Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 131
Filter
1.
Blood Cancer J ; 14(1): 76, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697960

ABSTRACT

Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT2) is among the most effective treatments for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse after first alloSCT (alloSCT1). Long-term EBMT registry data were used to provide large scale, up-to-date outcome results and to identify factors for improved outcome. Among 1540 recipients of alloSCT2, increasing age, better disease control and performance status before alloSCT2, more use of alternative donors and higher conditioning intensity represented important trends over time. Between the first (2000-2004) and last (2015-2019) period, two-year overall and leukemia-free survival (OS/LFS) increased considerably (OS: 22.5-35%, LFS: 14.5-24.5%). Cumulative relapse incidence (RI) decreased from 64% to 50.7%, whereas graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality (NRM) remained unchanged. In multivariable analysis, later period of alloSCT2 was associated with improved OS/LFS (HR = 0.47/0.53) and reduced RI (HR = 0.44). Beyond, remission duration, disease stage and patient performance score were factors for OS, LFS, RI, and NRM. Myeloablative conditioning for alloSCT2 decreased RI without increasing NRM, leading to improved OS/LFS. Haploidentical or unrelated donors and older age were associated with higher NRM and inferior OS. In summary, outcome after alloSCT2 has continuously improved over the last two decades despite increasing patient age. The identified factors provide clues for the optimized implementation of alloSCT2.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Registries , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Adult , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Transplantation, Homologous , Recurrence , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Treatment Outcome , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology
2.
Blood Adv ; 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598754

ABSTRACT

We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploHSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients (pts) with primary refractory (PR) / first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (n=129) versus those of de novo AML (n=590), transplanted between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of pts with sAML versus de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs. 58.6%) (p=0.002). In 81.4% of sAML pts, the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs. 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (p=0.13). In multivariate analysis HaploHSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups; non-relapse mortality (NRM) hazard ratio (HR) =1.38 (95% CI 0.96-1.98, p=0.083), relapse incidence (RI) HR= 0.68 (95% CI 0.4.7.-1.00, p=0.051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 0.99 (95% CI 0.76-1.28, p=0.94), 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.29, p=0.97) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.27, p=0.94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of HaploHSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison to PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.

3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555412

ABSTRACT

Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refractory to initial or reinduction chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis if they do not undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT). However, data assessing HCT outcomes from different donors are scarce. We evaluated results from a retrospective analysis on patients aged ≥70 years, with AML not in remission who received an allogeneic HCT from HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), HLA-10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD), or T-cell replete haploidentical (Haplo) donor, from 2010 to 2021, reported to the ALWP-EBMT database. A total of 360 patients (median age 72 years, range 70-79) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for the entire population was 35.5 months. Donors were MSD (n = 58), 10/10 HLA-MUD (n = 228), and Haplo (n = 74). A total of 213 (59.2%) patients were primary induction failures, while 147 (40.8%) were in first or subsequent relapse. Graft source was peripheral blood in 92% of the patients. Patients transplanted from Haplo donors more frequently received marrow grafts (p < 0.01) and presented the combination female donor to male recipient (p < 0.01). The overall 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were: 62.4% (95% CI 47.2-74.3) and 47.6% (95% CI 33.1-60.8) for MSD, 43% (95% CI 35.8-49.9), and 37.5% (95% CI 30.7-44.4) for MUD, and 25.9% (95% CI 15.8-37.2), and 26.5% (95% CI 16.3-37.8) for recipients of Haplo transplants. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was slightly lower for Haplo recipients at 29.6% (95% CI 19-40.9), for MUD it was 30.2% (95% CI 23.9-36.7), and for MSD 34.9% (95% CI 22-48.2); counterbalanced by a higher incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 43.9% (95% CI 31.6-55.6) for Haplo recipients, 32.2% (95% CI 26-33.1) for MUD and 17.5% (95% CI 8.4-29.3) for MSD. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 35.3% (95% CI 22.3-48.5) for MSD, 29.6% (95% CI 23.2-36.2) for MUD, and 19.2% (95% CI 10.7-29.6) for Haplo patients. In the multivariate model, compared to the referent group of MSD recipients, the risk of NRM was higher among patients transplanted from Haplo donors ([hazard ratio] HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.23-11.61, p < 0.001) and MUD (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.48-0.6.94, p = 0.003). Furthermore, both Haplo and MUD were associated with inferior OS, (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.98-0.6.56, p < 0.001, and HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.37-0.3.88, p = 0.002, respectively), and LFS (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.31-0.3.84, p = 0.003, and HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-0.2.60, p = 0.034, respectively). Patients transplanted from Haplo donors were also associated with worse GFRS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, p:0.025) compared with MSD patients. Older adult AML patients with active disease transplanted from MSD experienced prolonged OS and LFS compared to 10/10 MUD and Haplo due to lower NRM. Prospective clinical trials are warranted.

