Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Br J Surg ; 108(8): 983-990, 2021 08 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34195799

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Based on excellent outcomes from high-volume centres, laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly being adopted into nationwide practice which typically includes low-medium volume centres. It is unknown how the use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection compare between high-volume centres and low-medium volume centres. This study aimed to compare use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection in three leading European high-volume centres and nationwide practice in the Netherlands. METHOD: An international, retrospective multicentre cohort study including data from three European high-volume centres (Oslo, Southampton and Milan) and all 20 centres in the Netherlands performing laparoscopic liver resection (low-medium volume practice) from January 2011 to December 2016. A high-volume centre is defined as a centre performing >50 laparoscopic liver resections per year. Patients were retrospectively stratified into low, moderate- and high-risk Southampton difficulty score groups. RESULTS: A total of 2425 patients were included (1540 high-volume; 885 low-medium volume). The median annual proportion of laparoscopic liver resection was 42.9 per cent in high-volume centres and 7.2 per cent in low-medium volume centres. Patients in the high-volume centres had a lower conversion rate (7.4 versus 13.1 per cent; P < 0.001) with less intraoperative incidents (9.3 versus 14.6 per cent; P = 0.002) as compared to low-medium volume centres. Whereas postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups, a lower reintervention rate (5.1 versus 7.2 per cent; P = 0.034) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (3 versus 5 days; P < 0.001) were observed in the high-volume centres as compared to the low-medium volume centres. In each Southampton difficulty score group, the conversion rate was lower and hospital stay shorter in high-volume centres. The rate of intraoperative incidents did not differ in the low-risk group, whilst in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups this rate was lower in high-volume centres (absolute difference 6.7 and 14.2 per cent; all P < 0.004). CONCLUSION: High-volume expert centres had a sixfold higher use of laparoscopic liver resection, less conversions, and shorter hospital stay, as compared to a nationwide low-medium volume practice. Stratification into Southampton difficulty score risk groups identified some differences but largely outcomes appeared better for high-volume centres in each risk group.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Hepatectomy/methods , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Laparoscopy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Propensity Score , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Int J Med Robot ; 13(2)2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26987773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is important to minimize risks associated with live donor nephrectomy. In this study we evaluated the results of left-sided robot-assisted donor nephrectomies in comparison with standard techniques. METHODS: Data on perioperative results, kidney function, and recipient and graft survival were collected. All left-sided laparoscopic and hand-assisted procedures were selected as control groups. RESULTS: Fifty-nine robot-assisted procedures were performed by two surgeons. Operative time was significantly longer in the robot-assisted group compared with both control groups. However, it decreased significantly during procedures 40-59 compared with procedures 20-39 (P = 0.014) to median 172.5 (114.0-242.0) min. One conversion to the open approach occurred in the robot group due to a bleeding of the renal artery stump. No difference was found between all techniques at 3 months post-donation. CONCLUSION: Left-sided robot-assisted donor nephrectomy is feasible with over time a significant decrease in operative time with good outcomes for donor and recipient. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data , Nephrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Utilization Review , Young Adult
3.
Am J Transplant ; 15(11): 2947-54, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26153103

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to review the surgical outcome of kidney retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa in comparison to first kidney transplants. The database was screened for retransplantations between 1995 and 2013. Each study patient was matched with 3 patients with a first kidney transplantation. Just for graft and patient survival analyses, we added an extra control group including all patients receiving a second transplantation in the contralateral iliac fossa. We identified 99 patients who received a retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa. There was significantly more blood loss and longer operative time in the retransplantation group. The rate of vascular complications and graft nephrectomies within 1 year was significantly higher in the study group. The graft survival rates at 1 year and 3, 5, and 10 years were 76%, 67%, 61%, and 47% in the study group versus 94%, 88%, 77%, and 67% (p < 0.001) in the first control group versus 91%, 86%, 78%, and 57% (p = 0.008) in the second control group. Patient survival did not differ significantly between the groups. Kidney retransplantation in ipsilateral iliac fossa is surgically challenging and associated with more vascular complications and graft loss within the first year after transplantation. Whenever feasible, the second renal transplant (first retransplant) should be performed contralateral to the prior failed one.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Nephrectomy/methods , Replantation/methods , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Operative Time , Proportional Hazards Models , Reoperation/methods , Replantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
World J Surg ; 38(5): 1127-40, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24322177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The worldwide introduction of multimodal enhanced recovery programs has also changed perioperative care in patients who undergo liver resection. This study was performed to assess current perioperative practice in liver surgery in 11 European HPB centers and compare it to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles. METHODS: In each unit, 15 consecutive patients (N = 165) who underwent hepatectomy between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Compliance was classified as "full," "partial," or "poor" whenever ≥ 80, ≥ 50, or <50 % of the 22 ERAS protocol core items were met. The primary study end point was overall compliance with the ERAS core program per unit and per perioperative phase. RESULTS: Most patients were operated on for malignancy (91 %) and 56 % were minor hepatectomies. The median number of implemented ERAS core items was 9 (range = 7-12) across all centers. Compliance was partial in the preoperative (median 2 of 3 items, range = 1-3) and perioperative phases (median 5 of 10 items, range: 4-7). Median postoperative compliance was poor (median 2 of 9 items, range = 0-4). A statistically significant difference was observed between median length of stay and median time to recovery (7 vs. 5 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative care among centers that perform liver resections varied substantially. In current HPB surgical practice, some elements of the ERAS program, e.g., preoperative counselling and minimal fasting, have already been implemented. Elements in the perioperative phase (avoidance of drains and nasogastric tube) and postoperative phase (early resumption of oral intake, early mobilization, and use of recovery criteria) should be further optimized.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hepatectomy , Perioperative Care/standards , Recovery of Function , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Br J Surg ; 99(7): 911-6, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22619025

