Argatroban in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a multicenter clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to collect data in France in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who required parenteral anticoagulation and for whom other non-heparin anticoagulant therapies were contraindicated including patients with renal failure, cross-reactivity to danaparoid or at high hemorrhagic risk. METHODS: A total of 20 patients, of mean age 72 ± 10 years, were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter clinical study. Exploratory statistical data analysis was performed with descriptive interpretation of intra-individual comparisons using simple univariate statistics. RESULTS: The diagnosis of HIT was confirmed in 16 subjects by an independent scientific committee. Fourteen patients (70 %) were in an intensive care unit during the course of the study. Patients were treated with argatroban for a mean duration of 8.5 ± 6.1 days. The mean starting dose of argatroban was 0.77 ± 0.45 µg/kg/min. Platelet recovery was rapid. aPTT and anti-IIa activity assays were used to monitor the dose of argatroban. The mean baseline aPTT value was 45.0 ± 9.8 sec and increased to 78.2 ± 35.8 sec two hours after initiating argatroban. At this time mean argatroban concentration was 0.34 ± 0.16 and 0.61 ± 0.28 µg/ml using ECT and TT measurements, respectively. New and/or extended thromboses were reported in 25 % of patients and major bleedings were documented in 15 %. Six patients died due to their underlying medical condition. CONCLUSION: Considering its hepatic elimination and its short half-life, argatroban can be considered as a safe therapeutic option in HIT patients at high hemorrhagic risk and with renal failure, particularly in an ICU setting.

Early High-Volume Hemofiltration versus Standard Care for Post-Cardiac Surgery Shock. The HEROICS Study.

RATIONALE: Post-cardiac surgery shock is associated with high morbidity and mortality. By removing toxins and proinflammatory mediators and correcting metabolic acidosis, high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) might halt the vicious circle leading to death by improving myocardial performance and reducing vasopressor dependence. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether early HVHF decreases all-cause mortality 30 days after randomization. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial included patients with severe shock requiring high-dose catecholamines 3-24 hours post-cardiac surgery who were randomized to early HVHF (80 ml/kg/h for 48 h), followed by standard-volume continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) until resolution of shock and recovery of renal function, or conservative standard care, with delayed CVVHDF only for persistent, severe acute kidney injury. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On Day 30, 40 of 112 (36%) HVHF and 40 of 112 (36%) control subjects (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.56; P = 1.00) had died; only 57% of the control subjects had received renal-replacement therapy. Between-group survivors' Day-60, Day-90, intensive care unit, and in-hospital mortality rates, Day-30 ventilator-free days, and renal function recovery were comparable. HVHF patients experienced faster correction of metabolic acidosis and tended to be more rapidly weaned off catecholamines but had more frequent hypophosphatemia, metabolic alkalosis, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with post-cardiac surgery shock requiring high-dose catecholamines, the early HVHF onset for 48 hours, followed by standard volume until resolution of shock and recovery of renal function, did not lower Day-30 mortality and did not impact other important patient-centered outcomes compared with a conservative strategy with delayed CVVHDF initiation only for patients with persistent, severe acute kidney injury. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01077349).

Plasma fibrinogen level on admission to the intensive care unit is a powerful predictor of postoperative bleeding after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence regarding the behavior of fibrinogen levels and the relation between fibrinogen levels and postoperative bleeding is limited in cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). To evaluate perioperative fibrinogen levels as a predictor of postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, single-center, observational cohort study of 1956 patients following cardiac surgery with CPB, fibrinogen level was measured perioperatively. Excessive bleeding group was defined as patients with a 24-h chest tube output (CTO) exceeded the 90th percentile of distribution. RESULTS: The median 24-h CTO was 728.6±431.1ml. A total of 189 patients (9.7%) were identified as having excessive bleeding. At admission to the intensive care (Day 0), the fibrinogen levels were 2.5±0.8g/l and 2.1±0.8g/l in the control and excessive bleeding groups, respectively (P<0.0001). The fibrinogen level on Day 0 was significantly correlated with the 24-h CTO (rho=-0.237; P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the fibrinogen level at Day 0 was the best perioperative standard laboratory test to predict excessive bleeding (P=0.0001; odds ratio, 0.5), whereas preoperative fibrinogen level was not a predictor. Using receiver operating characteristics curve analyses, the best Day 0 fibrinogen level cutoff to predict postoperative bleeding was 2.2g/l. CONCLUSIONS: In this large prospective study, the fibrinogen level upon admission to the intensive care unit after CPB predicted the risk of postoperative bleeding. Our data add to the concern regarding the fibrinogen level threshold that might require fibrinogen concentrate infusion to reduce postoperative blood loss.

Exclusive low-molecular-weight heparin as bridging anticoagulant after mechanical valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin has been the standard anticoagulant used immediately after mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR). The purpose of this study was to assess a postoperative anticoagulation protocol with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) immediately after MHVR without the use of unfractionated heparin or anti-factor Xa monitoring. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-center, observational study of 1,063 consecutive patients undergoing elective MHVR with postoperative LMWH anticoagulation treatment. The exclusion criteria were as follows: renal failure, intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, critical perioperative state, or a recent neurologic event. The postoperative anticoagulation protocol used subcutaneous enoxaparin as a bridging anticoagulant treatment beginning on the first postoperative day and continuing until vitamin K antagonist treatment was fully effective. Patients were followed for 6 weeks. The primary endpoints were the incidence of thromboembolic or major bleeding events. RESULTS: Eleven (1%) thromboembolic events occurred. Ten of these events were transient or permanent strokes. Major bleeding events occurred in 44 patients (4.1%), 7 of which were observed before the enoxaparin treatment period. At the time of discharge, 570 patients (53.6%) were no longer receiving LMWH treatment due to achieving the target international normalized ratio. The mean length of hospital stay was 8.5 ± 2.9 days. There were no deaths during the 6-week follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In our highly selected population, after MHVR, postoperative anticoagulation using LMWH is associated with a low rate of thromboembolic and major bleeding events. This large observational study demonstrates that the use of LMWH as an anticoagulant is effective and safe after MHVR.