Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 87
Filter
1.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 36(1): 63-69, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667628

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The investigators aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with or without delirium and preexisting depression, dementia, both, or neither by using validated tools easily administered in clinical practice. METHODS: In this cross-sectional prospective observational study conducted in Medellín, Colombia, 200 geriatric inpatients were evaluated with the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro), Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, Hachinski Ischemic Scale, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index-short form. Delirium motor subtype, mortality, and length of hospital stay were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 134 patients without delirium (67%), 14 with delirium only (7%), 16 with delirium and dementia (8%), 13 with delirium and depression (7%), and 23 with delirium, dementia, and depression (the three Ds) (12%). Prevalence rates of dementia (59%) and depression (55%) among 66 patients with delirium were higher than prevalence rates among patients without delirium (13% and 28%, respectively), suggesting that both conditions are risk factors. Main medical diagnoses, mortality, and dementia type did not differ among groups. Motor subtypes were similar among delirium groups. Patients in the delirium groups, except those in the delirium and depression group, were older than patients without delirium. Medical burden was highest among the patients with delirium and dementia and those with all three conditions. Delirium and dementia were more severe when comorbid with each other. Depression was most severe among patients with delirium and depression. Patients with all three conditions had a longer length of hospital stay than those without delirium. CONCLUSIONS: Using brief tools to detect dementia and depression in conjunction with the DDT-Pro to assess delirium diagnosis and severity is feasible and enables a more in-depth evaluation of elderly hospitalized patients. Because previous longitudinal research suggests that these comorbid conditions influence prognosis following a delirium episode, better identification of the three Ds offers proactive interventional opportunities. Depression is an underrecognized risk factor for delirium.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Dementia , Humans , Aged , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/psychology , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/psychology , Inpatients , Cross-Sectional Studies , DDT
2.
Genome Biol Evol ; 15(10)2023 10 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776517

ABSTRACT

The detection of invasive pathogens is critical for host immune defense. Cell surface receptors play a key role in the recognition of diverse microbe-associated molecules, triggering leukocyte recruitment, phagocytosis, release of antimicrobial compounds, and cytokine production. The intense evolutionary forces acting on innate immune receptor genes have contributed to their rapid diversification across plants and animals. However, the functional consequences of immune receptor divergence are often unclear. Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) comprise a family of animal G protein-coupled receptors which are activated in response to a variety of ligands including formylated bacterial peptides, pathogen virulence factors, and host-derived antimicrobial peptides. FPR activation in turn promotes inflammatory signaling and leukocyte migration to sites of infection. Here we investigate patterns of gene loss, diversification, and ligand recognition among FPRs in primates and carnivores. We find that FPR1, which plays a critical role in innate immune defense in humans, has been lost in New World primates. Amino acid variation in FPR1 and FPR2 among primates and carnivores is consistent with a history of repeated positive selection acting on extracellular domains involved in ligand recognition. To assess the consequences of FPR divergence on bacterial ligand interactions, we measured binding between primate FPRs and the FPR agonist Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B, as well as S. aureus FLIPr-like, an FPR inhibitor. We found that few rapidly evolving sites in primate FPRs are sufficient to modulate recognition of bacterial proteins, demonstrating how natural selection may serve to tune FPR activation in response to diverse microbial ligands.


Subject(s)
Receptors, Formyl Peptide , Staphylococcus aureus , Humans , Animals , Receptors, Formyl Peptide/genetics , Receptors, Formyl Peptide/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Ligands , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/metabolism , Receptors, Immunologic , Primates/metabolism
3.
Rev. cuba. med. mil ; 52(1)mar. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521989

ABSTRACT

Los desastres sanitarios han afectado la humanidad desde sus albores. En otras epidemias, las bajas causadas se contabilizan por cientos de miles. La preparación para el enfrentamiento a la epidemia de la COVID-19 en el hospital Militar de Matanzas, "Dr. Mario Muñoz Monroy", comenzó tempranamente. Con el objetivo de analizar esa experiencia, se reflexiona sobre los resultados del enfrentamiento en el año 2020, a partir de los principales aspectos, las coordinaciones con otros organismos, las decisiones tomadas, cambios estructurales y modificaciones de procesos institucionales. Consolidar la superación científica ha sido un pilar permanente, junto con la disciplina, la responsabilidad personal y social de los miembros del colectivo.


