Evaluation and Management of Posterior Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Tibial plateau fractures are caused by high-energy or low-energy trauma and result in complex injuries that require careful management of both osseous injuries and associated soft tissues. The posterior aspect of the tibial plateau can be involved in a variety of fracture patterns, requiring systematic evaluation, imaging, and advanced surgical planning to address these complex injuries. Early classification systems failed to classify posterior plateau fractures; however, three-dimensional imaging and newer classification schemes, including the Quadrant System and 3D systems, have incorporated posterior column lesions. There has been a growing body of literature focused on fixation principles and plating options for posterior column fractures. Furthermore, there are multiple approaches for surgeons to choose between, including a direct posterior, posteromedial, posterolateral (including Lobenhoffer and lateral condyle osteotomy), and combined posterior approach. This article presents a guide for managing posterior tibial plateau fractures, including the initial evaluation and management, descriptions of the surgical approaches, principles of fixation, and the associated outcomes and complications.

The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measurement are important in improving patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) domain for patients who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture. METHODS: All patients with tibial plateau fractures that underwent operative fixation at a single level 1 trauma center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients without PROMIS PF scores or an anchor question at two-time points postoperatively were excluded. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were calculated. RESULTS: The MCID for PROMIS PF scores was 4.85 in the distribution-based method and 3.93 (SD 14.01) in the anchor-based method. There was significantly more improvement in the score from the first postoperative score (<7 weeks) to the second postoperative time (<78 weeks) in the improvement group 10.95 (SD 9.95) compared to the no improvement group 7.02 (SD 9.87) in the anchor-based method (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving MCID at 7 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 37-42 %, 57-62 %, 80-84 %, and 95-87 %, respectively. DISCUSSION: This study identified MCID values for PROMIS PF scores in the tibial plateau fracture population. Both MCID scores were similar, resulting in a reliable value for future studies and clinical decision-making. An MCID of 3.93 to 4.85 can be used as a clinical and investigative standard for patients with operative tibial plateau fractures.

Risk of reverse golf club deformity with medial plating of distal femur fracture.

INTRODUCTION: This study described a deformity induced by medial plating of supracondylar distal femur fractures using plates that are precontoured for other anatomic locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OTA/AO 33A fractures were created in 12 sawbone femurs and fixed with either a proximal humerus locking plate (PH), an ipsilateral lateral tibial plateau plate (LTP), or an ipsilateral medial distal tibial plate (MDT). A motion capture system measured changes in length and rotation of the distal femur as the plate was applied. Each plate underwent four trials and the mean and standard deviation (SD) for each measurement was reported. An analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test compared malreduction measures between plate types. RESULTS: All plates consistently created a varus deformity. There was lateral lengthening with a compensatory medial shortening and an increase in the lateral distal femoral angle. The distal fracture fragment was laterally translated, and internally rotated. The PH plate had significantly greater lateral length (27.39 mm SD 4.78, p = 0.007), shorter medial length (13.57 mm SD 4.99, p = 0.028), greater lateral translation (28.82 mm SD 5.70, p = 0.010) and greater widening of the lateral distal femoral angle (28.54° SD 4.98, p < 0.001) than the LTP and MDT plates. The MDT plate had significantly greater angulation anteriorly (8.40° SD 1.07, p < 0.001) and laterally (7.63° SD 3.10, p = 0.002) than the PH and LTP plates. There was no significant difference between plates in internal rotation (PH: 3.07° SD 2.79; LTP: 2.05° SD 1.05; MDT 3.81° SD 3.56; p = 0.659). CONCLUSION: When dual plating supracondylar distal femur fractures, poor plate positioning and a mismatch between plate contour and the slope of the medial distal femur can lead to varus angulation, internal rotation, and lateral translation or a "reverse golf club deformity". After comparing three types of precontoured plates, the authors recommend initial evaluation of the ipsilateral proximal tibial plate when placing a plate along the medial distal femur. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Update on Current Concepts of Blood Flow Restriction in the Perioperative Period of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament tears or ruptures are common orthopedic injuries. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is an orthopedic procedure allowing for earlier return to sports, improved maintenance of lifestyle demands, and restored knee stability and kinematics. A perioperative rehabilitative adjunct recently gaining interest is blood flow restriction (BFR), a method in which temporary restriction of blood flow to a chosen extremity is introduced and can be used as early as a few days postoperative. There has been increasing investigation and recent literature regarding BFR. This review synthesizes current concepts of BFR use in the ACLR perioperative period. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):e333-e340.].

