Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture: the aquaculture performance indicators.

Aquaculture is a rapidly growing food production technology, but there are significant concerns related to its environmental impact and adverse social effects. We examine aquaculture outcomes in a three pillars of sustainability framework by analyzing data collected using the Aquaculture Performance Indicators. Using this approach, comparable data has been collected for 57 aquaculture systems worldwide on 88 metrics that measure social, economic, or environmental outcomes. We first examine the relationships among the three pillars of sustainability and then analyze performance in the three pillars by technology and species. The results show that economic, social, and environmental outcomes are, on average, mutually reinforced in global aquaculture systems. However, the analysis also shows significant variation in the degree of sustainability in different aquaculture systems, and weak performance of some production systems in some dimensions provides opportunity for innovative policy measures and investment to further align sustainability objectives.

Long-rains crops, short-rains crops, permanent crops and fruit crops: The 'hidden' multiple season-cropping system for adaptation to rain variability by smallholder farms.

To adapt is to survive. However, sub-Saharan Africa, although highly dependent on agriculture, is vulnerable, most affected, with low-adaptive capacity. Luckily, the region is blessed with inherent adaptation-related strengths that are within reach, to counteract uncertainty in climatic patterns which are expected to continue well into the future. One such strength is a bimodal rainfall pattern that avails the 'hidden' multiple season-cropping systems that have the potential to produce four types of crops in a single plot in a single year: short-rains crops, long-rains crops, permanent crops and fruit crops. Despite burgeoning literature on adaptation, the impact of multiple season-cropping systems has not been adequately investigated. This study applies a novel approach to measure its impact on productivity of more than 10,000 smallholder plots using an endogenous switching regression framework. The study finds that plots that adopt multiple season-cropping systems produce higher quantities, earn more crop revenue, and are less likely to be affected by rainfall variability in comparison to plots that engage in single season-cropping systems. As the fight against climate change continues, there is need to move the needle on adaptation and consider strategies that are within reach. The multiple season-cropping systems provide this opportunity and emphasises the benefit of engaging in agriculture throughout the year and producing long-rains, short rains, permanent and fruits crops.

Naturally available wild pollination services have economic value for nature dependent smallholder crop farms in Tanzania.

Despite the importance of naturally available wild pollination ecosystem services in enhancing sub-Saharan African smallholder farms' productivity, their values to actual farming systems remain unknown. We develop a nationally representative empirical assessment by integrating nationally representative plot level panel data with spatially and temporally matched land cover maps to identify the contribution of wild pollinators to crop revenue. Our estimation results reveal distinct and robust contributions by natural habitats of wild pollinators - forests - to plot-level crop revenue, where habitats in near proximity to plots contribute much more value than those farther away. When contrasting between pollinator-dependent and pollinator-independent crops, we find that the positive effects emerge only for pollinator-dependent crops, while pollinator-independent crops show no benefits. We conclude the empirical assessment by using our estimates to evaluate changes in crop revenue associated with the actual habitat reduction during 2008-2013. We find that this change in the natural habitats of wild pollinators has reduced crop revenue possibly by as much as 29% (mean) and 4% (median). To our knowledge, this is the first empirical assessment to use nationally representative smallholder farms to assess the value of naturally available wild pollination ecosystem services. Our results magnify the documented benefits of forest conservation, as this preserves pollinators' natural habitats, and by extension its inhabitants, who play an important role in boosting crop yields of nature dependent smallholder farms.