Health disasters have affected humanity since its dawn. In other epidemics, the casualties caused number in the hundreds of thousands. The preparation for confronting the COVID-19 epidemic at the Military Hospital of Matanzas, "Dr. Mario Muñoz Monroy", began early. In order to analyze this experience, we reflect on the results of the confrontation in 2020, based on the main aspects, the coordination with other organizations, the decisions made, structural changes and modifications of institutional processes. Consolidating scientific improvement has been a permanent pillar, along with discipline, personal and social responsibility of the members of the collective.

4.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 51(3): 245-255, 2022.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36085127

ABSTRACT

The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 poses unprecedented challenges in the health care. Among them is the increase in cases of delirium. The severe SARS-CoV-2 disease, COVID-19, has common vulnerabilities with delirium and produces alterations in organs such as the lungs or the brain, among others, which have the potential to trigger the mental disorder. In fact, delirium may be the first manifestation of the infection, before fever, general malaise, cough or respiratory disturbances. It is widely supported that delirium increases the morbidity and mortality in those who suffer from it during hospitalization, so it should be actively sought to carry out the relevant interventions. In the absence of evidence on the approach to delirium in the context of COVID-19, this consensus was developed on three fundamental aspects: diagnosis, non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment, in patients admitted to the general hospital. The document contains recommendations on the systematic use of diagnostic tools, when to hospitalize the patient with delirium, the application of non-pharmacological actions within the restrictions imposed by COVID-19, and the use of antipsychotics, taking into account the most relevant side effects and pharmacological interactions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delirium , Psychiatry , COVID-19 Testing , Colombia , Consensus , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/etiology , Delirium/therapy , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Rev. colomb. psiquiatr ; 51(3): 245-255, jul.-set. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1408075

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN La pandemia por el nuevo coronavirus denominado SARS-CoV-2 plantea retos sin precedentes en la atención de la salud. Entre ellos se cuenta el aumento en los casos de delirium. La enfermedad grave por SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, tiene vulnerabilidades comunes con el delirium y produce alteraciones en órganos como el pulmón o el cerebro, entre otros, que tienen potencial para precipitar el trastorno mental; de hecho, este puede ser la primera manifestación de la infección, antes de la fiebre, el malestar general, la tos o las alteraciones respiratorias. Está ampliamente sustentado que el delirium incrementa la morbilidad y la mortalidad de quienes lo padecen durante una hospitalización, por lo que se debe buscar activamente para realizar las intervenciones pertinentes. Ante la ausencia de evidencia sobre el abordaje del delirium en el contexto de la COVID-19, se elaboró este consenso sobre tres aspectos fundamentales: diagnóstico, tratamiento no farmacológico y tratamiento farmacológico, en pacientes ingresados en el hospital general. El documento contiene recomendaciones sobre uso sistemático de herramientas diagnósticas, cuándo hospitalizar al paciente con delirium, la aplicación de acciones no farmacológicas dentro de las restricciones que impone la COVID-19 y la utilización de antipsicóticos teniendo en cuenta los efectos secundarios más relevantes y las interacciones farmacológicas.


ABSTRACT The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 poses unprecedented challenges in the health care. Among them is the increase in cases of delirium. The severe SARS-CoV-2 disease, COVID-19, has common vulnerabilities with delirium and produces alterations in organs such as the lungs or the brain, among others, which have the potential to trigger the mental disorder. In fact, delirium may be the first manifestation of the infection, before fever, general malaise, cough or respiratory disturbances. It is widely supported that delirium increases the morbidity and mortality in those who suffer from it during hospitalization, so it should be actively sought to carry out the relevant interventions. In the absence of evidence on the approach to delirium in the context of COVID-19, this consensus was developed on three fundamental aspects: diagnosis, non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment, in patients admitted to the general hospital. The document contains recommendations on the systematic use of diagnostic tools, when to hospitalize the patient with delirium, the application of non-pharmacological actions within the restrictions imposed by COVID-19, and the use of antipsychotics, taking into account the most relevant side effects and pharmacological interactions.

6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(49): e32096, 2022 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36626485