4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(9): 1778-1787, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38514469

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease of older patients. Progress in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) allowed the delivery of allo-HCT to older patients. We assessed changes over time in transplant characteristics and outcomes in patients with AML ages 65 years and above. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 7,215 patients with AML (median age 68 years, range 65-80) allografted between 2000 and 2021 in first complete remission (CR1; 64%), second or subsequent remission (CR2+; 14%), or active disease (22%). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 40 months. The 3-year cumulative relapse incidence (RI) gradually and significantly decreased from 37% to 31%, then to 30% (P = 0.001) over the three time periods (2000-2009; 2010-2014; 2015-2021), whereas nonrelapse mortality (NRM) decreased from 31% and 31% to 27% (P = 0.003). The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) gradually and significantly improved from 32% to 38%, and then to 44% (P = 0.001) and from 37% to 42%, and then to 49% (P = 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, significant improvement in the RI, LFS, and OS were noted after 2015, whereas NRM was not significantly affected. This improvement was observed regardless of disease status at transplant. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with AML, we observed an impressive improvement over time in posttransplant outcomes, mostly attributed to decreased RI rather than decreased NRM, and regardless of disease status at transplant. These large-scale, real-world data can serve as a benchmark for future studies in this setting and indicate that the opportunity for transplant for the elderly should be mandatory and no longer an option.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Aged , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Female , Male , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Transplantation, Homologous , Follow-Up Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies
5.
Blood Adv ; 8(10): 2332-2341, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429091

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: There is a paucity of information to guide the selection of the most suitable donor in haploidentical (Haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For this reason, from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of Haplo donor characteristics on outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The primary end point was graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). Overall, 2200 patients were included. The median age of donors was 37 years (range, 8-71); 820 (37%) were females, including 458 (21%) who were used for male recipients. In addition, 1631 donors (74%) donated peripheral blood (PB). Multivariable analysis identified certain donor-related risk factors with a detrimental impact on transplant outcomes. The use of PB, older donors' ages (>37 years), and female donors to male recipients negatively affected GRFS. Donor's age and female donor-to-male recipient combination also affected nonrelapse mortality, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival. In conclusion, donor-related variables significantly influence outcomes in patients with AML after Haplo-HSCT with PTCy. When possible, younger donors and male donors for male recipients should be prioritized. The use of bone marrow can additionally prevent GVHD.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Male , Female , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Aged , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Child , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Haploidentical/methods , Tissue Donors , Donor Selection
6.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(3)2024 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38339283

ABSTRACT

Up to 50% of patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies die of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Current sequential conditioning regimens like the FLAMSA protocol combine intensive induction therapy with TBI or alkylators. Venetoclax has synergistic effects to chemotherapy. In a retrospective survey among German transplant centers, we identified 61 patients with myeloid malignancies that had received FLAMSA-based sequential conditioning with venetoclax between 2018 and 2022 as an individualized treatment approach. Sixty patients (98%) had active disease at transplant and 74% had genetic high-risk features. Patients received allografts from matched unrelated, matched related, or mismatched donors. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in two patients but no significant non-hematologic toxicity related to venetoclax was observed. On day +30, 55 patients (90%) were in complete remission. Acute GvHD II°-IV° occurred in 17 (28%) and moderate/severe chronic GvHD in 7 patients (12%). Event-free survival and overall survival were 64% and 80% at 1 year as well as 57% and 75% at 2 years, respectively. The off-label combination of sequential FLAMSA-RIC with venetoclax appears to be safe and highly effective. To further validate these insights and enhance the idea of smart conditioning, a controlled prospective clinical trial was initiated in July 2023.

