ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study in chronic spinal cord injury with cervical lesions (cSCI). OBJECTIVE: To determine the corticomotor projection and motor cortex organization of paralyzed forearm muscles that presented only liminal voluntary activation. SETTING: Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, USA. METHODS: We identified ten people with chronic SCI who had a wrist flexor or extensor muscle with a motor power (MP) of 1 over 5. We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex of the hemisphere contralateral to the target muscle. We measured resting motor threshold (RMT), corticomotor latency (LTY), MEP amplitude (AMP) and performed cortical motor mapping to determine the optimal site (OPT) and map area (AREA). Results were compared with the data from 18 controls. RESULTS: A MEP in the target muscle was observed for all cSCI cases. LTY was normal, while corticomotor excitability (as determined by RMT and AMP) was reduced in about half of the group. The OPT site of the motor maps was within control range for all cSCI cases, while AREA was reduced in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: Corticomotor conduction and cortical topography were appreciably normal despite only liminal activation of the target muscle with voluntary effort. Muscles with these characteristics may benefit from a targeted rehabilitation program even in the chronic phase after SCI.
Subject(s)
Forearm/physiopathology , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Adult , Brain Mapping/methods , Chronic Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electromyography , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Female , Forearm/innervation , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/innervation , Neural Conduction , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Combining tDCS with robotic therapy is a new and promising form of neurorehabilitation after stroke, however the effectiveness of this approach is likely to be influenced by the relative timing of the brain stimulation and the therapy. OBJECTIVE: To measure the kinematic and neurophysiological effects of delivering tDCS before, during and after a single session of robotic motor practice (wrist extension). METHODS: We used a within-subjects repeated-measurement design in 12 chronic (>6 months) stroke survivors. Twenty minutes of anodal tDCS was delivered to the affected hemisphere before, during, or after a 20-minute session of robotic practice. Sham tDCS was also applied during motor practice. Robotic motor performance and corticomotor excitability, assessed through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), were evaluated pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Movement speed was increased after motor training (sham tDCS) by â¼20%. Movement smoothness was improved when tDCS was delivered before motor practice (â¼15%). TDCS delivered during practice did not offer any benefit, whereas it reduced speed when delivered after practice (â¼10%). MEPs were present in â¼50% of patients at baseline; in these subjects motor practice increased corticomotor excitability to the trained muscle. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of stroke survivors, motor performance kinematics improved when tDCS was delivered prior to robotic training, but not when delivered during or after training. The temporal relationship between non-invasive brain stimulation and neurorehabilitation is important in determining the efficacy and outcome of this combined therapy.
Subject(s)
Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Robotics/methods , Stroke Rehabilitation , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Aged , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Time FactorsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVES: To identify preserved corticomotor connection in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) in the absence of clinically observable movement. SETTING: Rehabilitation Hospital and Medical Research Institute, NY, USA. METHODS: The motor-evoked potential (MEP) response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was recorded using surface electromyography from the right biceps brachii, extersor carpi radialis (ECR), flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles in a 31-year-old male traumatic SCI chronic patient-ASIA B, injury level C5. Motor power scores were additionally obtained from a clinician blinded to the results of TMS. RESULTS: TMS could consistently elicit MEPs of normal latency, phase and amplitude, in the severely affected ECR muscle but not the similarly affected FCR muscle. The response in proximal and unaffected biceps muscle was larger than the healthy subject, whereas no response was obtained in the distal APB muscle as expected. CONCLUSION: TMS can identify residual pathways not apparent from clinical assessment alone, which may have prescriptive value for rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Arm/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Adult , Electric Stimulation/methods , Humans , Male , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Movement/physiology , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methodsABSTRACT
Repetitive finger tapping is a well-established clinical test for the evaluation of parkinsonian bradykinesia, but few studies have investigated other finger movement modalities. We compared the kinematic changes (movement rate and amplitude) and response to levodopa during a conventional index finger-thumb-tapping task and an unconstrained index finger flexion-extension task performed at maximal voluntary rate (MVR) for 20 s in 11 individuals with levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease (OFF and ON) and 10 healthy age-matched controls. Between-task comparisons showed that for all conditions, the initial movement rate was greater for the unconstrained flexion-extension task than the tapping task. Movement rate in the OFF state was slower than in controls for both tasks and normalized in the ON state. The movement amplitude was also reduced for both tasks in OFF and increased in the ON state but did not reach control levels. The rate and amplitude of movement declined significantly for both tasks under all conditions (OFF/ON and controls). The time course of rate decline was comparable for both tasks and was similar in OFF/ON and controls, whereas the tapping task was associated with a greater decline in MA, both in controls and ON, but not OFF. The findings indicate that both finger movement tasks show similar kinematic changes during a 20-s sustained MVR, but that movement amplitude is less well sustained during the tapping task than the unconstrained finger movement task. Both movement rate and amplitude improved with levodopa; however, movement rate was more levodopa responsive than amplitude.