No Increased Risk of Nonunion with Bisphosphonate Use in a Medicare Claims Cohort Following Operatively Treated Long-Bone Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of a fragility fracture represents an important intervention event for the initiation of medical osteoporosis treatments. However, it is unclear if osteoporosis medications increase the risk of nonunion if administered in the setting of acute fracture. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators/hormone replacement therapy (SERM/HRT) are associated with nonunion following fracture in a Medicare population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Medicare claims from 2016 to 2019 was performed to identify patients ≥65 years of age who had a surgically treated long-bone fracture as identified with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Successive claims were linked for each beneficiary through 1 year following the fracture to determine fracture union status. Multivariable logistic regression models were specified to identify the association between medications and fracture union status while controlling for age, sex, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and fracture type. RESULTS: Of the 111,343 included fractures, 10,452 (9.4%) were associated with a diagnosis of nonunion within 1 year. The nonunion group was younger (79.8 ± 8.3 versus 80.6 ± 8.4 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be White (92.4% versus 90.9%; p < 0.001), and more likely to have a CCI of ≥2 (50.9% versus 49.4%; p < 0.001). Bisphosphonate use was more common in the nonunion group (12.2% versus 11.4%; p = 0.017). When controlling for race, age, sex, and CCI, neither bisphosphonates (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.12]; p = 0.101) nor SERM/HRT (OR, 1.13 [0.93 to 1.36]; p = 0.218) were associated with nonunion. Bisphosphonate use within 90 days post-fracture was not significantly associated with nonunion (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.03]; p = 0.175), and the timing of medication administration did not influence fracture union status. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nonunion after operatively treated long-bone fractures was 9.4%. In this cohort, use of a bisphosphonate or SERM/HRT was not associated with fracture union status at 1 year. Orthopaedic surgeons should not withhold or delay initiating medical therapies for osteoporosis in the setting of acute fracture out of concern for nonunion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact of intraoperative fluoroscopic beam positioning relative to the hip and pelvis on perceived acetabular component position.

Background: Parallax is poorly understood and can mislead surgeons using intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF) to guide cup placement during anterior approach (AA) total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to examine how changes in fluoroscopic beam positioning in relation to the hip and pelvis affects the projected acetabular image. Methods: An acetabular component was positioned in an anatomic pelvis model in 45° and 20° of abduction and anteversion, respectively using a computer assisted cup targeting system. Fluoroscopic images were taken at various caudal and cranially directed angles with the fluoroscopic beam centered over the hip then pelvis. In each position, four independent observers measured the abduction and anteversion angles of the projected cup image using the same computer targeting system. Results: Cup abduction and anteversion measured 43.5° and 19.5° when IF was centered over the hip and 40.5 and 27.5° when centered over the pelvis in the neutral position. Increasing the caudal direction of the beam 20° increased the projected abduction/anteversion angles by approximately 7°/12° and 9°/16° when centered over the hip and pelvis respectively. Increasing the cranial direction of the beam 20° decreased the measured abduction/anteversion angles by roughly 4°/20° and 4°/24° when centered over the hip and pelvis, respectively. Conclusion: The projected image of the acetabular component can change dramatically depending on fluoroscopic beam position relative to the hip and pelvis. Recognizing the approximate direction and magnitude of change with differing fluoroscopy positions may help surgeons avoid cup malpositioning.

Posterior Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Scapular Fractures.

