Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Radiology ; 311(1): e231348, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625010

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis and management of chronic nonspinal osteomyelitis can be challenging, and guidelines regarding the appropriateness of performing percutaneous image-guided biopsies to acquire bone samples for microbiological analysis remain limited. An expert panel convened by the Society of Academic Bone Radiologists developed and endorsed consensus statements on the various indications for percutaneous image-guided biopsies to standardize care and eliminate inconsistencies across institutions. The issued statements pertain to several commonly encountered clinical presentations of chronic osteomyelitis and were supported by a literature review. For most patients, MRI can help guide management and effectively rule out osteomyelitis when performed soon after presentation. Additionally, in the appropriate clinical setting, open wounds such as sinus tracts and ulcers, as well as joint fluid aspirates, can be used for microbiological culture to determine the causative microorganism. If MRI findings are positive, surgery is not needed, and alternative sites for microbiological culture are not available, then percutaneous image-guided biopsies can be performed. The expert panel recommends that antibiotics be avoided or discontinued for an optimal period of 2 weeks prior to a biopsy whenever possible. Patients with extensive necrotic decubitus ulcers or other surgical emergencies should not undergo percutaneous image-guided biopsies but rather should be admitted for surgical debridement and intraoperative cultures. Multidisciplinary discussion and approach are crucial to ensure optimal diagnosis and care of patients diagnosed with chronic osteomyelitis.


Subject(s)
Osteomyelitis , Adult , Humans , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Osteomyelitis/diagnostic imaging , Osteomyelitis/therapy , Inflammation , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Radiologists
2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(9): ofad433, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37674630

ABSTRACT

Background: Blood culture contamination may lead to misdiagnosis, overutilization of antibiotics, and prolonged length of stay. Blood specimen diversion devices can reduce contamination rates during blood culture collection procedures. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluating the influence of blood specimen diversion devices in blood culture contamination rates. Methods: We searched Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science, from database inception to 1 March 2023, for studies evaluating the impact of a diversion device on blood culture contamination. Blood culture contamination was a positive blood culture with microorganisms not representative of true bacteremia, but rather introduced during collection or processing the blood sample. Random-effects models were used to obtain pooled mean differences, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Results: Of 1768 screened studies, 12 met inclusion criteria for this systematic literature review. Of them, 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were substantially heterogeneous, but stratified analyses considering only high-quality studies revealed that venipuncture using a diversion device was associated with a significant reduction in blood culture contamination in comparison to the standard procedure of collection (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.26 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .13-.54]; I2 = 19%). Furthermore, the stratified analysis showed that the adoption of a diversion device did not reduce the detection of true infection (pooled OR, 0.85 [95% CI, .65-1.11]; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Blood culture diversion devices was associated with decreased contamination rates and could improve quality of care, reduce costs, and avoid unnecessary antibiotic use.

3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(8): 1457-1461, 2022 10 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35535794

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) causes considerable morbidity and mortality and requires comprehensive assessment for metastatic infection. The roles of routine imaging beyond echocardiography in SAB, including 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT), remain contentious. We performed a literature review of studies reporting impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on the clinical management or outcomes of SAB published through 1 March 2022. We identified 7 observational studies in which 18F-FDG-PET/CT frequently identified metastatic foci of infection, revealed foci undetected by prior investigations, led to additional source control procedures, and was associated with fewer infection relapses and lower mortality. Calculated numbers needed to treat for receipt of 18F-FDG-PET/CT were 7-9 to change antimicrobial therapy, 10-27 to lead to an additional source control procedure, and 4-8 to prevent death. These data are comparable to the evidence for clinical impact of other diagnostic modalities accepted as standard of care in SAB, and form a compelling basis for advocacy to expand access to 18F-FDG-PET/CT.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Bacteremia , Neoplasms , Staphylococcal Infections , Aged , Bacteremia/diagnostic imaging , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Glucose , Humans , Medicare , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus , United States
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 97(4): 115086, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32535413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The T2 Candida Panel (T2CP) bodes high sensitivity and specificity to detect candidemia, enabling providers to make quick therapy decisions and possibly decrease mortality. However, utilization in practice and clinical application remains to be evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall provider-utilization of the T2CP at a large community hospital. METHODS: This single center, retrospective, observational study compared antifungal management in all patients with positive or negative T2CP. Additional endpoints included patient-specific variables influencing antifungal management decisions. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-eight T2CP results were evaluated. Antifungal optimization occurred in 54% of patients who had antifungal orders at the time of T2CP test. Antifungal therapy was avoided in 60.4% of negative cases. Patients with negative T2CP had significantly fewer days of therapy compared to positive tests. CONCLUSIONS: Although the T2CP led to fewer days of antifungal therapy with negative tests, many opportunities for improvement in antifungal stewardship were identified, specifically, with negative tests.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidemia/diagnosis , Candidemia/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/classification , Candida/drug effects , Candidiasis/diagnosis , Female , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mycological Typing Techniques , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Postgrad Med ; 132(6): 526-531, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32379557

