Evaluation of Clinical Applicability of Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment on Non-Gated Chest Computed Tomography, Compared With the Classic Agatston Score on Cardiac Computed Tomography.

Given current pretest probability (PTP) estimations tend to overestimate patients' risk for obstructive coronary artery disease, evaluation of patients' coronary artery calcium (CAC) is more precise. The value of CAC assessment with the Agatston score on cardiac computed tomography (CT) for risk estimation has been well indicated in patients with stable chest pain. CAC can be equally well assessed on routine non-gated chest CT, which is often available. This study aims to determine the clinical applicability of CAC assessment on non-gated CT in patients with stable chest pain compared with the classic Agatston score on gated CT. Consecutive patients referred for evaluation of the Agatston score, who had a previously performed non-gated chest CT for evaluation of noncardiac diseases, were included. CAC on non-gated CT was ordinally scored. Subsequently, patients were stratified according to CAC severity and PTP. The agreement and correlation between the classic Agatston score and CAC on non-gated CT were evaluated. The discriminative power for risk reclassification of both CAC assessment methods was assessed. Invasive coronary angiography was used as the gold standard, when available. A total of 140 patients aged between 30 and 88 years were included. The agreement between ordinally scored CAC and the Agatston score was excellent (κ = 0.82) and the correlation strong (r = 0.94). Most patients (80%) with an intermediate PTP had no or mild CAC on non-gated CT. They were reclassified at low risk with 100% accuracy compared with invasive coronary angiography. Similarly, 86% of patients had an Agatston score <300. These patients were reclassified with 98% accuracy. In patients with high PTP, the accuracy remained substantial and comparable, 94% and 89%, respectively. In conclusion, we believe this is the first study to assess the clinical applicability of CAC on non-gated CT in patients with stable chest pain, compared with the classic Agatston score. The agreement between methods was excellent and the correlation strong. Furthermore, CAC assessment on non-gated CT could reclassify patients' risk for obstructive coronary artery disease as accurately as could the classic Agatston score.

The evolution of the CTO-PCI landscape in Belgium and Luxembourg: a four-year appraisal.

BACKGROUND: To chart the evolution of the CTO-PCI landscape in Belgium and Luxembourg, the Belgian Working Group on Chronic Total Occlusions (BWGCTO) was established in 2016. METHODS: Between May 2016 and December 2019, patients undergoing a CTO-PCI treatment were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Twenty-one centres in Belgium and one in Luxembourg participated. Individual operators had mixed levels of expertise in treating CTO lesions. Demographic, angiographic, procedural parameters and incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were systematically registered. RESULTS: Over a four-year enrolment period, 1832 procedures were performed in 1733 patients achieving technical success in 1474 cases (80%), with an in-hospital MACCE rate of 2.3%. Fifty-nine (3%) cases were re-attempt procedures of which 41 (69%) were successful. High-volume centres treated more complex lesions (mean J-CTO score: 2.15 ± 1.21) as compared to intermediate (mean J-CTO score: 1.72 ± 1.23; p < 0.001) and low-volume centres (mean J-CTO score: 0.99 ± 1.21; p = 0.002). Despite this, success rates did not differ between centres (p = 0.461). Overall success rates did not differ over time (p = 0.810). High-volume centres progressively tackled more complex CTOs while keeping success rates stable. In all centres, the most applied strategy was antegrade wire escalation (83%). High-volume centres more often successfully applied antegrade dissection and re-entry and retrograde techniques in lesions with higher complexity. CONCLUSION: With variable experience levels, operators treated CTOs with high success and relatively few complications. Although AWE remains the most used technique, it is paramount for operators to be skilled in all contemporary techniques in order to be successful in more complex CTOs.

Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial.

AIMS: Visual estimation is the most commonly used method to evaluate the degree of coronary artery stenosis prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. In interventional cardiology, the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decisions has become routine. We investigated whether the preoperative FFR measurement of coronary lesions is associated with anastomosis function 6 months after surgical revascularization using a multiarterial grafting strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective double-blind study, 67 patients were enrolled from two institutions in Europe and Canada. From these patients, 199 coronary lesions were assessed visually and with FFR at the time of the preoperative angiogram. All patients received coronary revascularization using multiple arterial grafts. A post-operative 6-month angiogram was performed to assess anastomosis functionality using a described angiographic method. The primary outcome was the association between preoperative FFR values and anastomosis function 6 months after surgery. Preoperative FFR was significantly associated with 6-months anastomotic function for all conduits and for all targets (P < 0.001). An FFR value of ≤0.78 was associated with an anastomotic occlusion rate of 3%. CONCLUSION: We found a significant association between the preoperative FFR measurement of the target vessel and the anastomotic functionality at 6 months, with a cut-off of 0.78. Integration of FFR measurement into the preoperative diagnostic workup before multiarterial coronary surgical revascularization leads to improved anastomotic graft function. CLINICAL TRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02527044.