Nature and Clonality of the Fluoresceinated Secondary Antibody in Luminex Multiplex Bead Assays Are Critical Factors for Reliable Monitoring of Serum HLA Antibody Levels in Patients for Donor Organ Selection, Desensitization Therapy, and Assessment of the Risk for Graft Loss.

Luminex multiplex immunoassays enable simultaneous monitoring of Abs against multiple Ags in autoimmune, inflammatory, and infectious diseases. The assays are used extensively to monitor anti-HLA Abs in transplant patients for donor organ selection, desensitization, and assessing the risk for graft rejection. To monitor IgG Abs, fluoresceinated IgG constant H chain-binding polyclonal F(ab')2 (IgHPolyFab) is used as the fluoresceinated secondary Ab (2nd-Ab), whereas IgG subclasses are monitored with Fc-specific monoclonal whole IgG (FcMonoIgG). The fluorescent signal from the 2nd-Ab is measured as mean florescence intensity (MFI). When IgHPolyFab is used, the signal is amplified as a result of the binding of multiple polyclonal Fabs to the C region of primary IgH. The reliability of such amplification for Ab measurements was not validated, nor were MFIs compared with 1:1 binding of FcMonoIgG to primary Abs. Comparing the MFIs of anti-HLA Abs obtained with IgHPolyFab and FcMonoIgG against normal human sera, IVIg, and allograft recipients' sera, it was observed that the number of HLA-Abs was notably higher with IgHPolyFab than with FcMonoIgG The MFIs of anti-HLA Abs also remained higher with IgHPolyFab in the normal sera and in IVIg, but the reverse was true when the autologous and allogeneic IgG concentrations were augmented in allograft recipients. Indeed, MFIs of the de novo allo-HLA Abs were markedly higher with FcMonoIgG than with IgHPolyFab. Serum titration established the superiority of FcMonoIgG for monitoring MFIs of de novo allo-HLA Abs in allograft recipients. Avoiding false amplifications of the number and MFIs of anti-HLA IgG with FcMonoIgG may minimize immunosuppressive therapies, maximize the number of donors for patients waiting for allografts, and enable better prediction of graft rejection.

Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Donor-Specific Alloantibody Among Intestinal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Rejection remains the leading cause of allograft loss, and a major barrier to improving long-term outcomes after intestinal transplantation. Our aim is to define the prevalence and investigate the role of donor-specific antibody (DSA) on intestinal graft outcomes. METHODS: The study includes 109 transplants performed in 95 recipients at a single center. Patients were screened for DSA pretransplant, monitored regularly posttransplant and when clinically indicated using the single-antigen bead Luminex assay. Standard induction immunosuppression was with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, and antithymocyte globulin in high-risk recipients. Maintenance regimens were tacrolimus-based. RESULTS: Pretransplant DSA was detected in 12 (11%) recipients with 50% continuing to have circulating antibodies posttransplant. An additional 24 (25%) patients developed de novo DSA, and of these, 71% had persistent antibodies. Recipients with preformed DSA demonstrated elevated risks of early graft failure, whereas those with de novo DSA experienced accelerated graft loss once DSA was detected, reaching a 28% failure rate within 2 years. HLA-DQ mismatch is a significant risk factor for de novo DSA emergence, whereas the persistence of antibodies is predicted by DSA strength and specificity. Although inclusion of the liver in the intestinal allograft imparts an immunological advantage against rejection-related graft loss, this protective effect was lost among recipients with persistent DSA. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of DSA is associated with inferior graft outcomes among intestinal transplant recipients. An enhanced understanding of the mechanisms by which DSA causes allograft injury, and effective strategies targeting humoral immune reactivity are needed to improve long-term intestinal graft outcomes.

Conformational Variants of the Individual HLA-I Antigens on Luminex Single Antigen Beads Used in Monitoring HLA Antibodies: Problems and Solutions.

