Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of a cytomegalovirus-specific monoclonal antibody (MSL-109) for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

MSL-109 is a monoclonal antibody specific to the cytomegalovirus (CMV) glycoprotein H with high neutralizing capacity. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients with positive donor and/or recipient serology for CMV before transplantation received either 60 mg/kg MSL-109 (n = 59), 15 mg/kg MSL-109 (n = 60), or placebo (n = 60) intravenously every 2 weeks from day -1 until day 84 after transplantation. CMV pp65 antigenemia, CMV-DNA load in plasma, and viremia by culture were tested weekly. Primary end points were development of pp65 antigenemia at any level and/or viremia for which ganciclovir was given. There was no statistically significant difference in CMV pp65 antigenemia or viremia among patients in the 60-mg group (pp65 antigenemia, 47%; viremia, 15%), the 15-mg group (52%; 23%), and the placebo group (45%; 17%). There was also no difference in maximum levels of pp65 antigenemia, time to clearance of pp65 antigenemia after start of ganciclovir, CMV disease, invasive bacterial and fungal infections, time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, acute graft-versus-host disease, days of hospitalization, and overall survival rate among the 3 groups. However, a subgroup analysis of CMV-seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor (D+/R-) showed a transiently improved survival rate by day 100 in MSL-109 recipients (mortality: 60-mg group, 1/13; 15-mg group, 1/12; placebo group, 6/10 [P = .02 for 60-mg versus placebo groups; P = .08 for 15-mg versus placebo groups]); by the end of follow-up, the difference was no longer statistically significant. The improved survival rate in D+/R- patients could not be attributed to a reduction in CMV disease; however, MSL-109 was associated with improved platelet engraftment and less grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease in this subgroup. In a subgroup analysis of CMV-seropositive recipients of MSL-109 (D+/R+ and D-/R+), overall mortality was increased compared to that of the placebo group (P = .12 for the 60-mg versus placebo groups, P = .05 for the 15-mg versus placebo groups, and P = .04 for the dose levels combined versus placebo). MSL-109 was well tolerated and no immune response to the drug was observed. Thus, MSL-109 was safe but did not reduce CMV infection in allogeneic HSCT recipients. The transient survival advantage seen early after transplantation in CMV D+/R- patients and the negative effect on survival in seropositive patients remain unexplained. Thus, there is no evidence that MSL-109 is beneficial in CMV-seropositive HSCT recipients.

Equivalence of 2 effective graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimens: results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial.

We have previously demonstrated a decrease in the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with the addition of methotrexate (MTX) to cyclosporine (CSP) and prednisone (PSE) chemotherapy in patients with leukemia. We have now completed a prospective randomized trial comparing the 3-drug regimen (CSP/MTX/PSE, including 3 doses of MTX) to the standard 2-drug regimen (CSP/MTX, including 4 doses of MTX) to investigate the benefit of PSE used up front for the prevention of acute and chronic GVHD. In the trial, 193 patients were randomized and 186 were included in the final analysis. All patients received a bone marrow graft from a fully histocompatible sibling donor. The preparatory regimen consisted of fractionated total-body irradiation (fTBI) and etoposide in all but 13 patients, who received fTBI and cyclophosphamide. The patients were randomized to receive either CSP/MTX/PSE or CSP/MTX. The 2 groups were well balanced with respect to diagnosis, disease stage, age, donor-recipient sex, and parity. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the incidence of acute GVHD was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12-28) for the CSP/MTX/PSE group compared with 20% (CI 10-26) for the CSP/,MTX group (P = .60), with a median follow up of 2.2 years. Overall survival was 65% for those receiving CSP/MTX/PSE and 72% for those receiving CSP/MTX (P = .10); the relapse rate was 15% for the CSP/MTX/PSE group and 12% for the CSP/MTX group (P = .83). The incidence of chronic GVHD was similar (46% versus 52%; P = .38), with a follow-up of 0.7 to 6.0 years. Of interest, 21 patients went off study due to GVHD (5 in the CSP/MTX/PSE group and 16 in the CSP/MITX group [P = .02]), and 11 patients went off study because of alveolar hemorrhage (3 in the CSP/MTX/PSE group and 8 in the CSP/MTX group [P = .22]). The addition of PSE did not result in a higher incidence of infectious complications, bacterial (66% versus 58%), viral (77% versus 66%), or fungal (20% versus 20%), in those receiving CSP/MTX/PSE versus CSP/MTX, respectively. These data suggest that the addition of PSE was associated with a somewhat lower incidence of early posttransplantation complications but did not have a positive impact on the incidence of acute or chronic GVHD or event-free or overall survival.

A daily flowsheet for an outpatient bone marrow transplant treatment center.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To develop a flowsheet for an outpatient bone marrow transplant treatment center that would decrease the time required to complete documentation and facilitate verbal reports. DATA SOURCES: Oncology nursing standards of care, clinical experience, and published books and articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: A comprehensive daily flowsheet was developed to provide consistency in assessments and documentation of a complex outpatient population. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the new flowsheet decreased the amount of nursing time spent on written documentation and verbal reports. Patients' daily assessments are tracked more easily using this form. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Staff satisfaction can be increased by reducing the amount of time spent on patient documentation.

Paradoxical effect of thalidomide prophylaxis on chronic graft-vs.-host disease.

