Limbal reconstruction in uveitic glaucoma patient with exposed Ahmed valve coincident with corneal melting and iris prolapse using multiple corneoscleral allografts.

Aim: To present a complex case of Ahmed tube exposure 6 months after the implantation associated with corneal melting and iris prolapse, and the surgical reposition that required multiple allografts and limbal reconstruction. Methods: A 60-year-old patient arrived at the emergency room with tube exposure combined with corneal melting and iris prolapse from a previously placed Ahmed valve 6 months prior. Our approach was to use one corneoscleral graft to repair the melted cornea and avoid further iris prolapse and a second scleral graft to cover the repositioned tube. Upon completion of conjunctival dissection, cleaning and deepithelization of the melted cornea and the tube by application of alcohol 100% followed. A new entry point was made for the tube and was covered using an alcohol-preserved scleral allograft and the previous entry point was repaired using a corneoscleral allograft with the corneal aspect restoring the limbus and avoiding further iris protrusion. Results: 6 months follow-up of the patient showed excellent recovery, anatomical restoration, and IOP normalization. Conclusion: Surgical repair of these cases can be very demanding, and requires surgical improvisation and prolonged surgical time. The literature remains very limited on how a surgeon should approach similar cases, which are the crucial tips, and which are the missteps that should be avoided. In this case, we used multiple scleral/corneoscleral allografts in a specific orientation and different sutures to reconstruct the damaged limbal area and restore the anatomy. Abbreviations: VA = Visual Acuity, GDD = Glaucoma Drainage Device, IOP = Intra Ocular Pressure.

Two Year Randomized Prospective Comparison of Ahmed Valve Versus Baerveldt Implant in Vitrectomized Eyes.

PRCIS: Ahmed Valve and Baerveldt shunt are efficacious options in vitrectomized eyes. Baerveldt implant achieves a lower mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 2 years, with fewer medications and a higher percentage of medication-free patients. PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the efficacy and complications between Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant (BGI) in vitrectomized eyes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center randomized clinical trial, 43 vitrectomized eyes (39 patients) underwent glaucoma drainage device implantation. Eyes were randomized to receive either an AGV (FP7) or a BGI (101-350) and were followed for 2 years. Surgical success was defined as an IOP measurement≤18 mm Hg and≥5 mm Hg with or without glaucoma medication at 2 or more sequential visits after 3 months. The primary outcome was the comparison of the success rate at 2 years, while mean IOP, mean number of medications, and number of complications were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 2-year success rates in IOP control after GDD implantation were similar between the 2 groups; AGV group 81.8% (95% CI: 67.2%-99.6%) and BGI group 85.7% (95% CI: 72.0%-100.0%), (log-rank test P value = 0.74). Patients in the BGI group had a statistically significant lower mean IOP compared with the AGV group in all follow-up visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months (11.62 vs. 17.45 mm Hg at the latter P value <0.001). The BGI group required a significantly lower number of medications for IOP control at the 2-year visit compared with the AGV group (0.76±0.99 vs. 1.5±1.06 P value = 0.02) but had a higher number of complications (62% vs. 41%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: GDDs provide a viable solution for IOP control in vitrectomized eyes. Based on our prospective comparison, both Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve and Baerveldt 101-350 Glaucoma Implant are efficacious options.

Acute Effects of Graduated Elastic Compression Stockings in Patients with Symptomatic Varicose Veins: A Randomised Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of graduated elastic compression stockings (GECS) below the knee in improving symptoms in patients with varicose veins in the absence of high quality evidence. METHODS: This was a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Thirty patients with no experience of elastic stockings, presenting with primary varicose veins causing calf pain or aching were randomised to a GECS (18-21 mmHg at the ankle level, n=15) or a placebo stocking (0 mmHg, n=15). Pain or aching of the index leg after 1 week was the primary outcome measure. In patients with bilateral varicose veins the leg with the most severe pain/aching was considered. Other defined symptoms were secondary outcome measures. All symptoms were scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The two study groups were well balanced at baseline. At the completion of the study after 1 week, GECS were more effective than placebo stockings in reducing pain or aching (VAS score 1.7±3.0 vs. 4.5±2.8 for placebo, p=.02), while non-significant trends were observed for some of the remaining symptoms of the index leg, including feeling of swelling (VAS score 0.9±1.9 vs. 3.3±3.5 for placebo), paraesthesiae (VAS score 0.2±0.6 vs. 2.1±3.1 for placebo), and the number of symptoms other than pain or aching (1.3±1.1 vs. 2.8±1.7 for placebo). Number needed to treat (95% CI) for a 50% or complete improvement of pain or aching in the index leg was 2 (95% CI 1.2-5.5) and 2 (95% CI 1.2-5.3), respectively. Mean daily use of the placebo stockings and GECS was 8.0 hours and 10.2 hours, respectively (p=.13). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with varicose veins, GECS seem effective in ameliorating symptoms, particularly pain or aching, compared with placebo stockings after 1 week of use. Long-term studies are justified.