BACKGROUND: Single antigen beads (SAB) are used for monitoring HLA antibodies in pretransplant and posttransplant patients despite the discrepancy between virtual and actual crossmatch results and transplant outcomes. This discrepancy can be attributed to the presence of conformational variants of HLA-I on SAB, assessment of which would increase the concordance between SAB and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) results, thus enabling improved organ accessibility for the waiting list patients and a better prediction of antibody-mediated rejection. METHODS: The conformational variants were examined on HLA-I beads, iBeads, acid-/alkali-treated beads, and T cells using HLA-I monoclonal antibodies (W6/32, TFL-006, and heavy chain (HC)-10). RESULTS: The affinity of the monoclonal antibodies against HLA-I beads confirmed the presence and heterogeneous density of peptide-associated ß2-microglobulin-associated HLA HC (pepA-ß2aHC), peptide-free-ß2aHC (pepF-ß2aHC), and ß2-free HC (ß2fHC) on every single antigen-coated bead. In contrast, iBeads harbor a high density of pepA-ß2aHC, low density of pepF-ß2aHC, and are lacking ß2fHC. The FCXM analyses confirmed the prevalence of pepA-ß2aHC, but not pepF-ß2aHC or ß2fHC on resting T cells. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of a donor-specific antibody should be assessed with a bead-specific mean fluorescence intensity cutoff based on TFL-006 reactivity against HLA-I beads, and HC-10 against iBeads, where the ß2fHC or pepF-ß2aHC normalized donor-specific antibody level would reveal the true anti-pepA-ß2aHC reactivity associated with positive FCXM.

Dynamics and epitope specificity of anti-human leukocyte antibodies following renal allograft nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: A considerable proportion of patients awaiting kidney transplantation is immunized by previous transplantation(s). We investigated how allograft nephrectomy (Nx) and withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression (WD-MIS) in patients with a failed renal allograft contribute to allosensitization. METHODS: HLA antibodies (HLAabs) were analyzed before and after Nx and/or WD-MIS using a single antigen bead assay. Patients were grouped as follows: (A) Nx and concomitant WD-MIS (n = 28), (B) Nx (n = 14) and (C) WD-MIS (n = 12). In a subgroup of patients, the epitope specificity of HLAabs was determined by adsorption and elution of sera with recombinant single HLA allele-expressing cell lines. RESULTS: Following Nx and/or WD-MIS, HLAabs were detectable in 100, 100 and 92% of patients in Groups A, B and C, respectively. In patients of all groups, de novo donor-specific HLAabs (DSAs) were found. After Nx, an increase in the breadth [percent panel reactive antibody (%PRA)] and mean fluorescence intensity of class I HLAabs was predominant. In contrast, an increase of class II HLAabs prevailed following WD-MIS. Experimental analysis of the epitope specificities revealed that 64% of the class I HLAabs classically denoted as non-DSA were donor epitope-specific HLAabs (DESA). CONCLUSIONS: Both Nx and WD-MIS contribute to alloimmunization with differing patterns concerning class I and II HLAabs. Nx preferentially increased class I HLAabs and most of the observed class I HLAabs were DESA. Considering that class I, but not class II, HLA molecules are constitutively expressed, our results support the hypothesis that the increase of HLAabs following Nx might have been caused by removal of the adsorbing donor tissue (sponge hypothesis).

Significance of the differences in the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in matched pairs of mother's and cord blood.

