Bioengineering solutions for ureteric disorders: clinical need, challenges and opportunities.

OBJECTIVES: To summarise the causes of ureteric damage and the current standard of care, discussing the risks and benefits of available therapeutic options. We then focus on the current and future solutions that can be provided by ureteric bioengineering and provide a description of the ideal characteristics of a bioengineered product. METHODS: We performed a literature search in February 2021 in: Google Scholar, Medline, and Web of Science. Three searches were conducted, investigating: (a) the epidemiology of ureteric pathology, (b) the current standard of care, and (c) the state of the art in ureteric bioengineering. RESULTS: The most-common causes of ureteric damage are iatrogenic injury and external trauma. Current approaches to treatment include stent placement or surgical reconstruction. Reconstruction can be done using either urological tissue or segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Limitations include scarring, strictures, and infections. Several bioengineered alternatives have been explored in animal studies, with variations in the choice of scaffold material, cellular seeding populations, and pre-implantation processing. Natural grafts and hybrid material appear to be associated with superior outcomes. Furthermore, seeding of the scaffold material with stem cells or differentiated urothelial cells allows for better function compared to acellular scaffolds. Some studies have attempted to pre-implant the graft in the omentum prior to reconstruction, but this has yet to prove any definitive benefits. CONCLUSION: There is an unmet clinical need for safer and more effective treatment for ureteric injuries. Urological bioengineering is a promising solution in preclinical studies. However, substantial scientific, logistic, and economic challenges must be addressed to harness its transformative potential in improving outcomes.

The use of intravesical hyaluronic acid in the management of symptomatic premenopausal women with pseudomembranous trigonitis: Are symptoms related to cystoscopy and pathological findings?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of intravesical hyaluronic acid (HA) in symptomatic women with trigonitis and to correlate the severity of symptoms with the endoscopic and histological findings. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (aged 20-46 years) were enrolled. All patients had cystoscopy and biopsy of the bladder trigone followed by intravesical instillations of sodium HA once weekly for 10 weeks and then once monthly for the next 10 months. Clinical response was evaluated by Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Symptom Scale, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and urgency and functional bladder capacity. A repeat cystoscopy and biopsy were performed at the end of the treatment. Symptoms and cystoscopy and pathological findings were compared before and after treatment. RESULTS: The average initial score for pain was reduced from 5.5 to 2.8 (P < 0.001) at 10 weeks and further to 2.4 (P < 0.001) at 12 months and the score for urgency from 6.9 to 3.8 (P < 0.001) and further to 3.3 (P < 0.001). The average PUF score initially decreased from 20.5 to 12.1 (P < 0.001) and then further to 10.1 (P = 0.21). The mean functional bladder capacity increased from 125 to 204 mL (P < 0.001). No association was found between baseline PUF score and cystoscopy findings (P = 0.87). The PUF score was not changed significantly between patients with improved cystoscopy and those with stable findings (P = 0.74). No significant changes were reported between initial and final biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical HA appeared to be effective and well tolerated, although a clear relationship between symptoms and trigonitis was not confirmed.