ABSTRACT

Delirium is an acute state of impaired consciousness and a medical urgency. Its broad range of alterations in mental status make diagnosis challenging. Awareness and accurate provisional diagnosis by nonpsychiatric clinicians are important for prompt management. Because delirium symptoms overlap and mimic other neuropsychiatric conditions, a referral to a consultant psychiatrist is often needed. The aim of this study was to determine the discriminating variables that are associated with concordance or discordance for a DSM-5 delirium diagnosis made by the consultation/liaison (C/L) psychiatrist as compared to the referral diagnosis/reasons given by the referring physicians for inpatients from a Tertiary Hospital in a Latin-American country. Prospective study of a cohort of 399 consecutive patients admitted to any ward of a university hospital in Medellin-Colombia and referred by a specialist physician to the C/L Psychiatry service. Analyses for diagnostic concordance used a nested sample of 140 cases diagnosed with delirium by the psychiatrist. Two multivariate logistic models were run, for delirium diagnosis concordance and discordance between the referring physician and C/L psychiatrist. The referral diagnosis was concordant with that of Psychiatry in 90/140 patients in 64.3%, with 35.7% discordance. Increasing age (OR = 1.024) and internal medicine ward (OR = 3.0) were significantly related (Wald statistic P < .05) to concordance in the multivariate analysis whose model accuracy was 68.6%. Trauma/orthopedics ward (OR = 5.7) and SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR = 3.8) were important contributors to the model fit though not significant. Accuracy of the discordance model was 70.7%, where central nervous system (CNS) disorder (OR = 6.1) and referrals from ICU (OR = 4.9), surgery (OR = 4.6), neurology/neurosurgery (OR = 5.1) and another consultant (OR = 4.7) were significantly related (Wald statistic P < .05), while metabolic/endocrine disorder (OR = 2.7) was important for model fit, but not significant. Concordance for delirium diagnosis was higher from services where education, guidelines and working relationships with C/L Psychiatry could have contributed beneficially whereas, surprisingly, CNS disorders and neurology/neurosurgery services had higher discordance, as well as the ICU. Routine use of brief sensitive delirium assessment tools such as the DDT-Pro could enhance provisional delirium diagnosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delirium , Physicians , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers , Prospective Studies , Colombia , SARS-CoV-2 , Referral and Consultation , Delirium/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing
7.
Rev. colomb. psiquiatr ; 50(4): 260-272, oct.-dic. 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1376929

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivo: describir las prácticas farmacológicas y no farmacológicas para el delirium, realizadas por residentes de psiquiatría y psiquiatras en Colombia. Métodos: encuesta anónima basada en el consenso de expertos del Comité de Psiquiatría de Enlace de la Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría y en la literatura. Enviada por correo electrónico a los adscritos a la asociación. Resultados: Participaron 101 clínicos. Las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas como psi-coeducación, corrección de problemas sensoriales o higiene del sueno son realizadas por el 70% o más. Solo cerca de uno de cada 10 hace parte de algún programa multicomponente preventivo institucional. La prescripción preventiva de fármacos fue menor del 20%. Respecto al tratamiento no farmacológico, más del 75% hace corrección de dificultades sensoriales, control de estímulos y reorientación. Nadie indicó que en su centro la atención esté organizada para potenciar el tratamiento no farmacológico. El 17,8% no usa fármacos en el tratamiento. Los que los usan prefieren haloperidol o quetiapina, especialmente en casos hiperactivos o mixtos. Conclusiones: Las prácticas de los encuestados coinciden con las de otros expertos en el mundo. En general, las acciones no farmacológicas son iniciativas individuales, lo que evidencia la necesidad de que las instituciones colombianas de salud se comprometan con el abordaje del delirium, especialmente cuando su prevalencia y consecuencias son indicadores de calidad en la atención.


ABSTRACT Objective: To describe pharmacological and non-pharmacological practices for delirium, carried out by psychiatry residents and psychiatrists in Colombia. Methods: An anonymous survey was conducted based on the consensus of experts of the Liaison Psychiatry Committee of the Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría [Colombian Psychiatric Association] and on the literature review. It was sent by email to the association members. Results: 101 clinicians participated. Non-pharmacological preventive measures such as psychoeducation, correction of sensory problems or sleep hygiene are performed by 70% or more. Only about 1 in 10 participants are part of an institutional multi-component prevention programme. The preventive prescription of drugs was less than 20%. Regarding non-pharmacological treatment, more than 75% recommend correction of sensory difficulties, control of stimuli and reorientation. None of the participants indicated that the care at their centres is organised to enhance non-pharmacological treatment. 17.8% do not use medication in the treatment of delirium. Those who use it prefer haloperidol or quetiapine, particularly in hyperactive or mixed motor subtypes. Conclusions: The practices of the respondents coincide with those of other experts around the world. In general, non-pharmacological actions are individual initiatives, which demonstrates the need in Colombian health institutions to commit to addressing delirium, in particular when its prevalence and consequences are indicators of quality of care.

