Cat, dog and house dust mite allergen levels on children's soft toys.

OBJECTIVE: Children's soft toys are known to harbour house dust mite (HDM) allergens, but little is known whether they harbour cat or dog allergens. The objective of the study was to measure cat (Fel d 1), dog (Can f 1) and HDM allergens on children's soft toys. METHODS: Dust was collected from 40 children's soft toys and their mattresses. Data were collected on pet ownership. Dust samples were analysed for Fel d 1, Can f 1, Der p 1 and Der f 1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and results are expressed as median levels with inter-quartile ranges. RESULTS: Thirty-five (87.5%) soft toys had detectable Fel d 1 levels (median: 0.73 µg/g; inter-quartile range: 0.26-2.56 µg/g) while 34 (85%) had detectable Can f 1 levels (1.20 µg/g; 0.53-2.68). Correspondingly, 32 (80%) mattresses had detectable Fel d 1 levels (0.18 µg/g, 0.07-1.01) while 34 (85%) had detectable Can f 1 levels (0.50 µg/g; 0.33-1.06). All mattresses and soft toys had detectable HDM allergen (Der p 1 + Der f 1) levels with soft toys containing about three times higher levels than mattresses. In homes with cats (n = 10) Fel d 1 levels were higher on soft toys than homes without cats (2.49 versus 0.48 µg/g; p = 0.0009). In homes with dogs (n = 25) Can f 1 levels were generally higher on soft toys (1.38 versus 0.63 µg/g; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that soft toys can harbour cat and dog allergen as well as HDM allergens, some with very high levels. Cat and dog ownership resulted in higher Fel d 1 and Can f 1 levels on soft toys and mattresses. The levels of Fel d 1, Can f 1 and HDM allergens on soft toys could be of importance to sensitized asthmatic children.

Incidence of percutaneous injuries and non-reporting rates among first-aid responders in Taiwan.

We determined the incidence of percutaneous (needlestick and sharps) injuries among emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in one county in Taiwan, compared this with the official reporting rate, and sought reasons for non-reporting. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all EMTs in that county, eliciting percutaneous injuries occurrences, reasons why, and reporting data. Data were analyzed by logistic regression. A total of 329 out of 353 EMTs completed the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 93.2%. Thirty-nine EMTs (11.9%) experienced at least one percutaneous injury in the preceding 12 months. Older, less experienced EMTs were at greater risk of percutaneous injuries. None of the EMTs officially reported their percutaneous injuries primarily because they thought reporting was not mandatory and that the reporting process was too complicated. About one in eight EMTs had experienced at least one percutaneous injury in the preceding year. None of these injuries was officially reported to their organization. Ways to make reporting more user friendly are required, along with resources to minimize percutaneous injuries among EMTs in Taiwan.