The presence of IgG against pathogens in the cord blood (CB) of vaccinated mothers is attributed to transplacental transfer. However, previous studies using lymphocytotoxicity assay showed anti-HLA IgG in mother's blood (MB) but not in CB, perhaps due to non-transfer of anti-HLA IgG or assay limitations in detecting anti-HLA IgG. Anti-HLA IgG of native and purified sera of 16 MB and CB pairs were measured using an array of microbeads coated with HLA-I/-II molecules on a Luminex platform. Two cases showed no anti-HLA-I IgG in either MB or CB; four MB cases displayed polyallelic HLA-reactive IgG, with negligible or no reactivity by the corresponding CB sera. Notably, anti-HLA-I reactivity in cases 3-6/11/12 and anti-HLA-II reactivity in cases 1/3/4/6/8/11-13 were restricted to CB, with lower or no HLA-reactivity in MB. Mothers' HLA typing is done for HLA-A*, HLA-B* and DRB1* alleles. The mother in case 14 carried DRB1*11:01, the allele-reactive IgG is seen in both native and the purified fraction of sera of MB but not in CB. Also in cases 15 (DRB1*01:01) and 16 (B*49:01 and DBR1*07:01), the allele-reactive IgGs are seen in both native and purified fractions of MB but not in CB confirming the earlier reports on the absence of materno-fetal transfer of anti-HLA IgG. However, the mother of case 6 is homozygous for DRB1*03:01 and the allele-reactive IgG occurred in both MB and CB, confirming the presence of anti-HLA autoantibodies. In Case 13, the mother (HLA-A*24 and HLA-A*52) and CB carried allele-reactive IgG in both native and purified sera, indicating the possible occurrence of transplacental transfer of the IgG. Further confirmation is restricted by the paucity of detailed molecular HLA typing for both the parents and fetuses. While 37.5% of the native IgG in CB and 18.8% in MB showed DRB3*03:01 reactivity, 100% of purified IgG from both CB and MB showed anti-DRB3*03:01 and anti-DPA1*02:01\ DPB1*23:01 antibodies. Several CB cases showed high-prevalence IgG reacting to a single allele of HLA-I and/or HLA-II with minimal or no cross-reactive IgG in CB or in the MB, suggesting the presence of de novo antibodies, possibly against non-inherited maternal HLA or inherited parental HLA haplotypes by the fetus.

Complement-fixing antibodies against denatured HLA and MICA antigens are associated with antibody mediated rejection.

BACKGROUND: We have found antibodies against denatured HLA class I antigens in the serum of allograft recipients which were not significantly associated with graft failure. It is unknown whether transplant recipients also have denatured HLA class II and MICA antibodies. The effects of denatured HLA class I, class II, and MICA antibodies on long-term graft outcome were further investigated based on their ability to fix complement c1q. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 4-year retrospective cohort study, post-transplant sera from 975 kidney transplant recipients were tested for antibodies against denatured HLA/MICA antigens and these antibodies were further classified based on their ability to fix c1q. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients had antibodies against denatured HLA class I, II, or MICA antigens. Among them, 8.5% and 21.5% of all patients had c1q-fixing and non c1q-fixing antibodies respectively. There was no significant difference on graft survival between patients with or without antibodies against denatured HLA/MICA. However, when these antibodies were further classified according to their ability to fix c1q, patients with c1q-fixing antibodies had a significantly lower graft survival rate than patients without antibodies or patients with non c1q-fixing antibodies (p=0.008). In 169 patients who lost renal grafts, 44% of them had c1q-fixing antibodies against denatured HLA/MICA antigens, which was significantly higher than that in patients with functioning renal transplants (25%, p<0.0001). C1q-fixing antibodies were more significantly associated with graft failure caused by AMR (72.73%) or mixed AMR/CMR (61.9%) as compared to failure due to CMR (35.3%) or other causes (39.2%) (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Transplant recipients had antibodies against denatured HLA class I, II, and MICA antigens. However, only c1q-fixing antibodies were associated with graft failure which was related to antibody mediated rejection.

The Monospecificity of Novel Anti-HLA-E Monoclonal Antibodies Enables Reliable Immunodiagnosis, Immunomodulation of HLA-E, and Upregulation of CD8+ T Lymphocytes.

