Effect of an Educational Intervention on Therapeutic Inertia in Neurologists With Expertise in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Therapeutic inertia (TI) is the failure to escalate therapy when treatment goals are unmet and is associated with low tolerance to uncertainty and aversion to ambiguity in physician decision-making. Limited information is available on how physicians handle therapeutic decision-making in the context of uncertainty. Objective: To evaluate whether an educational intervention decreases TI by reducing autonomic arousal response (pupil dilation), a proxy measure of how physicians respond to uncertainty during treatment decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial, 34 neurologists with expertise in multiple sclerosis (MS) practicing at 15 outpatient MS clinics in academic and community institutions from across Canada were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an educational intervention that facilitates treatment decisions (active group) or to receive no exposure to the intervention (usual care [control group]) from December 2017 to March 2018. Participants listened to 20 audio-recorded simulated case scenarios as pupil responses were assessed by eye trackers. Autonomic arousal was assessed as pupil dilation in periods in which critical information was provided (first period [T1]: clinical data, second period [T2]: neurologic status, and third period [T3]: magnetic resonance imaging data). Data were analyzed from September 2018 to March 2020. Interventions: The traffic light system (TLS)-based educational intervention vs usual care (unexposed). The TLS (use of established associations between traffic light colors and actions to stop or proceed) assists participants in identifying factors associated with worse prognosis in MS care, thereby facilitating the treatment decision-making process by use of established associations between red, green, and yellow colors and risk levels, and actions (treatment decisions). Main Outcomes and Measures: Pupil assessment was the primary autonomic outcome. To test the treatment effect of the educational intervention (TLS), difference-in-differences models (also called untreated control group design with pretest and posttest) were used. Results: Of 38 eligible participants, 34 (89.4%) neurologists completed the study. The mean (SD) age was 44.6 (11.6) years; 38.3% were female and 20 (58.8%) were MS specialists. Therapeutic inertia was present in 50.0% (17 of 34) of all participants and was associated with greater pupil dilation. For every additional SD of pupil dilation, the odds of TI increased by 51% for T1 (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.12-2.03), by 31% for T2 (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08-1.59), and by 49% for T3 (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13-1.97). The intervention significantly reduced TI (risk reduction, 31.5%; 95% CI, 16.1%-47.0%). Autonomic arousal responses mediated 29.0% of the effect of the educational intervention on TI. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the TLS intervention decreased TI as measured by pupil dilation, which suggests that individual autonomic arousal is an indicator of how physicians handle uncertainty when making live therapeutic decisions. Pupil response, a biomarker of TI, may eventually be useful in medical education. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134794.

Factors associated with therapeutic inertia among pharmacists caring for people with multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacists play a critical role on therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS) care. Therapeutic inertia (TI) is defined as the lack of treatment initiation or escalation when there was evidence of clinical and radiological disease activity. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with TI among pharmacists involved in MS care. METHODS: A multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional study involving hospital pharmacists in Spain was conducted. Participants answered questions regarding their standard practice, risk preferences, and management of nine simulated MS case-scenarios. We created a score defined as the number of case-scenarios that fit the TI criteria over the total number of presented cases (score range from 0-6). Similarly, an optimal treatment score (OTS) was created to determine the degree of appropriate pharmacological decisions (ranging from 0-lowest to 9-highest). Candidate predictors of TI included demographic data, practice setting, years of practice, MS expertise, number of MS patients managed at hospital/year, participation in MS clinical trials, and participants' risk preferences. RESULTS: Overall, 65 pharmacists initiated and completed the study (response rate: 45.5%). The mean age was 43.5 ± 7.8 years and 67.1% were female. Forty-two (64.6%) participants had specialization in MS management. Overall, the mean TI score was 3.4 ± 1.1. Of 390 individual responses, 224 (57.4%) met the TI criteria. All participants failed to recommend treatment escalation in at least one of the six case-scenarios. The mean OTS was 4.1 ± 1.4. Of 585 individual responses, 264 (45.1%) met the optimal choice criteria. Only 40% of participants (23/65) made five or more optimal treatment choices. Lower experience in dispensing MS drugs and lack of specialization in MS were the most common factors associated with TI and optimal management. The multivariable analysis revealed that more years of experience (p = 0.03), being a co-author of a peer-reviewed publication (p = 0.03), and specialization in MS (p = 0.017) were associated with lower TI scores (adjusted R2 = 0.23). CONCLUSION: Therapeutic inertia was observed in all pharmacist participants, affecting over fifty percent of MS treatment choices. Continuing education and specialization in MS may facilitate therapeutic decisions in MS care.

Emotional expressions associated with therapeutic inertia in multiple sclerosis care.

