Assessing hypercoagulability and VTE risk using thromboelastography and Khorana score in women with cancers receiving chemotherapy.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common occurrence in cancer and chemotherapy increases thrombosis risk. Current risk assessment models such as the Khorana score (KS) and its modifications have limitations in female cancers. We assessed the coagulation profile of a group of women cancer patients under chemotherapy using thromboelastography (TEG) to determine if this can inform VTE risk assessment. Cancer patients who planned to receive chemotherapy were recruited. Baseline demographics, cancer data, BMI, Khorana Score (KS), and VTE risk factors were recorded and patients were followed for 6 months, for any thrombotic events. A total of 36 patients aged 35-85 (18 breast, 11 endometrial, 7 ovarian cancer) were evaluated. Hypercoagulability was detected in 63% of patients post-chemo cycle 1 and 75% post-cycle 2, with a significant increase in MA (maximum amplitude) and CI (clotting index), reduction in R (reaction time), K (clot kinetics), and LY30 (lysis time after 30 min of MA). KS showed only 7% of patients were high risk, 23% were low, and 70% were intermediate risk. MA and CI significantly increased in patients with intermediate and high-risk KS when compared with the low-risk patients and MA was positively correlated with KS. Five patients developed actual VTE; 100% of the tested ones were hypercoagulable either post-cycle 1 or 2 and 80% were KS intermediate risk. TEG is a hypercoagulability marker and TEG-MA and CI can potentially assess VTE risk. Larger studies are needed to assess the utility of TEG as an adjuvant to KS to better predict VTE in specific female cancers.

High Mobility Group Box 1 Gene Polymorphism and Serum High Mobility Group Box 1, Interleukin 1 Beta, and Alpha-Klotho Crosstalk in Severe COVID-19 Patients.

AIM: To evaluate the serum levels of HMGB1, IL1ß, and α-klotho in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity, investigate their association with clinicopathological parameters, and to assess HMGB1 rs1045411 polymorphism and its relation with clinical severity. METHODS: 120 COVID-19 patients (89 critically ill, 15 severe, and 16 moderately severe) along with 80 healthy control were enrolled.The serum levels of HMGB1,IL1ß, and α-klotho were determined by ELISA. The HMGB1 rs1045411 polymorphism was detected by RT- PCR. RESULTS: The serum levels of HMGB1, IL1ß, and α-klotho were significantly higher in critically ill COVID-19 patients compared to other groups. The HMGB1rs1045411 polymorphism revealed a significant decrease in the percentage of T/T genotypes in COVID-19 patients compared to controls. The (ROC) analysis showed moderate diagnostic potential for serum HMGB1, IL1ß, and α-klotho. CONCLUSION: The serum HMGB1, IL1ß, and α-klotho may be severity markers and promising therapeutic targets for COVID-19 patients.

Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with haematological cancers using three prediction models.

PURPOSE: Assessment of individual VTE risk in cancer patients prior to chemotherapy is critical for determining necessity of interventions. Risk assessment models (RAM) are available but have not been validated for haematological malignancy. We aimed to assess the validity of the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (V-CATS) score in prediction of VTE in a variety of haematological malignancies. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study conducted on 81 newly diagnosed cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Demographic, clinical and cancer related data were collected, patients were followed up for 6 months, and VTE events were recorded. Khorana score (KS) was calculated. Plasma D-dimer and sP-selectin were measured, and then, V-CATS score was calculated. Receiver operator curve (ROC) was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of RAMs. A modified V-CATS was generated and subsequently assessed by using new cut-off levels of d-dimer and sP-selectin based on ROC curve of the patients' results and compared the probability of VTE occurrence using all three RAMs. RESULTS: Among the 81 patients included in this study, a total of 2.7% were diagnosed with advanced metastatic cancer. The most frequent cancer was non-Hodgkin lymphoma (39.5%), and 8 patients (9.8%) developed VTE events. The calculated probability of VTE occurrence using KS, V-CATS and modified V-CATS scores at cut-off levels ≥ 3 was 87.5%, 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The AUC in ROC curve of modified Vienna CATS score showed significant difference when compared to that of V-CATS and KS (P = 0.047 and 0.029, respectively). CONCLUSION: The findings of our study highlight the value of three VTE risk assessment models in haematological malignancies. The modified V-CATS score demonstrated higher specificity compared to both V-CATS and KS, while all three scores exhibited similar sensitivity. We encourage the implementation of RAMs in haematological cancers for an appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis.

Sex differences in D-dimer and critical illness in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Observed sex differences in COVID-19 outcomes suggest that men are more likely to experience critical illness and mortality. Thrombosis is common in severe COVID-19, and D-dimer is a significant marker for COVID-19 severity and mortality. It is unclear whether D-dimer levels differ between men and women, and the effect of D-dimer levels on disease outcomes remains under investigation. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the sex difference in the D-dimer level among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and the effect of sex and D-dimer level on disease outcomes. Methods: We meta-analyzed articles reporting D-dimer levels in men and women hospitalized for COVID-19, until October 2021, using random effects. Primary outcomes were mortality, critical illness, and thrombotic complications. Results: In total, 11,682 patients from 10 studies were analyzed (N = 5606 men (55.7%), N = 5176 women (44.3%)). Men had significantly higher odds of experiencing mortality (odds ratios (OR) = 1.41, 95% CI: [1.25, 1.59], P ≤ .001, I2 = 0%) and critical illness (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: [1.43, 2.18], P ≤ .001, I2 = 61%). The mean D-dimer level was not significantly different between men and women (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.40], P = .61, I2 = 52%). In the subgroup analysis, men had significantly higher odds of experiencing critical illness compared with women in both the "higher" (P = .006) and "lower" (P = .001) D-dimer subgroups. Conclusion: Men have significantly increased odds of experiencing poor COVID-19 outcomes compared with women. No sex difference was found in the D-dimer level between men and women with COVID-19. The diversity in D-dimer reporting impacts data interpretation and requires further attention.

Hypercoagulability and Thrombosis Risk in Prostate Cancer: The Role of Thromboelastography.

Thrombosis is one of the leading causes of death in cancer. Cancer-induced hypercoagulable state contributes to thrombosis and is often overlooked. Prostate cancer may not be of high thrombogenic potential compared with other cancers, but its high prevalence brings it into focus. Pathological evidence for venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in prostate cancer exists. Factors such as age, comorbidities, and therapies increase the VTE risk further. There is a need to systematically identify the risk of VTE in regard to patient-, cancer-, and treatment-related factors to risk stratify patients for better-targeted and individualized strategies to prevent VTE. Sensitive tests to enable such risk assessment are urgently required. There is sufficient evidence for the utility of thromboelastography (TEG) in cancer, but it is not yet part of the clinic and there is only limited data on the use of TEG in prostate cancer. One study revealed that compared with age-matched controls, 68.8% of prostate cancer patients demonstrated hypercoagulable TEG parameters. The absence of clinical guidelines is a limiting factor in TEG use in the cancer population. Cancer heterogeneity and the unique cancer-specific microenvironment in each patient, as well as determining the hypercoagulable state in each patient, are added limitations. The way forward is to combine efforts to design large multicenter studies to investigate the utility and clinical effectiveness of TEG in cancer and establish longitudinal studies to understand the link between hypercoagulable state and development of thrombosis. There is also a need to study low thrombogenic cancers as well as high thrombogenic ones. Awareness among clinicians and understanding of test applicability and interpretation are needed. Finally, expert discussion is critical to identify the investigation priorities.