In human cancers, over-expression of HLA-E is marked by gene expression. However, immunolocalization of HLA-E on tumor cells is impeded by the HLA-Ia reactivity of commercial anti-HLA-E monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). So there was a clear need to develop monospecific anti-HLA-E MAbs for reliable immunodiagnosis of HLA-E, particularly considering the prognostic relevance of HLA-E in human cancer. HLA-E overexpression is correlated with disease progression and poor survival of patients, both of which are attributed to the suppression of anti-tumor activity of cytotoxic T cells mediated by HLA-E. The suppression mechanism involves the binding of HLA-E-specific amino acids located on the α1 and α2 helices of HLA-E to the inhibitory receptors (CD94/NKG2a) on CD8+ T lymphocytes. An anti-HLA-E MAb that recognizes these HLA-E-specific sequences can not only be a monospecific MAb with potential for specific immunolocalization of HLA-E but can also block the sequences from interacting with the CD94/NKG2a receptors. We therefore developed several clones that secrete such HLA-E-specific MAbs; then we assessed the ability of the MAbs to bind to the amino acid sequences interacting with the CD94/NKG2a receptors by inhibiting them from binding to HLA-E with peptides that inhibit receptor binding. Elucidation of the immunomodulatory capabilities of these monospecific MAbs showed that they can induce proliferation of CD8+ T cells with or without co-stimulation. These novel MAbs can serve a dual role in combating cancer by blocking interaction of HLA-E with CD94/NKG2a and by promoting proliferation of both non-activated and activated CD8+ cytotoxic αß T cells.

Risk Stratification of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class II Donor Specific Antibody Positive Patients by Immunoglobulin G Subclasses.

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are a major cause of graft loss in mismatched transplant recipients. However, the time to graft loss resulting from antibody induced injury is unpredictable. The unpredictable nature of antibodies may be related to the subclass of antibodies. In this study, HLA immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses were investigated to determine whether a unique IgG subclass composition could better identify those patients at eminent risk for graft loss. METHODS: The serial serum samples from the 57 patients with post-transplant HLA class II donor specific antibodies (DSA) were tested for the three IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG3, and IgG4). RESULTS: IgG3 and IgG4 were highly prevalent in failed patients compared to functioning patients (82 % vs. 34%, 45% vs. 20%, respectively). IgG3 development showed a distinct subclass trend between failed and functioning patients with poor graft survival (log rank p=0.0006). IgG1 was almost equally abundant in both groups (100% and 97%, respectively). Of the 5 patterns of IgG subclass combinations observed, IgG1+3+ showed the strongest association with graft failure (hazard ratio 3.14, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Patients with IgG3 subclass HLA DSA showed lower graft survival. Post-transplant monitoring for IgG subclasses rather than total IgG monitoring may identify patients at risk for graft failure.

Pre-existing anti-HLA antibodies negatively impact survival of pediatric aplastic anemia patients undergoing HSCT.

Graft failure and survival are the major problems for patients with aplastic anemia undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Previous studies showed that anti-HLA antibodies negatively impact engraftment in HSCT. This retrospective study of 51 pediatric patients with acquired aplastic anemia who underwent allogeneic HSCT at a single institution between 2006 and 2012 investigated the influence of anti-HLA antibodies on the outcome of HSCT. Serum samples collected before HSCT were tested for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. Pre-existing anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 54.9% (28/51) of patients, among whom 39.2% (20/51) had anti-HLA class I antibodies. Anti-HLA antibodies were associated with worse five-yr survival (78.6% vs. 100%, p = 0.021) and higher treatment-related mortality (21.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.028) compared with antibody-negative patients. Anti-HLA class I antibody-positive patients had poorer five-yr survival (75.0%) than anti-HLA class I&II antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients (87.5% and 100.0%, respectively, p = 0.039). Presence of anti-HLA class I antibodies (p = 0.024) and older age (10 yr or more; p = 0.027) significantly increased the risk of post-HSCT mortality. Pre-existing anti-HLA antibodies negatively affect the outcome of HSCT in pediatric patients with aplastic anemia. Routine testing for anti-HLA antibodies concurrent with efficient treatment should be conducted prior to HSCT.

Acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an inter-institutional study of significant histopathological features.

