Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of trastuzumab and bevacizumab in early-stage breast cancer.

AIMS: To describe the sources of interindividual variability of bevacizumab and trastuzumab pharmacokinetics in early-stage breast cancer, and to study the relationship between exposure and both early clinical response and specific adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 86) received 6 cycles of docetaxel + trastuzumab. Early tumour response was assessed by determination of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) variation (ΔSUVmax) after 1 cycle using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET. Early poor responders (ΔSUVmax < 70%) also received bevacizumab from cycle 3 to cycle 6. Sources of interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of both antibodies were studied by population compartment modelling. Exposure as assessed by area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) was compared between responders and non-responders and between patients experiencing specific adverse events or not. RESULTS: A two-compartment model described the pharmacokinetics of both antibodies satisfactorily. Their central volume of distributions (Vc) increased with body surface area and their elimination half-lives were shorter (~14 days) than previously reported (~26-28 days). There was a time-dependent increase in trastuzumab Vc, positively correlated to baseline SUVmax. Bevacizumab elimination rate (k10) was positively correlated with ΔSUVmax measured at the end of the first cycle. Bevacizumab had no significantly influence on trastuzumab pharmacokinetics. No relationship between exposure and clinical response or occurrence of adverse events was found. CONCLUSION: Tumour uptake as assessed by SUVmax influences the pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab and trastuzumab. In early-stage breast cancer, elimination half-lives of these therapeutic monoclonal antibodies may be shorter than those previously reported in more advanced disease.

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose nebulized amikacin in ventilated critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic nebulization theoretically allows the delivery of high doses to the lungs together with limited systemic exposure and toxicity. This study aimed to describe amikacin pharmacokinetics, and especially its absorption, in patients treated with high-dose nebulized amikacin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty critically ill patients experiencing ventilator-associated pneumonia received a 20 mg/kg infusion of amikacin, followed by either three other infusions or three nebulizations of 60 mg/kg amikacin. An extensive sampling regimen allowed measurement of amikacin serum concentrations at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 24 h after each administration. Amikacin pharmacokinetics was studied by population compartmental modelling. RESULTS: Amikacin pharmacokinetics was best described using a two-compartment structural model with first-order distribution and elimination, in which lung absorption was described using a transit model. Estimated means (interindividual variability) of the main parameters were: bioavailability F = 2.65% (22.1%); transit compartments n = 1.58 (fixed); transit constant ktr = 1.38 h-1 (33.4%); central volume Vc = 10.2 L (10.5%); and elimination constant k10 = 0.488 h-1 (35.8%). The addition of interoccasion variability on F (44.0%) and k10 (41.7%) allowed the description of intraindividual variability of bioavailability and elimination. Amikacin clearance was positively correlated with baseline creatinine clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Our pharmacokinetic model provided an accurate description of amikacin concentrations following nebulization. There was wide interindividual and interoccasion variability in the absorption and elimination of amikacin. Nevertheless, systemic exposure after nebulization was always much lower than after infusion, an observation suggesting that nebulized high doses are safe in this regard and may be used to treat ventilator-associated pneumonia.

[N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis: value of immunomodulatory therapy]. / Encéphalite à anticorps anti-récepteurs N-méthyl-D-aspartate (NMDA-R) : place des immunomodulateurs.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) encephalitis is little known to pediatricians and likely underdiagnosed. The child's vital and cognitive prognosis is at stake. The use of immunomodulatory drugs, such as rituximab has led to spectacular results, but many questions remain about its mode of action in this type of pathology. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 6-year-old girl with no medical history, admitted for status epilepticus preceded by behavior symptoms and sleep disorders. Gradually, the child became bedridden, mute, and animated by predominantly orofacial dyskinesia. Examinations were normal (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] analysis, brain MRI). The diagnosis was established by the presence of NMDA-R antibodies in the CSF. After exclusion of a tumor-associated syndrome, treatment was started initially by intravenous immunoglobulins, then by plasma exchange, and finally rituximab. The patient was cured with rituximab despite an unusually early recovery of the B-cell pool. DISCUSSION: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) encephalitis is a severe but potentially reversible neurologic disorder only recently described, even in childhood. It may be reversible without sequelae if diagnosed and treated early. The use of immunomodulatory therapy, such as rituximab seemingly improves the outcome. Immunological monitoring is needed to better understand its mechanism of action in autoimmune diseases of the nervous system in childhood.