Background: This technique utilizes a full-thickness flap to provide a posterior approach to the scapula for open reduction and internal fracture fixation. The present video article outlines the Judet approach along with an incision modification tip for the surgeon's consideration. Description: Prior to making the incision, perform preoperative planning, patient and C-arm positioning, and identification of the primary fragments of the fracture that necessitate fixation on imaging. The Judet incision is made, and the full-thickness flap is retracted laterally (also described as a "boomerang-shaped" incision, allowing for the flap to be reflected medially). Next, detach and reflect the deltoid off the scapular spine superolaterally to reveal the internervous plane between the infraspinatus and teres minor. Utilize this interval to access the fracture sites while making sure to reflect the infraspinatus cranially, carefully minding the suprascapular neurovascular bundle, and the teres minor inferiorly, protecting the axillary nerve. A longitudinal arthrotomy may then be created parallel to the posterior border of the glenoid, with careful attention paid toward protecting the labrum from iatrogenic injury. The arthrotomy will allow for intra-articular evaluation of the reduction if needed. Primary fractures are then reduced. Reduction is confirmed with use of fluoroscopy, and fixation is applied to maintain the reduction. Alternatives: Most scapular fractures do well with nonoperative treatment, and this has been well documented in the literature. Open reduction and internal fixation has been shown to offer good-to-excellent clinical outcomes with minimal risk of complications in patients with traumatic scapular fractures that necessitate operative treatment1. In certain fractures of the glenoid fossa, operative treatment is necessary to restore normal anatomy, provide stability to the glenohumeral joint, and facilitate functional rehabilitation. Operative treatment is typically reserved for injuries with intra-articular involvement that results in joint incongruity or joint instability2,3. When operative treatment is indicated, an open posterior approach is utilized for some fractures. The posterior Judet approach is the best-known operative technique for such fractures, while other modifications of the Judet technique have also been described in the literature3-5. Rationale: Reports state that scapular body or neck and glenoid fossa fractures account for up to 80% of scapular fractures6. Open reduction and internal fixation of the scapula is an invasive procedure, requiring large incisions and manipulation of soft tissues to expose the various possible fracture sites on the scapula. Thus, numerus surgical techniques have been described that allow surgeons to best tailor treatment to their patients on a case-by-case basis. However, the Judet approach is the workhorse approach for the operative treatment of scapular fractures and is a technique that should be mastered7. The Judet approach allows access to the posterior scapula and provides excellent exposure for fractures that require posterior fixation. The alternative boomerang-shaped incision represents a mirrored version of the Judet incision, with the skin flap reflected medially. The benefit of this modified approach is that it increases the degree of lateral surgical exposure of the scapula and provides easier access to the glenohumeral joint. Expected Outcomes: With this technique for open reduction and internal fixation of scapular fractures, patients can expect comparable outcomes to those described in the literature for the standard Judet technique. These outcomes have been reported as clinical scores and defined as good-to-excellent in a few retrospective case series1,2. Given the variability in scapular fracture morphology, a trauma surgeon should have a strong repertoire of approaches to address these fractures on a case-by-case basis. The Judet approach is one of these necessary approaches and has been shown in the literature to have acceptable outcomes1-3,7. Important Tips: Placing the vertical limb of the boomerang incision too medial can limit lateral exposure of the scapula and make glenohumeral joint access difficult. To avoid this, be sure that the vertical limb of the incision remains in line with the posterior axillary fold.Wound-healing complications can occur following such an extensive surgical approach. A thorough and secure wound closure with repair of the deltoid back to the scapular spine may avoid these problems.Difficulty with intra-articular visualization may occur. Placing a threaded pin into the humeral head or a small distractor across the glenohumeral joint (with a pin in the extra-articular proximal humerus) may improve visualization. Manipulation of the arm can also be beneficial in this regard.Lateral positioning offers easier imaging and allows for exposure to the coracoid or clavicle if these structures are also injured and require operative fixation.Drawing a boomerang-shaped incision with the horizontal limb paralleling the scapular spine and vertical limb along the posterior axillary fold of the arm allows the skin flap to be reflected medially, increasing the degree of lateral surgical exposure of the scapula.After identifying the internervous plane between the infraspinatus and teres minor, take care to reflect the infraspinatus cranially, protecting the suprascapular neurovascular bundle, and the teres minor inferiorly, protecting the axillary nerve. Acronyms and Abbreviations: ORIF = open reduction and internal fixationK-wire = Kirschner wire.

Metastatic skull base chordoma: A systematic review.