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurs in a small minority of sensitized liver transplant recipients. Although histopathological characteristics have been described, specific features that could be used (1) to make a generalizable scoring system and (2) to trigger a more in-depth analysis are needed to screen for this rare but important finding. Toward this goal, we created training and validation cohorts of putative acute AMR and control cases from 3 high-volume liver transplant programs; these cases were evaluated blindly by 4 independent transplant pathologists. Evaluations of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections were performed alone without knowledge of either serum donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibody (DSA) results or complement component 4d (C4d) stains. Routine histopathological features that strongly correlated with severe acute AMR included portal eosinophilia, portal vein endothelial cell hypertrophy, eosinophilic central venulitis, central venulitis severity, and cholestasis. Acute AMR inversely correlated with lymphocytic venulitis and lymphocytic portal inflammation. These and other characteristics were incorporated into models created from the training cohort alone. The final acute antibody-mediated rejection score (aAMR score)--the sum of portal vein endothelial cell hypertrophy, portal eosinophilia, and eosinophilic venulitis divided by the sum of lymphocytic portal inflammation and lymphocytic venulitis--exhibited a strong correlation with severe acute AMR in the training cohort [odds ratio (OR) = 2.86, P < 0.001] and the validation cohort (OR = 2.49, P < 0.001). SPSS tree classification was used to select 2 cutoffs: one that optimized specificity at a score > 1.75 (sensitivity = 34%, specificity = 86%) and another that optimized sensitivity at a score > 1.0 (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 71%). In conclusion, the routine histopathological features of the aAMR score can be used to screen patients for acute AMR via routine H&E staining of indication liver transplant biopsy samples; however, a definitive diagnosis requires substantiation by DSA testing, diffuse C4d staining, and the exclusion of other insults.

Association of anti-human leukocyte antigen and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies with liver allograft fibrosis after immunosuppression withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Many pediatric patients who receive a living-donor liver transplant undergo withdrawal of immunosuppression (IS). For them, the high incidence of long-term progressive graft fibrosis is of particular concern. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study including 81 pediatric patients who underwent IS withdrawal after living-donor liver transplant at Kyoto University Hospital and whose serum samples and pathological data could be obtained during the analysis period. We examined the association of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (anti-AT1R Ab) with posttransplant graft fibrosis. Normalized mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) 5,000 or higher and anti-AT1R Ab concentrations 17 U/mL or higher were both considered high level. The patients were classified into an advanced fibrosis group (AFG) (Ishak score ≥ 3) and a control group (CG) (Ishak score ≤ 2). RESULTS: Only one patient demonstrated DSA class I. Among those who demonstrated DSA class II, more AFG patients than CG patients demonstrated high-level mean fluorescence intensity, although the difference was not significant (64% vs. 39%; P=0.053). The incidence of high-level DSA-DRB1, however, was significantly higher in the AFG than that in the CG (40% vs. 4%; P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in DSA-DQB1 or DSA-DRB345. High-level anti-AT1R Ab was significantly more frequent in the AFG than in the CG (65% vs. 36%; P=0.02). All patients with both high-level DSA-DRB1 and high-level anti-AT1R Ab were found to have advanced fibrosis (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Anti-AT1R Ab and DSA-DRB1 may be candidates as biomarkers of graft fibrosis; both HLA and non-HLA immunity may be involved in graft fibrosis after IS withdrawal.

Changes in successive measures of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies intensity and the development of allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Many patients develop de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSA) after transplantation. Despite development of dnDSA, not all patients will immediately fail. This study analyzes dnDSA intensity and longitudinal trends as prospective clinical parameters to assess subsequent allograft function. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with dnDSA onset in the first 2 years after transplantation received antibody monitoring by LABScreen single antigen beads. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was recorded at time of dnDSA onset and up to 24 months thereafter. The dnDSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the stable function patient group (n=8; eGFR decline ≤ 25%) was compared with the impaired function patient group (n=16; eGFR decline>25%) using first year peak MFI (pMFI), eight month MFI change (ΔMFI), and eighteen month MFI trend (MFI slope). RESULTS: Both groups showed similar dnDSA characteristics (time to onset after transplantation, class I/II distribution, and initial MFI). Between groups, MFI trends were analyzed. Impaired patients showed a higher pMFI during the first year (median pMFI, 13,055 vs. 2,397; P=0.007). Longitudinal analysis revealed that ΔMFI was strongly associated with dysfunction. Both a ΔMFI increase greater than 20% as well as a stronger increase (ΔMFI>50%) were followed by graft dysfunction in almost all patients and could significantly differentiate between stable and impaired function patients (P=0.001 and P=0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that tracking dnDSA intensity, particularly in the early period after onset, is important to estimate the impact of dnDSA on the allograft and could, therefore, determine help on how best to monitor patients with dnDSA.

