Does Suicide Risk Screening Improve the Identification of Primary Care Patients Who Will Attempt Suicide Versus Depression Screening Alone?

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of suicide risk screening relative to depression screening alone among primary care patients has not been tested rigorously. This study compared the performance of multiple depression screening methods (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-2, PHQ-8, and PHQ-9) and multiple suicide risk screening methods (PHQ-9 item 9 and suicide-focused screening of "thoughts of killing yourself" during the entire lifespan, within the past month, and within the past week) in a convenience sample of primary care patients. METHODS: A total of 2,744 patients (military personnel, family members, and retirees) from six military primary care clinics completed the PHQ-9 and screening for suicidal ideation (SI) during routine clinic visits. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted for one year post-baseline to assess the incidence of suicide attempts, the study's primary outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 statistics were calculated for each screening method for identifying patients who attempted suicide. RESULTS: More than 65% of patients who screened positive for SI also screened positive for depression on the PHQ-9. Depression screening with the PHQ-9 correctly identified more patients who attempted suicide during follow-up than the PHQ-2, past week SI, and past month SI. The PHQ-9 correctly identified more patients who attempted suicide within 3 months than lifetime SI, but lifetime SI correctly identified more patients who attempted suicide within 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: Depression screening with the PHQ-9 was the most effective strategy for identifying patients who attempted suicide in the near term. Universal suicide risk screening is unlikely to meaningfully improve identification of higher-risk patients beyond PHQ-9 depression screening.

Comparison of behavioral activation-enhanced cognitive processing therapy and cognitive processing therapy among U.S. service members: A randomized clinical trial.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently co-occur and can cause significant impairment. Data are lacking as to whether interventions targeting both PTSD and MDD may improve treatment outcomes among individuals with this comorbidity compared with existing evidence-based PTSD treatments alone. This randomized trial compared the effectiveness of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) enhanced with behavioral activation (BA+CPT) versus CPT among 94 service members (52 women and 42 men; age M = 28.5 years) with comorbid PTSD and MDD. The primary outcome was clinician-administered depression symptom severity on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from pretreatment through 3-month follow-up. Intent-to-treat analyses using multilevel models showed statistically and clinically significant decreases in MADRS scores for both conditions over time, with no significant differences between BA+CPT and CPT. Secondary depression and PTSD symptom outcomes followed a similar pattern of results. For diagnostic MDD and PTSD outcomes using available data, no statistically significant differences between treatments emerged at posttreatment or 3-month follow-up. Sessions attended, dropout rate, and treatment satisfaction did not significantly differ between treatments. Outcomes were comparable for both treatments, suggesting that BA+CPT and CPT were similarly effective psychotherapy options for comorbid PTSD and MDD.

Rapid intensification of suicide risk preceding suicidal behavior among primary care patients.

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of those who attempt suicide report experiencing suicidal ideation and suicidal planning in advance; others deny these experiences. Some researchers have hypothesized that rapid intensification is due to past suicidal ideation and/or behaviors that are "mentally shelved" but remain available for rapid access later. METHOD: To evaluate this hypothesis, we examined (a) temporal sequencing of suicidal ideation, suicidal planning, and suicidal behavior, and (b) speed of emergence of suicidal behavior in a prospective cohort study of 2744 primary care patients. RESULTS: Of 52 patients reporting suicidal behavior during follow-up, 20 (38.5%) reported suicidal ideation and planning prior to their suicidal behavior, 23 (44.2%) reported suicidal ideation but not planning, and nine (17.3%) denied both suicidal ideation and planning. Over half (n = 30, 57.7%) reported the onset of suicidal ideation and/or planning on the same day as or after their suicidal behavior (i.e., rapid intensification). Rapid intensification was not associated with increased likelihood of reporting recent or past suicidal ideation, planning, or behaviors, suggesting rapid intensification does not depend on prior experience with suicidal ideation and/or behaviors. CONCLUSION: Detecting primary care patients at risk for this form of suicidal behavior may be limited even with universal suicide risk screening.

Self-Reported Symptoms in U.S. Marines Following Blast- and Impact-Related Concussion.

