Neurovascular Imaging with Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT: Preliminary Findings on Image-Quality Evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The first-generation photon-counting detector CT was recently introduced into clinical practice and represents a promising innovation in high-resolution CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT compared with energy-integrating detector CT and to explore different reconstruction kernel sharpness levels for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with intracranial saccular aneurysms who had previously undergone conventional energy-integrating detector CT were prospectively enrolled. CT angiograms were acquired on a clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT in ultra-high-resolution mode and reconstructed with 4 vascular kernels (Bv36, Bv40, Bv44, Bv48). Quantitative and qualitative image-quality parameters of the intracranial arteries were evaluated. For the quantitative analysis (image noise, SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio), ROIs were manually placed at standard anatomic intracranial and extracranial locations by 1 author. In addition, vessel border sharpness was evaluated quantitatively. For the qualitative analysis, 3 blinded neuroradiologists rated photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT image quality for the evaluation of the intracranial vessels (ie, the aneurysms and 9 standard vascular branching locations) on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Additionally, readers independently selected their preferred kernel among the 4 kernels evaluated on photon-counting detector CT. RESULTS: In terms of quantitative image quality, Bv48, the sharpest kernel, yielded increased image noise and decreased SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio parameters compared with Bv36, the smoothest kernel. Compared with energy-integrating detector CT, the Bv48 kernel offered better quantitative image quality for the evaluation of small intracranial vessels (P < .001). Image-quality ratings of the Bv48 were superior to those of the energy-integrating detector CT and not significantly different from ratings of the B44 reconstruction kernel. When comparing side by side all 4 photon-counting detector reconstruction kernels, readers selected the B48 kernel as the best to visualize the aneurysms in 80% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT provides improved image quality for neurovascular imaging. Although the less sharp kernels provided superior SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio, the sharpest kernels delivered the best subjective image quality on photon-counting detector CT for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography of the lungs: Phantom and clinical assessment of radiation dose and image quality.

PURPOSE: Photon-counting-detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced noise reduction, spatial resolution, and image quality in comparison to energy-integrated-detectors CT (EID-CT). These hypothesized improvements were compared using PCD-CT ultra-high (UHR) and standard-resolution (SR) scan-modes. METHODS: Phantom scans were obtained with both EID-CT and PCD-CT (UHR, SR) on an adult body-phantom. Radiation dose was measured and noise levels were compared at a minimum achievable slice thickness of 0.5 mm for EID-CT, 0.2 mm for PCD-CT-UHR and 0.4 mm for PCD-CT-SR. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for five tissue densities. Additionally, data from 25 patients who had PCD-CT of chest were reconstructed at 1 mm and 0.2 mm (UHR) slice-thickness and compared quantitatively (SNR) and qualitatively (noise, quality, sharpness, bone details). RESULTS: Phantom PCD-CT-UHR and PCD-CT-SR scans had similar measured radiation dose (16.0mGy vs 15.8 mGy). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) (9.0HU vs 9.6HU). PCD-CT-UHR (0.2 mm) had slightly higher noise level (11.1HU). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had higher SNR in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) while achieving higher resolution (Bone 115 vs 96, Acrylic 14 vs 14, Polyethylene 11 vs 10). SNR was slightly lower across all densities for PCD-CT UHR (0.2 mm). Interestingly, CNR was highest in the 0.2 mm PCD-CT group; PCD-CT CNR was 2.45 and 2.88 times the CNR for 0.5 mm EID-CT for acrylic and poly densities. Clinical comparison of SNR showed predictably higher SNR for 1 mm (30.3 ± 10.7 vs 14.2 ± 7, p = 0.02). Median subjective ratings were higher for 0.2 mm UHR vs 1 mm PCD-CT for nodule contour (4.6 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.1, p = 0.02), bone detail (5 ± 0 vs 4 ± 0.1, p = 0.001), image quality (5 ± 0.1 vs 4.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), and sharpness (5 ± 0.1 vs 4 ± 0.2). CONCLUSION: Both UHR and SR PCD-CT result in similar radiation dose levels. PCD-CT can achieve higher resolution with lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT.