Donor-specific alloantibodies are associated with fibrosis progression after liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-infected patients.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) fibrosis progression after liver transplantation (LT) is accelerated in comparison with fibrosis progression before transplantation. The vast majority of the risk factors for fibrosis progression after LT are not modifiable. With the goal of identifying modifiable risk factors for fibrosis progression, we evaluated the impact of preformed and de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies (DSAs) on fibrosis progression after LT in HCV-viremic patients. After blinding, we analyzed all 507 HCV-viremic patients who underwent primary LT from January 2000 to May 2009 and had pretransplant and posttransplant samples available for analysis (86% of the total) for preformed and de novo class I and class II DSAs with a mean fluorescence intensity ≥ 5000 with single-antigen bead technology. Fibrosis was assessed on the basis of indication and protocol liver biopsies; compliance with protocol liver biopsies at 1, 2, and 5 years was ≥80%. Preformed class I DSAs [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44, P = 0.04] and class II DSAs (HR = 1.86, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of progression to stage 2-4 fibrosis, and de novo DSAs (HR = 1.41, P = 0.07) had borderline significance. In addition, preformed class I DSAs (HR = 1.63, P = 0.03) and class II DSAs (HR = 1.72, P = 0.03) were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of death. In conclusion, after we controlled for donor and recipient characteristics in multivariate modeling, DSAs were independently associated with fibrosis progression and death after LT in HCV-viremic patients.

Impact of IgM and IgG3 anti-HLA alloantibodies in primary renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: With standard IgG donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) testing, it is unclear which immunoglobulin-G (IgG) DSA positive patients will fail. We looked further into the immune response by studying immunoglobulin-M (IgM) and IgG subclass 3 (IgG3) DSA to determine if these identify the IgG DSA patients at highest risk for allograft loss. METHODS: In 189 consecutively transplanted primary renal allograft recipients, sera were collected sequentially pre- and posttransplant. Of the 189, 179 patients had sera available to retrospectively test for anti-HLA IgG, IgM, and IgG3 antibodies via LABScreen single-antigen bead assay and were included in the study. All patients had a negative crossmatch. Per patient, all DSA (IgM, IgG3, and IgG) refers to the same serologic specificity. RESULTS: Overall, 100 (56%) patients developed an alloimmune response (IgM or IgG DSA positive, or both). Ninety-five patients developed IgM DSA and 47 patients developed IgG DSA. IgM DSA was detected in 42 of 47 patients with IgG DSA. IgM DSA alone did not increase the allograft loss risk, whereas IgG DSA did (P=0.002). Once IgG DSA appeared, IgM DSA persisted in 33 patients and an isotype switch to IgG3 positive DSA occurred in 25 patients. Patients with IgM persistent IgG3 positive DSA (n=19) were more likely to have allograft failure than those without (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: This study shows the evolution of the humoral immune response from IgM to IgG DSA posttransplant. We found that development of IgM persistent IgG3 positive DSA identifies the most dangerous IgG DSA subpopulation.

Antibody-mediated rejection as a contributor to previously unexplained early liver allograft loss.