8.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 50(4): 260-272, 2021.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728177

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe pharmacological and non-pharmacological practices for delirium, carried out by psychiatry residents and psychiatrists in Colombia. METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted based on the consensus of experts of the Liaison Psychiatry Committee of the Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría [Colombian Psychiatric Association] and on the literature review. It was sent by email to the association members. RESULTS: 101 clinicians participated. Non-pharmacological preventive measures such as psychoeducation, correction of sensory problems or sleep hygiene are performed by 70% or more. Only about 1 in 10 participants are part of an institutional multi-component prevention programme. The preventive prescription of drugs was less than 20%. Regarding non-pharmacological treatment, more than 75% recommend correction of sensory difficulties, control of stimuli and reorientation. None of the participants indicated that the care at their centres is organised to enhance non-pharmacological treatment. 17.8% do not use medication in the treatment of delirium. Those who use it prefer haloperidol or quetiapine, particularly in hyperactive or mixed motor subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: The practices of the respondents coincide with those of other experts around the world. In general, non-pharmacological actions are individual initiatives, which demonstrates the need in Colombian health institutions to commit to addressing delirium, in particular when its prevalence and consequences are indicators of quality of care.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Psychiatry , Colombia , Delirium/prevention & control , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 33(3): 210-218, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33843248

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The investigators aimed to describe delirium etiologies and clinical characteristics, as well as the relationship between COVID-19 and delirium severities, at baseline and follow-up after delirium improvement among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: A longitudinal study of 20 consecutive critically ill, delirious COVID-19 inpatients, assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index-Short Form (CCI-SF), COVID-19 Clinical Severity Scale (CCSS), Delirium Etiology Checklist, Delirium Motor Subtype Scale-4, and Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro), was conducted. Correlational analysis of delirium severity (DDT-Pro) with each measure of clinical severity (CCI-SF and CCSS) and comparison of baseline DDT-Pro scores between patients who were living and those who were deceased at follow-up were conducted. RESULTS: Participants were 50-90 years old (male, 75%; hypertension, 60%). The prevalence of preexisting medical comorbidities (CCI-SF) was low and not correlated with delirium severity (p=0.193). Eighteen patients were on mechanical or high-flow noninvasive ventilation at baseline in the intensive care unit (ICU; CCSS scores 2-4). Delirium severity (DDT-Pro scores 0-6) correlated with COVID-19 severity (0.459, p=0.021). Delirium motor subtype was hyperactive in 75% of patients. There were three to four etiologies for delirium in each patient, most commonly organ insufficiency (100%), systemic infection (100%), and metabolic and endocrine disturbances (95%). The baseline DDT-Pro score was ≤4 for five (25%) patients who died before the final assessment, with a trend of being lower than that for survivors (χ2=3.398, p=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: Among inpatients with COVID-19, at least three different etiological categories were identified for delirium. ICU staff treating patients with severe cases of COVID-19 should anticipate a greater severity of delirium. Although multivariate analyses with larger study samples are needed, more severe delirium may herald greater risk of death among COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Critical Illness , Delirium , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32444154

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of signs of abnormal executive function (EF) and primitive reflexes (PR) with delirium in older hospitalized patients with or without comorbid dementia has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To describe prevalence of signs of EF deficits and PR in older inpatients and their discriminant value for delirium while accounting for dementia. METHODS: Participants were evaluated for delirium using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition and the Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98, dementia using Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, and signs of PR (n = 5) and EF deficits (n = 3) using bedside neuropsychiatric examination. Three indices (PR, EF, and Combined) and 4 diagnostic groups were created for correlational and discriminant analyses. RESULTS: Correlations of indices were higher with the Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 than with the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly and even higher in those with dementia, especially the Combined index (Delirium Frontal Index). Among individual signs, glabellar and Simple Luria Hand Sequence were most common in delirium and the best for delirium discrimination irrespective of dementia status. The Combined index had about 80% sensitivity and specificity at the ≥2 cutoff in the whole cohort (positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios: PPV 50.0%, NPV 93.8%, +LR 3.82, -LR 0.25). The Combined index also had the best performance on discriminating delirium in dementia patients at the ≥3 cutoff, with about 80% for both sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: PR and EF deficit signs are consistent with reduced neural network integration during delirium, even worse in those with dementia whose baseline structural injury impairs network connectivity with frontal regions. We recommend simple bedside assessment of PR and EF signs to help assess for delirium as an indicator of cerebral cortical neural network impairment in older persons.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Dementia , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Delirium/diagnosis , Dementia/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , Neural Networks, Computer , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 67: 107-114, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33091783