7.
Eur J Haematol ; 112(5): 819-831, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243840

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe late transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) as chronic endothelial complication in bone marrow (BM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: BM specimens along with conventional diagnostic parameters were assessed in 14 single-institutional patients with late TA-TMA (more than 100 days after HCST), including 11 late with history of early TA-TMA, 10 with early TA-TMA (within 100 days), and 12 non TA-TMA patients. Three non-HSCT patients served as control. The time points of BM biopsy were +1086, +798, +396, and +363 days after HSCT, respectively. RESULTS: Late TA-TMA patients showed an increase of CD34+ and von Willebrand Factor (VWF)+ microvascular endothelial cells with atypical VWF+ conglomerates forming thickened VWF+ plaque sinus in the BM compared to patients without late TA-TMA and non-HSCT. Severe chronic (p = .002), steroid-refractory GVHD (p = .007) and reactivation of HHV6 (p = .002), EBV (p = .003), and adenovirus (p = .005) were pronounced in late TA-TMA. Overall and relapse-free survival were shorter in late TA-TMA than in patients without late TA-TMA (5-year OS and RFS: 78.6% vs. 90.2%, 71.4% vs. 86.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Chronic allo-immune microangiopathy in BM associated with chronic, steroid-refractory GVHD and/or viral infections are key findings of late, high-risk TA-TMA, which deserves clinical attention.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Thrombotic Microangiopathies , Virus Diseases , Humans , Bone Marrow/pathology , Endothelial Cells/pathology , von Willebrand Factor , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/diagnosis , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/etiology , Thrombotic Microangiopathies/therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Virus Diseases/complications , Biopsy , Steroids
8.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 59(3): 395-402, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38195984

ABSTRACT

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN), either myelodysplastic neoplasms (t-MDS) or acute myeloid leukemias (t-AML), have a poor prognosis and allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) represents the only curative option. In this multicenter, registry-based study, we analyzed outcomes of 378 patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2006-2017 for t-MN arising secondary to lymphoma treatment. Median age was 58 years at allo-HCT; 222 (59%) had a diagnosis of t-MDS and 156 (41%) of t-AML, respectively. At the time of allo-HCT, 46% of t-MN cases were reported as in complete remission (CR) and 15% of lymphomas were recorded as not in remission. A reduced intensity conditioning regimen was used in 70% of cases. For the entire cohort, 5-year OS, and t-MN PFS, relapse incidence and NRM were 32%, 28%, 35% and 37%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, undergoing allo-HCT with t-MN not in CR and older age were associated with significantly worse OS, PFS and NRM. At 5 years post allo-HCT, the relapse incidence of lymphoma was low at 3%, while the rate of secondary malignancies was 8%. This analysis shows the curative potential of allo-HCT for patients with t-MN arising secondary to lymphoma treatment in approximately a third of patients.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Lymphoma , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Lymphoma/etiology , Lymphoma/therapy , Recurrence , Transplantation Conditioning , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology
9.
Haematologica ; 109(2): 431-443, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37646665

