Bridging the Gap: A Systematic Review on Reporting Baseline Characteristics, Process, and Outcome Parameters in Rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's Disease.

The variation in standardized, well-defined parameters in Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) research hinders overarching comparisons and complicates evaluations of care quality across healthcare settings. This review addresses the significant variability observed in these parameters as reported in recent publications. The goal is to compile a list of commonly described baseline characteristics, process and outcome measures, and to investigate disparities in their utilization and definitions. A systematic review of literature on the primary care process for HSCR was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Relevant literature published between 2015 and 2021 was obtained by combining the search term "Hirschsprung's disease" with "treatment outcome," "complications," "mortality," "morbidity," and "survival" in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We extracted study characteristics, reported process and outcome parameters, and patient and disease characteristics. We extracted 1,026 parameters from 200 publications and categorized these into patient characteristics (n = 226), treatment and care process characteristics (n = 199), and outcomes (n = 601). A total of 116 parameters were reported in more than 5% of publications. The most frequently reported characteristics were sex (88%), age at the time of surgery (66%), postoperative Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (64%), type of repair (57%), fecal incontinence (54%), and extent of aganglionosis (51%). This review underscores the pronounced variation in reported parameters within HSCR studies, highlighting the necessity for consistent, well-defined measures and reporting systems to foster improved data interpretability. Moreover, it advocates for the use of these findings in the development of a Core Indicator Set, complementing the recently developed Core Outcome Set. This will facilitate quality assessments across pediatric surgical centers throughout Europe.

Selection of Quality Indicators to Evaluate Quality of Care for Patients with Esophageal Atresia Using a Delphi Method.

OBJECTIVE: Survival of neonates with esophageal atresia (EA) is relatively high and stable, resulting in increased attention to optimizing care and longer-term morbidity. This study aimed to reach consensus on a quality indicator set for benchmarking EA care between hospitals, regions, or countries in a European clinical audit. METHODS: Using an online Delphi method, a panel of EA health care professionals and patient representatives rated potential outcome, structure, and process indicators for EA care identified through systematic literature and guideline review on a nine-point Likert scale in three questionnaires. Items were included based on predefined criteria. In rounds 2 and 3, participants were asked to select the five to ten most essential of the included indicators. RESULTS: An international panel of 14 patient representatives and 71 multidisciplinary health care professionals representing 41 European hospitals completed all questionnaires (response rate: 81%), eventually including 22 baseline characteristics and 32 indicators. After ranking, 10 indicators were prioritized by both stakeholder groups. In addition, each stakeholder group highly prioritized one additional indicator. Following an additional online vote by the other group, these were both added to the final set. CONCLUSION: This study established a core indicator set of twenty-two baseline characteristics, eight outcome indicators, one structure indicator, and three process indicators for evaluating (quality of) EA care in Europe. These indicators, covering various aspects of EA care, will be implemented in the European Pediatric Surgical Audit to enable recognition of practice variation and focus EA care improvement initiatives.

Outcome of functional treatment with a Lucerne Cast in patients with hand fractures: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcome of patients treated with a functional Lucerne Cast (LuCa) for different types of hand fractures. Static casting has traditionally been the preferred treatment for hand fractures. However, functional casting may lead to good functional outcomes, less stiffness, and earlier return to work. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all consecutive patients with a metacarpal or proximal phalangeal fracture treated with a LuCa between 2018 and 2019 was conducted. A total of 90 patients were included. Clinical data were collected directly from the patient's medical records. Functional outcome was assessed with the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). RESULTS: The median MHQ score was 95 (IQR 83-100) with a median follow-up of 23 months. Complications occurred in 7 of 90 patients (8%). Functional impairment occurred in two (2%) patients. Functional impairment was defined as stiffness, persisting rotational deformity, a boutonnière or swanneck deformity. Persisting pain or CRPS occurred in six (7%) patients. CONCLUSION: The LuCa shows to be effective in the functional treatment of both metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures with excellent patient-reported outcomes but at a relatively high rate of persisting pain.

Development and validation of a condition-specific quality of life instrument for adults with esophageal atresia: the SQEA questionnaire.

The importance of multidisciplinary long-term follow-up for adults born with esophageal atresia (EA) is increasingly recognized. Hence, a valid, condition-specific instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes imperative. This study aimed to develop and validate such an instrument for adults with EA. The Specific Quality of life in Esophageal atresia Adults (SQEA) questionnaire was developed through focus group-based item generation, pilot testing, item reduction and a multicenter, nationwide field test to evaluate the feasibility, reliability (internal and retest) and validity (structural, construct, criterion and convergent), in compliance with the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments guidelines. After pilot testing (n = 42), items were reduced from 144 to 36 questions. After field testing (n = 447), three items were discarded based on item-response theory results. The final SQEA questionnaire (33 items) forms a unidimensional scale generating an unweighted total score. Feasibility, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.94) and test-retest agreement (intra-class coefficient 0.92) were good. Construct validity was discriminative for esophageal replacement (P < 0.001), dysphagia (P < 0.001) and airway obstruction (P = 0.029). Criterion validity showed a good correlation with dysphagia (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.736). SQEA scores correlated well with other validated disease-specific HRQoL scales such as the GIQLI and SGRQ, but poorly with the more generic RAND-36. Overall, this first condition-specific instrument for EA adults showed satisfactory feasibility, reliability and validity. Additionally, it shows discriminative ability to detect disease burden. Therefore, the SQEA questionnaire is both a valid instrument to assess the HRQoL in EA adults and an interesting signaling tool, enabling clinicians to recognize more severely affected patients.