INTRODUCTION: Recent research on traumatic brain injury (TBI) has suggested that the mechanism of injury (i.e., whether the TBI was caused by high-level blast [HLB] vs. direct physical impact to the head) may be an important factor in injury severity, symptomology, and recovery because of differences in physiological effects of each type of injury on the brain. However, differences in self-reported symptomology resulting from HLB- vs. impact-related TBIs have not been thoroughly examined. This study tested the hypothesis that HLB- and impact-related concussions result in different self-reported symptoms in an enlisted Marine Corps population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All records of 2008 and 2012 Post-Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) forms completed by enlisted active duty Marines between January 2008 and January 2017 were examined for self-reported concussion, mechanism of injury, and self-reported symptoms experienced during deployment. Concussion events were categorized as either blast- or impact-related; individual symptoms were categorized as neurological, musculoskeletal, or immunological. A series of logistic regressions were performed to examine associations between self-reported symptoms experienced by healthy controls and Marines who endorsed (1) any concussion (mTBI), (2) a probable blast-related concussion (mbTBI), and (3) a probable impact-related concussion (miTBI); analyses were also stratified by PTSD. To determine if there were significant differences between odds ratios (ORs) for mbTBIs vs. miTBIs, 95% CIs were examined for overlap. RESULTS: Marines with a probable concussion, regardless of the mechanism of injury, were significantly more likely to report all symptoms (OR range: 1.7-19.3). Overall, mbTBIs, compared with miTBIs, resulted in higher odds of symptom reporting for eight symptoms on the 2008 PDHA (tinnitus, trouble hearing, headache, memory problems, dizziness, dim vision, trouble concentrating, and vomiting) and six symptoms on the 2012 PDHA (tinnitus, trouble hearing, headaches, memory problems, balance problems, and increased irritability), all of which were in the neurological symptom category. Conversely, odds of symptom reporting were higher for Marines experiencing miTBIs (vs. mbTBIs) for seven symptoms on the 2008 PDHA (skin diseases or rashes, chest pain, trouble breathing, persistent cough, red eyes, fever, and other) and one symptom on the 2012 PDHA (skin rash and/or lesion), all of which were in the immunological symptoms category. mbTBI (vs. miTBI) was consistently associated with greater odds of reporting tinnitus, trouble hearing, and memory problems, regardless of PTSD status. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support recent research suggesting that the mechanism of injury may play an important role in symptom reporting and/or physiological changes to the brain after concussion. The results of this epidemiological investigation should be used to guide further research on the physiological effects of concussion, diagnostic criteria for neurological injuries, and treatment modalities for various concussion-related symptoms.

All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates after severe extremity injuries among previously deployed active duty service members.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that active duty military personnel who sustain extremity injuries while in service are at elevated risk for serious physical and psychological health issues that could affect their long-term functioning and quality of life yet longer-term mortality has not been studied in this population. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rates of all-cause and cause-specific mortality are elevated for active duty U.S. service members who sustained traumatic limb injuries in service, compared to the broader population of deploying service members. To assess differences in mortality rates between service members with traumatic limb injuries that did versus did not result in amputation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; archival Department of Defense deployment, personnel, medical, and death records were combined and analyzed. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) adjusted for age, sex, and ethnoracial group, along with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated to directly compare all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates in each of the two injury groups to rates in the total study population. SETTING: Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS: Service members who deployed in support of the global war on terror between 2001 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion; the final sample included 1,875,206 individuals surveilled through 2019. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates. RESULTS: Overall, the number of deaths was over three times higher than expected among service members with amputations (SMR = 3.01; CI: 2.36-3.65), and nearly two times higher among those with serious limb injuries not resulting in amputation (SMR = 1.72; CI: 1.54-1.90) when compared to the larger study population. Rates for both internal and external causes of death were significantly elevated among those with limb injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term mortality rates are elevated among service members with traumatic limb injuries, though mortality patterns may differ based on whether the injury results in amputation. Although further research into causal mechanisms is needed, these results may inform the development of interventions to improve long-term health outcomes among injured military personnel.

Scores on the suicide cognitions scale-revised (SCS-R) predict future suicide attempts among primary care patients denying suicide ideation and prior attempts.

