Respiratory tract viral infections associated sepsis in patients with underlying liver disease: Viral sepsis an entity to look forward!

BACKGROUND: Sepsis remains a global health burden associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Bacteria are known to be the predominant pathogens in sepsis; however, viral etiologies in sepsis are still under diagnosed. Respiratory viral pathogens have been previously linked to sepsis, but the knowledge of incidence, disease burden and mortality of viral-induced sepsis remains limited. This study aimed at understanding the role of respiratory viral infections in the causation of sepsis in liver disease patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of liver disease patients with influenza-like illness, whose requests for respiratory viral testing were received from January 2019 to December 2022, were reviewed. Respiratory viruses were identified using FilmArray 2.0 respiratory panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Utah, USA). RESULTS: Of 1391 patients tested, a respiratory viral etiology was detected in 23%. The occurrence of sepsis was seen in 35%. Among these, isolated viral etiology with no other bacterial/fungal coinfection was found in 55% of patients. Rhinovirus/Enterovirus was found as the most common underlying viral etiology (23.4%). The sepsis prevalence was higher among patients with associated comorbidities (45%) and decompensated cirrhosis (84%). On multi-variable analysis, no factor was found independently associated with sepsis-related mortality. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of isolated viral etiology in causation of sepsis among liver disease patients. Patients with comorbidities, older age and decompensated cirrhosis are at an increased risk of developing sepsis and are associated with poorer outcomes. Accurate and timely identification of the viral etiology in sepsis would prevent the misuse of antibiotics and improve overall patient care.

Effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, its effectiveness and safety in other populations, including those with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class B cirrhosis, is unclear. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from 1st May, 2020 till 5th October, 2022; the last date of access was January 31, 2023. Pooled progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiological response rate among patients receiving atezo-bev were compared between patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and among those receiving the drug as first-line and later line therapy. The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42022364430). Findings: Among 47 studies (n = 5400 patients), pooled PFS and OS were 6.86 (95% CI, 6.31-7.41) and 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.81-15.8), respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were 26.7% (24.6-29.1) and 75.3% (73.1-77.4) using RECIST criteria, and 34% (30.3-37.8) and 73.6% (68.8-78) using mRECIST criteria, respectively. Among those receiving atezo-bev, patients with CTP-B cirrhosis had similar ORRs by RECIST (odds ratio [OR], 1.42 [0.77-2.6]; P = 0.25) and mRECIST criteria (OR, 1.33 [0.52-3.39]; P = 0.53) but shorter PFS (mean difference [MD]:3.83 months [1.81-5.84]) than those with CTP-A cirrhosis. Compared to patients receiving TKIs, those receiving atezo-bev had longer PFS (MD: 2.27 months [0.94-3.5]) and higher ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.44 [1.01-2.04] and mRECIST: OR, 1.33 [1.01-1.75]). Compared to first-line therapy, later-line therapy had lower ORR (RECIST: OR, 1.82 [1.3-2.53]; P < 0.001 and mRECIST: OR, 2.02 [1.34-3.05]) but comparable PFS (MD: 0.58 months [-0.18 to 1.35]) among nine studies. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events among patients with CTP-A and CTP-B cirrhosis was comparable (OR, 0.89 [0.45-1.74]) as it was for patients receiving atezo-bev and TKIs (OR, 0.86 [0.61-1.2]). Interpretation: Our findings suggest that atezo-bev is safe and effective as first-line systemic therapy for patients with uHCC and CTP-A or CTP-B cirrhosis. Funding: An unsolicited grant from ROCHE Products India Pvt Ltd. was received for publication.

A randomized-controlled trial comparing 20% albumin to plasmalyte in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension [ALPS trial].