Thalidomide has been reported to be an effective agent for the treatment of chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). To determine its efficacy as a prophylactic agent for the prevention of chronic GVHD, a prospective randomized double-blind study was performed. A total of 59 patients were randomized to receive either placebo or thalidomide (200 mg orally twice a day) beginning 80 days after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Fifty-four evaluable patients were analyzed, 26 received placebo, and 28 received thalidomide. The characteristics of patients were well-balanced between the two groups. Following the first interim analysis conducted by the Data Safety Monitoring Board using an intent-to-treat approach, a statistically significant difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD was found. Patients receiving thalidomide developed chronic GVHD more often than patients receiving placebo (p = 0.06). Moreover, an apparent overall survival advantage was noted for patients receiving placebo compared to those receiving thalidomide (p = 0.006). Adjustment for possible confounding factors did not eliminate these negative effects of thalidomide. These results demonstrate that while thalidomide is an effective agent for the therapy of chronic GVHD, its use at the doses administered for the prophylaxis of chronic GVHD resulted in a paradoxical outcome with a higher incidence of chronic GVHD and a lower overall survival. We conclude that the early use of thalidomide results in a shift in the balance between GVHD and induction of tolerance. These data demonstrate again the importance of phase III double-blind controlled randomized studies.

Critical pathway for administering high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell rescue in the outpatient setting.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explain the rationale and process of outpatient critical pathway development for sequential high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. DATA SOURCES: Published books and journal articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: Complex treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer is shifting to the outpatient area. To make this therapy safe and cost effective, a process for monitoring this type of outpatient care needs to be developed. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration with a multidisciplinary team is important in ensuring quality of care for complex outpatient treatment protocols. Critical pathway development can serve as a road map for delivering this care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: As team leaders, nurses should oversee the critical pathway development and implementation. Nurses also should maintain their role of patient advocacy through monitoring pathway compliance.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Hematopoietic growth factors have been shown to be effective in reducing the period of neutropenia after autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Initial concerns over potential aggravation of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and increase in the incidence of relapse in patients with myeloid leukemias influenced the number of studies using hematopoietic growth factors after allogeneic BMT. We report the experience with 50 patients treated at a single institution using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after allogeneic sibling (n = 30) and matched unrelated (n = 20) BMT. The time to an absolute neutrophil count > or = 500/microL was significantly faster in patients who received G-CSF and cyclosporine and prednisone for GVHD prophylaxis when compared with historical control patients receiving the same GVHD prophylaxis (10 v 13 days, P < .01). A similar accelerated myeloid engraftment was observed for those patients who received the addition of methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis when compared with historical control patients receiving the same GVHD prophylaxis regimen (16 v 19 days, P < .05). The median time to engraftment for patients receiving a matched unrelated BMT and G-CSF was 17 days (range 13 to 26). We did not observe any increase in GVHD or early mortality in the matched related sibling BMT. The incidence of acute GVHD in the matched unrelated BMT recipients was also low at 21%; however, 9 patients (45%) died within 100 days of the date of BMT, similar to the experience reported with granulocyte-macrophage CSF. This study confirms the efficacy of G-CSF in accelerating myeloid engraftment after allogeneic matched sibling BMT. The higher early mortality associated with patients receiving matched unrelated BMT suggests that randomized controlled trials using G-CSF after allogeneic BMT should be performed.

Autologous bone marrow transplantation. A review of the principles and complications.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) is now used routinely in an attempt to cure patients with poor-prognosis malignant diseases. This aggressive and intensive treatment requires a highly trained health-care team. Nurses specializing in the care of these patients are essential to maintain patient well-being and ensure a good outcome. High-dose therapy leads to myelosuppression and tissue damage, and the resultant infections, bleeding, and organ toxicities are frequently either unusual or more severe than those seen with conventional-dose antineoplastic therapies. Organ toxicities can affect both short-term and long-term functional status. Disabling or even fatal consequences of treatment can occur during the transplant or months or years later. A specialized knowledge base and an understanding of the way this therapy affects the patient is required not only for the acute inpatient period, but also for the long term. A team approach to these complex patients with a central role for the nurse clinician will lead to optimal patient care.

Dynamic assessment of quality of life after autologous bone marrow transplantation.

To determine the quality of life in adult patients after autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT), we administered a questionnaire to a cohort of patients seen at a single referral-based center. The sample included adults 18 years and older during the 1 year following an autologous BMT. Both disease-free patients and those who relapsed with 1-year of follow-up data available were included. Of 59 eligible patients, 58 (98%) responded to the questionnaire. Patients completed a telephone questionnaire administered by a nurse specialist in the field of BMT approximately every 90 days. At the time of initial contact on day +90, the mean quality of life was 7.8 (range, 1 to 10) on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best. By the end of the first year of follow-up, the mean quality of life was 8.9 (range, 3 to 10). Seventy-eight percent of the patients were employed. Twenty-one percent lost weight during the first year, with the majority reporting voluntary weight loss. Fourteen percent reported difficulties with sexual activity. Only 5% reported difficulty with sleeping or with frequent colds. One patient felt that her appearance was worse, and none of the patients reported a poor appetite. Eighty-eight percent of surviving adult patients reported an above-average to excellent quality of life 1 year following autologous BMT. This outcome is encouraging and suggests that this procedure is not associated with long-term morbidity in the surviving adult patient.