Musculoskeletal injuries during trail sports: Sex- and age-specific analyses over 20 years from a national injury database.

INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries in US trail sports are understudied as trail sport popularity grows. This study describes MSK injury patterns among hikers, trail runners, and mountain bikers from 2002 through 2021 and investigates MSK injury trends acquired during mountain sports. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was used to identify US emergency department (ED) patients from 2002-2021 (inclusive) who endured MSK injuries during hiking, trail running, or mountain biking. Injury rates and national estimates were calculated across demographics. RESULTS: 9835 injuries were included (48.4% male, 51.6% female). Injuries increased over time, with 1213 from 2002-2005 versus 2417 from 2018-2021. No sex differences existed before 2010, after which female injury rates exceeded those of males. The following findings were statistically significant, with P<0.05: females endured more fractures and strains/sprains; males endured more lacerations; concussions and head injuries were higher among those <18 y; dislocations and strains/sprains were higher for 18 to 65 y; fractures were higher for >65 y; <18 y had high mountain-biking and low running rates; 18 to 65 y had high running rates; and >65 y had low biking and running rates. Although all diagnoses increased in number over time, no significant differences existed in the proportion of any given diagnosis relative to total injuries. CONCLUSIONS: MSK injuries during trail sports have increased since 2002. Males endured more injuries until 2009, after which females endured more. Significant sex and age differences were found regarding injury diagnosis and body parts. Further studies are needed to confirm these trends and their causes.

Does Running Increase the Risk of Hip and Knee Arthritis? A Survey of 3804 Marathon Runners.

BACKGROUND: Long-distance running is a popular form of cardiovascular exercise with many well-described health benefits, from improving heart health to the management of obesity, diabetes, and mental illness. The impact of long-distance running on joint health in recreational runners, however, remains inconclusive. HYPOTHESIS: The prevalence of osteoarthritis in runners is not associated with an athlete's running-related history, including the number of marathons completed, cumulative years of running, average weekly mileage, and average running pace. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A survey was distributed to all participants registered for the 2019 or 2021 Chicago marathon (n = 37,917). Surveys collected runner demographics and assessed for hip/knee pain, osteoarthritis, family history, surgical history, and running-related history. Running history included the number of marathons run, number of years running, average running pace, and average weekly mileage. The overall prevalence of osteoarthritis was identified, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with the presence of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 3804 participants (response rate of 10.0%). The mean age was 43.9 years (range, 18-83 years) and participants had completed on average 9.5 marathons (median, 5 marathons; range, 1-664 marathons). The prevalence of hip and/or knee arthritis was 7.3%. A history of hip/knee injuries or surgery, advancing age, family history, and body mass index (BMI) were risk factors for arthritis. Cumulative number of years running, number of marathons completed, weekly mileage, and mean running pace were not significant predictors for arthritis. The majority (94.2%) of runners planned to run another marathon, despite 24.2% of all participants being told by a physician to do otherwise. CONCLUSION: From this largest surveyed group of marathon runners, the most significant risk factors for developing hip or knee arthritis were age, BMI, previous injury or surgery, and family history. There was no identified association between cumulative running history and the risk for arthritis.

Association of Injury Rates Among Players in the National Football League With Playoff Qualification, Travel Distance, Game Timing, and the Addition of Another Game: Data From the 2017 to 2022 Seasons.