ABSTRACT

Incidences of diseases treated with transplantation frequently peak at higher age. The contribution of age to total risk of transplantation has not been estimated amidst an aging society. We compare outcomes of 1,547 patients aged 70-79 years and 9,422 patients aged 60-69 years transplanted 1998-2018 for myeloid, lymphoid and further neoplasia in Germany. To quantify the contribution of population mortality to survival, we derive excess mortality based on a sex-, year- and agematched German population in a multistate model that incorporates relapse and graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). Overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS) and GvHD-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) is inferior in patients aged 70-79 years, compared to patients aged 60-69 years, with 36% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 34-39%) versus 43% (41-44%), 32% (30- 35%) versus 36% (35-37%) and 23% (21-26%) versus 27% (26-28%) three years post-transplant (P<0.001). Cumulative incidences of relapse at three years are 27% (25-30%) for patients aged 70-79 versus 29% (29-30%) (60-69 years) (P=0.71), yet the difference in non-relapse mortality (NRM) (40% [38-43%] vs. 35% [34-36%] in patients aged 70-79 vs. 60-69 years) (P<0.001) translates into survival differences. Median OS of patients surviving >1 year relapse-free is 6.7 (median, 95% CI: 4.5-9.4, 70-79 years) versus 9 (8.4-10.1, 60-69 years) years since landmark. Three years after RFS of one year, excess NRM is 14% (95% CI: 12-18%) in patients aged 70-79 versus 12% [11-13%] in patients aged 60-69, while population NRM is 7% (6-7%) versus 3% (3-3%). Mortality for reasons other than relapse, GvHD, or age is as high as 27% (24-29%) and 22% (22-23%) four years after transplantation. In conclusion, survival amongst older patients is adequate after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Germany/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies
10.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(21)2023 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37958420

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has demonstrated its potential as a curative option for patients with r/r lymphoma. With the introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based (PTCY) graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, allo-HCT using haploidentical related donors (Haplo-HSCT) has emerged as a valuable alternative for patients without an available HLA-matched donor. In this study, we compared intermediate and long-term outcomes between Haplo-HSCT and HLA-matched related donor (MRD) and unrelated donor (URD) transplantations in 16 matched pairs using age, disease status, lymphoma classification and performance status as matching criteria. Of note, 88% of patients in each group presented with active disease at the time of conditioning. After a median follow-up of >10 years, 10-year overall and progression-free survival and non-relapse mortality incidence after Haplo-HSCT were 31%, 25% and 38%, respectively, and did not differ compared to the values observed in MRD-HSCT and URD-HSCT. A remarkable lower incidence of acute GvHD ≥ II and moderate and severe chronic GvHD was observed after Haplo-HSCT compared to MRD-HSCT (50%/50%, p = 0.03/0.03) and URD-HSCT (44%/38%, p = 0.04/0.08), resulting in slightly higher 10-year GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (25%) and chronic GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (25%) in the Haplo-HSCT group. In conclusion, Haplo-HSCT is an effective treatment in patients with non-remission NHL. Given its advantage of immediate availability, haploidentical donors should be preferably used in patients with progressive disease lacking an HLA-matched related donor.

11.
J Transl Med ; 21(1): 837, 2023 11 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) not tolerating/responding to ruxolitinib (RR-aGvHD) have a dismal prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed real-world outcomes of RR-aGvHD treated with the random-donor allogeneic MSC preparation MSC-FFM, available via Hospital Exemption in Germany. MSC-FFM is provided as frozen cell dispersion for administration as i.v. infusion immediately after thawing, at a recommended dose of 1-2 million MSCs/kg body weight in 4 once-weekly doses. 156 patients, 33 thereof children, received MSC-FFM; 5% had Grade II, 40% had Grade III, and 54% had Grade IV aGvHD. Median (range) number of prior therapies was 4 (1-10) in adults and 7 (2-11) in children. RESULTS: The safety profile of MSC-FFM was consistent with previous reports for MSC therapies in general and MSC-FFM specifically. The overall response rate at Day 28 was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-55%) in adults and 64% (45-80%) in children; most responses were durable. Probability of overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 47% (38-56%), 35% (27-44%) and 30% (22-39%) for adults, and 59% (40-74%), 42% (24-58%) and 35% (19-53%) for children, respectively (whole cohort: median OS 5.8 months). CONCLUSION: A recent real-world analysis of outcomes for 64 adult RR-aGvHD patients not treated with MSCs reports survival of 20%, 16% and 10% beyond 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively (median 28 days). Our data thus suggest effectiveness of MSC-FFM in RR-aGvHD.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Child , Adult , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Acute Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy
12.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1251593, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37965339

