bowel lesion occurred, which was the only intraoperative complication. One 5 mm and another 10/12 mm trocar were used in 88% of procedures while additional trocars were needed in 12%. No leak of cytostatics was observed and no procedure needed to be stopped. VAS for overall difficulty of the procedure was 3 ± 2.4, and 3 ± 2.9 and 3 ± 2.5, respectively, for abdominal access and intraoperative staging. CONCLUSIONS: With standardized surgical approach and dedicated safety checklist, PIPAC can be safely introduced in clinical routine with minimal learning curve.


Subject(s)
Aerosols , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Learning Curve , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma/secondary , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Oxaliplatin , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
5.
Transplant Proc ; 49(1): 210-212, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28104139

ABSTRACT

A rare type of acquired internal hernia, the renal paratransplant hernia (RPTH), of which only 11 cases have been reported in the literature so far, can follow renal transplantation. We report a patient who presented with acute abdominal pain and vomiting 6 weeks after renal transplantation in the right iliac fossa. A noncontrast abdominal computed tomography scan showed signs of small bowel obstruction. The patient was taken to the operating room for a midline laparotomy, and RPTH with incarcerated small bowel was diagnosed. The bowel loop was released and found to be viable. The postoperative course was unremarkable. It is unclear whether perioperative peritoneal defects or spontaneous ruptures of lymphoceles into the peritoneal cavity form the basis of this rare type of internal hernia. Surgeons should be aware of this entity and avoid both peritoneal defects and postoperative lymphoceles by paying careful attention to meticulous surgical technique.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Abdominal/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Intestine, Small
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...