"Do We Stay or Do We Go?" The Impact of Anti-LGBTQ+ Legislation on the HIV Workforce in the South.

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) workforce continues to face a crisis, particularly in the southern United States. Adding to known issues of administrative burden and less competitive compensation, recent anti- lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) legislation threatens the already strained HIV workforce. HIV care providers advocate for all aspects of their patient's lives, including those needing gender-affirming care. The recent legislative targets against transgender patients, which involves many people with HIV, will clearly add to the burden on individual HIV care providers and therefore the HIV workforce. Recruitment and retention efforts in states impacted by these laws will become increasingly difficult without advocacy for the patients we serve. The HIV workforce must work together with LGBTQ+ populations to address these recent laws and promote the well-being of all our patients and colleagues.

The Society of General Internal Medicine's Recommendations to Improve LGBTQ + Health.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ +) individuals experience bias in healthcare with 1 in 6 LGBTQ + adults avoiding healthcare due to anticipated discrimination and overall report poorer health status compared to heterosexual and cisgendered peers. The Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) is a leading organization representing academic physicians and recognizes that significant physical and mental health inequities exist among LGBTQ + communities. As such, SGIM sees its role in improving LGBTQ + patient health through structural change, starting at the national policy level all the way to encouraging change in individual provider bias and personal actions. SGIM endorses a series of recommendations for policy priorities, research and data collection standards, and institutional policy changes as well as community engagement and individual practices to reduce bias and improve the well-being and health of LGBTQ + patients.

Patient-Facing Clinical Decision Support for High Blood Pressure Control: Patient Survey.

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure (HBP) affects nearly half of adults in the United States and is a major factor in heart attacks, strokes, kidney disease, and other morbidities. To reduce risk, guidelines for HBP contain more than 70 recommendations, including many related to patient behaviors, such as home monitoring and lifestyle changes. Thus, the patient's role in controlling HBP is crucial. Patient-facing clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help patients adhere to evidence-based care, but customization is required. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand how to adapt CDS to best engage patients in controlling HBP. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study with two phases: (1) survey-guided interviews with a limited cohort and (2) a nationwide web-based survey. Participation in each phase was limited to adults aged between 18 and 85 years who had been diagnosed with hypertension. The survey included general questions that assessed goal setting, treatment priorities, medication load, comorbid conditions, satisfaction with blood pressure (BP) management, and attitudes toward CDS, and also a series of questions regarding A/B preferences using paired information displays to assess perceived trustworthiness of potential CDS user interface options. RESULTS: We conducted 17 survey-guided interviews to gather patient needs from CDS, then analyzed results and created a second survey of 519 adults with clinically diagnosed HBP. A large majority of participants reported that BP control was a high priority (83%), had monitored BP at home (82%), and felt comfortable using technology (88%). Survey respondents found displays with more detailed recommendations more trustworthy (56%-77% of them preferred simpler displays), especially when incorporating social trust and priorities from providers and patients like them, but had no differences in action taken. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents to the survey felt that CDS capabilities could help them with HBP control. The more detailed design options for BP display and recommendations messaging were considered the most trustworthy yet did not differentiate perceived actions.

Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs Associated with More Aggressive Diagnostic Testing.

BACKGROUND: Variation in clinicians' diagnostic test utilization is incompletely explained by demographics and likely relates to cognitive characteristics. We explored clinician factors associated with diagnostic test utilization. METHODS: We used a self-administered survey of attitudes, cognitive characteristics, and reported likelihood of test ordering in common scenarios; frequency of lipid and liver testing in patients on statin therapy. Participants were 552 primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants from practices in 8 US states across 3 regions, from June 1, 2018 to November 26, 2019. We measured Testing Likelihood Score: the mean of 4 responses to testing frequency and self-reported testing frequency in patients on statins. RESULTS: Respondents were 52.4% residents, 36.6% attendings, and 11.0% nurse practitioners/physician assistants; most were white (53.6%) or Asian (25.5%). Median age was 32 years; 53.1% were female. Participants reported ordering tests for a median of 20% (stress tests) to 90% (mammograms) of patients; Testing Likelihood Scores varied widely (median 54%, interquartile range 43%-69%). Higher scores were associated with geography, training type, low numeracy, high malpractice fear, high medical maximizer score, high stress from uncertainty, high concern about bad outcomes, and low acknowledgment of medical uncertainty. More frequent testing of lipids and liver tests was associated with low numeracy, high medical maximizer score, high malpractice fear, and low acknowledgment of uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician variation in testing was common, with more aggressive testing consistently associated with low numeracy, being a medical maximizer, and low acknowledgment of uncertainty. Efforts to reduce undue variations in testing should consider clinician cognitive drivers.