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is used to cure hematologic malignancies or deficiencies of the hematopoietic system. It is associated with severe immunodeficiency of the host early after transplant and therefore early reactivation of latent herpesviruses such as CMV and EBV within the first 100 days are frequent. Small studies and case series indicated that application of herpes virus specific T cells can control and prevent disease in this patient population. Methods: We report the results of a randomized controlled multi centre phase I/IIa study (MULTIVIR-01) using a newly developed T cell product with specificity for CMV and EBV derived from the allogeneic stem cell grafts used for transplantation. The study aimed at prevention and preemptive treatment of both viruses in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation targeting first infusion on day +30. Primary endpoints were acute transfusion reaction and acute-graft versus-host-disease after infusion of activated T cells. Results: Thirty-three patients were screened and 9 patients were treated with a total of 25 doses of the T cell product. We show that central manufacturing can be achieved successfully under study conditions and the product can be applied without major side effects. Overall survival, transplant related mortality, cumulative incidence of graft versus host disease and number of severe adverse events were not different between treatment and control groups. Expansion of CMV/EBV specific T cells was observed in a fraction of patients, but overall there was no difference in virus reactivation. Discussion: Our study results indicate peptide stimulated epitope specific T cells derived from stem cell grafts can be administered safely for prevention and preemptive treatment of reactivation without evidence for induction of acute graft versus host disease. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02227641.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Herpesvirus 4, Human/physiology , T-Lymphocytes , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects
13.
Br J Haematol ; 202(6): 1165-1177, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37455345

ABSTRACT

Acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia (AMKL) is associated with poor prognosis. Limited information is available on its cytogenetics, molecular genetics and clinical outcome. We performed genetic analyses, evaluated prognostic factors and the value of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in a homogenous adult AMKL patient cohort. We retrospectively analysed 38 adult patients with AMKL (median age: 58 years, range: 21-80). Most received intensive treatment in AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) trials between 2001 and 2016. Cytogenetic data showed an accumulation of adverse risk markers according to ELN 2017 and an unexpected high frequency of structural aberrations on chromosome arm 1q (33%). Most frequently, mutations occurred in TET2 (23%), TP53 (23%), JAK2 (19%), PTPN11 (19%) and RUNX1 (15%). Complete remission rate in 33 patients receiving intensive chemotherapy was 33% and median overall survival (OS) was 33 weeks (95% CI: 21-45). Patients undergoing allo-HSCT (n = 14) had a superior median OS (68 weeks; 95% CI: 11-126) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of 27 weeks (95% CI: 4-50), although cumulative incidence of relapse after allo-HSCT was high (62%). The prognosis of AMKL is determined by adverse genetic risk factors and therapy resistance. So far allo-HSCT is the only potentially curative treatment option in this dismal AML subgroup.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Chromosome Aberrations , Prognosis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Chromosomes
14.
Ann Hematol ; 102(8): 2213-2223, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37300568

ABSTRACT

We sought to evaluate the role of extramedullary disease (EMD) in sequential RIC retrospectively analyzing data of 144 high-risk AML patients undergoing HLA-matched transplantation. Median long-term follow-up was 11.6 years. Eighteen percent of patients (n = 26/144) presented with extramedullary AML (EM AML) or a history of EMD at time of transplantation. Overall relapse rate was 25% (n = 36/144) with 15% (n = 21/144) of all patients developing isolated BM relapse and 10% (n = 15/144) developing EM AML relapse with or without concomitant BM relapse (EM ± BM). Manifestation of EM relapse after transplantation occurred frequently at multiple sites and presented mostly as solid tumor mass. Only 3/15 patients with EM ± BM relapse showed a prior EMD manifestation. EMD prior to allogeneic transplantation had no impact on post-transplant OS when compared to non-EMD (median post-transplant OS 3.8 years versus 4.8 years; ns). Risk factors (p = < 0.1) for EM ± BM relapse included younger age and a higher number of prior intensive chemotherapies, whereas the presence of chronic GVHD was a protective factor. Median post-transplant OS (15.5 months vs. 15.5 months), RFS (9.6 months vs 7.3 months), and post-relapse OS (6.7 months vs. 6.3 months) were not significantly different between patients with isolated BM vs. EM ± BM relapse. Taken together, occurrence of EMD prior to as well as of EM ± BM AML relapse after transplantation was moderate, presenting mostly as solid tumor mass after transplantation. However, diagnosis of those does not seem to influence outcomes after sequential RIC. A higher number of chemotherapy cycles prior to transplantation was identified as recent risk factor for EM ± BM relapse.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/complications , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/epidemiology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Risk Factors , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Recurrence , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control
15.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 58(8): 907-915, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160941

