ABSTRACT
Background: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) has supplanted surgery in the treatment of patients with advanced emphysema, but not all patients qualify for it. Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) among patients who either failed BLVR or were not candidates for it. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LVRS for upper lobe-predominant emphysema at a single tertiary center between March 2018 and December 2022. The main outcomes measures were preoperative and postoperative respiratory parameters, perioperative morbidity, and mortality. Results: A total of 67 LVRS recipients were evaluated, including 10 who had failed prior valve placement. The median patient age was 69 years, and 35 (52%) were male. All procedures were performed thoracoscopically, with 36 patients (53.7%) undergoing bilateral LVRS. The median hospital length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-11 days). Prolonged air leak (>7 days) occurred in 20 patients. There was one 90-day mortality from a nosocomial pneumonia (non-COVID-related) and no further deaths at 12 months. There were mean improvements of 10.07% in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and 4.74% in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, along with a mean decrease 49.2% in residual volume (P < .001 for all). The modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale was improved by 1.84 points (P < .001). Conclusions: LVRS can be performed safely in patients who are not candidates for BLVR and those who fail BLVR and leads to significant functional improvement. Long-term follow-up is necessary to ensure the sustainability of LVRS benefits in this patient population.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has beneficial effects in patients hospitalized with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. HFNT has not been extensively studied following hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). OBJECTIVE: We explored the feasibility of conducting a multicentered trial to evaluate the use of HFNT to increase the time to next moderate/ severe exacerbation in patients recently hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation. In this pilot study we measured the hours of home daily HFNT use, maximally tolerated flow rates and temperature, and side effects for a period of 90 days. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a 90-day, open-labeled pilot study of HFNT to determine the safety and feasibility of home use for daily outpatient COPD management. Patients ≥ 40 years of age with prior hospitalization within the past 12 weeks for an AECOPD were enrolled. COPD was the primary diagnosis in all patients. RESULTS: Thirty patients presented for HFNT titration. Two dropped out; 1 after receiving a lung transplant and the other was lost to follow-up. The remaining 28 patients completed 90 days of HFNT. None withdrew from HFNT due to intolerance. Use of HFNT averaged 6.8 (2.1) hours daily. CONCLUSIONS: Daily home HFNT for up to 3 months is feasible in COPD patients following hospitalization for AECOPD. Improvements observed in disease-specific quality of life, respiratory symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance suggest the need for a prospective multicenter controlled clinical trial.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effect of high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) in individuals with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypercapnia is not well studied. We assessed patient tolerance and impact of air-gas therapy delivered by humidified HFNT (20-35 L/min) on gas exchange in hypercapnic COPD patients during hospitalization for COPD exacerbation. We hypothesized that HFNT use would be safe and well tolerated in individuals hospitalized for COPD exacerbation regardless of the degree of hypercapnia. METHODS: Patients hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation were included if they were hypercapnic (arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide [PaCO2] > 45 mmHg), ≥ 10 pack-year history, and agreed to treatment with HFNT, along with daily arterial blood gas (ABG) samples and bedside spirometry. They were placed on a HFNT system following admission for at least 3 days with an air-gas blend to maintain a flow rate between 20-35 L/min and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) titrated to keep oxygen saturation (SaO2) values > 90%. Patient tolerance of HFNT and evidence of clinical deterioration as defined by worsening hypoxia or hypercapnia was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients participated in the study. The patients had frequent prior exacerbations, were hypercapnic, dyspneic, and gas trapped. Participants received an air-gas flow rate (median [interquartile range (IQR)] 25 (IQR 20-30) L/min and FiO2 of 30 (IQR 30-30) %. There was no increase in PaCO2- levels (p = 0.26) or dyspnea (Borg scale, p= 0.52) while using HFNT. No patient discontinued HFNT, had further decompensation, required non-invasive ventilation or intubation during the study period. CONCLUSION: In a pilot study, patients experiencing a severe COPD exacerbation were able to tolerate continuous HFNT safely regardless of degree of hypercapnia.
ABSTRACT
Since the advent of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, a blower/mister has been routinely used in cardiac operation theatres. In our setup, in an attempt to reduce the cost of coronary artery bypass grafting by performing off-pump coronary artery bypass, reusable materials have been routinely used.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/adverse effects , Disposable Equipment , Equipment Design , Equipment Reuse , HumansABSTRACT
Tuberculosis rarely figures in the list of thymic masses. We hereby report a case of thymic tuberculosis successfully managed with surgical excision and antituberculouschemotherapy.