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although benign in itself, hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) can be complicated by hormone-induced growth, and subsequent haemorrhage and rupture. The exact risk of haemorrhage and rupture is not known. This systematic review of the literature was carried out with the aim of estimating the risk of haemorrhage and rupture in HCA. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed for all articles relevant to haemorrhage and/or rupture of HCA, published between 1969 and March 2011. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles met the selection criteria, containing a total of 1176 patients. Haemorrhage was reported with an overall frequency of 27·2 per cent among patients, and in 15·8 per cent of all HCA lesions. Rupture and intraperitoneal bleeding were reported in 17·5 per cent of patients. Bleeding was the first symptom in 68·5 per cent of patients with a bleeding HCA. Six of 13 articles reporting the size of HCA lesions in which bleeding occurred mentioned haemorrhage in HCAs smaller than 5 cm. CONCLUSION: Haemorrhage and rupture are common in patients with HCA.


Subject(s)
Adenoma, Liver Cell/complications , Hemorrhage/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Adenoma, Liver Cell/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Rupture, Spontaneous/etiology , Rupture, Spontaneous/prevention & control , Young Adult
6.
Transplant Proc ; 43(5): 1623-6, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21693245

ABSTRACT

The risk of urologic complications after kidney transplantation is 0% to 30%. We studied the impact of prophylactic stent placement during transplantation by assessing the necessity for a percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) after living kidney transplantation. From January 2003 to December 2007, 342 living donor kidney transplantations were performed. Intra- and postoperative data were collected retrospectively from 285 patients with stent and 57 without. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups, except for the number of previous transplantations: 31 (11%) patients with versus 16 (28%) without stent had a history of >1 transplantation (P < .001). From patients with PCN, 55 (87%) patients in the stented group received a PCN <3 months versus 11 (100%) in the nonstented group (P = .71). The reoperation rate for urologic complications was similar in both groups (3% (stented) versus 5% (nonstented; P = .43). In multivariate analysis, risk for PCN was similar in both groups (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.5). Recipient survival was not significantly different. One- and 3-year death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between stented (89% and 84%) and nonstented group (90% and 85%, P = .71 and P = .96). Ureteral stent insertion is not associated with a reduced rate of PCN placement in living donor kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Living Donors , Stents , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Urinary Bladder Diseases/prevention & control , Young Adult
7.
Am J Transplant ; 11(4): 737-42, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21446976

ABSTRACT

The safety of older live kidney donors, especially the decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after donation, has been debated. In this study we evaluated long-term renal outcome in older live kidney donors. From 1994 to 2006 follow-up data of 539 consecutive live kidney donations were prospectively collected, during yearly visits to the outpatient clinic. Donors were categorized into two groups, based on age: < 60 (n = 422) and ≥ 60 (n = 117). Elderly had lower GFR predonation (80 vs. 96 mL/min respectively, p < 0.001). During median follow-up of 5.5 years, maximum decline in eGFR was 38% ± 9% and the percentage maximum decline was not different in both groups. On long-term follow-up, significantly more elderly had an eGFR < 60 mL/min (131 (80%) vs. 94 (31%), p < 0.001). However, renal function was stable and no eGFR of less than 30 mL/min was seen. In multivariate analysis higher body mass index (HR 1.09, 95%CI 1.03-1.14) and more HLA mismatches (HR 1.17, 95%CI 1.03-1.34) were significantly correlated with worse graft survival. Donor age did not influence graft survival. After kidney donation decline in eGFR is similar in younger and older donors. As kidney function does not progressively decline, live kidney donation by elderly is considered safe.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Kidney/physiopathology , Living Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
8.
Dig Surg ; 27(1): 61-7, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20357453

