Omission of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely necrotic Wilms tumor stage I and radiotherapy in stage III: The 30-year SIOP-RTSG experience.

BACKGROUND: Completely necrotic Wilms tumor (CN-WT) following preoperative chemotherapy has been regarded as low-risk WT since the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 study, and patients have been treated with reduced postoperative therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with localized CN-WT stage I and radiotherapy in stage III was safe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective observational study of outcomes of patients diagnosed with localized CN-WT on central pathology review and treated according to the SIOP 93-01 and SIOP-WT-2001 protocols (1993-2022). RESULTS: There were 125 patients with localized CN-WT: 90 with stage I, 10 with stage II, and 25 with stage III. Sixty-two of 125 (49.6%) patients had a discrepant diagnosis and/or staging between the institutional pathologist and central pathology review. In the group of 90 patients with stage I, postoperative chemotherapy was not given to 41 (46%) patients, whereas 49 patients received postoperative chemotherapy-in the latter group, two patients relapsed, and one of them died. One stage I and one stage II patient developed chemotherapy-induced toxicity and died. Nineteen of 25 patients with stage III received no flank radiotherapy. No stage III patient relapsed or died. The overall 5-year event-free survival (EFS) estimate for the entire cohort (stages I-III) was 96.8% [95% confidence interval, CI: 93.6%-99.6%] and the overall survival (OS) was 97.6% [95% CI: 95.0-100%]. The EFS and OS were 97% and 98%, respectively, for stage I, and 100% for stage III. CONCLUSION: Omission of postoperative chemotherapy for patients with CN-WT stage I, and radiotherapy for stage III is safe. Rapid central pathology review is required to assign appropriate treatment and avoid treatment-related side effects.

Pediatric renal tumor epidemiology: Global perspectives, progress, and challenges.

Pediatric renal tumors account for 3%-11% of childhood cancers, the most common of which is Wilms tumor or nephroblastoma. Epidemiology plays a key role in cancer prevention and control by describing the distribution of cancer and discovering risk factors for cancer. Large pediatric research consortium trials have led to a clearer understanding of pediatric renal tumors, identification of risk factors, and development of more risk-adapted therapies. These therapies have improved event-free and overall survival for children. However, several challenges remain and not all children have benefited from the improved outcomes. In this article, we review the global epidemiology of pediatric renal tumors, including key consortium and global studies. We identify current knowledge gaps and challenges facing both high and low middle-incomes countries.

Pediatric renal tumor epidemiology: Global perspectives, progress, and challenges.

Pediatric renal tumors account for 3%-11% of childhood cancers, the most common of which is Wilms tumor or nephroblastoma. Epidemiology plays a key role in cancer prevention and control by describing the distribution of cancer and discovering risk factors for cancer. Large pediatric research consortium trials have led to a clearer understanding of pediatric renal tumors, identification of risk factors, and development of more risk-adapted therapies. These therapies have improved event-free and overall survival for children. However, several challenges remain and not all children have benefited from the improved outcomes. In this article, we review the global epidemiology of pediatric renal tumors, including key consortium and global studies. We identify current knowledge gaps and challenges facing both high and low middle-incomes countries.

Nomogram to predict ipsilateral breast relapse based on pathology review from the EORTC 22881-10882 boost versus no boost trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The EORTC 22881-10882 trial showed that for patients treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT), a 16Gy boost dose significantly improved local control, but increased the risk of breast fibrosis. A model to estimate the risk of ipsilateral breast relapse (IBR) already exists, but now a model has been developed which takes boost treatment into account and is based on centrally reviewed pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Cox model was developed based on central pathology review data and clinical data of 1603 patients from the EORTC 22881-10882 trial with a median follow-up of 11.5years. From a predefined set of variables, predictors with a maximal effect on 10-year IBR rate >4% were retained in the model. Bootstrap re-sampling was used to assess model calibration and discrimination. The results are presented in the form of a nomogram. RESULTS: Apart from young age and no boost, presence of DCIS adjacent to the invasive tumor was associated with increased risk of IBR (HR 1.96, p=0.001). Patients with high grade invasive tumors were younger than patients with low/intermediate grade (p<0.0001). The nomogram includes histologic grade, DCIS, tumor diameter, age, tamoxifen, chemotherapy, and boost with a concordance probability estimate of 0.68. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram for predicting IBR 10years after BCT includes seven factors, with young age, presence of DCIS and boost treatment as the most dominant factors. The nomogram estimates IBR and confirms the importance of a boost dose. Combined with a model to predict fibrosis published previously, the nomogram presented here may assist in decision making for individual patients.