ABSTRACT

Background: Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome (STSS) is a serious condition that can arise from streptococcal postpartum endometritis. It is associated with a substantial increase in mortality rate and can rarely result in multiorgan infarction. Early recognition plays a vital role in patients' outcome. Objective: To report a case of complicated STSS and review the literature for previous case reports of streptococcal postpartum endometritis to determine if STSS diagnostic criteria (published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) were fulfilled. Case presentation: This is a 41-year-old woman who presented 5 days after an uncomplicated vaginal delivery with endometritis complicated by invasive group A ß-hemolytic streptococcus (GAS) infection and confirmed toxic shock syndrome. The patient was initially admitted to the critical care unit due to hemodynamic compromise requiring intravenous (IV) fluids, IV antibiotic therapy with penicillin and clindamycin, and IV immunoglobulin therapy. The patient subsequently developed multi-organ infarctions, acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring noninvasive respiratory support, and severe reactive arthritis. Literature review revealed 15 case reports of GAS postpartum endometritis, five met criteria for confirmed STSS. One patient died from severe septic shock leading to cardiopulmonary arrest. Thirteen out of 15 cases of postpartum endometritis occurred after uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Conclusion: STSS is a serious and possibly fatal medical condition that requires early diagnosis and treatment to prevent poor patient outcomes and death. Careful consideration to the patient's postpartum clinical presentation with the implementation of an intradisciplinary approach should be utilized.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Arthritis, Reactive , Endometritis , Kidney , Puerperal Infection , Splenic Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Streptococcal Infections , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolation & purification , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/classification , Arthritis, Reactive/etiology , Arthritis, Reactive/therapy , Endometritis/microbiology , Endometritis/physiopathology , Endometritis/therapy , Female , Fluid Therapy/methods , Humans , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Puerperal Infection/microbiology , Puerperal Infection/physiopathology , Puerperal Infection/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Shock, Septic/microbiology , Shock, Septic/physiopathology , Streptococcal Infections/etiology , Streptococcal Infections/physiopathology , Streptococcal Infections/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Infect Public Health ; 13(8): 1118-1122, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32336607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and VRE (vancomycin resistant Enterococcus) are placed under contact precautions according to the Center of Disease Control protocol. Contact precautions however increases patient isolation from Health Care Workers, increase overall hospital costs and may increase depression and anxiety. Our aim in this study was to observe the effects of shortening the number of days of contact precautions for patients infected with MRSA and VRE. METHOD: We observed patients as two cohorts (Pre-Pilot and Pilot) in one Medical Intensive Care Unit, one Surgical Intensive Care Unit & two medical floors during 2014-2015. In the Pre-pilot period contact precautions were kept throughout admission. In the Pilot period contact precautions were initially placed followed by universal gloving. Comparisons were made for MRSA and VRE infection rates. Total costs were estimated assuming the average cost of 1 gown was $26 per patient per day. RESULTS: Mean isolation days were reduced from 11.9 days to 6.8 days for MRSA and 12.8 days to 8.4 days for VRE. There were 86 MRSA infections in the Pre-Pilot period and 73 MRSA infections during the Pilot period (p=0.052). Incidence of hospital acquired MRSA in the wards decreased from 15 to 7 cases and 6 to 2 cases in the Intensive Care Unit in both the Pilot and Pre-Pilot periods respectively. Cost reduced by $2476 and $17,336 per month for VRE and MRSA patients. Number of readmissions also decreased by 39% for MRSA and 50% for VRE. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in contact precautions has reduced patient costs without affecting the rate of MRSA and VRE infection within a one-year period.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections , Infection Control , Patient Isolation , Staphylococcal Infections , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Patient Isolation/statistics & numerical data , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...