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of patients who attempt or die by suicide screened negative for suicidal ideation during their most recent medical visit. Maladaptive beliefs and schemas can increase cognitive vulnerability to suicidal behavior, even among patients without recent or past suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Assessing these beliefs could improve the detection of patients who will engage in suicidal behavior after screening negative for elevated suicide risk. METHODS: Primary care patients who completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) during routine clinic visits and denied suicidal ideation at baseline (N = 2417) were included in the study sample. Suicidal behaviors during the 12 months after baseline were assessed. Logistic regression analyses examined the association of baseline SCS-R scores with later suicidal behavior. RESULTS: In both univariate and multivariate analyses, SCS-R total scores were associated with significantly increased risk of suicidal behavior within 90, 180, and 365 days post-baseline. Results were unchanged when patients who reported prior suicidal behavior were excluded (N = 2178). In item-level analyses, all 16 SCS-R items significantly differentiated patients with and without follow-up suicidal behavior. LIMITATIONS: Study limitations included missing follow-up data, restriction of sample to U.S. military medical beneficiaries, and inability to assess representativeness of the sample relative to the full primary care population. CONCLUSIONS: SCS-R scores are elevated among patients who attempt suicide after denying both suicidal ideation and prior suicide attempts, suggesting the scale may reflect enduring suicide risk. The SCS-R could enhance suicide risk screening and assessment.

Gender differences in disorders comorbid with posttraumatic stress disorder among U.S. Sailors and Marines.

Psychological comorbidity, the co-occurrence of mental health disorders, is more often the rule than the exception among individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Research shows that prevalence estimates for specific psychological disorders differ by gender; however, little is known about whether these patterns persist in the presence of a comorbid PTSD diagnosis. This study examined gender differences in prevalence estimates for conditions comorbid with PTSD using medical records for 523,626 active duty U.S. Sailors and Marines who entered the military over an 8-year period. Using chi-square tests of independence, we detected statistically significant gender differences for specific comorbid conditions in the subsample of 9,447 service members with a PTSD diagnosis. Women were more likely than men to have PTSD with comorbid adjustment, OR = 1.35; depressive, OR = 1.71; and generalized anxiety or other anxiety disorders, OR = 1.16, with the largest effects for eating, OR = 12.60, and personality disorders, OR = 2.97. In contrast, women were less likely than men to have a diagnosis of PTSD with comorbid alcohol use, OR = 0.69, and drug use disorders, OR = 0.72, with the largest effects for insomnia, OR = 0.42, and traumatic brain injury, OR = 0.17. No significant gender differences emerged for comorbid bipolar, obsessive-compulsive, panic/phobic, psychotic, or somatoform/dissociative disorders, ps = .029-.314. The results show gender differences in conditions comorbid with PTSD generally align with internalizing and externalizing dimensions. Differences in comorbidities with PTSD between women and men could have implications for treatment development and delivery.

Predictors of Symptom Increase in Subsyndromal PTSD Among Previously Deployed Military Personnel.

INTRODUCTION: Subsyndromal PTSD (sub-PTSD) is associated with functional impairment and increased risk for full PTSD. This study examined factors associated with progression from sub-PTSD to full PTSD symptomatology among previously deployed military veterans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were drawn from a longitudinal survey of Navy and Marine Corps personnel leaving military service between 2007 and 2010 administered immediately before separation (baseline) and ~1 year later (follow-up). Survey measures assessed PTSD symptoms at both times; the baseline survey also assessed potential predictors of symptom change over time. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of progression from sub-PTSD to full PTSD status. RESULTS: Compared to those with no or few PTSD symptoms at baseline, individuals with sub-PTSD were almost three times more likely to exhibit full PTSD symptomatology at follow-up. Risk factors for symptom increase among those with sub-PTSD included moderate or high levels of combat exposure and utilization of fewer positive coping behaviors. Use of prescribed psychotropic medication was protective against symptom increase. CONCLUSION: This study identified several predictors of symptom increase in military veterans with sub-PTSD. Interventions targeting modifiable risk factors for symptom escalation, including behavioral and pharmacological treatments, may reduce rates of new-onset PTSD in this population.