BACKGROUND: Emotions play a critical role in our daily decisions. However, it remains unclear how and what sort of emotional expressions are associated with therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS) care. Our goal was to evaluate the relationship between emotions and affective states (as captured by muscle facial activity and emotional expressions) and TI amongst neurologists caring for MS patients when making therapeutic decisions. METHODS: 38 neurologists with expertise in MS were invited to participate in a face-to-face study across Canada. Participants answered questions regarding their clinical practice, aversion to ambiguity, and the management of 10 simulated case-scenarios. TI was defined as lack of treatment initiation or escalation when there was clear evidence of clinical and radiological disease activity. We recorded facial muscle activations and their associated emotional expressions during the study, while participants made therapeutic choices. We used a validated machine learning algorithm of the AFFDEX software to code for facial muscle activations and a predefined mapping to emotional expressions (disgust, fear, surprise, etc.). Mixed effects models and mediation analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between ambiguity aversion, facial muscle activity/emotional expressions and TI measured as a binary variable and a continuous score. RESULTS: 34 (89.4%) neurologists completed the study. The mean age [standard deviation (SD)] was 44.6 (11.5) years; 38.3% were female and 58.8% self-identified as MS specialists. Overall, 17 (50%) participants showed TI in at least one case-scenario and the mean (SD) TI score was 0.74 (0.90). Nineteen (55.9%) participants had aversion to ambiguity in the financial domain. The multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex and MS expertise showed that aversion to ambiguity in the financial domain (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.32-1.86) was associated with TI. Most common muscle activations included mouth open (23.4%), brow furrow (20.9%), brow raise (17.6%), and eye widening (13.1%). Most common emotional expressions included fear (5.1%), disgust (3.2%), sadness (2.9%), and surprise (2.8%). After adjustment for age, sex, and physicians' expertise, the multivariate analysis revealed that brow furrow (OR 1.04; 95%CI 1.003-1.09) and lip suck (OR 1.06; 95%CI 1.01-1.11) were associated with an increase in TI prevalence, whereas upper lip raise (OR 0.30; 95%CI 0.15-0.59), and chin raise (OR 0.90; 95%CI 0.83-0.98) were associated with lower likelihood of TI. Disgust and surprise were associated with a lower TI score (disgust: p < 0.001; surprise: p = 0.008) and lower prevalence of TI (ORdisgust: 0.14, 95%CI 0.03-0.65; ORsurprise: 0.66, 94%CI 0.47-0.92) after adjusting for covariates. The mediation analysis showed that brow furrow was a partial mediator explaining 21.2% (95%CI 14.9%-38.9%) of the association between aversion to ambiguity and TI score, followed by nose wrinkle 12.8% (95%CI 8.9%-23.4%). Similarly, disgust was the single emotional expression (partial mediator) that attenuated (-13.2%, 95%CI -9.2% to -24.3%) the effect of aversion to ambiguity on TI. CONCLUSIONS: TI was observed in half of participants in at least one case-scenario. Our data suggest that facial metrics (e.g. brow furrow, nose wrinkle) and emotional expressions (e.g. disgust) are associated with physicians' choices and partially mediate the effect of aversion to ambiguity on TI.

Does attendance at the ECTRIMS congress impact on therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis care?

Conferences traditionally play an important role in the ongoing medical education of healthcare professionals. We assessed the influence of attending the ECTRIMS congress on therapeutic decision-making in multiple sclerosis (MS) care. A non-interventional, cross-sectional study involving 96 neurologists was conducted. Treatment escalation when therapeutic goals were unmet and management errors related to tolerability and safety scenarios of MS therapies were tested using different case-scenarios. Attendance at ECTRIMS was associated with an increase likelihood of treatment escalation in the presence of clinical progression (cognitive decline) and radiological activity (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.06-5.82) and lower number of management errors (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-0.98). Attendance at ECTRIMS may facilitate therapeutic decisions and reduction in management errors in MS care.

Therapeutic Inertia in Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Study of Canadian Neurologists.

Introduction: According to previous studies, therapeutic inertia (TI) may affect 7 out of 10 physicians who care for MS patients, particularly in countries where clinical guidelines are not widely used. Limited information is available on the prevalence of TI and its associated factors across Canada. Objectives: (i) To evaluate factors associated with TI amongst neurologists caring for MS patients across Canada; (ii) to compare the prevalence of TI observed in Canadian neurologists to the prevalence of TI observed in Argentinean, Chilean, and Spanish neurologists (historical controls from prior studies). Design: One hundred and eight neurologists with expertise in MS were invited to participate in an online study in Canada. Participants answered questions regarding their clinical practice, risk preferences, management of 10 simulated case-scenarios. The design of that study was similar to that of the prior studies completed in Argentina and Chile (n = 115). TI was defined as lack of treatment initiation or escalation when there was clear evidence of clinical and radiological disease activity (8 case-scenarios, 440 individual responses). A TI score was created & defined as the number of case-scenarios that fit the TI criteria over the total number of presented cases (score range from 0 to 8), with a higher score corresponding to a higher TI. TI scores observed in the Canadian study were compared with those observed in Argentina and Chile, as both studies followed the same design, case-scenarios and methodologies. Predictors of TI included demographic data, MS specialist vs. general neurologist, practice setting, years of practice, volume of MS patients and risk preferences. Results: Fifty-five Canadian neurologists completed the study (completion rate: 50.9%). The mean age (±SD) was 38.3 (±15) years; 47.3% of the participants were female and 56.4% self-identified as MS specialists. Overall, 54 of 440 (12.3%) individual responses were classified as TI. 60% of participants displayed TI in at least one case-scenario. The mean TI score across Canada [0.98 (SD = 1.15)] was significantly lower than the TI score observed in the Argentinean-Chilean [1.82 (SD = 1.47); p < 0.001] study. The multivariable analysis revealed that older age (p = 0.018), years of experience (p = 0.04) and willingness to risk further disease progression by avoiding treatment initiation or treatment change (p = 0.043) were independent predictors of TI. Conclusions: TI in Canada was observed in 6 out of 10 neurologists, affecting on average 1 in 8 therapeutic decisions in MS care. TI in Canada is significantly lower than in the other studied countries. Factors associated with TI include older age, lower years of experience, and willingness to risk disease progression by avoiding treatment initiation or treatment change. Differences in clinical practice patterns and adherence/access to accepted MS guidelines may explain how TI in Canada differs significantly from TI in Argentina-Chile.