Subject(s)
Fingers/physiopathology , Hypokinesia/physiopathology , Movement/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Female , Humans , Hypokinesia/complications , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Psychomotor Performance/physiologyABSTRACT
A single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse typically evokes a short series of spikes in corticospinal neurons [known as indirect (I)-waves] which are thought to arise from transynaptic input. Delivering a second pulse at inter-pulse intervals (IPIs) corresponding to the timing of these I-waves leads to a facilitation of the response, and if stimulus pairs are delivered repeatedly, a persistent LTP-like increase in excitability can occur. This has been demonstrated at an IPI of 1.5 ms, which corresponds to the first I-wave interval, in an intervention referred to as ITMS (I-wave TMS), and it has been argued that this may have similarities with timing-dependent plasticity models. Consequently, we hypothesized that if the second stimulus is delivered so as not to coincide with I-wave timing, it should lead to LTD. We performed a crossover study in 10 subjects in which TMS doublets were timed to coincide (1.5-ms IPI, ITMS(1.5)) or not coincide (2-ms IPI, ITMS(2)) with I-wave firing. Single pulse motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, resting motor threshold (RMT), and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) were measured from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. After ITMS(1.5) corticomotor excitability was increased by ~60% for 15 min (P < 0.05) and returned to baseline by 20 min. Increasing the IPI by just 500 µs to 2 ms reversed the aftereffect, and MEP amplitude was significantly reduced (~35%, P < 0.05) for 15 min before returning to baseline. This reduction was not associated with an increase in SICI, suggesting a reduction in excitatory transmission rather than an increase in inhibitory efficacy. RMT also remained unchanged, suggesting that these changes were not due to changes in membrane excitability. Amplitude-matching ITMS(2) did not modulate excitability. The results are consistent with timing-dependent synaptic LTP/D-like effects and suggest that there are plasticity mechanisms operating in the human motor cortex with a temporal resolution of the order of a few hundreds of microseconds.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Synapses/physiology , Adult , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic StimulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Stimulation intensity (SI) in transcranial magnetic stimulation is commonly set in relation to motor threshold (MT), or to achieve a motor-evoked potential (MEP) of predefined amplitude (usually 1 mV). Recently, IFCN recommended adaptive threshold-hunting over the previously endorsed relative-frequency method. We compared the Rossini-Rothwell (R-R) relative-frequency method to an adaptive threshold-hunting method based on parameter estimation by sequential testing (PEST) for determining MT and the SI to target a MEP amplitude of 1 mV (I(1) mV). METHODS: In 10 healthy controls we determined MT and I(1) mV with R-R and PEST using a blinded crossover design, and performed within-session serial PEST measurements of MT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between methods for MT (52.6±2.6% vs. 53.7±3.1%; p=0.302; % maximum stimulator output; R-R vs. PEST, respectively) or I(1) mV (66.7±3.0% vs. 68.8±3.8%; p=0.146). There was strong correlation between R-R and PEST estimates for both MT and I(1) mV. R-R required significantly more stimuli than PEST. Serial measurements of MT with PEST were reproducible. CONCLUSIONS: PEST has the advantage of speed without sacrificing precision when compared to the R-R method, and is adaptable to other SI targets. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results in healthy controls add to increasing evidence in favour of adaptive threshold-hunting methods for determining SI.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Motor Cortex/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
The performance of a repetitive index finger flexion-extension task at maximal voluntary rate (MVR) begins to decline just a few seconds into the task and we have previously postulated that this breakdown has a central origin. To test this hypothesis, we have combined two objectives; to determine whether motor practice can lessen the performance deterioration in an MVR task, and whether further gains can be achieved with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol that increases corticomotor excitability (CME). Eleven right-handed subjects participated in a randomized crossover study design that consisted of a 15-min interventional TMS at I-wave periodicity (ITMS) and single-pulsed Sham intervention prior to six 10-s practice sets of a repetitive finger flexion-extension task at MVR. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The starting movement rate, and the percentage decline in rate by the end of the MVR were quantitated. Training of the MVR task improved the sustainability of the task by reducing the decline in movement rate. CME increased steadily after each training bout, and this increase was maintained up to 20 min after the last bout. ITMS further increased CME, and was associated with an increase in both the starting rate of the MVR task and its sustainability, when compared to Sham. The results implicate central motor processes in the performance and sustainability of the MVR task, and indicate that MVR kinematics can improve with short-term training and with non-invasive neuro-modulation.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Learning/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Fingers/physiology , Humans , Male , Reaction Time/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Young AdultABSTRACT