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma (HA) has a great impact on the lives of young women and may pose clinical dilemmas to the clinician since there are no standardized protocols to follow. We aimed to establish expert opinions on diagnosis and treatment of HA by collecting data from a nationwide questionnaire in the Netherlands. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 20 Dutch hospitals known to offer hepatologic and surgical experience on liver tumours. RESULTS: 17 hospitals (85%) responded to the questionnaire. Annually, a median of 52 patients presented with a solid liver tumour. In 15 (88%) hospitals, hepatic adenomas were diagnosed with contrast-enhanced, multiphase spiral CT or MRI. In 2 (12%) hospitals, histology was required as part of a management protocol. Surveillance after withdrawal of oral contraceptives was the initial policy in all clinics. MRI, CT or ultrasound was used for follow-up. Criteria for surgical resection were a tumour size >5 cm and abdominal complaints. In 5 (29%) hospitals, patients were dismissed from follow-up after surgery. In complex cases (e.g. large, multiple or centrally localized lesions, a wish for pregnancy), the treatment policy was highly variable. Pregnancy was not discouraged in 15 hospitals, but in 11 (65%) of these, strictly defined conditions were noted: frequent follow-up, peripheral tumour localization that makes surgery easier if necessary, stable tumour size, and a good informed consent. CONCLUSION: The management of HAs in the Netherlands is rather uniform, except in complex cases in which multiple factors may influence policy.


Subject(s)
Adenoma, Liver Cell/diagnosis , Adenoma, Liver Cell/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Hernia ; 13(5): 539-43, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19212701

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Abdominal wall nerve injury as a result of trocar placement for laparoscopic surgery is rare. We intend to discuss causes of abdominal wall paresis as well as relevant anatomy. METHODS: A review of the nerve supply of the abdominal wall is illustrated with a rare case of a patient presenting with paresis of the internal oblique muscle due to a trocar lesion of the right iliohypogastric nerve after laparoscopic appendectomy. RESULTS: Trocar placement in the upper lateral abdomen can damage the subcostal nerve (Th12), caudal intercostal nerves (Th7-11) and ventral rami of the thoracic nerves (Th7-12). Trocar placement in the lower abdomen can damage the ilioinguinal (L1 or L2) and iliohypogastric nerves (Th12-L1). Pareses of abdominal muscles due to trocar placement are rare due to overlap in innervation and relatively small sizes of trocar incisions. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the anatomy of the abdominal wall is mandatory in order to avoid the injury of important structures during trocar placement.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall/innervation , Appendicitis/surgery , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Paresis/etiology , Abdominal Wall/anatomy & histology , Adult , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Appendectomy/methods , Humans , Male
10.
Dig Surg ; 22(1-2): 86-90, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15849468

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although there are many advantages of a posterior approach to rectal disease, these procedures are not widely accepted because many surgeons fear the postoperative complications. METHODS: The medical records were reviewed of 57 patients who underwent a posterior approach to the rectum between January 1980 and December 2002. RESULTS: Twenty-eight men and 29 women with a mean age of 70.5 (range 47-83) years underwent either a posterior transsacral (n = 52) or a transsphincteric (n = 5) procedure. Indications for surgery were benign lesions (n = 33), e.g. villous adenoma, rectal prolapse and endometriosis as well as invasive adenocarcinoma (n = 24). All patients with an invasive adenocarcinoma were classified as ASA grade III or IV. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 12 patients (21%), consisting of temporary incontinence, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and hemorrhage. There was no mortality. During a mean follow-up of 29 (range 2-86) months, 3 patients with a villous adenoma and 2 patients who were treated for a malignant lesion had a locally recurrent lesion. CONCLUSION: We believe that a posterior approach to the rectum should be considered for various benign and selected malignant diseases, especially in case of elderly patients or patients with a compromised general condition, and has to be a part of the surgeon's armamentarium.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adenoma, Villous/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prolapse , Rectal Diseases/surgery
11.
Br J Surg ; 89(10): 1240-4, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12296890

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The unknown natural history and risk of complications of large haemangiomas may pose therapeutic dilemmas. The authors describe their experience with the management of giant haemangiomas. METHODS: Patients with a giant haemangioma were identified by a survey of the hospital database. Forty-nine patients with a haemangioma of at least 4 cm in diameter presented between January 1990 and December 2000. Medical records were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Eleven patients had surgical treatment and 38 were managed conservatively. The median diameter of the tumours was 8.0 cm in surgically treated patients and 6.0 cm in the group managed by observation. Surgery-related morbidity occurred in three patients, and abdominal complaints persisted in three of ten patients with a symptomatic lesion. During a median follow-up of 52 months, 12 non-operated patients had mild abdominal complaints, considered to be unrelated to the lesion. In these patients symptoms either diminished or became minimal during follow-up. Complications did not occur. CONCLUSION: Observation of giant haemangiomas can be performed safely. The authors advocate resection of cavernous liver haemangiomas only in patients with persistent severe symptoms.