Psychometric evaluation of the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R).

The measurement of self-reported suicide risk can be complicated in medical settings due to patient apprehension about the potential consequences of self-disclosure. The Suicide Cognitions Scale (SCS) was designed to assess suicide risk by measuring a range of suicidogenic cognitions (e.g., hopelessness, perceived burdensomeness) collectively referred to as the suicidal belief system. The SCS's concurrent, known groups, and prospective validity for suicidal thoughts and behaviors have previously been supported. The present study examined the factor structure, known-groups, and concurrent validity of a revised, 16-item version of the SCS (SCS-R), which removed two items that explicitly used the word "suicide" and changed item scoring from a 1-5 to 0-4 scale, thereby improving the interpretation of scores. In a sample of 2,690 primary care patients presenting for routine medical care at one of six US military clinics, results of bifactor analysis supported the scale's unidimensionality. The SCS-R significantly differentiated participants with a history of suicide attempts and was significantly correlated with frequency of thoughts about death and self-harm during the previous 2 weeks. Results align with earlier research and provide psychometric support for the SCS-R.

Occupational Risk of Low-Level Blast Exposure and TBI-Related Medical Diagnoses: A Population-Based Epidemiological Investigation (2005-2015).

Because traumatic brain injury (TBI)-most often caused by exposure to high-level blast (HLB)-is a leading cause of medical evacuations of deployed U.S. service members in recent conflicts, researchers seek to identify risk factors for TBI. Previous research using self-reported data has identified low-level blast (LLB) as one such risk factor and suggests an association with susceptibility to and symptoms associated with TBI. This article presents a population-based study of all branches of military service that examines the association between occupational risk for LLB and both clinically diagnosed TBIs-from concussions to severe and penetrating TBIs-and conditions commonly comorbid with concussion. Using archival medical and career records from >2 million service members between 2005-2015, this work demonstrates that occupational risk of LLB is associated with any TBI, mild TBI, moderate TBI, cognitive problems, communication problems, hearing problems, headaches, any behavioral health condition, anxiety, drug abuse/dependence, alcohol abuse/dependence, delirium/dementia, posttraumatic stress disorder, post-concussive syndrome, tinnitus, fatigue, and migraines. Understanding the full scope of the effects of LLB on service members will help ensure the health and readiness of service members and may influence both military policy and clinical practice guidelines for blast-induced injuries.

Improving Suicide Risk Screening to Identify the Highest Risk Patients: Results From the PRImary Care Screening Methods (PRISM) Study.

PURPOSE: Over 95% of patients who screen positive on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) suicide risk item do not attempt or die by suicide, which could lead to unnecessary treatment and/or misallocation of limited resources. The present study seeks to determine if suicide risk screening can be meaningfully improved to identify the highest-risk patients. METHODS: Patients eligible to receive medical treatment from the US Department of Defense medical system were recruited from 6 military primary care clinics located at 5 military installations around the United States. Patients completed self-report measures including the PHQ-9 and 16 items from the Suicide Cognitions Scale (SCS) during routine primary care clinic visits. Postbaseline suicidal behaviors (suicide attempts, interrupted attempts, and aborted attempts) were assessed by evaluators who were blind to screening results using the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview. RESULTS: Among 2,744 patients, 13 (0.5%) engaged in suicidal behavior in the 30 days after screening and 28 (1.0%) displayed suicidal behavior in the 90 days after screening. Multiple SCS items differentiated patients with suicidal behavior less than 30 days after screening positive for suicide risk. Augmenting the PHQ-9 suicide risk item with SCS items improved the identification of patients who were most likely to have suicidal behavior within a month of screening positive without sacrificing sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Among primary care patients who screen positive for suicide risk on the PHQ-9, SCS items improved screening efficiency by identifying those patients who are most likely to engage in suicidal behavior within the next 30 days.

Getting on the Same Page: Consolidating Terminology to Facilitate Cross-Disciplinary Health-Related Blast Research.

