Effects of Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Therapy Using a Noninvasive Finger-Cuff Monitoring Device on Intraoperative Cerebral Oxygenation and Early Delayed Neurocognitive Recovery in Patients Undergoing Beach Chair Position Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) and delayed neurocognitive recovery are common among patients undergoing beach chair position (BCP) shoulder surgery and may be caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. This study tested the hypothesis that the application of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) would attenuate these conditions. METHODS: We randomly assigned 70 adult patients undergoing BCP shoulder surgery to GDHT group or control at a 1:1 ratio. Cerebral oxygenation was monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy, and GDHT was administered using the ClearSight pulse wave analysis system. The primary outcome was CDE duration, whereas the secondary outcomes were CDE occurrence, delayed neurocognitive recovery occurrence, and Taiwanese version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci-TW) test score on the first postoperative day (T 2 ) adjusted for the baseline score (on the day before surgery; T 1 ). RESULTS: CDE duration was significantly shorter in the GDHT group (0 [0-0] vs 15 [0-75] min; median difference [95% confidence interval], -8 [-15 to 0] min; P = .007). Compared with the control group, fewer patients in the GDHT group experienced CDEs (23% vs 51%; relative risk [95% confidence interval], 0.44 [0.22-0.89]; P = .025) and mild delayed neurocognitive recovery (17% vs 40%; relative risk [95% confidence interval], 0.60 [0.39-0.93]; P = .034). The Qmci-TW scores at T 2 adjusted for the baseline scores at T 1 were significantly higher in the GDHT group (difference in means: 4 [0-8]; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing GDHT using a noninvasive finger-cuff monitoring device stabilizes intraoperative cerebral oxygenation and is associated with improved early postoperative cognitive scores in patients undergoing BCP shoulder surgery.

Influence of Catheter-Incision Congruency in Epidural Analgesia on Postcesarean Pain Management: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or epidural morphine may alleviate postcesarean pain; however, conventional lumbar epidural insertion is catheter-incision incongruent for cesarean delivery. METHODS: In total, 189 women who underwent cesarean delivery were randomly divided into four groups (low thoracic PCEA, lumbar PCEA, low thoracic morphine, and lumbar morphine groups) for postcesarean pain management. Pain intensities, including static pain, dynamic pain, and uterine cramp, were measured using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The proportion of participants who experienced dynamic wound pain with a VAS score of >33 mm was evaluated as the primary outcome. Adverse effects, including lower extremity blockade, pruritus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation, and time of first passage of flatulence, were evaluated. RESULTS: The low thoracic PCEA group had the lowest proportion of participants reporting dynamic pain at 6 h after spinal anesthesia (low thoracic PCEA, 28.8%; lumbar PCEA, 69.4%; low thoracic morphine, 67.3%; lumbar morphine group, 73.9%; p < 0.001). The aforementioned group also reported the most favorable VAS scores for static, dynamic, and uterine cramp pain during the first 24 h after surgery. Adverse effect profiles were similar among the four groups, but a higher proportion of participants in the lumbar PCEA group (approximately 20% more than in the other three groups) reported prolonged postoperative lower extremity motor blockade (p = 0.005). In addition, the first passage of flatulence after surgery reported by the low thoracic PCEA group was approximately 8 h earlier than that of the two morphine groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural congruency is essential to PCEA for postcesarean pain. Low thoracic PCEA achieves favorable analgesic effects and may promote postoperative gastrointestinal recovery without additional adverse effects.

Mini-fluid challenge test predicts stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness during spine surgery in prone position: A STARD-compliant diagnostic accuracy study.

The study was designed to verify if mini-fluid challenge test is more reliable than dynamic fluid variables in predicting stroke volume (SV) and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness during spine surgery in prone position with low-tidal-volume ventilation.Fifty patients undergoing spine surgery in prone position were included. Fluid challenge with 500 mL of colloid over 15 minutes was given. Changes in SV and systolic blood pressure (SBP) after initial 100 mL were compared with SV, pulse pressure variation (PPV), SV variation (SVV), plethysmographic variability index (PVI), and dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) in predicting SV or arterial pressure fluid responsiveness (15% increase or greater).An increase in SV of 5% or more after 100 mL predicted SV fluid responsiveness with area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.99), which was significantly higher than that of PPV (0.71 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.86]; P = .01), and SVV (0.72 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.87]; P = .03). A more than 4% increase in SBP after 100 mL predicted arterial pressure fluid responsiveness with AUROC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.71-1.00), which was significantly higher than that of Eadyn (0.52 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.71]; P = .01).Changes in SV and SBP after 100 mL of colloid predicted SV and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness, respectively, during spine surgery in prone position with low-tidal-volume ventilation.