Simulating for Quality: A Centralized Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Simulation Curriculum for Residents and Fellows.

PROBLEM: Requirements for experiential education in quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS) in graduate medical education (GME) have recently expanded. Major challenges to meeting these requirements include a lack of faculty with the needed expertise, paucity of standardized curricular models allowing for skill demonstration, and inconsistent access to data for iterative improvement. APPROACH: In October 2017, the authors began development of a centralized QI/PS flipped-classroom simulation-based medical education (SBME) curriculum for GME trainees across multiple disciplines at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). The curriculum development team included OHSU and Veterans Affairs faculty with experience in QI/PS and SBME, as well as house officers. The curriculum consisted of a preassessment and prework readings and videos (sent 3 weeks before the simulation day) and an 8-hour simulation day, with introductory activities, 4 linked simulation sessions, and concluding activities. The 4 linked sessions followed the same medication error from disclosure and reporting to root cause analysis, iterative implementation of an action plan, and consolidation of lessons learned into routine operations with Lean huddles. OUTCOMES: In academic year 2018-2019, 71 residents and fellows of various postgraduate years from 23 training programs enrolled in 2 pilot sessions. Learners reacted favorably to the simulation curriculum. Learner attitudes, confidence, knowledge, and skills significantly increased across all QI/PS domains studied. NEXT STEPS: This approach focuses a small cadre of educators toward the creation of a centralized resource that, owing to its experiential SBME foundation, can accommodate many learners with data-driven practice-based learning and improvement cycles in a shorter time frame than traditional QI initiatives. Next steps include the addition of a control group, assessment of the sustainability of learner outcomes, translation of learning to behavior change and improvements in patient and health system outcomes, and adapting the materials to include learners from different professions and levels.

Adapting SQUIRE 2.0 to Create a Quality Improvement Evidence-Based Medicine Critical Appraisal Tool (QI-EBM-CAT) for Graduate Medical Education Trainees.

Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has long been taught to physician trainees for critical appraisal of research manuscripts. There is no parallel or similar framework to guide trainees in the appraisal of quality improvement (QI) literature. Objective: To adapt existing guidelines of QI manuscript reporting into an educational QI-EBM appraisal tool to help residents distinguish research and QI manuscripts, assess QI designs and methodologies, and evaluate QI manuscripts' strengths and weaknesses. Methods: Between 2018 and 2021, we developed a QI-EBM critical appraisal tool (QI-EBM-CAT) and performed 3 plan-do-study-act cycles to refine the tool based on JAMA and SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. We then surveyed residents regarding the usefulness of the tool and their confidence in evaluating QI manuscripts before and after completing a QI-EBM workshop using the QI appraisal tool. Results: Sixty-six of 74 internal medicine postgraduate year (PGY)-1 to PGY-3 residents (89.2%) completed the workshop and assessment surveys in 2021. The workshop was found to be moderately to very useful by 85.1% (63 of 74) of residents as a framework for QI manuscript critical analysis. The summary confidence score in QI manuscript critical appraisal improved from a 64% rating of moderately to very confident in the pre-period to 94.6% in the post-period (P<.001) with statistical improvements in all 5 confidence areas assessed (P<.001). Conclusions: The QI-EBM-CAT, designed to teach residents how to critically assess QI manuscripts using EBM principles, resulted in subjective improvements in confidence of QI manuscript analysis.

The Mystery Dinner RCA: Using Gamification and Simulation to Teach Root Cause Analysis.

Introduction: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a widely utilized tool for investigating systems issues that lead to patient safety events and near misses, yet only 38% of learners participate in an interdisciplinary patient safety investigation during training. Common barriers to RCA education and participation include faculty time and materials, trainee time constraints, and learner engagement. Methods: We developed a simulated RCA workshop to be taught to a mix of medical and surgical specialties from over 11 GME programs and to third-year medical students. The workshop was a single 90-minute session formatted as a gamified mystery dinner including characters and sequentially revealed clues to promote engagement. Participant satisfaction and subjective knowledge, skills, and attitudes were assessed with a pre/post survey. Results: The workshop was completed by 134 learners between October 2018 and October 2019. The short workshop duration and premade simulation allowed a small number of faculty to train a wide variety of learners in various educational settings. Participants' presurvey (124 out of 134, 92%) versus postsurvey (113 out of 134, 84%) responses showed that attitudes about RCA were statistically improved across all domains queried, with an average effect size of 0.6 (moderate effect); 91% of participants would recommend this course to a colleague. Discussion: A 90-minute, gamified, simulated RCA workshop was taught to medical students and multiple GME specialties with subjective improvements in patient safety attitudes and knowledge while alleviating faculty time constraints in case development.