The consequences of blast exposure (including both high-level and low-level blast) have been a focal point of military interest and research for years. Recent mandates from Congress (e.g., National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, section 734) have further accelerated these efforts, facilitating collaborations between research teams from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds. Based on findings from a recent scoping review, we argue that the scientific field of blast research is plagued by inconsistencies in both conceptualization of relevant constructs and terminology used to describe them. These issues hamper our ability to interpret study methods and findings, hinder efforts to integrate findings across studies to reach scientific consensus, and increase the likelihood of redundant efforts. We argue that multidisciplinary experts in this field require a universal language and clear, standardized terminology to further advance the important work of examining the effects of blast exposure on human health, performance, and well-being. To this end, we present a summary of descriptive conventions regarding the language scientists currently use when discussing blast-related exposures and outcomes based on findings from a recent scoping review. We then provide prescriptive conventions about how these terms should be used by clearly conceptualizing and explicitly defining relevant constructs. Specifically, we summarize essential concepts relevant to the study of blast, precisely distinguish between high-level blast and low-level blast, and discuss how the terms acute, chronic, exposure, and outcome should be used when referring to the health-related consequences of blast exposure.

The Persistence of Blast- Versus Impact-Induced Concussion Symptomology Following Deployment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the persistence of concussion-related symptoms following injury as a function of mechanism of injury (high-level blast [HLB] vs impact) and low-level blast (LLB) exposure among Marines. SETTING: Upon return from deployment and approximately 6 months later, respectively, Marines completed the Post-Deployment Health Assessment and Post-Deployment Health Re-Assessment in an operational or clinic setting. PARTICIPANTS: Data from active duty enlisted Marines who completed both assessments (n = 102 075) and who reported a potentially mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)-inducing event and completed an mTBI screen (n = 8106) were analyzed. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of Marines deployed between 2008 and 2012. Marines were categorized into groups with relatively high versus low risk for occupational risk of LLB exposure. A mixed model analysis of variance was used to examine the number of symptoms Marines reported experiencing during deployment as a function of probable concussion, HLB exposure, occupational risk, type of symptom, and time of measurement. MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported deployment exposures including HLB, probable mTBIs, and occupational risk of LLB exposure were identified. Outcomes included the proportion of neurological, musculoskeletal, and immunological symptoms for which Marines reported seeking care during and following deployment were analyzed. RESULTS: Probable HLB-induced mTBIs (vs impact-induced) were associated with significantly more neurological symptoms at return from deployment and approximately 6 months later. Although symptom reporting decreased at statistically equivalent rates regardless of mechanism of injury, those with a probable HLB-induced concussion continued to report elevated symptomology post-deployment. Additionally, Marines with probable concussion working in occupations with LLB exposure reported elevated levels of persistent neurological symptoms. Both HLB and LLB exposure were associated with neurological symptoms that persisted following deployment. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that blast-induced brain injuries may be fundamentally different from impact-induced injuries, and that additional screening and symptomatic treatment for blast-exposed patients may be warranted.

Potential Health and Performance Effects of High-Level and Low-Level Blast: A Scoping Review of Two Decades of Research.

Although blast exposure has been recognized as a significant source of morbidity and mortality in military populations, our understanding of the effects of blast exposure, particularly low-level blast (LLB) exposure, on health outcomes remains limited. This scoping review provides a comprehensive, accessible review of the peer-reviewed literature that has been published on blast exposure over the past two decades, with specific emphasis on LLB. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of the scientific literature published between January 2000 and 2019 pertaining to the effects of blast injury and/or exposure on human and animal health. A three-level review process with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria was used. A full-text review of all articles pertaining to LLB exposure was conducted and relevant study characteristics were extracted. The research team identified 3,215 blast-relevant articles, approximately half of which (55.4%) studied live humans, 16% studied animals, and the remainder were non-subjects research (e.g., literature reviews). Nearly all (99.49%) of the included studies were conducted by experts in medicine or epidemiology; approximately half of these articles were categorized into more than one medical specialty. Among the 51 articles identified as pertaining to LLB specifically, 45.1% were conducted on animals and 39.2% focused on human subjects. Animal studies of LLB predominately used shock tubes to induce various blast exposures in rats, assessed a variety of outcomes, and clearly demonstrated that LLB exposure is associated with brain injury. In contrast, the majority of LLB studies on humans were conducted among military and law enforcement personnel in training environments and had remarkable variability in the exposures and outcomes assessed. While findings suggest that there is the potential for LLB to harm human populations, findings are mixed and more research is needed. Although it is clear that more research is needed on this rapidly growing topic, this review highlights the detrimental effects of LLB on the health of both animals and humans. Future research would benefit from multidisciplinary collaboration, larger sample sizes, and standardization of terminology, exposures, and outcomes.

