Multicomponent perioperative interventions to improve outcomes for frail patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative frailty is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. In 2017, McIsaac and colleagues' systematic review found that few interventions improved outcomes in this population and evidence was low-quality. We aimed to systematically review the evidence for multicomponent perioperative interventions in frail patients that has emerged since McIsaac et al.'s review. METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched for English-language studies published since January 1, 2016, that evaluated multicomponent perioperative interventions in patients identified as frail. Quality was assessed using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis of the extracted data was conducted. RESULTS: Of 2835 articles screened, five studies were included, all of which were conducted in elective oncologic gastrointestinal surgical populations. Four hundred and thirteen patients were included across the five studies and the mean/median age ranged from 70.1 to 87.0 years. Multicomponent interventions were all applied in the preoperative period. Two studies also applied interventions postoperatively. All interventions addressed exercise and nutritional domains with variability in timing, delivery, and adherence. Multicomponent interventions were associated with reduced postoperative complications, functional deterioration, length of stay, and mortality. Four studies reported on patient-centred outcomes. The quality of evidence was fair. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides evidence that frail surgical patients undergoing elective oncologic gastrointestinal surgery may benefit from targeted multicomponent perioperative interventions. Yet methodological issues and substantial heterogeneity of the interventions precludes drawing clear conclusions regarding the optimal model of care. Larger, low risk of bias studies are needed to evaluate optimal intervention delivery, effectiveness in other populations, implementation in health care settings and ascertain outcomes of importance for frail patients and their carers.

A Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Patients Presenting to Townsville Hospital Emergency Department With Chest Pain.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous Australians have a high rate of ischaemic heart disease (IHD). There is a paucity of local data for North Queensland regarding the clinical characteristics of Indigenous people who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. The aim of the study is to compare the cardiovascular risk factors, social characteristics, and the clinical outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients who presented with cardiac-related chest pain. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre audit. The data was collected through chart reviews of chest pain presentations to the Townsville University Hospital Emergency Department, Queensland, Australia, from January to December 2017. We categorised the patients into Indigenous and non-Indigenous groups and compared their cardiac risk factors and social characteristics. We further classified the patients into three diagnosis groups and we measured the clinical outcomes in the patients with a diagnosis of cardiac-related chest pain. We used a data linkage to the Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages for the death outcomes. A multivariable analysis was done to determine the risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) for Indigenous vs non-Indigenous patients. RESULTS: Indigenous patients were over-represented making up 19.1% of the total cohort (compared with 11.1% of the North Queensland Indigenous population) and presented at a younger age (median age: 45 vs 52, p<0.005). Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were significantly higher in Indigenous patients. The incidence of discharge against medical advice was also higher (6.5% vs 2.7%, p<0.005). There was an underutilisation of the local chest pain pathway amongst the Indigenous group (35.8% vs 44.7%, p<0.005). In patients with a diagnosis of cardiac-related chest pain, the rate of receiving invasive coronary angiogram procedures was similar in both cohorts (44.5% vs 43.7%, p=0.836). With regards to outcomes, Indigenous patients suffered from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a younger median age (51 vs 64, p<0.005) and were more likely to have severe three vessel disease (17% vs 6%, p<0.005) leading to coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG) (19% vs 6%, p<0.005). When adjusted for age, gender, and comorbidities, Indigenous patients were more likely to have MACE within 1 year of their chest pain presentation, compared with non-Indigenous patients with the same diagnosis (adjusted odds ration [AOR]=2.0, 95% CI [1.1, 3.8], p=0.03). CONCLUSION: In our study, Indigenous patients carried a heavier burden of cardiovascular risk factors, presented at a younger age, with more severe coronary disease and had a higher rate of CABG. We found an underutilisation of the local chest pain protocol amongst the Indigenous cohort, which suggests a need to improve support structures in the ED. In our multivariable analysis, Indigenous patients suffered from a significantly higher MACE compared to non-Indigenous patients which indicates that more collaborative efforts are needed to improve the cardiovascular health of local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Association Between Indigenous Status and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison of Coronary Angiogram Findings in Patients With Chest Pain Presenting to a Regional Hospital Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death amongst Indigenous Australians accounting for 12.1% of all deaths in this population. However, there is little evidence to suggest that Indigenous status is an independent risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease. This study assessed the association between Indigenous status and the severity of CAD in patients presenting with chest pain at a regional hospital emergency department. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre audit over 12 months from January to December 2017. Charts were reviewed for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients 18 years and older who presented with chest pain and subsequently underwent an invasive coronary angiogram. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association of Indigenous status with the severity of CAD. RESULTS: Indigenous patients are 2.7 times more likely to experience significant CAD compared to non-Indigenous patients (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.73, 95% CI [1.38, 5.39], p≤0.001) even after adjusting for other risk factors. Those aged 65 years and older are more prone to significant CAD (AOR=2.96, 95% CI [1.12, 7.78], p=0.03), while women were less likely to have significant CAD compared to men, (AOR=0.46, 95% CI [0.27, 0.78], p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In this study cohort, our analysis indicates that there is a strong association between Indigenous status and significant coronary artery disease, independent of the increased burden of traditional cardiovascular risk factors among Indigenous Australians.

The relationship between the five minute Apgar score, mode of birth and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the five-minute Apgar score categories (low, intermediate, and normal), mode of birth and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross sectional study of term singleton deliveries at Mater Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane, Australia between January 2007 and December 2015. The five minute score was subdivided in to three categories - low (0-3), intermediate (4-6), and normal (≥7). These were correlated with adverse neonatal outcomes and mode of birth. The referent cohort was the normal Apgar group. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 39,258 births with a recorded five minute Apgar score. Of these, 38,705 (98.6%) neonates had a normal (≥7) Apgar score, 439 (1.1%) had an intermediate score (4-6) and 114 (0.3%) had a low (0-3) score. Neonatal complications including respiratory distress, feeding problems, hypothermia, and seizures were all significantly associated with both low and intermediate Apgar scores. Emergency operative birth (caesarean and instrumental) conveyed a higher risk of low and intermediate scores and poorer neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Low and intermediate five minute Apgar scores were strongly associated with mode of birth and poorer neonatal outcomes.

Pregnancy Outcome in Cartilage-Hair Hypoplasia, a Rare Form of Dwarfism.

Background. This case report discusses the pregnancy outcome of a patient with cartilage-hair hypoplasia, a rare form of dwarfism, and multiple previous orthopedic surgeries. Literature on pregnancy outcomes in patients with cartilage-hair hypoplasia is limited. Case. A 32-year-old patient with cartilage-hair hypoplasia presented at 12 weeks' gestation to the high-risk obstetrics clinic for care. Preterm labor resulted in cesarean delivery at 34 weeks' gestation with general anesthetic. Breastfeeding was stopped at 6 weeks due to neonatal complications. Conclusion. Pregnancy and delivery were uncomplicated. A multidisciplinary approach allowed for effective management during pregnancy and postnatal care. This is the first known documented case of prenatal care, delivery, and breastfeeding in a woman with this rare disorder.