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro), a 0-9 point scale with three items each representing symptoms from delirium's three core domains, differentiates subsyndromal delirium (SSD) from delirium and no delirium. METHODS: We applied cluster analyses of DDT-Pro scores from 200 consecutive inpatients using three reference standards for delirium diagnosis to determine DDT-Pro cutoff values for delirium, SSD and no delirium groups. Clinical validators and DDT-Pro item scores were compared among groups. RESULTS: DDT-Pro SSD range was 6-7 (n = 54), with no delirium having higher scores (n = 98) and delirium lower (n = 48). Dementia prevalence in the SSD group (40.7%) was intermediate between no delirium (20.4%) and delirium (66.7%). SSD and delirium groups were more affected than no delirium regarding medical comorbidities, hospital stay (no delirium <1 week, SSD and delirium >1 week) and mortality (SSD = 7.4%, delirium = 18.8%, no delirium = 1%). Values for motor subtypes, frontal lobe signs, and DRS-R98 in the SSD group were intermediate between no delirium and delirium, as well as for the DDT-Pro items (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All DDT-Pro items, which represent the three delirium core domains, are important for SSD diagnosis. Patients scoring in the SSD 6-7 range have significant clinical and prognostic features and deserve clinical attention.


Subject(s)
DDT , Delirium , Delirium/diagnosis , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
12.
Comunidad (Barc., Internet) ; 22(1): 0-0, mar.-jun. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-193592

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las comunidades rurales poseen características diferenciales que pueden condicionar las iniciativas participativas para mejorar la salud local. OBJETIVO: Crear un espacio intersectorial para mejorar la salud local y empoderar a los agentes locales para trabajar en salud utilizando diferentes activos locales. MÉTODOS: Se identificaron agentes comunitarios con influencia en la salud local y se les invitó a una sesión de formación inicial abierta a la participación ciudadana. Se decidió realizar una actividad para promocionar la salud utilizando los recursos municipales. Un grupo motor se ocupó de la organización y de informar del proceso. Tras hacer la actividad, se realizó su evaluación. RESULTADOS: Múltiples instituciones locales y ciudadanos participaron en el proceso, y la valoración final tanto del proceso como del resultado fue muy satisfactoria. CONCLUSIÓN: Reunir a la comunidad en torno a una actividad concreta resultó muy motivador, pero la estructura del capital social pudo haber dificultado la participación


INTRODUCTION: Rural communities have differential characteristics that can determine participatory initiatives to improve local health. OBJECTIVES: To create an intersectoral space to improve local health. To empower local agents to work in favour of health using different local assets. METHODS: Community agents with influence in local health were identified and invited to a citizen-wide participatory session for initial instruction. It was decided to promote health using local assets. A motor group took responsibility for organizing and informing about the process. The activity was subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: Multiple local institutions and citizens took part in the process and the final evaluation of the process and outcome was very satisfying. CONCLUSION: Gathering the community together for a specific activity turned out to be very engaging. However, the structure of social capital could have hindered participation


Subject(s)
Humans , Population Dynamics , Aging , Community Participation , Intersectoral Collaboration , Social Capital
13.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735042

ABSTRACT

The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 poses unprecedented challenges in the health care. Among them is the increase in cases of delirium. The severe SARS-CoV-2 disease, COVID-19, has common vulnerabilities with delirium and produces alterations in organs such as the lungs or the brain, among others, which have the potential to trigger the mental disorder. In fact, delirium may be the first manifestation of the infection, before fever, general malaise, cough or respiratory disturbances. It is widely supported that delirium increases the morbidity and mortality in those who suffer from it during hospitalization, so it should be actively sought to carry out the relevant interventions. In the absence of evidence on the approach to delirium in the context of COVID-19, this consensus was developed on three fundamental aspects: diagnosis, non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment, in patients admitted to the general hospital. The document contains recommendations on the systematic use of diagnostic tools, when to hospitalize the patient with delirium, the application of non-pharmacological actions within the restrictions imposed by COVID-19, and the use of antipsychotics, taking into account the most relevant side effects and pharmacological interactions.

14.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe pharmacological and non-pharmacological practices for delirium, carried out by psychiatry residents and psychiatrists in Colombia. METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted based on the consensus of experts of the Liaison Psychiatry Committee of the Asociación Colombiana de Psiquiatría [Colombian Psychiatric Association] and on the literature review. It was sent by email to the association members. RESULTS: 101 clinicians participated. Non-pharmacological preventive measures such as psychoeducation, correction of sensory problems or sleep hygiene are performed by 70% or more. Only about 1 in 10 participants are part of an institutional multi-component prevention programme. The preventive prescription of drugs was less than 20%. Regarding non-pharmacological treatment, more than 75% recommend correction of sensory difficulties, control of stimuli and reorientation. None of the participants indicated that the care at their centres is organised to enhance non-pharmacological treatment. 17.8% do not use medication in the treatment of delirium. Those who use it prefer haloperidol or quetiapine, particularly in hyperactive or mixed motor subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: The practices of the respondents coincide with those of other experts around the world. In general, non-pharmacological actions are individual initiatives, which demonstrates the need in Colombian health institutions to commit to addressing delirium, in particular when its prevalence and consequences are indicators of quality of care.