Studying the Health and Performance of Shipboard Sailors: An Evidence Map.

INTRODUCTION: It is estimated that sailors who are assigned to surface ships and submarines are deployed for more than 1 year across their careers and they spend 15% to 23% of their time away from home. Research suggests that shipboard sailors experience rates of behavioral health issues similar to those with ground combat experiences. Despite the rigorous operational tempo and the unique shipboard environment experienced by these service members, little military health research has examined the health outcomes of sailors serving aboard ships. The objectives of this study were to develop an evidence map of the peer-reviewed literature to (1) identify potential threats to the health and readiness of shipboard sailors, (2) identify health and performance issues experienced by this population, and (3) identify gaps in the current peer-reviewed published literature on shipboard health and performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the existing peer-reviewed literature pertaining to the health, experiences, and performance of shipboard service members was conducted. Comprehensive search terms were used to identify articles published between January 2000 and April 2018. Identified articles were subject to a two-level review process. Study characteristics for all articles selected for final review were extracted, and articles were categorized into 13 content areas that were selected a priori. Findings are presented in an evidence map. RESULTS: The initial literature search yielded 8,858 unique articles, 90 of which were eligible for full review. Most articles primarily examined active duty sailors from the U.S. or other foreign militaries (88.9%). A total of 60 articles (67.8%) included information about the type of ship studied; the most frequently examined were submarines (29.5%) and aircraft carriers (27.9%). Most of the included studies used cross-sectional (63.3%) or longitudinal (24.4%) designs. Only 7.8% (n = 7) of articles described interventions. The most commonly examined focal areas included physical health issues, such as viral infections and injuries (56.7%), and health behaviors, such as substance use/misuse (40.0%). Other frequently addressed content areas were occupational stress (38.9%), interpersonal issues (32.2%), ship conditions (30.0%), and mental health (28.9%). Most articles (73.3%) addressed more than one content area. There was a high degree of variation in the measurement tools used; self-report surveys were the most common (48.9%), followed by objective physical, biological, or cognitive measures (32.2%) and medical and personnel record reviews (31.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence map identified various gaps in the research pertaining to the health and performance of shipboard sailors. These gaps included a lack of research on the risk factors for common health and performance issues experienced by sailors and on the relationship between stressors of shipboard life and sailors' health, performance, and readiness. The results of this evidence map should be used to inform the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions to improve the shipboard environment and/or the preventive health behaviors used by sailors while underway or deployed.

Self-Reported Concussion Symptomology during Deployment: Differences as a Function of Injury Mechanism and Low-Level Blast Exposure.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), which can result from either direct impact to the head or blast exposure, has been the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in recent military conflicts. However, little research has compared mTBIs by mechanism of injury. The present research addressed two research questions: (1) Are blast-related mTBIs (mbTBIs) associated with significantly more symptoms than impact-related mTBIs (miTBIs), and (2) are mTBIs associated with more self-reported symptoms among service members with higher (vs. lower) risk of low-level blast (LLB) exposure. We obtained data from 181,423 active duty enlisted United States Marines deployed between 2003 and 2012, who completed the Post-Deployment Health Assessment. We examined the self-reported symptoms of Marines who completed an mTBI screen and could be classified as at high or low risk for LLB exposure, using their military occupation as a proxy (n = 12,013). Symptoms were compared as a function of blast exposure (blast vs. impact), probable mTBI (yes vs. no), occupational risk of LLB (high vs. low), and symptom type (neurological vs. musculoskeletal vs. immunological). Overall, musculoskeletal symptoms were reported more frequently than neurological and immunological symptoms. However, Marines with probable mTBIs (regardless of mechanism of injury) and those with probable mbTBIs specifically reported more neurological symptoms, which rose to the level of musculoskeletal symptom reporting. Among Marines with probable mTBI, those with high risk of LLB exposure also reported significantly more neurological symptoms. Our results indicate that mbTBIs and miTBIs may be fundamentally different, and that LLB may increase susceptibility to injury.