ABSTRACT

For patients with acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukaemia (AML/ALL) lacking a matched sibling or unrelated donor, haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HAPLO-SCT) is increasingly used. However, available data on the treatment of relapse after HAPLO-SCT, including feasibility and efficacy of a second HAPLO-SCT (HAPLO-SCT2), is scarce. Hence, adults with AML/ALL, that had undergone HAPLO-SCT2 without ex-vivo manipulation after haematologic relapse from HAPLO-SCT1 were selected for a retrospective registry analysis. Eighty-two patients (AML, n = 63, ALL, n = 19, median follow-up: 33 months) were identified. Engraftment rate was 87%. At day +180, cumulative incidences of acute GvHD II-IV°/chronic GvHD were 23.9%/22.6%, respectively. Two-year overall survival/leukaemia-free survival (OS/LFS) were 34.3%/25.4%; 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) were 17.6% and 57%. Leukaemia was the most frequent cause of death. Separated by disease, 2-year OS/LFS/NRM/RI were 28.7%/22.3%/16.2%/61.6% in AML, and 55.3%/38.4%/23.5%/38.2% in ALL patients. In a risk-factor analysis among patients with AML, stage at HAPLO-SCT1 and HAPLO-SCT2, and interval from HAPLO-SCT1 to relapse significantly influenced outcome. Our data demonstrate that HAPLO-SCT2 is a viable option in acute leukaemia relapse after HAPLO-SCT1. Engraftment, toxicity, risk factors and long-term outcome are comparable to data reported after allo-SCT2 in a matched donor setting.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Bone Marrow , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Unrelated Donors , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects
17.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 148(8): 459-466, 2023 04.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990118

ABSTRACT

To date allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the most effective immunotherapeutic approach for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It involves the transplantation of blood stem cells from a healthy donor into a patient, with the goal of using the donor's immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells (Graft-versus-leukemia effect). Thereby, allo-HSCT is more efficient than chemotherapy alone, as it combines high dose chemotherapy +/- irradiation with immunotherapy establishing a long-term control of leukemic cells while allowing reconstitution of a healthy donor hematopoiesis and a new immune system. However, the procedure carries significant risks, including the possibility of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and requires careful patient selection to ensure the best possible outcome. In AML patients with high-risk, relapsed or chemo-refractory disease allo-HSCT provides the only curative option.While allo-HSCT is currently the most established form of immunotherapy in the treatment of AML, other approaches that use the immune system to fight cancer are being researched. These may include immunomodulatory drugs or cell therapies such as CAR-T cells, which stimulate the immune system to attack cancer cells. Even if this does not yet play a role in current standard therapy, as our understanding of the immune system and its role in cancer grows, it is likely that targeted immunotherapies will become increasingly important in the treatment of AML The following article gives you an overview of allo-HSCT in AML patients and the current developments.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Homologous
18.
Haematologica ; 108(8): 2080-2090, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36794500

