Patients with Chronic Liver Disease under Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Have a Favorable Long-Term Outcome for Pancreatic Cancer Due to Early Diagnosis and High Resection Rate.

Patients with viral hepatitis-related chronic liver disease (CLD) under surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are often diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PC) at an early stage. However, the long-term outcomes of these patients are unclear. We aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes of patients with PC with viral hepatitis-related CLD using a chart review. Data collection included the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage at PC diagnosis, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus status, and long-term outcomes. The distribution of the entire cohort (N = 552) was as follows: early stage (UICC 0-IB; n = 52, 9.5%) and non-early stages (UICC IIA-IV; n = 500, 90.5%). At diagnosis, the HCC surveillance group (n = 18) had more patients in the early stages than the non-surveillance group (n = 534) (50% vs. 8.0%), leading to a higher indication rate for surgical resection (72.2% vs. 29.8%) and a longer median survival time (19.0 months vs. 9.9 months). We confirmed that patients with viral hepatitis-related CLD under HCC surveillance were diagnosed with PC at an early stage. Because of the higher indication rate for surgical resection in these patients, they had favorable long-term outcomes for PC.

Clinical Outcomes of S-1 Monotherapy and Modified FOLFIRINOX Therapy after Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel Therapy in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Objective S-1 and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) were often used as the second-line chemotherapies after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC) until nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy was approved as an alternative in Japan in 2020. However, the clinical outcomes of S-1 and mFFX after GnP have scarcely been reported. Therefore, we retrospectively studied them. Methods We extracted the clinical data of 86 patients with UPC who received second-line chemotherapy after GnP between 2015 and 2020. Among the patients who had a good organ functions and no massive ascites, 41 patients treated with S-1 and 21 treated with mFFX were enrolled. Results Compared to S-1, mFFX tended to be used for younger patients with a good general condition (median age, 63 vs. 71 years, p<0.01; and performance status 0, 67% vs. 37%, p<0.05). The median progression-free and overall survival were similar between the S-1 (3.7 and 7.2 months, respectively) and mFFX (3.3 and 7.4 months, respectively) groups. The response rate in patients with measurable lesions was 4% (n=1/23) in the S-1 group and 17% (n=2/12) in the mFFX group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 20% in the S-1 group and 57% (neutrophil count decreased in 43%) in the mFFX group (p<0.01). Conclusion S-1 and mFFX were both acceptable second-line chemotherapies after GnP therapy for UPC, although attention should be paid to myelosuppression during mFFX treatment. Further studies involving nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy are necessary to facilitate the selection of the optimal regimen for each patient.

Simple prognostic markers for optimal treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

ABSTRACT: Most patients with pancreatic cancer are ineligible for curative resection at diagnosis, resulting in poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.We retrospectively collected clinical data from 196 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received palliative chemotherapy (N = 153) or palliative care alone (N = 43) from January 2011 to December 2013. Patients' background data and overall survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.In patients receiving palliative chemotherapy (gemcitabine-based regimen, 88.2%) and palliative care alone, the median (range) ages were 68 (43-91) and 78 (53-90) years, and metastatic diseases were present in 80% (N = 123) and 86% (N = 37), respectively. Multivariate analysis in the palliative chemotherapy patients showed that liver metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.20, P < .001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (>4.5 vs ≤4.5; HR 3.45, 95% CI 2.22-5.36, P < .001), and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (≥900 vs <900 U/mL; HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02-2.05, P = .036) were independent prognostic factors. In those receiving palliative care alone, lung (HR 3.27, 95% Cl 1.46-7.35, p = 0.004) and peritoneum (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20-5.18, P = .014) metastases and the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (≥1.3 vs <1.3; HR 3.33, 95% Cl 1.51-7.35, P = .003) were independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, patients with multiple factors had worse prognosis in both groups. Median survival time of palliative chemotherapy patients with risk factors 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 13.1 (95% CI 8.0-16.9), 9.4 (95% CI 7.9-10.1), 6.6 (95% CI 4.9-7.8), and 2.5 (95% CI 1.7-4.0) months, respectively. Similarly, median survival time was 5.7 (95% CI 1.3 -8.0), 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-3.9), and 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-1.7) months, respectively, for palliative care alone patients with risk factor 0, 1, and 2 to 3.Prognostic markers for pancreatic cancer were neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, liver metastasis, and CA19-9 in patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and lung/peritoneum metastases in patients undergoing palliative care alone. These simple markers should be considered when explaining the prognosis and therapeutic options to patients.

[Tolerability of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer].