Blast Exposure and Risk of Recurrent Occupational Overpressure Exposure Predict Deployment TBIs.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in recent military conflicts and deployment-related TBIs are most commonly caused by blast. However, knowledge of risk factors that increase susceptibility to TBI following an acute, high-level blast is limited. We hypothesized that recurrent occupational overpressure exposure (ROPE) may be one factor that increases susceptibility to mild TBI (mTBI) following blast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using military occupational specialty as a proxy, we examined the effects of high versus low ROPE on mTBI following blast exposure. Initial analyses included 111,641 active-duty-enlisted U.S. Marines who completed the 2003 or 2008 version of the Post-Deployment Health Assessment. Final analyses examined probable mTBI screens among Marines with at least one qualifying exposure as a function of whether the exposure was a blast and level of ROPE (N = 12,929). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Naval Health Research Center. RESULTS: Blast and ROPE were both independently and jointly associated with a probable mTBI. Marines who experienced a blast (vs other qualifying exposure) and those in high (vs low) risk occupations were 1.07 and 1.23 times more likely to sustain a probable mTBI, respectively. Furthermore, among those who experienced a blast during deployment, those in high-risk occupations were 1.45 times more likely than those in low-risk occupations to sustain a probable mTBI. CONCLUSIONS: Blast exposure and ROPE were independently associated with mTBIs, and Marines with both blast exposure during deployment and ROPE were especially likely to sustain an mTBI. This suggests that ROPE heightens the risk of mTBI following blast. Ongoing research is examining the severity, symptomology, and sequelae of TBIs as a function of ROPE.

Comparison of surf and hike therapy for active duty service members with major depressive disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of novel interventions in a naturalistic setting.

Many active duty service members suffer from major depressive disorder (MDD). Although traditional treatments exist, alternative approaches may also be effective in treating depressive symptoms. Previous research has shown that physical activity has significant positive effects on depression symptoms in individuals with MDD, and that these benefits may be enhanced when physical activity occurs in a natural environment. Even though physical activity (i.e., hiking, walking) in natural environments has been shown to reduce depressive symptoms, water-based activity occurring in a natural environment (e.g., surfing) may produce even greater improvements in depressive symptoms. We detail an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of surf therapy and hike therapy with respect to immediate and longer-term psychological, physical, and functional outcomes in active duty service members with MDD. We describe the methodological development of this RCT evaluating novel treatment approaches and discuss considerations for evaluating physical activity interventions in a naturalistic setting.

The PRImary care Screening Methods (PRISM) study: Rationale and design considerations.

BACKGROUND: Primary care is the most frequently visited clinic type immediately prior to suicidal behavior, with nearly half of suicide decedents visiting a primary care provider within a month of their death. Data supporting the efficacy of suicide risk screening in this setting is lacking, however. Improved suicide risk screening in primary care could lead to earlier intervention and treatment. PURPOSE: The PRImary care Screening Methods (PRISM) study is designed to develop and evaluate the efficacy of an alert algorithm that can be used by military primary care providers to accurately identify high-risk patients, to improve the identification of high-risk patients who deny suicidal thoughts, and to quantify patient subgroups who are more likely to be missed by existing screening methods (i.e., false negatives). METHODS: The rationale of the PRISM study is discussed, along with ethical and design considerations related to the conduct of suicide prevention research. The PRISM study enrolled 2690 patients from six primary care clinics across the U.S. Patients were enrolled during routine visits to a primary care clinic, and completed a battery of self-report scales in clinic waiting rooms. Follow-up phone interviews are conducted 1, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. The primary outcome is suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: PRISM is the first study to prospectively examine multiple suicide risk screening methods in "real-world" military primary care clinics. Ethical and design issues were considered to ensure that human participants, especially suicidal patients, were adequately protected while minimizing the potential confounding effect of risk management protocols.