Previous studies on handedness have often reported functional asymmetries in corticomotor excitability (CME) associated with voluntary movement. Recently, we have shown that the degree of post-exercise corticomotor depression (PED) and increase in short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) after a repetitive finger movement task was less when the task was performed at a maximal voluntary rate (MVR) than when it was performed at a submaximal sustainable rate (SR). In the current study, we have compared the time course of PED and SICI in the dominant (DOM) and nondominant (NDOM) hands after an MVR and SR finger movement task to determine the influence of hand dominance and task demand. We tracked motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the DOM and NDOM hand for 20 min after a 10-s index finger flexion-extension task at MVR and SR. For all hand-task combinations, we report a period of PED and increased SICI lasting for up to 8 min. We find that the least demanding task, one that involved index finger movement of the DOM hand at SR, was associated with the greatest change in PED and SICI from baseline (63.6±5.7% and 79±2%, P<0.001, PED and SICI, respectively), whereas the most demanding task (MVR of the NDOM hand) was associated with the least change from baseline (PED: 88.1±3.6%, SICI: 103±2%; P<0.001). Our findings indicate that the changes in CME and inhibition associated with repetitive finger movement are influenced both by handedness and the degree of demand of the motor task and are inversely related to task demand, being smallest for an MVR task of the NDOM hand and greatest for an SR task of the DOM hand. The findings provide additional evidence for differences in neuronal processing between the dominant and nondominant hemispheres in motor control.
Subject(s)
Exercise/physiology , Functional Laterality/physiology , Motor Activity/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Female , Fingers/physiology , Humans , Male , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Young AdultABSTRACT
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an established neurophysiological tool to examine the integrity of the fast-conducting corticomotor pathways in a wide range of diseases associated with motor dysfunction. This includes but is not limited to patients with multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, movement disorders, disorders affecting the spinal cord, facial and other cranial nerves. These guidelines cover practical aspects of TMS in a clinical setting. We first discuss the technical and physiological aspects of TMS that are relevant for the diagnostic use of TMS. We then lay out the general principles that apply to a standardized clinical examination of the fast-conducting corticomotor pathways with single-pulse TMS. This is followed by a detailed description of how to examine corticomotor conduction to the hand, leg, trunk and facial muscles in patients. Additional sections cover safety issues, the triple stimulation technique, and neuropediatric aspects of TMS.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation/methods , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/standards , Biophysics , Cortical Spreading Depression , Electromyography , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Functional Laterality , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/innervation , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Neural ConductionABSTRACT
In subjects performing voluntary background contraction, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induces an interruption of electromyographic (EMG) activity known as the silent period (SP). This is thought to be mediated through the action of inhibitory cortical neurons, in particular involving γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors. In some studies of the SP, a post-SP increase in EMG activity has been reported but not described in detail. In the present study we have sought to determine the presence and persistence of late EMG bursting associated with the return of voluntary drive after the SP, and to characterize the relationship to background contraction level, stimulus intensity, and SP duration. TMS was delivered at 3 levels of intensity (120, 140 and 160% of active motor threshold) and during 3 levels of voluntary contraction of the first dorsal interosseous muscle (10, 30 and 50% of maximum contraction) in a pseudo-randomized order in 11 healthy participants. The SP was followed by a brief (~60 ms) burst of EMG up to 290±42% of the pre-stimulus EMG level. Both SP duration and the amplitude of the EMG burst increased with TMS intensity (p<0.001). Burst amplitude correlated with SP duration (r2=0.750; p=0.003). We conclude that post-SP EMG bursting is a quantifiable phenomenon that depends on the strength of TMS and the duration of the SP. This bursting may correspond with the post inhibitory period of disinhibition that has recently been identified in human motor cortex.