Radiation Effective Doses to Adults Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Modified Barium Swallow Studies (MBSSs) are important tests to aid the diagnosis of swallowing impairment and guide treatment planning. Since MBSSs use ionizing radiation, it is important to understand the radiation exposure associated with the exam. This study reports the average radiation dose in routine clinical MBSSs, to aid the evidence-based decision-making of clinical providers and patients. We examined the MBSSs of 200 consecutive adult patients undergoing clinically indicated exams and used kilovoltage (kV) and Kerma Area Product to calculate the effective dose. While 100% of patients underwent the exam in the lateral projection, 72% were imaged in the upper posterior-anterior (PA) projection and approximately 25% were imaged in the middle and lower PA projection. Average kVs were 63 kV, 77 kV, 78.3 kV, and 94.3 kV, for the lateral, upper, middle, and lower PA projections, respectively. The average effective dose per exam was 0.32 ± 0.23 mSv. These results categorize a typical adult MBSS as a low dose examination. This value serves as a general estimate for adults undergoing MBSSs and can be used to compare other sources of radiation (environmental and medical) to help clinicians and patients assess the risks of conducting an MBSS. The distinction of MBSS as a low dose exam will assuage most clinician's fears, allowing them to utilize this tool to gather clinically significant information about swallow function. However, as an X-ray exam that uses ionizing radiation, the principles of ALARA and radiation safety must still be applied.

Radiation exposure in modified barium swallow studies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The modified barium swallow study (MBSS) is an X-ray examination of swallowing used to detect the presence and type impairment, aspiration risk, and to develop intervention plans. In this review, we will cover the use of ionizing radiation in MBSSs and review recent literature concerning radiation exposure and cancer risks to patients undergoing MBSSs. Lastly, we will discuss the clinical implications of these findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature confirms that the MBSS is a low-dose examination and that reducing pulse rate negatively impacts diagnostic accuracy. Importantly, cancer risks to adults undergoing MBSSs were also reported to be low. SUMMARY: An adult undergoing MBSS using a standardized, valid protocol, like the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), has low-radiation exposure and very low associated cancer risks. MBSSs should be used whenever relevant to adult patient care without undue concern regarding radiation exposure. Children also have low radiation exposure from MBSSs; however, cancer risks from that exposure remain unknown. Best practices in radiation safety must always be followed. Reducing pulse rates in the adult or pediatric population to reduce radiation exposure is not a valid strategy because of the resulting reduction in diagnostic accuracy.

Radiation Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Modified Barium Swallow Studies (MBSSs) are a fluoroscopic exam that exposes patients to ionizing radiation. Even though radiation exposure from MBSSs is relatively small, it is necessary to understand the excess cancer risk to the patient, in order to ensure a high benefit-to-risk ratio from the exam. This investigation was aimed at estimating the excess radiation risks during MBSSs. We examined 53 adult MBSSs performed using the full Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) protocol. For each exam, the radiation dose (in terms of dose area product), patient age, and sex was recorded. Using published methodology, we determined the effective dose and organ specific dose then used BEIR VII data to calculate the excess cancer incidence related to radiation exposure from MBSSs in adults. Excess cancer incidence risks due to MBSSs were 11 per million exposed patients for 20-year-old males, 32 per million exposed patients for 20-year-old females, 4.9 per million exposed patients for 60-year-old males, and 7.2 per million exposed patients for 60-year-old females. Radiation exposure to the thyroid, lung, and red bone marrow contributed over 90% of the total cancer incidence risk. For the 20-year-old males, the excess cancer incidence risk is 4.7%/Sv, which is reduced to 1.0%/Sv in the 80-year-olds. For the 20-year-old females, the excess cancer incidence risk is 14%/Sv, which is reduced to 1.3%/Sv for 80-year-olds. Overall, the risk per unit effective dose from MBSSs is lower than the risk estimates for uniform whole-body irradiation. Patient age is the most important determinant of patient cancer risk from MBSSs.

Estimating Thyroid Doses From Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

This study sought to obtain factors to convert entrance air kerma into thyroid doses for patients undergoing modified barium swallow studies. A commercial software package (PCXMC 2.0.1) was used to calculate patient thyroid doses from modified barium swallow studies, which were divided by the entrance air kerma to yield fthyroid ratios. Exposure in the lateral and posterior-anterior projections were considered where the thyroid was directly irradiated. Calculations were obtained for adult patients as well as children ranging from birth to 10 y old. The average value of fthyroid in a normal-sized adult was 0.63 ± 0.11 in the lateral projection and 0.18 ± 0.06 for an upper gastrointestinal posterior-anterior projection. Increasing the beam quality from the lowest (60 kV + 3 mm aluminum) to the highest (110 kV + 3 mm aluminum + 0.2 mm copper) values investigated nearly doubled the value of fthyroid from 0.42 to 0.79 in the lateral projection and quadrupled the value from 0.07 to 0.29 in the upper gastrointestinal posterior-anterior projection. Values of fthyroid decreased with increasing body mass index. Average values of fthyroid in 10 y olds were similar to those of adults but always increased as the age of the exposed child was reduced. The average fthyroid for newborns was 0.84, nearly one-third higher than the corresponding ratio for normal-sized adults.