Background: Injury incidence is higher in the National Football League (NFL) than in other collision sports. Although previous research has identified that scheduling variations, including overseas games and bye week timing, does not affect concussion risk, data are currently lacking regarding the effects of scheduling variation on season-long musculoskeletal injury incidence. Purpose: To determine whether higher cumulative travel distance, overseas play, an early season bye week, and an expansion of the regular season is associated with higher injury rates in the NFL. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: All 1275 injuries across 5 NFL seasons from 2017 to 2018 through 2021 to 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Injury data and travel distances were extracted from publicly available sources, which were cross-referenced for validation. Injury rates were calculated per 1000 athletic-exposures (AEs). Cumulative team travel distances were compared statistically using a linear regression. Single factor analysis of variance was used to compare categorical variables. Results: Travel distance did not significantly predict injury rates (P = .47), and there was no difference in injury rates between teams that played a game overseas versus teams that did not (19.3 injuries per 1000 AEs for both; P = .96). In addition, no difference was found in injury rates (F[109,2100[ = 0.704; P = .73) or players placed on the injured reserve list (F[99,778] = 1.70; P = .077) between various bye weeks (P = .73). Injury rates did not differ between the new 17-game regular season (18.4 per 1000 AEs) versus the previous four 16-game regular seasons (19.7 per 1000 AEs; P = .12). However, teams that did not qualify for the playoffs had a significantly higher injury rate (19.9 per 1000 AEs) as well as players on injured reserve (8.0 per 1000 AEs) than playoff-qualifying teams (18.4 and 6.8 per 1000 AEs, respectively; P < .05 for both). Conclusion: Over 5 NFL seasons, cumulative travel distance, overseas play, bye week timing, and adding 1 regular season game were not associated with increased injury rates in NFL players. However, a lack of regular season success was associated with higher injury rates and more players on injured reserve.

Sex-Based Differences in Prevalence, Outcomes, and Complications of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Trends between the sexes have been reported regarding prevalence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications of hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), yet current results lack consensus. Purpose: To evaluate sex-based differences after HA for FAIS in (1) prevalence of cam and pincer morphology in FAIS and (2) PROs, pain scores, and postoperative complication rates. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The EMBASE, PubMed, and Ovid (MEDLINE) databases were searched from establishment to February 28, 2022, according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included studies had sex-based data on prevalence, outcomes, and complications of HA for FAIS. Reviews and commentaries were excluded. Data were combined, and between-sex differences were analyzed. Meta-analyses using random-effects models were performed when possible. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences were calculated. Results: A total of 74 studies were included (213,059 patients; 132,973 female hips [62.4%] and 80,086 male hips [37.6%]). The mean age was 30.7 ± 7.7 years among male patients and 31.1 ± 7.8 years among female patients. Male patients experienced mixed-type impingement significantly more often (39.4% vs 27.2% for female patients; RR = 0.69 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.81]; P < .001), whereas female patients experienced pincer-type impingement more often (50.6% vs 30.8% for male patients; RR = 2.35 [95% CI, 1.14-4.86]; P = .02). Male patients had higher likelihoods of undergoing femoroplasty (89.8% vs 77.4% for female patients; RR = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83-0.97]; P = .006), acetabuloplasty (67.1% vs 59.3% for female patients; RR = 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79-0.97]; P = .01), or combined femoroplasty/acetabuloplasty (29.2% vs 14.5% for female patients; RR = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.44-0.90]; P = .01). Although female patients showed greater improvements in Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific subscale (P = .005), modified Harris Hip Score (P = .006), and visual analog scale pain (P < .001), both sexes surpassed the minimal clinically important difference at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Female patients had higher complication rates (P = .003), although no sex-based differences were found in total hip arthroplasty conversion rates (P = .21). Conclusion: Male patients undergoing HA for FAIS had a higher prevalence of mixed-type FAIS while female patients had more pincer-type FAIS. Female patients gained greater improvements in PROs, although both sexes exceeded the minimal clinically important difference, suggesting that both male and female patients can benefit from HA.

Injury Rates at an NCAA Division I Institution After the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Descriptive Epidemiological Study.