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The choice of resuscitation fluid in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension is unclear. 5% albumin was superior to normal saline in the FRISC study. We compared the efficacy and safety of 20% albumin, which has greater oncotic properties, to plasmalyte in reversing sepsis-induced hypotension. METHODS: Critically ill patients with cirrhosis underwent open-label randomization to receive either 20% albumin (0.5-1.0 g/kg over 3 hours; n = 50) or plasmalyte (30 ml/kg over 3 hours, n = 50). The primary endpoint of the study was the attainment of mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg at 3 hours. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable in albumin and plasmalyte groups; arterial lactate (6.16±3.18 mmol/L vs. 6.38±4.77 mmol/L; p = 0.78), MAP (51.4±6.52 mmHg vs. 49.9±4.45 mmHg; p = 0.17) and SOFA score (10.8±2.96 vs. 11.1±4.2; p = 0.68), respectively. Most patients were alcoholics (39%) and had pneumonia (40%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, albumin was superior to plasmalyte in achieving the primary endpoint (62% vs. 22%; p <0.001). A faster decline in arterial lactate (p = 0.03), a reduced need for dialysis (48% vs. 62%; p = 0.16), and a longer time to initiation of dialysis (in hours) (68.13±47.79 vs. 99.7± 63.4; p = 0.06) were seen with albumin. However, the 28-day mortality rate was not different (58% vs. 62%, p = 0.57) and treatment had to be discontinued in 11 (22%) patients in the albumin group due to adverse effects compared to no discontinuations in the plasmalyte group. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension, 20% albumin leads to a faster improvement in hemodynamics and lactate clearance than plasmalyte, while 28-day survival was similar. However, patients on 20% albumin need to be closely monitored as it was more often associated with pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02721238. LAY SUMMARY: The current randomized-controlled trial performed in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension highlights that 20% albumin restores arterial pressure more quickly but causes more pulmonary complications than plasmalyte. The impact on renal functions was also modest. These effects did not result in improvement in survival at 28 days. Plasmalyte is safer and well-tolerated and can be considered for volume resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension.

Safety and efficacy of terlipressin in acute-on-chronic liver failure with hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI): a prospective cohort study.

Terlipressin with albumin, the recommended treatment for hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI), is associated with adverse events. Furthermore, the course of AKI in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is unknown. We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of terlipressin infusion and AKI course in patients with ACLF. We prospectively enrolled consecutive adult patients with ACLF with HRS-AKI (satisfying EASL criteria) treated with terlipressin infusion between 14 October 2019 and 24 July 2020. The objectives were to assess the incidence of adverse events, response to terlipressin, course of HRS-AKI and predictors of mortality. A total of 116 patients were included. Twenty-one percent of patients developed adverse effects. Only 1/3rd of patients who developed adverse events were alive at day 90. Sixty-five percent of the patients responded to terlipressin. Nearly 22% developed recurrence of HRS, and 5.2% progressed to HRS-chronic kidney disease. TFS was 70.4% at day 30 and 57.8% at day 90. On multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis terlipressin non-response (hazard ratio [HR], 3.49 [1.85-6.57]; P < 0.001) and MELD NA score (HR,1.12 [1.06-1.18]; P < 0.001) predicted mortality at day-90. Patients with ACLF who develop terlipressin related adverse events have dismal prognoses. Terlipressin non-response predicts mortality in patients with ACLF and HRS-AKI.

Midodrine Improves the Tolerability of Diuretics in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure-A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome of acute portal hypertension with high short-term mortality. ACLF patients have low mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance, and high cardiac output. This, in turn, leads to an increased incidence of ascites, acute kidney injury, and hyponatremia. We evaluated the role of the early addition of midodrine, which has not been analyzed to date. METHODS: ACLF patients who were started on midodrine (Gr. A) in addition to standard of care (SOC) for ascites control were included and compared with those who received only SOC (Gr. B). The aim was to assess the hemodynamics, ascites control, diuretic-related complications, and mortality at 1 month. RESULTS: Forty-five ACLF patients (Gr. A-21; Gr. B-24) were included in the pilot study. At inclusion, the baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. The dose of midodrine was 22.5 (7.5-22.5) mg/day for 22.29 ± 8.75 days in Gr. A. Midodrine significantly improved the MAP and urinary sodium excretion. Only 33.34% of patients required paracentesis in Gr. A compared with 62.5% in Gr. B (p = 0.05). Gr. A patients tolerated a higher dose of diuretics than Gr. B. Diuretic-related complications developed in 54.2% of patients in Gr. B compared with only 23.8% in Gr. A (p = 0.03). Fourteen percent in Gr. A developed side effects to midodrine and required dose modification. Mortality at day 30 was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of midodrine improves the hemodynamics, tolerability of diuretics, and ascites control in ACLF patients.