EFFECTIVE DOSE PER UNIT KERMA-AREA PRODUCT CONVERSION FACTORS IN ADULTS UNDERGOING MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDIES.

This study presents an investigation of adult effective dose (E) per unit Kerma-Area Product (KAP) in Modified Barium Swallow Study (MBSS) examinations. PC program for X-ray Monte Carlo (version 2.0.1) was used to calculate patient organ doses during MBSS examinations, which used combined to generate effective dose. Normalized patient doses were obtained by dividing the effective dose (mSv) by the incident KAP (Gy·cm2). Five standard projections were studied and the importance of X-ray beam size and in patient size (body mass index) were investigated. Lateral projections had an average E/KAP conversion factor of 0.19 ± 0.04 mSv/Gy·cm2. The average E/KAP was highest for upper gastrointestinal (GI) anterior-posterior projections (0.27 ± 0.04 mSv/Gy·cm2) and lowest for upper GI posterior-anterior projections (0.09 ± 0.03 mSv/Gy·cm2). E/KAP always increased with increasing filtration and/or X-ray tube voltage. Reducing the X-ray beam cross-sectional area increased the E/KAP conversion factors. Small patients have the E/KAP conversion factors that are twice those of a standard adult. Conversion factors for effective dose of adult patients undergoing MBSS examinations must account for X-ray beam projection, beam quality (kV and filtration), image size and patient size.

Doses metrics and patient age in CT.

The aim of this study was to investigate how effective dose and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) change with patient age (size) for routine head and abdominal/pelvic CT examinations. Heads and abdomens of patients were modelled as a mass-equivalent cylinder of water corresponding to the patient 'effective diameter'. Head CT scans were performed at CTDIvol(S) of 40 mGy, and abdominal CT scans were performed at CTDIvol(L) of 10 mGy. Values of SSDE were obtained using conversion factors in AAPM Task Group Report 204. Age-specific scan lengths for head and abdominal CT scans obtained from the authors' clinical practice were used to estimate the dose-length product for each CT examination. Effective doses were calculated from previously published age- and sex-specific E/DLP conversion factors, based on ICRP 103 organ-weighting factors. For head CT examinations, the scan length increased from 15 cm in a newborn to 20 cm in adults, and for an abdominal/pelvic CT, the scan length increased from 20 cm in a newborn to 45 cm in adults. For head CT scans, SSDE ranged from 37.2 mGy in adults to 48.8 mGy in a newborn, an increase of 31 %. The corresponding head CT effective doses range from 1.4 mSv in adults to 5.2 mSv in a newborn, an increase of 270 %. For abdomen CT scans, SSDE ranged from 13.7 mGy in adults to 23.0 mGy in a newborn, an increase of 68 %. The corresponding abdominal CT effective doses ranged from 6.3 mSv in adults to 15.4 mSv in a newborn, an increase of 140 %. SSDE increases much less than effective dose in paediatric patients compared with adults because it does not account for scan length or scattered radiation. Size- and age-specific effective doses better quantify the total radiation received by patients in CT by explicitly accounting for all organ doses, as well as their relative radio sensitivity.

Thyroid Doses and Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Neck CT Examinations.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate absorbed thyroid dose and consequent cancer risks in adult patients undergoing neck CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from neck CT examinations of 68 consecutive adult patients to calculate the thyroid dose and estimate the corresponding cancer risk. Age and sex were recorded along with the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) that was used to perform the examination. CTDIvol values were used to estimate thyroid doses in the mathematic phantom used in the ImPACT patient CT dosimetry calculator. Corresponding doses in patients were estimated by modeling each patient's neck as an equivalent cylinder of water and applying correction factors for varying neck size and scanning length and the variation of radiation intensity due to automatic exposure control. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) adult patient age was 59 ± 16 years, and the mean equivalent water cylinder diameter used for modeling the patient neck was 19.4 ± 4.2 cm. The average adult patient neck size was about 3 cm larger than the mathematic anthropomorphic phantom (16.5 cm), decreasing the estimated thyroid doses by 15%. Thyroid doses were independent of age and sex, with an average of 50 ± 23 mGy. The average cancer risk for a 20-year-old woman was six times higher than the corresponding risk for a 20-year-old man. Increasing patient age of either sex from 40 to 60 years reduced the cancer risk by approximately an order of magnitude. CONCLUSION: Patient sex and age are the most important factors in determining thyroid cancer risk, with the thyroid dose being secondary.