Background: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to frequent schedule changes, abbreviated seasons, and disrupted training at all levels of organized sports. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of sports-related injuries at a single National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I institution during the 2020 COVID lockdown season when compared with pre-COVID seasons. It was hypothesized that there would be an increase in the overall injury rate and an increase in the number of days missed because of injury during the 2020 season when compared with the previous seasons. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: The injury surveillance database at a single NCAA Division I institution was queried for injuries that resulted in time loss (missed game or practice) for a student-athlete or for injuries that persisted >3 days. Injuries were categorized by anatomic area. Days unavailable because of injury were recorded as total days that a student-athlete was listed as "out of activity." Injury incidence and days unavailable, per 1000 athlete-exposures (AEs), were calculated for 3 pre-COVID seasons (2017-2019) and the 2020 season. The authors calculated the injury rate ratio (IRR) and its associated 95% CI of the 2020 season in comparison with those for the pre-COVID seasons. Results: Compared with the pre-COVID seasons, the total injury incidence increased by 10.5% in the 2020 season (68.45 vs 75.65 injuries/1000 AEs; IRR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.13]). Total days unavailable decreased by 20.7% in the 2020 season (1374 vs 1089 days/1000 AEs; IRR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.77-2.26]). Compared with women's teams, men's teams had a larger increase in total injury incidence (16.4% vs 6.5%) and larger decrease in days unavailable (23.7% vs 10.75%). There were no clear trends to changes in anatomic distribution of injuries, either by sport or between the sexes. Conclusion: Compared with the pre-COVID seasons, the injury incidence was higher and the number of days missed because of injury lower among collegiate student-athletes at a single NCAA Division I school in the season immediately after the COVID-19 lockdown.

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Confidence to Return to Sport: Perspectives From National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Athletes.

BACKGROUND: One of the unforeseen impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic has been a decrease in athletes' confidence to return to their sport after mandates were lifted. Both physical and psychological effects have been implicated. This study aimed to measure the severity of these changes among a group of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes. METHODS: A novel Readiness to Return to Sport Survey, based on the validated ACL-RSI survey, was distributed to Division 1 collegiate athletes. The survey evaluated the psychological readiness of each player to return to sport in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, utilizing a 1-10 scale (1 = least confident and 10 = most confident). Numerical responses to each survey were summed to create a primary outcome score-an athlete's Return to Sport Readiness Score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of readiness to return to sport in the nearest coming season. RESULTS: Responses came from 68 athletes representing a variety of sports. Of those with an injury, 14 (82.35%) attributed their injury to changes in their training schedule due to COVID-19 restrictions, and the remaining three (17.65%) did not. Among all athletes, the mean return to sport readiness (RTS) score was 44 (SD 24.76). Those playing a winter sport had the lowest mean RTS score, 35 ± 23, and those playing a fall season sport had the highest mean score, 48 ± 25.97. Overall, competitive athletes on leave from the sport due to collegiate and Division 1 COVID-19 guidelines had lower reported mean RTS scores as compared to athletes outlined in many other anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury survey (ACL-RSI) studies. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the athletes surveyed in our study reported much lower levels of readiness to return to sport in the context of COVID-19 than athletes surveyed in other studies, exhibiting COVID-19's unique impact on their confidence to return to their scheduled sport season. These differences may highlight the COVID-19 pandemic as a more severe detriment to returning to sport readiness among division-one athletes than recovering from injury alone. Given such an impact, more research is needed to elucidate the percentage of these athletes that returned to or abstained from their sport, as well as any motivating, facilitating, or detrimental factors in their choice.

Qualitative Research in Return to Sport: a Current Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Return to sport (RTS) is an important metric tied to patient satisfaction after receiving treatment for a sports-related injury. Recently, there has been an explosion of literature on RTS; yet a comprehensive review encompassing multiple injuries does not exist. Furthermore, RTS has historically been defined by quantitative measures that assess strength, function, and pain but little consideration has been given to psychologic factors nor has there been an open-ended forum for athletes to share with health care providers which factors they feel are most influential for RTS. This review also serves to heighten surgeons' awareness of underlying psychologic/psychosocial factors affecting RTS. RECENT FINDINGS: Qualitative studies which employ open-ended questioning of athletes who have undergone surgical management of superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears, shoulder instability, ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) rupture, femoral acetabular impingement (FAI), and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear demonstrate that fear of reinjury, lack of social support, and unrealistic expectations are all barriers to RTS. Qualitative studies give health care providers unique insight into the perspectives of their patients so that unmet postoperative needs can be addressed to facilitate RTS. Sports psychologists, coaches, athletic trainers, and physical therapists should create a positive environment to address these needs and provide optimal, holistic care to return athletes to the field safely. Though time consuming, further qualitative research is necessary to understand the unique factors affecting RTS in athletes.

Characteristics of Team Physicians in the National Football League: The Road to Success and a Call for Diversity.