We analyzed 60 patients with idiopathic early allograft loss (defined as death or retransplantation at <90 days) to determine the relative contribution of preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies (DSAs) to this endpoint, and we defined strict criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in liver allografts. The inclusion criteria encompassed the availability of a pretransplant serum sample and both postreperfusion and follow-up tissue specimens for a blinded, retrospective re-review of histology and complement component 4d (C4d) staining. AMR was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of all 4 of the following strict criteria: (1) DSAs in serum, (2) histopathological evidence of diffuse microvascular injury/microvasculitis consistent with antibody-mediated injury, (3) diffuse C4d staining in the portal microvasculature with or without staining in the sinusoids or central veins in at least 1 sample, and (4) the exclusion of other causes of a similar type of injury. Patients thought to be experiencing definite AMR on the basis of routine histopathology alone showed the highest levels of DSA sensitization. Forty percent of patients with pretransplant DSAs with a pattern of bead saturation after serial dilutions developed AMR. Another multiparous female developed what appeared to be a strong recall response, which resulted in combined AMR and acute cellular rejection (ACR) causing graft failure. A contribution of DSAs to allograft failure could not be excluded for 3 additional patients who received marginal grafts. In conclusion, liver allograft recipients with preformed DSAs with a high mean fluorescence intensity despite dilution seem to be at risk for clinically significant allograft injury and possibly for loss from AMR, often in combination with ACR.

Gastric cancer progression may involve a shift in HLA-E profile from an intact heterodimer to ß2-microglobulin-free monomer.

Phenotypic expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-E on the surface of tumor lesions includes intact heterodimer [HLA-E heavy chain and ß2-microglobulin (ß2m)] and ß2m-free monomer. Anti-HLA-E monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), MEM-E/02 or 3D12 bind to the peptide sequences in ß2m-free HLA-E, which is common and shared with HLA-Ia monomers. A newly developed monospecific anti-HLA-E mAb (TFL-033) recognizes HLA-E-restricted peptide sequences on α1 and α2 helices away from ß2-m-site. Tumor progression may involve shedding of ß2-m from HLA-E or overexpression of ß2m-free monomers. There is a need to identify and distinguish the different phenotypic expression of HLA-E, particularly the intact heterodimer from the ß2m-free monomer on the surface of tumor lesions. Because of the unique peptide-binding affinities of the mAbs, it is hypothesized that TFL-033 and MEM-E/02 may distinguish the phenotypic expressions of cell surface HLA-E during stages of tumor progression. Only TFL-033 stained diffusely the cytoplasm of normal mucosa. The incidence and intensity of TFL-033 staining of the cell surface in early stages, poorly or undifferentiated and non-nodal lesions and in diffuse carcinoma is greater than that of MEM-E/02. Whereas MEM-E/02 stained terminal stages, adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastatic lesions intensely, either owing to increased expression of ß2m-free HLA-E with tumor progression or owing to expression of HLA-Ia molecules. Our study evaluates the relative diagnostic potential of HLA-E-monospecific TFL-033 and the HLA-Ia-reactive MEM-E/02 for determining the specific distribution and immunodiagnosis of different phenotypic expression HLA-E in tumor lesions, and the structural and functional alterations undergone by HLA-E during tumor progression.

Improved Long-Term Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies After Mycophenolic Acid Escalation.

The development of donor specific antibodies (DSA) post transplant has been associated with chronic rejection and graft failure. In a longitudinal study, we have shown that increases in DSA precede rejection by months, thus allowing time for intervention. We hypothesized that mycophenolic acid (MPA) dose increases may reduce and/or stabilize DSA strength and also preserve renal function. Thirty stable DSA positive kidney transplant recipients participated in this Institutional Review Board approved, exploratory, open-label, single center study to assess the efficacy of MPA dose escalation in patients with DSA. MPA escalation was well tolerated and most patients were able to take higher doses for at least two years (duration of the study). In addition, MPA escalation is safe and participants had no significant side effects such as cytomegalovirus and BK infections. Long-term allograft survival of the MPA escalation group was superior when compared with the control group (p = 0.018). This pilot study indicates that escalation of MPA is safe and may stabilize DSA. In addition, five-year follow up demonstrates improved long-term survival with MPA escalation compared with DSA positive recipients receiving the standard of care. Additional studies using larger cohorts are warranted.