ABSTRACT

Therapy-resistant viral reactivations contribute significantly to mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Adoptive cellular therapy with virus-specific T cells (VST) has shown efficacy in various single-center trials. However, the scalability of this therapy is hampered by laborious production methods. In this study we describe the in-house production of VST in a closed system (CliniMACS Prodigy® system, Miltenyi Biotec). In addition, we report the efficacy in 26 patients with viral disease following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a retrospective analysis (adenovirus, n=7; cytomegalovirus, n=8; Epstein-Barr virus, n=4; multi-viral, n=7). The production of VST was successful in 100% of cases. The safety profile of VST therapy was favorable (n=2 grade 3 and n=1 grade 4 adverse events; all three were reversible). A response was seen in 20 of 26 patients (77%). Responding patients had a significantly better overall survival than patients who did not respond (P<0.001). Virus-specific symptoms were reduced or resolved in 47% of patients. The overall survival of the whole cohort was 28% after 6 months. This study shows the feasibility of automated VST production and safety of application. The scalability of the CliniMACS Prodigy® device increases the accessibility of VST treatment.


Subject(s)
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Virus Diseases , Humans , T-Lymphocytes , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Virus Diseases/etiology , Virus Diseases/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Stem Cell Transplantation
19.
J Hematol Oncol ; 16(1): 10, 2023 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36782226

ABSTRACT

The association between graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurrence and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse in patients treated with HLA-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis has remained debated. Here, we addressed this issue in patients with active AML at transplantation. 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 49% and 32.3%, respectively. There were no associations between acute nor chronic GVHD of any grade and lower relapse incidence. However, grade I acute GVHD was associated with better LFS (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99, P = 0.04). In contrast, grade III-IV acute (HR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.87-5.12, P < 0.0001) as well as extensive chronic (HR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.81-6.04, P = 0.0001) GVHD correlated with higher nonrelapse mortality leading to lower LFS (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.99-1.86, P = 0.056 and HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.35-2.89, P = 0.0004, respectively). In conclusion, these data suggest a dissociation of graft-versus-leukemia effects from GVHD in patients with active AML treated with PTCy-based Haplo-HCT.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Transplantation, Haploidentical/adverse effects , Unrelated Donors , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
20.
JAMA Oncol ; 9(4): 519-526, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36757706

ABSTRACT

Importance: The ideal postremission strategy in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) has been a matter of debate. Objective: To explore the optimal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk AML after first complete remission. Design, Settings, and Participants: This investigator-initiated, open-label, 2-armed, phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessed patients at 16 hospitals in Germany from February 2, 2011, until July 1, 2018. Key eligibility criteria included cytogenetically defined intermediate-risk AML according to Medical Research Council classification, first CR or CR with incomplete blood cell count recovery after conventional induction therapy, age of 18 to 60 years, and availability of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor. A detailed statistical analysis plan was written and finalized on July 7, 2020. Data were exported for analysis on April 13, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or high-dose cytarabine for consolidation and salvage HCT only in case of relapse. Strata for randomization included age (18-40 vs 41-60 years), NPM1 and CEBPA variation status, and donor type (unrelated vs related). Main Outcomes and Measures: End points included overall-survival as the primary outcome and disease-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, treatment-related mortality, and quality of life measured according to the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 143 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.2 [9.8] years; 81 [57%] male) with AML who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were randomized. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the probability of survival at 2 years was 74% (95% CI, 62%-83%) after primary allogeneic HCT and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .22). Disease-free survival after HCT at 2 years was 69% (95% CI, 57%-80%) compared with 40% (95% CI, 28%-53%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .001). Allogeneic HCT during the first CR was associated with a cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years of 20% (95% CI, 13%-31%) compared with 58% (95% CI, 47%-71%; P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality at 2 years after primary allogeneic HCT was 9% (95% CI, 5%-19%) and 2% (95% CI, 0%-11%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .005). Similar outcomes were observed when analyses were confined to the 96 patients at intermediate risk according to the European Leukemia Network classification. Most importantly, all 41 patients relapsing after consolidation chemotherapy (36 hematologic, 4 molecular, and 1 extramedullary) proceeded to allogeneic HCT. No significant differences in health-related quality of life measures were observed between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Primary allogeneic HCT during first CR was not associated with superior overall survival compared with consolidation chemotherapy in patients 60 years or younger with intermediate-risk AML during the first CR and an available donor. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01246752.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Female , Consolidation Chemotherapy , Quality of Life , Transplantation, Homologous , Remission Induction , Recurrence , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...