Background: The role of team physician (TP) in professional sports is a highly coveted position within sports medicine. There is currently limited research on the demographic characteristics of TPs within the National Football League (NFL). Purpose: To identify demographic characteristics and educational backgrounds of NFL head TPs (HTPs) and assistant TPs (ATPs). Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A list of TPs was identified through the National Football League Physicians Society (NFLPS). Variables investigated include age, gender, race, medical specialty, location and year of residency and fellowship training, leadership among medical societies and editorial boards, academic rank, and personal Scopus Hirsch index (h-index). Linear regression was performed to determine correlation, and t tests were used to assess differences in the h-index. Results: Of the 170 TPs, 21.2% were HTPs and 78.8% were ATPs. TPs were 97.6% male, 91.2% were non-Hispanic White, and 60% had attained an academic rank. The mean ages of the HTPs and ATPs were a 56.2 ± 9.6 and 52.6 ± 9.6 years, respectively (P = .047). Among orthopaedic surgeons, the most common subspecialties were sports medicine (70.5%), foot and ankle (7.6%), and spine (5.7%). Of the TPs, 48.2% and 32.9% worked for a team in the same state in which they graduated residency and fellowship, respectively. HTPs and ATPs had been in the NFLPS for a mean of 16.9 ± 10.8 and 8.8 ± 8.3 years, respectively (P < .001). Further, TPs holding an academic rank had a mean h-index of 14.0 ± 19.3, while those without an academic rank had a mean h-index of 6.2 ± 8.8 (P < .01). HTPs and ATPs had mean h-indices of 15.7 ± 15.9 and 9.6 ± 16.3 (P = .0503), respectively. Conclusion: TPs in the NFL are typically White men in their mid-50s who have trained at specific high-ranking institutions and obtained a fellowship in sports medicine. HTPs were likely to be older with longer tenures within the NFLPS and with more impactful research than their ATP counterparts.

Injury Risk in Collegiate Football Players With Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Prospective Cohort Study Over 2 Years.

Background: Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) has been identified as a risk factor for injury in various athletic patient populations. Purpose: To evaluate GJH as a predisposing risk factor for injury in a population of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football players. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The Beighton score was collected for 73 athletes during their preseason physical examinations in 2019. GJH was defined as a Beighton score ≥4. Athlete descriptive characteristics, including age, height, weight, and playing position, were recorded. The cohort was evaluated prospectively for 2 years, and the number of musculoskeletal issues, injuries, treatment episodes, days unavailable, and surgical procedures for each athlete during this period were recorded. These measures were compared between the GJH and no-GJH groups. Results: The mean Beighton score was 1.4 ± 1.5 for the 73 players; 7 players (9.6%) had a Beighton score indicating GJH. During the 2-year evaluation, there were 438 musculoskeletal issues, including 289 injuries. The mean number of treatment episodes per athlete was 77 ± 71 (range, 0-340), and the mean number of days unavailable was 67 ± 92 days (range, 0-432 days). There were 23 athletes who required 25 operations, the most common procedure being arthroscopic shoulder stabilization (n = 6). The number of injuries per athlete was not significantly different between the GJH and no-GJH groups (3.0 ± 2.1 vs 4.1 ± 3.0; P = .13), nor were there any between-group differences in the number of treatments received (74.6 ± 81.9 vs 77.2 ± 71.5; P = .47), days unavailable (79.6 ± 124.5 vs 65.3 ± 89.3; P = .61), or rates of surgery (43% vs 30%; P = .67). Conclusion: A preseason diagnosis of GJH did not place NCAA football players at a greater risk for injury during the 2-year study period. Based on the findings of this study, no specific preparticipation risk counseling or intervention is warranted for football players who are diagnosed with GJH as defined by the Beighton score.

Chronic calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing operative and nonoperative interventions.