Subject(s)
Cortical Spreading Depression/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Biophysics , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Transcranial magnetic stimulation has been used to study changes in central excitability associated with motor tasks. Recently, we reported that a finger flexion-extension task performed at a maximal voluntary rate (MVR) could not be sustained and that this was not due to muscle fatigue, but was more likely a breakdown in central motor control. To determine the central changes that accompany this type of movement task, we tracked motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles of the dominant hand in normal subjects for 20 min after a 10 sec index finger flexion-extension task performed at MVR and at a moderate sustainable rate (MSR) and half the MSR (MSR(/2)). The FDI MEP amplitude was reduced for up to 6-8 min after each of the tasks but there was a greater and longer-lasting reduction after the MSR and MSR(/2) tasks compared to the MVR task. There was a similar reduction in the amplitude of the FDI MEP after a 10 sec cyclic index finger abduction-adduction task when the FDI was acting as the prime mover. The amplitude of the MEP recorded from the inactive APB was also reduced after the flexion-extension tasks, but to a lesser degree and for a shorter duration. Measurements of short-interval cortical inhibition revealed an increase in inhibition after all of the finger flexion-extension tasks, with the MSR task being associated with the greatest degree of inhibition. These findings indicate that a demanding MVR finger movement task is followed by a period of reduced corticomotor excitability and increased intracortical inhibition. However, these changes also occur with and are greater with slower rates of movement and are not specific for motor demand, but may be indicative of adaptive changes in the central motor pathway after a period of repetitive movement.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Exercise/psychology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Muscle Fatigue/physiology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cues , Electromyography , Female , Fingers/innervation , Humans , Male , Movement/physiology , Reaction Time , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Young AdultABSTRACT
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions that modulate cortical plasticity may achieve a more functional benefit if combined with neuro-rehabilitation therapies. With a TMS protocol targeting I-wave dynamics, it is possible to deliver stimuli while a subject performs a motor task, and this may more effectively target functional networks related to the task. However, the efficacy of this intervention during a simple task such as a low-level voluntary contraction is not known. We delivered paired-pulse TMS at an inter-pulse interval (IPI) of 1.5 ms for 15 min while subjects performed a 10 ± 2.5% voluntary contraction of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and made motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) curve measurements. Pre-intervention SICF curves showed only a single peak at 1.3-1.5 ms IPI. During the intervention, MEP amplitude steadily increased (P < 0.001) to 137 ± 13% of its initial value. After the intervention, SICF curves were increased in amplitude (P < 0.001) and later peaks emerged at 2.8 and 4.3 ms IPIs. A control experiment, replacing paired-pulse stimulation with single-pulse stimulation showed no effect on MEP amplitude (P = 0.951). We conclude that the I-wave intervention can be administered concurrently with a simple motor task and that it acts by increasing trans-synaptic efficacy across a number of I-waves. The ability to perform a motor task simultaneously with a TMS intervention could confer a degree of specificity to the induced excitability changes and may be beneficial for functional neuro-rehabilitation programs built around motor learning and retraining.