What is the preferred strength setting of the sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm in abdominal CT imaging?

Our primary objective in this study was to determine the preferred strength setting for the sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging. Sixteen consecutive clinical CT scans of the abdomen were reconstructed by use of traditional filtered back projection (FBP) and 5 SAFIRE strengths: S1-S5. Six readers of differing experience were asked to rank the images on preference for overall diagnostic quality. The contrast-to-noise ratio was not significantly different between SAFIRE S1 and FBP, but increased with increasing SAFIRE strength. For pooled data, S2 and S3 were preferred equally but both were preferred over all other reconstructions. S5 was the least preferred, with FBP the next least preferred. This represents a marked disparity between the image quality based on quantitative parameters and qualitative preference. Care should be taken to factor in qualitative in addition to quantitative aspects of image quality when one is optimizing iterative reconstruction images.

Physician preference between low-dose computed tomography with a sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm and routine-dose computed tomography with filtered back projection in abdominopelvic imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to directly compare the preference between low-dose sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) and routine filtered back projection (FBP) abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A retrospective review identified 41 subjects who had undergone 2 different CT examinations at different times (a CT with reduced radiation dose SAFIRE and also a CT with routine-dose FBP). Radiation dose, patient size, and image noise were recorded. Two independent readers assessed the paired CT studies for preference in image quality in regard to 3 clinically relevant diagnostic endpoints (bowel pathology, biliary pathology, and general purpose). RESULTS: Radiation dose was significantly lower for SAFIRE (mean, 7.6 mGy; range, 4.1-15.4 mGy) than FBP (12.9 mGy; 6.7-31.6 mGy) (P < 0.001). Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction was preferred for the general purpose and bowel evaluations, particularly when the level of radiation dose reduction was less than 33%. The preference for interpretation of the biliary system was equivocal, especially when the level of radiation reduction was increased greater than 33%. Filtered back projection was preferred when SAFIRE had a radiation reduction from FBP of greater than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: For abdominopelvic CT, low-dose CT with SAFIRE may produce preferred image quality over FBP up to levels of 50% dose reduction.

Computation of thyroid doses and carcinogenic radiation risks to patients undergoing neck CT examinations.

The aim of the study was to investigate how differences in patient anatomy and CT technical factors in neck CT impact on thyroid doses and the corresponding carcinogenic risks. The CTDIvol and dose-length product used in 11 consecutive neck CT studies, as well as data on automatic exposure control (AEC) tube current variation(s) from the image DICOM header, were recorded. For each CT image that included the thyroid, the mass equivalent water cylinder was estimated based on the patient cross-sectional area and average relative attenuation coefficient (Hounsfield unit, HU). Patient thyroid doses were estimated by accounting for radiation intensity at the location of the patient's thyroid, patient size and the scan length. Thyroid doses were used to estimate thyroid cancer risks as a function of patient demographics using risk factors in BEIR VII. The length of the thyroid glands ranged from 21 to 54 mm with an average length of 42 ± 12 mm. Water cylinder diameters corresponding to the central slice through the patient thyroid ranged from 18 to 32 cm with a mean of 25 ± 5 cm. The average CTDIvol (32-cm phantom) used to perform these scans was 26 ± 6 mGy, but the use of an AEC increased the tube current by an average of 44 % at the thyroid mid-point. Thyroid doses ranged from 29 to 80 mGy, with an average of 55 ± 19 mGy. A 20-y-old female receiving the highest thyroid dose of 80 mGy would have a thyroid cancer risk of nearly 0.1 %, but radiation risks decreased very rapidly with increasing patient age. The key factors that affect thyroid doses in neck CT examinations are the radiation intensity at the thyroid location and the size of the patient. The corresponding patient thyroid cancer risk is markedly influenced by patient sex and age.