The Impact of Environmental Context on Intern Sign-Out Quality.

BACKGROUND: Resident duty-hour restrictions have led to more sign-out transitions, increasing the potential for preventable harm. An unfavorable environment is expected to exacerbate sign-out risks to patient safety. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of noise, interruptions, long sign-outs, and sign-outs exceeding allotted time on sign-out quality. METHODS: Eight trained observers evaluated 620 evening patient sign-outs between interns for 40 weeknights between February and April 2015 at a large internal medicine training program. Quality of sign-out was measured three ways: information quality, scores from the Handoff CEX Tool, and peer evaluations. RESULTS: Noise had no impact on information quality. Interruptions negatively affected information quality (-0.10 < r < -0.15, P < 0.001) and Handoff CEX quality scores (-0.11 < r < -0.26, P < 0.001). Long sign-outs taking more than 1 hour negatively affected sign-out quality (-0.09 < r < -0.23, P < 0.05). Sign-outs exceeding allotted time negatively impacted peer evaluations (-0.11 < r < -0.22, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions, long sign-outs, and sign-outs exceeding allotted time were related to lower sign-out quality. Improving the environment to reduce interruptions and training interns to manage their time during sign-outs may improve sign-out quality.

A Cross-sectional Survey of Internal Medicine Resident Knowledge, Attitudes, Behaviors, and Experiences Regarding Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is effective, yet many providers continue to lack knowledge and comfort in providing this intervention. It remains unclear whether internal medicine (IM) residents receive appropriate training in PrEP care and if this affects their future practices. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relationship between current IM residents' prior PrEP training and knowledge, comfort, and practice regarding the provision of PrEP. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We created an online survey to assess IM residents' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to PrEP. The survey was distributed among five IM programs across the USA. KEY RESULTS: We had a 35% response rate. Of 229 respondents, 96% (n = 220) had heard of PrEP but only 25% (n = 51) had received prior training and 11% (n = 24) had prescribed PrEP. Compared with those without, those with prior training reported good to excellent knowledge scores regarding PrEP (80% versus 33%, p < 0.001), more frequent prescribing (28% versus 7%, p = 0.001), and higher comfort levels with evaluating risk for HIV, educating patients, and monitoring aspects of PrEP (75% versus 26%, 56% versus 16%, and 47% versus 8%, respectively; all p values < 0.0001). While only 25% (n = 51) had received prior training, 75% (n = 103) of respondents reported that training all providers at their continuity clinic sites would improve implementation. CONCLUSIONS: We found that prior training was associated with higher levels of self-reported PrEP knowledge, comfort, and prescribing behaviors. Given the significant need for PrEP, IM residents should be trained to achieve adequate knowledge and comfort levels to prescribe it. This study demonstrates that providing appropriate PrEP training for IM residents may lead to an increase in the pool of graduating IM residents prescribing PrEP.

A Randomized Cohort Controlled Trial to Compare Intern Sign-Out Training Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have investigated the efficacy of specific sign-out protocols (such as the illness severity, patient summary, action list, situation awareness and contingency planning, and synthesis by reviewer [I-PASS] bundle), the implementation of a bundle can be time consuming and costly. We compared 4 sign-out training pedagogies on sign-out quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate training interventions that best enhance multidimensional sign-out quality measured by information exchange, task accountability, and personal responsibility. INTERVENTION: Four general internal medicine firms were randomly assigned into 1 of the following 4 training interventions: didactics (control), I-PASS, policy mandate on task accountability, and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA). SETTING: First-year interns at a large, Mid-Atlantic internal medicine residency program. MEASUREMENTS: Eight trained observers examined 10 days each in the pre- and postintervention periods for each firm using a standardized sign-out checklist. RESULTS: Pre- and postintervention differences showed significant improvements in the transfer of patient information, task accountability, and personal responsibility for the I-PASS, policy mandate, and PDSA groups, respectively, in line with their respective training foci. Compared to the control, I-PASS reported the best improvements in sign-out quality, although there was room to improve in task accountability and responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Different training emphases improved different dimensions of sign-out quality. A combination of training pedagogies is likely to yield optimal results.