BACKGROUND: Calcific tendinitis is a relatively common shoulder disorder, with 7%-17% of individuals with shoulder pain having rotator cuff calcium deposits. Several nonoperative interventions, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasonography-guided needling (UGN), and surgical techniques have been described to treat calcific tendonitis with satisfactory outcomes. Clinical guidelines are lacking for surgical excision in cases refractory to nonoperative treatment. Several arthroscopic and open operative techniques have been described to treat calcific tendonitis with satisfactory clinical outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials is to compare outcomes and complications of nonoperative vs. operative management of chronic calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff, to provide evidence-based treatment guidelines for practitioners. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, and OVID [MEDLINE] were searched from database inception until February 20, 2022, for randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes related to operative or nonoperative management for calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. Clinical outcomes including pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (CMS), and resolution of calcific deposits were evaluated. Continuous data at last follow-up was pooled into mean differences using a random effects model for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies (2212 nonoperative patients and 140 operative patients) met the final inclusion criteria. Pooled mean difference in VAS for ESWT was -3.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.38, -2.27); P < .001), compared to -4.83 (95% CI -5.44, -4.22; P < .001) for UGN, and -4.65 (95% CI -5.47, -3.82; P < .001) for the operative interventions. Pooled mean difference in CMS score after ESWT was 18.30 (95% CI 10.95, 25.66; P < .001) compared to 22.01 (95% CI 8.17, 35.84; P = .002) for UGN, and 38.35 (95% CI 31.68, 45.02; P < .001) for the operative interventions. Eighty-five percent of patients receiving operative and 67% of patients receiving UGN management had complete radiographic resolution of calcific deposit. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of chronic calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff results in larger improvement in functional outcome scores and comparable pain reduction to nonoperative interventions, particularly UGN. Both operative and nonoperative treatment modalities are likely to have clinically significant improvements in function and pain, and thus it is reasonable to trial UGN and ESWT as first-line treatment. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be needed to support one treatment over the other. High-quality randomized controlled trials directly comparing nonoperative interventions to operative interventions in patients prior to failing conservative treatment are needed to establish high-quality evidence-based guidelines.

Determining the incidence and risk factors for short-term complications following distal biceps tendon repair.

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps rupture is a relatively uncommon injury that can significantly affect quality of life. Early complications following biceps tendon repair are not well described in the literature. This study utilizes a national surgical database to determine the incidence of and predictors for short-term complications following distal biceps tendon repair. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing distal biceps repair between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Patient demographic variables of sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, functional status, and several comorbidities were collected for each patient, along with 30-day postoperative complications. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate risk ratios for these complications using patient predictor variables. RESULTS: Early postoperative surgical complications (0.5%)-which were mostly infections (0.4%)-and medical complications (0.3%) were rare. A readmission risk factor was diabetes (risk ratio [RR], 4.238; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.180-15.218). Non-home discharge risk factors were smoking (RR, 3.006; 95% CI, 1.123-8.044) and ≥60 years of age (RR, 4.150; 95% CI, 1.611- 10.686). Maleness was protective for medical complications (RR, 0.024; 95% CI, 0.005-0.126). Surgical complication risk factors were obese class II (RR, 4.120; 95% CI, 1.123-15.120), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; RR, 21.981; 95% CI, 3.719-129.924), and inpatient surgery (RR, 8.606; 95% CI, 2.266-32.689). CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates after distal biceps repair are low. Various patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors were all predictive of short-term complications.

Reduced Opioid Prescription After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Affect Postoperative Pain or Prescription Refills: A Prospective, Surgeon-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate opioid utilization after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the setting of a multimodal pain regimen and assess the feasibility of prescribing fewer opioids to achieve adequate postoperative pain control. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in conjunction with a multimodal approach to pain control were randomized to receive either 30 or 60 tablets of hydrocodone (10 mg)-acetaminophen (325 mg). Patients were contacted at multiple time points up to 21 days after surgery to assess opioid utilization and medication side effects. We compared the mean number of tablets used between groups as the primary outcome. Preoperative variables associated with an increased risk of higher opioid pain medication requirements were also assessed. RESULTS: The final analysis included 43 patients in the 30-tablet group and 42 in the 60-tablet group. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of tablets consumed (9.5 vs 12.2, P = .22), number of days opioids were required (4.5 vs 6.2, P = .14), 3-month opioid refill rates (12% vs 7%, P = .48), or postoperative pain control at any point up to 21 days after surgery. The 30-tablet group had a significantly smaller proportion of unused tablets compared with the 60-tablet group (69% of prescribed tablets [910 tablets] vs 80% of prescribed tablets [2,027 tablets], P < .001). Opioids were required after surgery by 91% of patients (n = 77), and 81% could have had their pain medication requirements met with a prescription for 15 tablets. Risk factors for increased postoperative opioid use included a family history of substance abuse (ß = 14.1; 95% confidence interval, 5.7-22.4; P = .0014) and increased pain score at 2 hours after surgery (ß = 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.064-2.07; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic surgeons may significantly reduce the number opioid tablets prescribed after ACL reconstruction without affecting postoperative pain control or refill rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