15.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 32(3): 213-226, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31662094

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Delirium remains underdetected as a result of its broad constellation of symptoms and the inadequate neuropsychiatric expertise of most medical-surgical clinicians. Brief, accurate tools are needed to enhance detection. METHODS: The authors extended validation of the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro), originally validated in a study of inpatients with traumatic brain injury for diagnosis of delirium by nonexpert clinicians, for 200 general medical inpatients in Colombia. The three structured, quantitatively rated items in DDT-Pro represent the three core delirium domains. RESULTS: High interrater reliability between physician and nurse (0.873) administrators, internal consistency (>0.81), and content validity were found. Compared with independent reference standard diagnosis with DSM-5 or the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (global diagnostic accuracy) range was 93.8%-96.3%. ROC analysis revealed the same cutoff score (≤6) as that for the original study, with somewhat lower sensitivities of 88.0%-90.0% and specificities of 85.3%-81.2% (independent expert physician or nurse ratings). Even when rated by a trained expert physician, the original version of the Confusion Assessment Method algorithm (CAM-A) performed moderately, with lower sensitivities (61.8%-70.0%) than the DDT-Pro (88.0%-100%) and somewhat higher specificities (84.8%-95.3% versus 67.4%-86.7%), with values depending on dementia status, reference standard, and rater type. Accuracies for the DDT-Pro and CAM-A were comparable (DDT-Pro: 83.0%-87.5% versus CAM-A: 87.5%-88.5%), although lower in the dementia subgroup, especially for CAM-A. However, these tools were significantly discordant, especially in negative cases, which suggests that they do not detect diagnosis of patients in the same way. CONCLUSIONS: The DDT-Pro had high validity and reliability in provisional delirium diagnosis by physicians and nonexpert clinicians, although further validation is warranted before widespread use can be recommended.


Subject(s)
Delirium/diagnosis , Inpatients , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Departments , Humans , Internal Medicine , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 12(1): 914-924, 2020 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31805231

ABSTRACT

Within the most mesmerizing materials in the world of optoelectronics, mixed halide perovskites (MHPs) have been distinguished because of the tunability of their optoelectronic properties, balancing both the light-harvesting efficiency and the charge extraction into highly efficient solar devices. This feature has drawn the attention of analogous hot topics as photocatalysis for carrying out more efficiently the degradation of organic compounds. However, the photo-oxidation ability of perovskite depends not only on its excellent light-harvesting properties but also on the surface chemical environment provided during its synthesis. Accordingly, we studied the role of surface chemical states of MHP-based nanocrystals (NCs) synthesized by hot-injection (H-I) and anion-exchange (A-E) approaches on their photocatalytic (PC) activity for the oxidation of ß-naphthol as a model system. We concluded that iodide vacancies are the main surface chemical states that facilitate the formation of superoxide ions, O2●-, which are responsible for the PC activity in A-E-MHP. Conversely, the PC performance of H-I-MHP is related to the appropriate balance between band gap and a highly oxidizing valence band. This work offers new insights on the surface properties of MHP related to their catalytic activity in photochemical applications.

17.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 932019 Oct 25.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31649235

ABSTRACT

The rural environment is eminently diverse and complex, and the concept of rurality is controversial and contentious depending on the countries and the context. However, there is a set of global dynamics that affect rural enclaves and their social organization, as well as the social determinants on which much of the health of their inhabitants depends. The family doctor in rural areas is in a strategic position thanks to the knowledge of her or his territory and community, and her or his close relation to it that is needed to carry out a contextual analysis of these external influences on the functioning of the community, on the conditions and lifestyles that affect the people in the community. In addition, rural medicine as a professional setting for the promotion of health, has a mobilizing instrument, the social capital that the rural doctor is able to accumulate to a greater extent than in an urban environment, in order to carry out empowering and salutogenic participatory-based community actions and to advocate for health. Likewise, the family doctor and the provision of health services are key pieces in the process of healing, assisting and caring for the development and support of rural enclaves, in order to maintain the habitability of these communities and to effectively exercise the right to equitable health services.