Subject(s)
Muscle Contraction/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Reaction Time/physiology , Time Factors , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
A suprathreshold pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to human motor cortex results in a period of long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) followed by a briefer period of disinhibition (late cortical disinhibition [LCD]). Short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) is mediated by excitatory networks in the motor cortex responsible for the generation of the indirect (I-) wave volleys that are evoked by TMS at a periodicity of about 1.5 ms. Because the excitatory synaptic network responsible for SICF undergoes inhibitory regulation, we hypothesized that SICF will be modulated during periods of inhibition and disinhibition. In particular we were interested to know whether SICF was up-regulated during disinhibition, implying an increase in excitatory synaptic efficacy. We measured SICF, at a paired-pulse interval of 1.5 ms, at various times (100-300 ms) after a suprathreshold priming stimulus (PS) of sufficient strength to evoke LICI and LCD. We found that the strength of SICF was normal during LICI, but was increased during LCD by an average of 64%. SICF onset latency was reduced by one I-wave interval during LCD and was delayed by one I-wave interval during LICI. We conclude that disinhibition, rather than inhibition, modulates the excitatory neuronal networks that underlie SICF, whereas the I-wave targeted is modified by the presence of both inhibition and disinhibition and that there is therefore a dissociation between the strength and site of SICF interaction. The increase in SICF during disinhibition further indicates that this is a promising period to investigate or modulate excitatory synaptic networks while they are less constrained by ongoing levels of inhibition.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Nervous System Physiological Phenomena , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Adult , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Interneurons/physiology , Male , Synapses/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic StimulationABSTRACT
In human motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to identify short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) corresponding to gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) effects and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) and the cortical silent period (SP) corresponding to postsynaptic GABA(B) effects. Presynaptic GABA(B) effects, corresponding to disinhibition, can also be identified with TMS and have been shown to be acting during LICI by measuring SICI after a suprathreshold priming stimulus (PS). The duration of disinhibition is not certain and, guided by studies in experimental preparations, we hypothesized that it may be longer-lasting than postsynaptic inhibition, leading to a period of late cortical disinhibition and consequently a net increase in corticospinal excitability. We tested this first by measuring the motor-evoked potential (MEP) to a test stimulus (TS), delivered after a PS at interpulse intervals (IPIs) < or =300 ms that encompassed the period of PS-induced LICI and its aftermath. MEP amplitude was initially decreased, but then increased at IPIs of 190-210 ms, reaching 160 +/- 17% of baseline 200 ms after PS (P < 0.05). SP duration was 181 +/- 5 ms. A second experiment established that the onset of the later period of increased excitability correlated with PS intensity (r(2) = 0.99) and with the duration of the SP (r(2) = 0.99). The third and main experiment demonstrated that SICI was significantly reduced in strength at all IPIs < or =220 ms after PS. We conclude that TMS-induced LICI is associated with a period of disinhibition that is at first masked by LICI, but that outlasts LICI and gives rise to a period during which disinhibition predominates and net excitability is raised. Identification of this late period of disinhibition in human motor cortex may provide an opportunity to explore or modulate the behavior of excitatory networks at a time when inhibitory effects are restrained.
Subject(s)
Motor Cortex/physiology , Adult , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Female , Hand/physiology , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Receptors, GABA-B , Synapses/physiology , Time Factors , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can transiently increase corticomotor excitability of intrinsic hand muscles and improve upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke. As a preliminary study, we tested whether increased corticomotor excitability would be similarly observed in muscles acting about the wrist, and remain present during robotic training involving active wrist movements, in six chronic stroke patients with residual motor deficit. METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) generated motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and provided a measure of corticomotor excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) before and immediately after a period of tDCS (1 mA, 20 min, anode and TMS applied to the lesioned hemisphere), and robotic wrist training (1hr). RESULTS: Following tDCS, the same TMS current strength evoked an increased MEP amplitude (mean 168 +/- 22%SEM; p < 0.05), that remained increased after robot training (166 +/- 23%; p < 0.05). Conditioned MEPs were of significantly lower amplitude relative to unconditioned MEPs prior to tDCS (62 +/- 6%, p < 0.05), but not after tDCS (89 +/- 14%, p = 0.40), or robot training (91 +/- 8%, p = 0.28), suggesting that the increased corticomotor excitability is associated with reduced intracortical inhibition. CONCLUSION: The persistence of these effects after robotic motor training, indicates that a motor learning and retraining program can co-exist with tDCS-induced changes in cortical motor excitability, and supports the concept of combining brain stimulation with physical therapy to promote recovery after brain injury.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Forearm/physiology , Robotics/methods , Stroke Rehabilitation , Wrist/innervation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Time Factors , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methodsABSTRACT