A Current Update on Pelvifemoral Conditions That Should be in the Differential Diagnosis for Patients With Lower Extremity Radiculopathy.

Patients presenting to an outpatient spine clinic frequently report symptoms of low back pain with associated buttock, groin, and lower extremity pain. While many of these individuals suffer from lumbar spine radiculopathy, a number of different orthopedic pathologies can mimic these symptoms. Management depends substantially on a detailed history and physical examination, in addition to working from a broad list of differential diagnoses when evaluating these patients. It is imperative that spine practitioners have a comprehensive understanding of the differential diagnoses that may mimic those originating from the lumbar spine, especially when a patient's symptoms are atypical from classic radicular pain. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary testing and treatment, while delaying an accurate clinical assessment and treatment plan. This review highlights common orthopedic diagnoses that may present similar to lumbar spine pathologies and the evidence-based evaluation of these conditions.

Isolated Acetabuloplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Favorable Patient-Reported Outcomes and Sustained Survivorship at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate minimum 5-year outcomes and conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome with an isolated acetabular osteoplasty. METHODS: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with an isolated acetabular osteoplasty from March 2009 to June 2014 for FAI syndrome with pincer and/or cam morphology and a labral tear were identified. Those who underwent femoroplasty or prior ipsilateral hip surgery or who had previous hip conditions, ipsilateral hip dysplasia, or a Tönnis grade higher than 2 were excluded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores specific to physical functioning and pain interference, modified Harris Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool 12, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Patients were also queried about secondary surgical procedures and conversion to THA. RESULTS: We identified 86 patients at minimum 5-year follow-up (average, 7.4 years). The average patient age was 39.8 ± 12.3 years, 70.9% of patients were female, and 7% of patients had Tönnis grade 2. The mean PRO scores were 52.0 ± 8.9 for the PROMIS physical functioning score, 39.6 ± 7.5 for the PROMIS pain interference score, 78.7 ± 12.0 for the modified Harris Hip Score, 73.3 ± 23.1 for the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score, 89.9 ± 12.0 for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, and 81.4 ± 21.0 for the Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale. Of the patients, 72.1% achieved the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) according to previously established PASS scores for FAI syndrome treated with hip arthroscopy at minimum 5-year follow-up. The overall rate of revision arthroscopy was 3.5%, and the rate of conversion to THA was 5.8%. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated acetabular osteoplasty can provide sustained clinical benefits for the treatment of FAI syndrome with labral tears, with good to excellent PROs and PASS rates and a low rate of conversion to THA at minimum 5-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Evaluating the Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sports Surgery Fellowship Education.

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic forced many hospitals to cancel elective surgeries to minimize the risk of viral transmission and ensure the availability of vital health resources. The unintended consequences of this action on the education and training of orthopaedic sports surgeons are unknown. The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaedic sports surgery fellows, their education and training, and their readiness for practice. Methods A comprehensive survey was created and distributed to all U.S. fellows and fellowship directors registered with the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Responses were collected between April 22, 2020, and May 5, 2020. Results Fifty-one sports fellows and twenty-nine sports fellowship directors completed the survey. Over 80.4% of fellows reported a greater than 50% decrease in the case volume since the cessation of elective cases. Average hours worked per week decreased by 58.2% during the pandemic. Fellows reported completing an average of 324.6 ± 97.4 cases prior to the COVID-19 crisis and 86.0% expected to complete at least 11% to 25% fewer cases by graduation compared to previous fellows. 87.5% of fellows were not concerned about their ability to complete their fellowship training but more than one-third of fellows voiced concerns to their fellowship directors regarding their readiness for independent practice. Fellowship directors were generally not concerned that COVID-19 would prevent their fellows from completing the fellowship. At least 54.2% are somewhat concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on their future job opportunities. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has universally affected work hours and case volume of sports fellows. Nevertheless, most sports fellows feel prepared to enter practice and are generally supported by the confidence of their fellowship directors. The results of this survey emphasize the importance of the fellowship year in sports training and highlight the future of online education and simulation as useful adjuncts.