Trends and characteristics in early glomerular filtration rate decline after posttransplantation alloantibody appearance.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 7% to 9% of patients with donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) fail within 1 year post-DSA onset. However, little is known as to how this DSA-associated failure temporally progresses. This longitudinal study investigates DSA's temporal relationship to allograft dysfunction and identifies predictors of allograft function's progressive deterioration post-DSA. METHODS: A cohort of 175 non-HLA identical patients receiving their first transplant between March 1999 and March 2006 were analyzed. Protocol testing for DSA via single antigen beads was done before transplantation and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplantation then annually. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was analyzed before and after DSA onset. RESULTS: Forty-two patients developed DSA and had adequate eGFR information for analysis. Before DSA onset, the 42 patients had stable eGFR. By 1 year post-DSA, the cohort's eGFR was significantly lower (P<0.001); however, 30 of 42 had stable function. Twelve patients had failure or early allograft dysfunction (eGFR decline >25% from DSA onset). Those who failed early (by 1 year post-DSA) had more antibody-mediated rejection than stable patients (P=0.03). Late failures (after 1 year post-DSA) were predictable with evidence of early allograft dysfunction (eGFR decline >25% by 1 year post-DSA; P<0.001). Early allograft dysfunction preceded late failure by nearly 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: DSA is temporally related to allograft function deterioration. However, in many cases, late allograft failures are preceded by early allograft dysfunction. Therefore, monitoring for early allograft dysfunction provides treating physicians with a window of opportunity for treatment or continued monitoring.

HLA class II DQA and DQB epitopes: recognition of the likely binding sites of HLA-DQ alloantibodies eluted from recombinant HLA-DQ single antigen cell lines.

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in sera of sensitized transplant patients are often produced against the specific epitopes on mismatched HLA antigens. In this study, we selected sera from 30 kidney transplant patients with DSA and AMR to define DQ epitopes. Using adsorption and elution assays, we identified 18 antibody reaction patterns to define 6 new epitopes and to confirm 12 previously defined epitopes. In one patient case, one mismatched antigen produced 3 different antibodies and, in another, antibodies were produced against the alpha and beta chains of the same antigen. For some sera, a single epitope can explain reactions for 27 of the 29 DQ beads in the single antigen panel. Several studies highlighted the prevalence of anti-DQ antibodies. In 2011, Almeshari et al. observed DQ DSA in 34/46 (74%) of rejection episodes - 44 patients had DSA and 20 lost their graft due to AMR. Other studies have shown a high prevalence of anti-DQ antibodies and an association with adverse effects on the graft. We conclude that analysis of the epitopes of the DQ antibodies using Adsorption/Elution and testing on single antigen DQ beads helps to better understand the specificities and cross-reactions of DQ antibodies in transplant patients.

Impact of alloantibody strength in crossmatch negative DSA positive kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical relevance of pre-transplant "low-level" donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in crossmatch negative kidney transplant recipients remains unclear. To determine what level of DSA associates with antibody mediated rejection (AMR) could be the way to measure the clinical relevance of pre-transplant "low-level" donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in crossmatch negative kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 221 patients from October 2008 to December 2009 was included in this study. Sera were obtained pre-transplant and two weeks post-transplant and tested for DSA using LABScreen single antigen beads. RESULTS: Among the 221 patients, 11 experienced AMR within 200days after transplant (5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with AMR at multiple mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoffs (500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000; p=0.003, 0.001, 0.007, 0.003, and 0.003, respectively). No correlation was seen between acute T-cell mediated rejection (CMR) and pre-transplant DSA at any of the same MFI cutoffs. There was an increased risk of AMR with higher levels of pre-transplant DSA. Finally, an increase in DSA MFI from pre- to two weeks post-transplant was indicative of a higher probability of AMR. CONCLUSION: Overall, this data supports using the single antigen bead to detect "low-level" DSA both pre- and post- as having a positive and persistent DSA may be predictive of higher AMR rates and poorer graft survival.