El ámbito rural es eminentemente diverso y complejo. El mismo concepto de ruralidad es polémico y contencioso, según los países y el contexto. Sin embargo, existe un conjunto de dinámicas globales que afectan a los enclaves rurales y a su organización social, y también a los determinantes sociales de los que depende gran parte de la salud de sus habitantes. El médico de familia rural se encuentra en una situación estratégica, gracias al conocimiento del territorio y su comunidad, así como a las relaciones que mantiene con ésta para realizar un análisis centrado en estas influencias externas sobre el funcionamiento de la comunidad y sobre las condiciones y estilos de vida que afectan a las personas de un territorio. Además, la medicina rural como escenario profesional para la promoción de la salud cuenta con un instrumento movilizador. Éste sería el capital social que el médico rural sea capaz de acumular en mayor medida que en el medio urbano, para así llevar a cabo acciones comunitarias participativas (basadas en activos para la salud) empoderadoras y salutogénicas, y también para ejercer como advocate o compromisario por la salud. Así mismo, el médico de familia y la provisión de servicios sanitarios son piezas clave para sanar, asistir y cuidar, así como para el desarrollo y sostenimiento de los enclaves rurales, para mantener la habitabilidad de estos lugares y para el ejercicio efectivo del derecho a la salud en términos de igualdad territorial.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/methods , Health Promotion/methods , Physician's Role , Rural Health Services , Rural Health , Humans , Social Capital , Social Determinants of Health , Spain
18.
Nanoscale ; 11(2): 762-774, 2019 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30566154

ABSTRACT

In quantum dot sensitized solar cells (QDSSC), a cascade energy level structure controlled by assembly of cadmium-chalcogenide quantum dots can remarkably improve the sunlight harvesting and charge carrier lifetime. Despite the advantages of using co-sensitizers, energy conversion efficiencies are still low. An increased understanding of the causes of the low photoconversion efficiency (PCE) will contribute to the development of a straightforward approach to improve solar cell performance by exploiting co-sensitization. Herein we discuss how an excess of cadmium causes structural disorder and defect levels impacting the PCE of QDSSC devices. Thus, outer CdS1-xSex/inner CdS QD-co-sensitized B,N,F-co-doped-TiO2 nanotubes (BNF-TNT) were prepared. Chalcogenides were deposited by the SILAR method on BNF-TNT, varying the load of CdS as the inner sensitizer, while for CdS1-xSex, five SILAR cycles were used (5-CdS1-xSex), controlling the nominal S/Se molar ratio of the ternary alloy. Cd defects named as Cd-Cd energy levels were observed during CdS sensitization. Although incorporation of outer CdS1-xSex provides a tunable band gap to achieve good band alignment for carrier separation, Cd-Cd energy levels in the sensitizers act as recombination centers, limiting the overall electron flow at the BNF-TNT/CdS/CdS1-xSex interface. A maximum PCE of 2.58% was reached under standard AM 1.5G solar illumination at 100 mW cm-2. Additional limitations of SILAR as a deposition strategy of QDs are also found to influence the PCE of QDSSC.

19.
Rev. esp. salud pública ; 93: 0-0, 2019. graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-189448

ABSTRACT

El ámbito rural es eminentemente diverso y complejo. El mismo concepto de ruralidad es polémico y contencioso, según los países y el contexto. Sin embargo, existe un conjunto de dinámicas globales que afectan a los enclaves rurales y a su organización social, y también a los determinantes sociales de los que depende gran parte de la salud de sus habitantes. El médico de familia rural se encuentra en una situación estratégica, gracias al conocimiento del territorio y su comunidad, así como a las relaciones que mantiene con ésta para realizar un análisis centrado en estas influencias externas sobre el funcionamiento de la comunidad y sobre las condiciones y estilos de vida que afectan a las personas de un territorio. Además, la medicina rural como escenario profesional para la promoción de la salud cuenta con un instrumento movilizador. Éste sería el capital social que el médico rural sea capaz de acumular en mayor medida que en el medio urbano, para así llevar a cabo acciones comunitarias participativas (basadas en activos para la salud) empoderadoras y salutogénicas, y también para ejercer como advocate o compromisario por la salud. Así mismo, el médico de familia y la provisión de servicios sanitarios son piezas clave para sanar, asistir y cuidar, así como para el desarrollo y sostenimiento de los enclaves rurales, para mantener la habitabilidad de estos lugares y para el ejercicio efectivo del derecho a la salud en términos de igualdad territorial