The beliefs and willingness of men who have sex with men to comply with a one-year blood donation deferral policy: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration ended the lifetime blood donation deferral for men who have sex with men (MSM) and replaced it with a 1-year deferral period. It is currently unknown how many MSM may meet the new deferral policy and how many are willing to comply with it. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous survey was shared on MSM-focused social media sites between May and July 2016 and enrolled self-identified American MSM who were at least 18 years old. The survey assessed the willingness of MSM to donate blood, donation history, and knowledge regarding current blood donation needs and testing limitations. RESULTS: A total of 764 men met criteria to be included in the final data set. Only 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9%-10.9%) met the current 12-month deferral criteria, yet 90.6% (95% CI, 88.5%-92.7%) were interested in donating. Among men interested in donating blood, 57.9% (95% CI, 54.3%-61.4%) would consider donating blood without meeting the 12-month deferral criteria. Overall, 26.7% (95% CI, 23.6%-29.8%) admitted to donating blood at least once in the past despite not meeting deferral criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Few MSM met the current deferral criteria, yet many were interested in donating, even without meeting deferral criteria. Possible motivations to donate without meeting deferral criteria may include a perceived shortage of donated blood and infallibility of current blood testing technology to detect human immunodeficiency virus. If the current 1-year deferral is maintained, it is essential that there is outreach to the MSM community to explain and educate why this policy exists.

Regular Formal Evaluation Sessions are Effective as Frame-of-Reference Training for Faculty Evaluators of Clerkship Medical Students.

BACKGROUND: Face-to-face formal evaluation sessions between clerkship directors and faculty can facilitate the collection of trainee performance data and provide frame-of-reference training for faculty. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that ambulatory faculty who attended evaluation sessions at least once in an academic year (attendees) would use the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager/Educator (RIME) terminology more appropriately than faculty who did not attend evaluation sessions (non-attendees). DESIGN: Investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study using the narrative assessments of ambulatory internal medicine clerkship students during the 2008-2009 academic year. PARTICIPANTS: The study included assessments of 49 clerkship medical students, which comprised 293 individual teacher narratives. MAIN MEASURES: Single-teacher written and transcribed verbal comments about student performance were masked and reviewed by a panel of experts who, by consensus, (1) determined whether RIME was used, (2) counted the number of RIME utterances, and (3) assigned a grade based on the comments. Analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation coefficients. KEY RESULTS: The authors reviewed 293 individual teacher narratives regarding the performance of 49 students. Attendees explicitly used RIME more frequently than non-attendees (69.8 vs. 40.4 %; p < 0.0001). Grades recommended by attendees correlated more strongly with grades assigned by experts than grades recommended by non-attendees (r = 0.72; 95 % CI (0.65, 0.78) vs. 0.47; 95 % CI (0.26, 0.64); p = 0.005). Grade recommendations from individual attendees and non-attendees each correlated significantly with overall student clerkship clinical performance [r = 0.63; 95 % CI (0.54, 0.71) vs. 0.52 (0.36, 0.66), respectively], although the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: On an ambulatory clerkship, teachers who attended evaluation sessions used RIME terminology more frequently and provided more accurate grade recommendations than teachers who did not attend. Formal evaluation sessions may provide frame-of-reference training for the RIME framework, a method that improves the validity and reliability of workplace assessment.

The rates, perceptions, and willingness of men who have sex with men to donate blood.

BACKGROUND: Since 1983 in the United States, any man who has had sex with another man (MSM) at any time since 1977 has been deferred from donating blood for life. Although there has been a push to change the deferral, there is a paucity of information on both the rates of MSM blood donation and the willingness of MSMs to donate if the deferral were changed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 15-question survey was given at two lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender festivals in Chicago and New Orleans. Participants were asked about a previous history of blood donation and whether they would be willing to donate were the lifetime deferral changed. Participants were also asked to determine whether it was safe for hypothetical MSMs with varying sexual practices to donate blood and whether they believed that it was safe for them to donate their own blood. RESULTS: Our study found that 42.0% of all participants had not complied with the deferral policy and have donated blood at least once, with a mean number of donations of 4.84. Additionally, 85.9% of participants would be willing to donate blood if the deferral were changed. CONCLUSION: Despite the lifetime deferral, many MSMs have previously donated blood, and many more are willing to donate. Given this, along with the safe implementation of temporary deferral policies in other nations, the United States should consider adopting a temporary deferral policy for MSMs.

A student's perspective on medical ethics education.

Despite many efforts to increase ethics education in US medical schools, barriers continue to arise that impede the production of morally driven physicians who practice medicine with ideal empathy. Research has shown that, particularly during the clinical years, medical students lose the ability both to recognize ethical dilemmas and to approach such situations with compassionate reasoning. This article summarizes the current status of ethics education in US medical schools, described through the eyes of and alongside the story of a graduating medical student.