Usability of an Educational Intervention to Overcome Therapeutic Inertia in Multiple Sclerosis Care.

Background: Educational interventions are needed to overcome knowledge-to-action gaps in clinical care. We previously tested the feasibility and potential efficacy of an educational intervention that facilitates treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis care. A demonstration of the usability of such an intervention is crucial prior to demonstration of efficacy in a large trial. Objectives: To evaluate the usability of a novel, pilot-tested intervention aimed at neurologists to improve therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS) care. Methods: We surveyed 50 neurologists from Chile, Argentina, and Canada randomized to an educational intervention arm of a pilot feasibility study using the System Usability Score (SUS) to assess the usability of a traffic light system (TLS)-based educational intervention. The TLS facilitates therapeutic decisions, allowing participants to easily recognize high-risk scenarios requiring treatment escalation. The SUS is a validated 10-item questionnaire with five response options. The primary outcome was the average and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the SUS score. Values above 68 are considered highly usable. Results: Of 50 neurologists invited to be part of the study, all completed the SUS scale and the study. For the primary outcome, the average usability score was 74.7 (95%CI 70.1-79.2). There was one outlier with a score of 35. The usability score excluding the outlier was 76.8 (95%CI 72.7-80.8). Multivariate analysis revealed no association between participants' characteristics and the SUS score. Conclusions: Our educational intervention has shown high usability among neurologists. The next step is to evaluate the effectiveness of this educational intervention in facilitating treatment decisions for the management of multiple sclerosis in a large trial.

Overcoming Therapeutic Inertia in Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial Applying the Traffic Light System in Medical Education.

BACKGROUND: Physicians often do not initiate or intensify treatments when clearly warranted, a phenomenon known as therapeutic inertia (TI). Limited information is available on educational interventions to ameliorate knowledge-to-action gaps in TI. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an educational intervention compared to usual care among practicing neurologists caring for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We conducted a pilot double-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Inclusion criteria included neurologists who are actively involved in managing MS patients. Participants were exposed to 20 simulated case-scenarios (10 cases at baseline, and 10 cases post-randomization to usual care vs. educational intervention) of relapsing-remitting MS with moderate or high risk of disease progression. The educational intervention employed a traffic light system (TLS) to facilitate decisions, allowing participants to easily recognize high-risk scenarios requiring treatment escalation. We also measured differences between blocks to invoke decision fatigue. The control group responded as they would do in their usual clinical practice not exposed to the educational intervention. The primary feasibility outcome was the proportion of participants who completed the study and the proportion of participants who correctly identified a high-risk case-scenario with the "red traffic light." Secondary outcomes included decision fatigue (defined as an increment of TI in the second block of case-scenarios compared to the first block) and the efficacy of the educational intervention measured as a reduction in TI for MS treatment. RESULTS: Of 30 neurologists invited to be part of the study, the participation rate was 83.3% (n = 25). Of the 25 participants, 14 were randomly assigned to the control group and 11 to the intervention group. TI was present in 72.0% of participants in at least one case scenario. For the primary feasibility outcome, the completion rate of the study was 100% (25/25 participants). Overall, 77.4% of participants correctly identified the "red traffic light" for clinical-scenarios with high risk of disease progression. Similarly, 86.4% of participants correctly identified the "yellow traffic light" for cases that would require a reassessment within 6-12 months. For the secondary fatigue outcome, within-group analysis showed a significant increased prevalence of TI in the second block of case-scenarios (decision fatigue) among participants randomized to the control group (TI pre-intervention 57.1% vs. TI post-intervention 71.4%; p = 0.015), but not in the active group (TI pre-intervention 54.6% vs. TI post-intervention 63.6%; p = 0.14). For the efficacy outcome, we found a non-significant reduction in TI for the targeted intervention compared to controls (22.6 vs. 33.9% post-intervention; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.26-1.22). CONCLUSION: An educational intervention applying the TLS is feasible and shows some promising results in the identification of high-risk scenarios to reduce decision fatigue and TI. Larger studies are needed to determine the efficacy of the proposed educational intervention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03134794.