Corticospinal excitability can be increased by a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intervention that delivers repeated paired TMS pulses at an I (indirect)-wave interval of 1.5 ms. This is thought to target excitatory synaptic events by reinforcing facilitatory I-wave interaction, however, it remains to be determined what effect this intervention has on the various I-wave components. In the present study we compared I-wave facilitation curves over a range of inter-pulse intervals (IPIs) encompassing the first three I-waves, before and after 15 min of a paired-pulse TMS intervention with an IPI of 1.5 ms. The three peaks in the I-wave facilitation curves occurred at the same IPIs pre- and post-intervention (1.3, 2.5 and 4.3 ms). The facilitation curves were increased in amplitude for all three I-wave peaks post-intervention (mean increase 33%), and the mean increase across all IPIs correlated with the post-intervention increase in single-pulse MEP amplitude (r = 0.77). Modelling showed that the changes in the post-intervention curves were consistent with an increase in amplitude and broadening of the individual I-wave peaks. We conclude that an iTMS intervention with an IPI of 1.5 ms is able to target multiple I-waves. The findings are consistent with existing models of I-wave generation and suggest that the intervention increases the efficacy of synaptic events associated with the generation of descending I-wave volleys.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor , Neurons/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Interneurons/physiology , Linear Models , Male , Regression Analysis , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate the corticomotor projection to the upper limb in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) and the changes that occur with botulinum toxin (BTX)-A. METHODS: The study design is a pilot prospective randomized trial. Twenty-two children with hemiplegic CP aged 7 years to 13 years 11 months were recruited. Treatment group (12) received one series of BTX-A injections into the upper limb. Control group (10) did not receive upper limb BTX-A. All participants except one treatment group participant also received lower limb BTX-A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was performed at baseline, and 1, 3 and 6 months post-injection. Outcome measures were: change in position of affected and unaffected side first dorsal interosseous optimal site of stimulation (OPTx). RESULTS: A shift in affected and unaffected side OPTx was observed for both treatment and control groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups at 1, 3 or 6 months. Poor tolerance of TMS cortical stimuli >80% was observed. CONCLUSION: Corticomotor projections associated with the upper limb in children with hemiplegic CP show significant variability over a 6-month period. This variability may reflect central motor reorganization because of systemic BTX-A effect or developmental changes. Upper limb BTX-A therapy is associated with reorganization of both affected and unaffected projections. Poor tolerance of the TMS procedure, in conjunction with higher cortical thresholds, may limit the usefulness of TMS as an investigatory tool in young children with movement disorders.
Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Cerebral Palsy/drug therapy , Motor Cortex/drug effects , Neural Pathways/drug effects , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Upper Extremity/innervation , Adolescent , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/physiopathology , Child , Female , Hemiplegia/drug therapy , Hemiplegia/etiology , Humans , Male , Muscle Spasticity/drug therapy , Muscle Spasticity/etiology , Pilot Projects , Transcranial Magnetic StimulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the central nervous system level at which paired-pulse repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at I-wave periodicity (iTMS) produces a facilitation of motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. METHODS: In one conscious patient who had an electrode implanted in the cervical epidural space for the control of pain, we recorded corticospinal volleys evoked before, during and after iTMS of the motor cortex. Moreover, we compared MEPs to TMS and cervico-medullary junction stimulation before and after iTMS in a separate group of five healthy subjects. RESULTS: In the patient with the epidural electrode, during iTMS there was progressive increase of MEP amplitude, and by the end of the intervention period MEP increased by more than 300%. The pronounced increase in MEP amplitude was paralleled by a slight increase in the amplitude of epidural volleys. An increased MEP amplitude (more than 200%) was still evident 3 min after the end of iTMS. In the five healthy subjects, iTMS produced a facilitation of MEPs evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation but had no effect on CMEPs evoked by cervico-medullary junction stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that iTMS leads to an increase in corticomotor excitability at a supraspinal level, and that this may include circuits in addition to those involved in I-wave generation. SIGNIFICANCE: iTMS increases cortical excitability more widely than the I-wave networks that it targets.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/radiation effects , Pain/physiopathology , Periodicity , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Electromyography/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/pathology , Pain Management , Reaction Time/radiation effects , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Spinal Cord/radiation effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between perception of comfort and electrolyte concentration and applied voltage during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). METHODS: NaCl solutions (15, 140 and 220 mM NaCl) or deionised water were used as electrolytes to dampen tDCS sponge electrodes. Subjects (14, 7 M, 20-60 years of age) rated comfort on an 11-point scale during 2 min of tDCS (1 mA). RESULTS: Overall participants rated tDCS as comfortable. Perception of comfort was negatively correlated with NaCl concentration (Spearman's rho=-0.88; p<0.05), and a logarithmic relationship was found between applied voltage and ionic strength of electrolytes (Pearson's r=-0.635; p<0.01). There was no relationship between applied voltage and perception of comfort. CONCLUSIONS: The application of NaCl solutions between 15 and 140 mM to sponge electrodes is more likely to be perceived as comfortable during tDCS. SIGNIFICANCE: The reporting of solution concentration and ratings of perception would be useful adjuncts to tDCS studies.