Frequency of overtime and consecutive games and their impact on injury rate in the National Hockey League (NHL).

OBJECTIVES: Ice hockey is a high-intensity contact sport that places athletes at an elevated risk for injury relative to other sports. The purpose of the current study was to analyze factors contributing to fatigue and decreased recovery time and their associations with injury incidence among professional athletes in the National Hockey League (NHL). METHODS: A retrospective review of all injuries suffered by NHL athletes during six consecutive seasons from 2013 to 2019 was performed. Team schedules were analyzed to assess (1) the number of instances with games on consecutive calendar days, (2) the number of overtime games, and (3) the number of overtime games within three calendar days of a previous overtime game. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated from this data to assess the association between these factors and injury rates. RESULTS: In total, 4886 injuries were suffered by NHL players during the period of study, with the 2013-2014 regular season highest injury rate per 1000 athletic exposures (15.8). The lower body was the most frequently injured body area (25.0% of all injuries), followed by injuries to the upper body (23.7%). In an analysis of the number of overtime games and games on consecutive days and their relationships to injury rate, only overtime games within three calendar days and total injuries were found to have a significant association (ρ = 0.19, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The weak positive correlation between the number of overtime games within threedays of a previous overtime game and total injuries in professional ice hockey players suggests that overtime games played within a short period of time place athletes at increased risk for injury. Further studies are necessary to address this on an athlete-by-athlete level.

Risk Factors for Increased Consumption of Narcotics After Hip Arthroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial.

INTRODUCTION: No accepted standard exists regarding the number of opioids to prescribe after many surgical procedures, and previous literature has indicated that the number of opioids prescribed influences the total number of pills consumed. The goal of this study was to investigate whether prescribing less opioids after hip arthroscopy results in less total postoperative utilization without compromising analgesia and identify risk factors for increased use. METHODS: This study randomized 111 patients to receive either 30 or 60 tablets of hydrocodone/acetaminophen 10 to 325 mg after hip arthroscopy. Demographic information, pain instruments, and scores including International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) were collected preoperatively. Postoperatively, patients were contacted over the course of 3 weeks to determine their Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores, total number of tablets taken/leftover, and the last day that they required narcotic pain medications, which were calculated and compared for each group. Preoperative variables that increased the risk of higher narcotic pain medication requirements were assessed. RESULTS: Patients in the 60-tablet group had significantly more tablets leftover than the 30-tablet group (49.5 versus 22.0, P < 0.001) and had no significant difference in Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores at 24 hours, 48 hours, or final follow-up. The 30- and 60-tablet groups demonstrated no significant difference in average tablets consumed (9.2 and 10.5, P = 0.60), respectively. Risk factors for increased postoperative opioid use included preoperative opioid use (B = 12.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.28-18.96, P < 0.001) or muscle relaxant use (B = 22.45, 95% CI, 7.59-37.31, P < 0.0036) within 1 year preoperatively. Preoperative iHOT-12 scoring also significantly predicted postoperative opioid consumption in this cohort (B = -0.25, 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.036, P < 0.022). CONCLUSION: The number of leftover tablets after hip arthroscopy can be significantly reduced by prescribing 30 tablets compared with 60 tablets without affecting postoperative pain control. Total tablets prescribed in this cohort did not affect total opioid utilization. Preoperative factors including opioid or muscle relaxant use and iHOT-12 scores can be used to predict postoperative opioid requirements.

Arthroscopic treatment of type II superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions in a younger population: minimum 2-year outcomes are similar between SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis.

