Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biofouling ; 36(4): 479-491, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32546074

ABSTRACT

Coumarins have been shown to possess antimicrobial, anti-quorum sensing and anti-biofilm properties against a wide range of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to shed light on the effects of non-substituted coumarin on biofilm formation by the foodborne pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium. Additionally, its efficacy was tested in combination with another potent anti-biofilm agent, resveratrol. Coumarin inhibited biofilm formation for prolonged periods in millimolar concentrations with marginal effects on planktonic growth. It attenuated curli and cellulose production, likely by downregulating the transcript levels of major biofilm formation genes csgD, csgA and adrA. Coumarin further restricted motility in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, coumarin with resveratrol exhibited improved anti-biofilm properties compared with the individual compounds alone. Thus, coumarin alone or with resveratrol can be employed for inhibiting biofilms in food storage and processing units.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Coumarins/pharmacology , Salmonella typhimurium , Biofilms/growth & development
2.
J Biosci ; 452020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32345776

ABSTRACT

The hallmarks of the adaptive immune response are specificity and memory. The cellular response is mediated by T cells which express cell surface T cell receptors (TCRs) that recognize peptide antigens in complex with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on antigen presenting cells (APCs). However, binding of cognate TCRs with MHC-peptide complexes alone (signal 1) does not trigger optimal T cell activation. In addition to signal 1, the binding of positive and negative costimulatory receptors to their ligands modulates T cell activation. This complex signaling network prevents aberrant activation of T cells. CD28 is the main positive costimulatory receptor on nai¨ve T cells; upon activation, CTLA4 is induced but reduces T cell activation. Further studies led to the identification of additional negative costimulatory receptors known as checkpoints, e.g. PD1. This review chronicles the basic studies in T cell costimulation that led to the discovery of checkpoint inhibitors, i.e. antibodies to negative costimulatory receptors (e.g. CTLA4 and PD1) which reduce tumor growth. This discovery has been recognized with the award of the 2018 Nobel prize in Physiology/Medicine. This review highlights the structural and functional roles of costimulatory receptors, the mechanisms by which checkpoint inhibitors work, the challenges encountered and future prospects.


Subject(s)
Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell Receptors/physiology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Antigen-Presenting Cells/immunology , CD28 Antigens/chemistry , CD28 Antigens/metabolism , CTLA-4 Antigen/chemistry , CTLA-4 Antigen/metabolism , Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell Receptors/chemistry , Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell Receptors/genetics , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/metabolism , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/physiology
3.
Microbiology (Reading) ; 166(5): 460-473, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32159509

ABSTRACT

The ability of bacteria to form biofilms increases their survival under adverse environmental conditions. Biofilms have enormous medical and environmental impact; consequently, the factors that influence biofilm formation are an important area of study. In this investigation, the roles of two cold shock proteins (CSP) during biofilm formation were investigated in Salmonella Typhimurium, which is a major foodborne pathogen. Among all CSP transcripts studied, the expression of cspE (STM14_0732) was higher during biofilm growth. The cspE deletion strain (ΔcspE) did not form biofilms on a cholesterol coated glass surface; however, complementation with WT cspE, but not the F30V mutant, was able to rescue this phenotype. Transcript levels of other CSPs demonstrated up-regulation of cspA (STM14_4399) in ΔcspE. The cspA deletion strain (ΔcspA) did not affect biofilm formation; however, ΔcspEΔcspA exhibited higher biofilm formation compared to ΔcspE. Most likely, the higher cspA amounts in ΔcspE reduced biofilm formation, which was corroborated using cspA over-expression studies. Further functional studies revealed that ΔcspE and ΔcspEΔcspA exhibited slow swimming but no swarming motility. Although cspA over-expression did not affect motility, cspE complementation restored the swarming motility of ΔcspE. The transcript levels of the major genes involved in motility in ΔcspE demonstrated lower expression of the class III (fliC, motA, cheY), but not class I (flhD) or class II (fliA, fliL), flagellar regulon genes. Overall, this study has identified the interplay of two CSPs in regulating two biological processes: CspE is essential for motility in a CspA-independent manner whereas biofilm formation is CspA-dependent.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/physiology , Biofilms/growth & development , Cold Shock Proteins and Peptides/physiology , Salmonella typhimurium/genetics , Salmonella typhimurium/physiology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Biological Phenomena , Cold Shock Proteins and Peptides/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial , Genetic Complementation Test , Movement , Mutation , Salmonella typhimurium/ultrastructure , Up-Regulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...