Definitive chemoradiotherapy(CRT)for esophageal cancer is the standard treatment and alternative to surgery. However, the tolerability of CRT in elderly patients is not well known. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 60 patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with CRT(5-FU 700 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2, radiation 60 Gy)at our hospital between January 2015 and September 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: an elderly group comprising 16 patients aged >75 years and a non-elderly group comprising 44 patients aged <74 years. The relative dose intensity of cisplatin in the elderly group was significantly lower than that in the non-elderly group. Radiotherapy was successfully executed in both groups. More patients in the elderly(25%)than the non-elderly group(7%)developed pneumonitis, and all patients who developed severe pneumonitis in the elderly group died. Application of definitive CRT and irradiation methods in elderly patients with a subpleural reticular shadow should be carefully considered before initiating therapy.

ABO Blood Type and the Long-term Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer.

Objective The long-term effect of the ABO blood type on the clinical course of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is inconclusive. This study aimed to determine whether or not the ABO blood type influences the long-term outcomes of PC in Japanese patients. Methods The medical records of Japanese patients with PC were reviewed. Data, including the age, sex, and outcomes, from the Ehime Pancreato-Cholangiology Study Group were analyzed. Results The mean age of the 406 patients was 71.0±10.5 years, and 220 (54.2%) were men. A total of 44.6%, 20.7%, 22.4%, and 12.3% had blood type A, B, O, and AB, respectively. The median survival time (MST) of patients with A alleles was shorter than that of patients with non-A alleles (p=0.048), especially among those who underwent resection (p=0.031). In contrast, no marked difference in the MST was noted among those who underwent chemotherapy and palliative care. Finally, a multivariate analysis confirmed A alleles as an independent factor associated with the long-term outcome of PC (p<0.05 in 2 different models). Conclusion The ABO blood type influenced the long-term outcomes of Japanese patients with PC, presumably due to its impact on disease onset and tumor behavior.

Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Under Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related chronic liver disease were diagnosed as having pancreatic cancer (PC) at an early stage during abdominal imaging surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 447 patients with PC diagnosed at Ehime University Hospital and affiliated centers (2011-2013). Data were collected regarding HBV and HCV status, likelihood of PC diagnosis, and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the χ2 test. RESULTS: The UICC stage distribution in the HCC surveillance group (n=16) was stage 0 (n=2, 12.5%), stage IA (n=3, 18.8%), stage IB (n=2, 12.5%), stage IIA (n=2, 12.5%), stage IIB (n=2, 12.5%), stage III (n=1, 6.3%), and stage IV (n=4, 25%). The UICC stage distribution in the nonsurveillance group (n=431) was stage 0 (n=4, 0.9%), stage IA (n=28, 6.5%), stage IB (n=27, 6.3%), stage IIA (n=86, 20.0%), stage IIB (n=48, 11.1%), stage III (n=56, 13.0%), and stage IV (n=182, 42.2%). The HCC surveillance group had significantly more patients with stage 0 disease than with stages IA through IV (P=.02). Similar results were observed when including stages IA (P=.007) and IB (P=.004) as early stages but not stage IIA (P=.10). A dilated pancreatic duct led to a PC diagnosis in all 6 patients with stage 0 disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with HBV- and HCV-related chronic liver disease had an early PC diagnosis during HCC surveillance. Careful evaluation of the pancreas is warranted during HCC surveillance.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a multicenter review of 895 patients.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer has improved. However, it is occasionally difficult to make treatment decisions for elderly patients. We reviewed the outcomes of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer by using a large cohort and evaluated whether they had received chemotherapy and the reason why. METHODS: Data for 895 pancreatic cancer patients who were treated using chemotherapy or best supportive care were analyzed considering demographics, clinical stage, treatment, and outcome. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test, Student t-test, or Mann-Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in survival were analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median survival time was significantly shorter in elderly patients (≥65 years) than in younger patients (<65 years) (181 vs. 263 days, P = 0.0001). The median survival time of patients treated with chemotherapy was not significantly different between the elderly and the younger group (274 days vs. 333 days, P = 0.09), and nor was that of patients choosing best supportive care (84 days vs. 78 days, P = 0.83). These results held true even when the age cut-off between younger and elder patients was increased to 70, 75, and 80 years. Elderly patients treated with chemotherapy had a significantly longer median survival time than those choosing best supportive care (274 vs. 86 days, P < 0.0001); a significantly greater proportion of elderly patients chose best supportive care compared to younger patients (47.8 vs. 25.8%, P < 0.0001). The reason for choosing best supportive care was established in 261 elderly patients (82.9%); 133 (51.0%) met the eligibility criteria for chemotherapy, but of these, 78 (58.6%) were not informed about their disease. The treatment preferences of elderly patients were not always considered; they often received only best supportive care per family members preference (N = 65, 48.8%) or because the physician based their treatment decision only on the patient's age (N = 68, 51.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy appears effective for elderly pancreatic cancer patients with unresectable disease, but treatment needs to be optimized to improve prognosis.