Magnetic resonance imaging datasets with anatomical fiducials for quality control and registration.

Tools available for reproducible, quantitative assessment of brain correspondence have been limited. We previously validated the anatomical fiducial (AFID) placement protocol for point-based assessment of image registration with millimetric (mm) accuracy. In this data descriptor, we release curated AFID placements for some of the most commonly used structural magnetic resonance imaging datasets and templates. The release of our accurate placements allows for rapid quality control of image registration, teaching neuroanatomy, and clinical applications such as disease diagnosis and surgical targeting. We release placements on individual subjects from four datasets (N = 132 subjects for a total of 15,232 fiducials) and 14 brain templates (4,288 fiducials), totalling more than 300 human rater hours of annotation. We also validate human rater accuracy of released placements to be within 1 - 2 mm (using more than 45,000 Euclidean distances), consistent with prior studies. Our data is compliant with the Brain Imaging Data Structure allowing for facile incorporation into neuroimaging analysis pipelines.

Low density electrical source imaging of the ictal onset zone in the surgical evaluation of children with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the utility of Low Density (LD) Electrical Source Imaging (ESI) to model the ictal onset zone (IOZ) for the surgical work up of children with medically refractory epilepsy. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 12 patients from a district and regional pediatric epilepsy center, who underwent focal resections between 2014 and 2019. ESI was generated using the Curry 8 software, incorporating T1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans and scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Concordance of the ictal LD-ESI localizations to the epileptogenic zone was assessed by comparing the location of the ictal LD-ESI to the focal resection margins on neuroimaging and noting the post-operative outcomes at one year. Localizations determined by ictal LD-ESI were also compared to interictal LD-ESI, positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and interictal magnetoencephalography (MEG). RESULTS: Ictal ESI correctly localized the ictal onset zone in 4/6 patients, with all four being seizure free at one year. Similarly, interictal ESI localized the irritative zone in 7/9 patients with focal resections, with 6/7 being seizure free at one year. Additionally, we observed ictal ESI to be concordant to interictal ESI in 5/6 patients. Ictal ESI and interictal ESI were concordant to interictal MEG in 3/6 patients. Ictal ESI was concordant with FDG-PET in 6/7 cases. CONCLUSION: IOZ source localization through LD-ESI is a promising complementary method of assessing the epileptogenic focus in children. These findings may support the inclusion of ictal LD-ESI within the pre-surgical evaluation of children to supplement current diagnostic tools.