PURPOSE: Compared to a relatively older population over 30-40 years of age, the efficacy of biceps tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions in a younger population is not well studied. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between biceps tenodesis and labral repair for type II SLAP lesions in a young active population. METHODS: Patients aged 15-40 who underwent primary arthroscopic biceps tenodesis or SLAP repair for type II SLAP tears between 2009 and 2016 were included. Shoulders with intraarticular chondral damage, full thickness rotator cuff tear, rotator cuff repair, labral repair outside of the superior labrum, bony subacromial decompression, and acromioclavicular joint resection were excluded. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Sports/Performing Arts Module (DASH-sport), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction. Return to sport rates were also recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (20 tenodesis, 33 repair) were available for minimum 2-year follow-up. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in mean ASES, DASH-sport, VAS, and satisfaction between groups [ASES: tenodesis 86.3 vs. repair 86.4 (n.s.); DASH-sport: 11.0 vs. 22.5 (n.s.); VAS: 1.85 vs. 1.64 (n.s.); satisfaction: 8.50 vs. 8.00 (n.s.)]. Rate of return to pre-injury level of performance/competition in sport/physical activity was also similar between groups [tenodesis 63% vs. repair 50% (n.s.)]. CONCLUSIONS: In a young active population, primary arthroscopic biceps tenodesis is a viable surgical alternative to labral repair for type II SLAP lesions. The results of this study suggest that indications for arthroscopic tenodesis can safely be expanded to a younger patient group than has previously been demonstrated in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Bilateral versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.

One in four patients presenting with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has bilateral symptoms, and despite excellent outcomes reported after arthroscopic treatment of FAI, there remains a paucity of data on the outcomes following bilateral hip arthroscopy. This systematic review aims to examine the outcomes following bilateral (either 'simultaneous' or 'staged') versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI. A systematic review of multiple electronic databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. All studies comparing simultaneous, staged and/or unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI were eligible for inclusion. Case series, case reports and reviews were excluded. All study, patient and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity among outcome measures. A total of six studies, including 722 patients (42.8% male) and 933 hips were eligible for inclusion. The mean age across patients was 35.5. The average time between staged procedures was 7.7 months. Four of the six studies were retrospective cohort studies, while the remaining two were prospective in nature. The overall quality of the eligible studies was found to be good. No significant difference was noted among patient-reported outcomes (modified Harris hip score, hip outcome score and non-arthritic hip score), visual analog scale, return to sport, traction time and complications between those undergoing bilateral (simultaneous or staged) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy. Based on the current available evidence, bilateral hip arthroscopy (whether simultaneous or staged) exhibits similar efficacy and safety when compared with unilateral hip arthroscopy. However, further prospective study is required to confirm this finding.

A Qualitative Assessment of Return to Sport in Collegiate Athletes: Does Gender Matter?

INTRODUCTION: Participation of female athletes in collegiate athletics continues to rise, but there remains a significant underrepresentation of this growth in the literature and lack of knowledge regarding the impact of gender on the college athlete experience. Our goal was to explore how collegiate female and male athletes perceive and approach return to sport after orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with collegiate varsity athletes from a single institution who underwent orthopaedic surgery following injury with at least two years follow-up. Athletes were asked about factors influencing recovery, rehabilitation, and their return to or retirement from sport. Codes, categories, and themes were derived within and across genders. RESULTS: Fifteen athletes (six females and nine males) were interviewed individually. Athletes shared similar experiences following injury, citing similar motivations driving them back to sport. Athletes stressed the importance of the athlete role to their identity regardless of gender. Our analysis revealed two gender-related challenges: male athletes commonly felt weight change was a barrier to successful recovery and often led to self-consciousness; while females expressed frustrations in lack of empathy from those they turned to for support. CONCLUSION: Female and male athletes shared some common supporting and challenging factors in return to sport following orthopaedic surgery. The most important findings of the present study were the differentiated challenges male versus female athletes experienced. Female athletes found difficulty with interpersonal relationships and external support, while male athletes struggled internally with their own body image and changing self-concept. This qualitative study provides a nuanced look at the experience of varsity athletes returning to sport following surgery. An understanding of the gendered experiences of collegiate athletes is critical to ensure all athletes in this unique population are supported as they cope with injury and seek to return to sport.