The rural environment is eminently diverse and complex, and the concept of rurality is controversial and contentious depending on the countries and the context. However, there is a set of global dynamics that affect rural enclaves and their social organization, as well as the social determinants on which much of the health of their inhabitants depends. The family doctor in rural areas is in a strategic position thanks to the knowledge of her or his territory and community, and her or his close relation to it that is needed to carry out a contextual analysis of these external influences on the functioning of the community, on the conditions and lifestyles that affect the people in the community. In addition, rural medicine as a professional setting for the promotion of health, has a mobilizing instrument, the social capital that the rural doctor is able to accumulate to a greater extent than in an urban environment, in order to carry out empowering and salutogenic participatory-based community actions and to advocate for health. Likewise, the family doctor and the provision of health services are key pieces in the process of healing, assisting and caring for the development and support of rural enclaves, in order to maintain the habitability of these communities and to effectively exercise the right to equitable health services


Subject(s)
Humans , Family Practice/methods , Health Promotion/methods , Physician's Role , Rural Health Services , Rural Health , Social Capital , Social Determinants of Health , Spain
20.
Rev. colomb. psiquiatr ; 47(1): 37-45, ene.-mar. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-960167

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivos: El delirium es muy prevalente entre los pacientes ancianos con enfermedad general. Si no se revierte en el momento del alta hospitalaria, se lo considera «delirium persistente¼ (DP). El propósito del estudio es describir la prevalencia y las características de los pacientes con DP 3 meses después del egreso hospitalario de la Clínica Universitaria Bolivariana (CUB). Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo longitudinal para evaluar la prevalencia y las características de los pacientes de 65 o más arios del servicio de hospitalización de la CUB que cumplieran criterios de delirium del DSM-5 al ingreso, el egreso y 3 meses después. Se determinaron las variables sociodemográficas y se aplicaron las escalas CGI-S y DRS-R98. Resultados: Se evaluó a 30 pacientes con diagnóstico de delirium con interconsulta por psiquiatría de enlace entre abril y octubre de 2013, y se excluyó a 6 por no cumplir los criterios de inclusión. Se incluyó en el estudio a 24 pacientes, de los que 9 fallecieron durante la hospitalización (37,5%). De los 15 sobrevivientes, 5 (el 20,8% de la muestra) presentaron remisión del delirium al egreso y 10 (41,6%) continuaron con síntomas y conformaron el grupo de DP. Del grupo de DP, 5 (20,8%) presentaron DP completo y los otros 5 (20,8%), DP subsindrómico (DPSS). A los 3 meses del egreso, solo 2 pacientes (8,3%) continuaron con DP completo y otros 2 (8,3%), con DPSS. En el grupo de pacientes con DP, la prevalencia fue del 30% (diagnóstico de delirium al ingreso) y una incidencia del 70% (aparición del delirium durante la hospitalización). Conclusiones: Un grupo importante de pacientes con delirium continúan sintomáticos 3 meses después del alta. El 40% de los pacientes con síntomas persistentes en el seguimiento a 3 meses indica una trayectoria de mejoría gradual del delirium, lo cual tiene implicaciones en la práctica clínica.


ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of patients with persistent delirium (PD) at three months after hospital discharge. Methodology: Longitudinal descriptive study to assess the prevalence and characteristics of in-patients aged 65 years and older in the Clinica Universitaria Bolivariana who met DSM-5 criteria for delirium at admission, at discharge, and at a 3-month follow up assessment. Socio-demographic features were determined, and CGI-S and DRS-R98 scales used. Results: A total of 30 patients were evaluated between April and October 2013, but 6 did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. The study included 24 patients, with 9 (37.5%) dying during hospitalisation. Of the 15 surviving patients, five (20.8% of the total sample) had their delirium resolved at discharge, and ten (41.6% of the sample) continued with symptoms. These established the PD group, of whom five of them (20.8%) had full PD, and the other five (20.8%) sub-syndromal PD (SSPD). At the final assessment, only two patients (8.3%) continued with full PD, and another two (8.3%) with SSPD. Among the PD group, 30% had a full delirium at admission (prevalence), and 70% developed full delirium during hospitalization (incidence). Conclusions: A significant number of patients did not recover from delirium at leaving hospital, and remained symptomatic three months after discharge. The study findings suggest a course of gradual improvement of delirium, with a persistence of symptoms over time in 40% of the patients, which would have implications for the clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Incidence , Prevalence , Delirium , Psychiatry , Survivors , Aftercare , Diagnosis , Hospitalization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...