Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 25(6): 1740-1749, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36809678

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the impact of treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), for up to 2 years in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) managed in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on data from national registries. People who redeemed at least one prescription of semaglutide and had 2 years of follow-up were included. Data were collected at baseline and after 180, 360, 540 and 720 days of treatment (all timepoints ± 90 days). RESULTS: In total, 9284 people redeemed at least one semaglutide prescription (intention-to-treat) and 4132 people redeemed semaglutide continuously (on-treatment). For the on-treatment cohort, the median (interquartile range) age was 62.0 (16.0) years, diabetes duration was 10.8 (8.7) years, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level was 62.0 (18.0) mmol/mol at baseline. A subset of the on-treatment cohort, comprising 2676 people, had HbA1c measurements at baseline and at least once during 720 days. The mean (95% confidence interval) changes in HbA1c after 720 days were -12.6 (-13.6; -11.6) mmol/mol (P < 0.001) for GLP-1RA-naïve people, and -5.6 (-6.2; -5.0) mmol/mol (P < 0.001) for GLP-1RA-experienced people. Similarly, 55% of GLP-1RA-naïve people and 43% of GLP-1RA-experienced people reached a HbA1c target of ≤53 mmol/mol after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: People treated with semaglutide in routine clinical practice experienced clinically relevant and sustained improvements in glycaemic control after 180, 360, 540 and 720 days, irrespective of former GLP-1RA exposure, effects which were comparable with those observed in clinical studies. These results support the use of semaglutide in routine clinical practice for the long-term management of T2D.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Glycated Hemoglobin , Glucagon-Like Peptides/adverse effects , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists
2.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(4): 673-681, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33794723

ABSTRACT

Background: Obesity is associated with increased societal costs, primarily due to its comorbidities. The objective of this study was to estimate the 3-year attributable societal costs of the first event of cardiovascular comorbidities among people with obesity.Methods: We used an incidence-based cohort study based on Danish national registries. Attributable costs of each event were calculated as the difference between costs of individuals with an event and costs incurred by matched controls.Results: We identified 58,597 individuals with a diagnosis of obesity. On average, 2,038 individuals were diagnosed annually with one or more than ten cardiovascular comorbidities between 2007 and 2013. The 3-year attributable societal costs (health-care costs plus productivity loss) for patients of working age ranged from 8,164 EUR for other ischemic heart disease to 32,203 EUR for hemorrhagic stroke. In the incidence year, costs were mainly driven by health-care costs, while productivity loss and income transfer payments were the primary drivers in subsequent years.Conclusion: The onset of obesity-related cardiovascular comorbidities affected health-care costs and work ability to an extent where sick pay and disability pension were required. Our study demonstrates the need to intensify obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factor management to prevent costly and debilitating obesity-related comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Denmark , Efficiency , Female , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/economics , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 37(6): 949-956, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33729871

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden associated with therapeutic inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in Denmark. METHODS: The economic burden for a newly diagnosed Danish T2D population was estimated using a validated diabetes model (The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE) Cohort model), based on achieving varying levels of glycemic control. The analyses were based on clinical data from the Danish Centre for Strategic Research (DD2) and supplemented with relevant Swedish data where variables were missing. The analysis estimated the economic burden for populations achieving different guideline-recommended targets for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and for a number of therapeutic inertia scenarios. To estimate the population-level burden Danish specific epidemiology data were incorporated. All costs are reported in 2020 Danish kroner (DKK) and 2020 Euros (€). RESULTS: The baseline HbA1c level used for this analysis was 7.9% (63 mmol/mol), which was observed in newly diagnosed Danish T2D patients prior to their first anti-diabetic treatment. Therapeutic inertia was associated with substantial economic burden compared to achieving immediate glycemic control (target < 6.5% (< 48 mmol/mol)). Per patient burdens were between 3562 DKK and 20,160 DKK (€477- €2701) dependent on the duration of therapeutic inertia (1-7 years), with this further increased when indirect costs were included (9649 DKK to 51,585 DKK [€1393-€6912]). The economic burden at a population level was between 27 million DKK to 150 million DKK (€3.6 million to €20 million), dependent on the duration of therapeutic inertia, rising to 72 million DKK to 384 million DKK (€9.6 million to €51.4 million) when indirect costs were included. CONCLUSION: Achieving early and intensive glycemic control, thereby minimizing therapeutic inertia can lead to substantial savings for the Danish society, ranging between 72 million DKK and 384 million DKK (€9.6 million to €51.4 million) (1-7 years of therapeutic inertia). This study highlights that efforts to minimize therapeutic inertia, by securing timely intensification before individual HbA1c targets are exceeded, results in significant long-term cost savings in Denmark.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Cost of Illness , Denmark/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Glycemic Control , Humans
4.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 20(6): 577-586, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33054434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of developing diabetes-related complications and the augmented societal costs increase with the severity of complications. The objective was to estimate the short-term attributable societal costs of the first event of specific diabetes-related complications amongst people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study was based on national registry data covering all patients with type 2 diabetes in Denmark. Attributable costs of each event were calculated as the difference between costs of patients with the specific event and costs incurred by their controls. Results were reported for the incidence year and the following two years. RESULTS: On average, 13,054 patients were identified annually from 2007 to 2013 with one or more of 17 specific first-incident diabetes-related complications. The attributable healthcare costs amounted to 114 million EUR annually in the incidence year alone. Costs were highest in the incidence year but were significantly higher also in the 2nd and 3rd year, driven particularly by increased indirect costs. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term excess costs of treating specific first-incident diabetes-related complications are massive for society. Our study highlights the importance of strengthening primary prevention within type 2 diabetes to minimize the risk of developing costly diabetes-related complications.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Denmark , Diabetes Complications/economics , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Severity of Illness Index
5.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 20(9): 2093-2102, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29726082

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare real-world antidiabetic treatment outcomes over 12 months in obese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who previously received oral antidiabetic therapy and then initiated a first injectable therapy with liraglutide or basal insulin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, propensity score-matched, longitudinal cohort study using real-world data (January 2010 to December 2015) from the Dutch PHARMO Database Network. Adult obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥35 kg/m2 ) patients with T2DM with ≥2 dispensing dates for liraglutide or basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT) were selected. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline during 12 months of follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the changes in weight, BMI and cardiovascular risk factors from baseline. Clinical data were analysed using descriptive statistics and compared using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: Obese patients with T2DM (N = 1157) in each treatment group were matched (liraglutide cohort, n = 544; BOT cohort, n = 613). From 3 months onwards, glycaemic control improved in both cohorts but improved significantly more with liraglutide than with BOT (12 months: -12.2 mmol/mol vs -8.8 mmol/mol; P = .0053). In addition, weight and BMI were significantly lower for treatments with liraglutide vs BOT (12 months: -6.0 kg vs -1.6 kg and - 2.1 kg/m2 vs -0.5 kg/m2 , respectively; P < .0001 for both). No significant differences were seen in changes in cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this real-world study in matched obese patients with T2DM showed that liraglutide was more effective than BOT for HbA1c control and weight/BMI reductions. Patients were more likely to maintain glycaemic control over time after initiating liraglutide than after initiating BOT.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulins/administration & dosage , Liraglutide/administration & dosage , Obesity/physiopathology , Aged , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Body Mass Index , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/etiology , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/drug effects , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...