Objective/Hypothesis: To investigate the clinical features, management strategies and outcomes for patients with metastatic primary skull base chordomas. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic search through Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost (CINAHL) was conducted without restriction on dates. After study screening and full-text assessment, two authors independently extracted all data using a pre-established abstraction form. Results: Forty cases were included from 38 studies. The average age (standard deviation [SD]) of the sample at presentation was 28.5 (23.3) and was equally distributed across genders. The average time (SD) between initial diagnosis to local recurrence was 40.1 (60.3) months. The average time (SD) from primary tumor detection to the diagnosis of metastatic disease was 55.2 (49.0) months. The most common subsite for metastatic spread were the lungs (32.5%). Of the 33 patients with data on outcomes, 48.5% were found to have expired by the time of publication. The median overall survival was estimated to be 84 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 62.3-105.7). Conclusions: The most common subsites for metastatic spread of skull base chordoma were the lungs and bone. Overall survival for patients in the current cohort was a median of 84 months, with no significant differences noted when stratifying by the extent of surgery or the site of metastases. Level of Evidence: 3a.

Hawai'i Rural Health Program: Shaping the Next Generation of Rural Doctors.

Like many areas of the United States, Hawai'i and its rural communities are suffering from a significant physician shortage. The University of Hawai'i (UH) John A. Burns School of Medicine (JABSOM) developed the Hawai'i Rural Health Program (HRHP) in 2011 to help provide early and substantial rural training experiences for its medical students in hopes of generating more rural health care providers. Thus far, 20.6% of the students who participated in this program and have since graduated from residency are now practicing in rural communities. Final exam grades of students who participated in the program were not statistically different from those who did not participate, suggesting a similar quality of training between both the rural and traditional cohorts of students. Reflections from students who completed the program demonstrate the large and lasting impact that this immersive experience has on their medical education and desire to help rural communities.

Can obese patients undergo simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty without an increased risk of perioperative complications?

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (simBTKA) remains controversial, especially in obese patients. Therefore, this retrospective study compared six month perioperative complications in 313 simBTKA patients. Comparison groups included 139 non-obese patients (BMI < 30), 61 obese patients (BMI = 30-35) and 48 severely obese patients (BMI > 35). Increased BMI was associated with longer tourniquet and surgical times (p < 0.001). However, no differences were found for transfusion (p = 0.288), deep infection (p = 0.971), pulmonary embolism (p = 0.454), or deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.670). Increased BMI was, therefore, not associated with greater post-operative complications and should not necessarily contraindicate simBTKA.

Comparison of Component Placement Accuracy Using Two Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Grid Technologies During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluoroscopy is beneficial when performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach; however, image distortion may influence component placement. A manual gridding system (MGS) and a digital gridding system (DGS) are commercially available, aimed at visually representing or correcting image distortion. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare component placement accuracy following direct anterior approach THA when intraoperative fluoroscopy was supplemented with MGS or DGS. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of acetabular cup abduction (ABD), leg length discrepancy (LLD) and global hip offset difference (GHO) was completed for consecutive patients from 6 week post-THA weight-bearing radiographs. The predefined target LLD and GHO was <10 mm and ABD target was 45° ± 10°. Differences between MGS and DGS were determined by independent t-tests. RESULTS: The MGS (250 patients, 315 hips) and DGS (183 patients, 218 hips) achieved targeted ABD in 98.7% and 96.8% of cases, respectively, and ABD was significantly lower in the MGS group (45.14 ± 4.03° and 47.01 ± 4.39°, respectively) (P < .001). Compared to MGS, the DGS group averaged significantly higher GHO (3.64 ± 2.44 and 4.45 ± 2.73 mm, respectively, P = .002) but was not significantly different regarding LLD (2.92 ± 2.55 and 3.19 ± 2.46 mm, respectively, P = .275). No significant group difference was noted for percentage within the targeted LLD and GHO; however, 93.5% of DGS and 97.6% of MGS achieved all three (P = .031). CONCLUSION: The use of both the MGS and DGS resulted in consistent component placement within the predefined target zone. Although the MGS appeared to be slightly more consistent, these differences are unlikely to be clinically significant.