Subject(s)
Hemangioma/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hemangioma/physiopathology , Hemangioma/surgery , Humans , Liver Function Tests , Liver Neoplasms/physiopathology , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
12.
Arch Surg ; 136(9): 1033-8, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11529826

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: The natural history and clinical behavior of benign hepatic tumors during long-term follow-up may not justify primary surgical treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred eight patients diagnosed as having a benign liver tumor between January 1, 1979, and December 31, 1999. INTERVENTION: Seventy-four patients underwent hepatic surgery and 134 were managed conservatively by radiological follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptoms and complications were assessed during management and follow-up. RESULTS: In the surgically treated population, the liver lesion was symptomatic in 47 patients (64%) and an incidental finding in 27 (36%). The operative morbidity and mortality were 27% (20 of 74 patients) and 3% (2 of 74 patients), respectively. Overall, 28 (80%) of 35 patients with complaints were asymptomatic after surgery. During observation of the tumor in the conservatively managed group, 39 (87%) of 45 patients who presented with complaints were asymptomatic during a mean follow-up of 45 months; 6 patients had mild abdominal pain considered to be unrelated to the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management of solid benign liver lesions such as focal nodular hyperplasia and hemangioma can be performed safely, irrespective of their size. We only advise surgery for liver lesions when there is an inability to exclude malignancy or in the case of severe complaints related to the tumor. Resection is always advocated in the case of a large hepatocellular adenoma (>5 cm) to reduce the risk of rupture and malignant degeneration.


Subject(s)
Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Adenoma, Liver Cell/complications , Adenoma, Liver Cell/diagnosis , Adenoma, Liver Cell/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Focal Nodular Hyperplasia/complications , Focal Nodular Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Focal Nodular Hyperplasia/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Hemangioma/complications , Hemangioma/diagnosis , Hemangioma/therapy , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Hepatectomy/mortality , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
13.
Br J Surg ; 88(2): 207-9, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11167868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the morbidity and mortality rates associated with emergency resection in patients with a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma are high, the authors have favoured initial non-operative management in haemodynamically stable patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the treatment of ruptured hepatocellular adenoma. RESULTS: Over a 21-year interval, 12 patients presented with a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma. Haemodynamic observation and support was the initial management in all 12 patients. Three underwent urgent laparotomy and gauze packing because of haemodynamic instability; no emergency liver resection was necessary. Eight patients had definitive surgery; three developed postoperative complications but none died. Regression of the tumour was observed in three of four patients treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: The initial management of a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma should be haemodynamic stabilization. Definitive resection is required for rebleeding or for tumours exceeding 5 cm in diameter. A conservative approach may well be justified in case of regression of an asymptomatic adenoma.


Subject(s)
Adenoma, Liver Cell/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Remission, Spontaneous , Retrospective Studies , Rupture, Spontaneous/surgery
15.
J Hepatol ; 33(4): 543-8, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059858

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Traditionally, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are regarded as separate disease entities. We report on a group of patients that suggests the existence of an overlap syndrome of the two conditions and on the prevalence of this syndrome among patients with PSC. Furthermore, the impact of the recently revised AIH scoring system for diagnosing AIH in this context was assessed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients of a tertiary referral centre for liver disease with a diagnosis of PSC. RESULTS: Diagnosis of the overlap syndrome was established for nine patients (8%) of a total group of 113 PSC patients. Four patients initially presented with features of AIH and in five cases PSC was diagnosed first. All patients responded to immunosuppressive therapy; in three cases long-term remission was achieved. Three patients underwent liver transplantation after 4 months and 7 and 9 years, respectively. The original and revised versions of the AIH scoring system gave essentially the same results in the patients with the PSC-AIH overlap syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with overlapping features of AIH and PSC may be more common than is currently assumed. Recognition of this syndrome is of clinical significance, considering the important therapeutical consequences.


Subject(s)
Cholangitis, Sclerosing/complications , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/complications , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/epidemiology , Liver/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cholangiography , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/pathology , Female , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...