Total fractures of the tibial pilon.

Complete fractures of the tibial pilon are rare and their treatment difficult. The pathophysiology includes three groups: (A) high-energy trauma (motor vehicle injuries), with severe articular and soft tissue lesions, (B) rotation trauma, (skiing accidents), with modest articular and soft tissue damage, and (C) low-energy trauma in elderly people. These three groups occasion very different problems and complications. In emergency situations, these fractures should be stabilized, most often using external fixation to restore length and prepare definitive fixation. The second stage can be applied once soft tissue healing is achieved. Two methods are discussed: internal plating and definitive external fixation. The first goal of treatment is to restore the articular surface, although this does not always prevent secondary arthritis. The second is to restore correct positioning of the foot as regard to the leg. The complication rate is high. Neither of the two fixation techniques has proven to be more effective. In group B, the two methods are similar, but external fixation seems to be safer in group A.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: which predictive factors of favorable functional results after decompressive laminectomy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Long-term results of decompressive laminectomy in degenerative lumbar stenosis have been studied in only six prospective studies. The objective of our study was to evaluate the functional outcome at long term of patients after decompressive laminectomy in lumbar stenosis and to determine predictive factors of favorable outcome. METHODS: A prospective cohort data were collected by an independent observer five years after decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. The endpoint was the assessment of the Beaujon score for functional evaluation. The result was considered as favorable if the Beaujon score increased by at last five points between the preoperative stage and at follow-up examination. Logistic regression was then performed with univariate and multivariate analysis to reveal predictive factors of good long-term outcome (P≤0.05). RESULTS: The preoperative characteristic of our population (n=98) was a mean age of 67.3±8.8 years, a low comorbidity (mean Charlson score=2.8±1.5), overweight status (BMI=29.4±6.3) and the mean Beaujon score was 9.3±3.1. At five years after surgery, the mean Beaujon score became 14.1±4.2. Favorable functional outcome concerned 45.9% of our series. The predictive factor of favorable outcome identified in the univariate analysis the neurological deficit (P=0.05) and in the multivariate analysis the low comorbidity (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: The long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis were moderate with an improved outcome in 49.5% of cases in our study. The only independent factor to a favorable outcome was the low comorbidity.

[Failure of locked centro-medullary nailing in pseudarthrosis of the humeral diaphysis]. / Echec de l'enclouage centro-médullaire verrouillé des pseudarthroses de la diaphyse humérale.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this work was to assess results after treatment by nailing of nonunion of the humeral shaft. In particular, we focused on consolidation and factors predictive of failure. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective study was conducted in 13 consecutive patients presenting aseptic nonunion of the humeral diaphysis. There were five cases after orthopedic treatment and eight cases after internal fixation. Two patients had iterative nonunions. Locked nailing was performed with three successive types of nails: the Seidel nail in four cases, the Russel Taylor nail in seven, and the ACE nail in two. Anterograde nailing was used for the first three cases and retrograde nailing for the others. All patients were followed regularly in our department. Last follow-up was one to seven years after nailing. RESULTS: Five nonunions (38%) did not consolidate after locked nailing. Consolidation was achieved in the other patients after four to 18 months. The anatomic result was good in these patients. Between the success and failure groups, there was no significant difference in age, gender, type of fracture, first intention treatment, delay from fracture to nailing, type or diameter of the nail, surgical access or not to the fracture site during nailing, or duration of complementary fixation. Anterograde nail insertion, used in our first three patients in this series, appeared to affect shoulder function. The retrograde route was used in other patients and did not appear to have any impact on the elbow itself or the elbow region. DISCUSSION: This clinical study was unable to identify clinical factors explaining failures but did provide several arguments suggesting that defective primary stability of the initial fixation could be incriminated in the failures. CONCLUSION: Centromedullary locked nailing is a simple technique with potential for resolving difficult problems of nonunion. Good functional outcome can be obtained when consolidation is achieved. Rather than abandoning this technique, it would be advisable to conduct further research to determine what factors are determinant in its failures.

[Experimental study of the primary stability of locked centro-medullary nailing of the humeral diaphysis]. / Etude expérimentale de la stabilité primaire des enclouages centro-médullaires verrouillés de la diaphyse humérale.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: A clinical trial on the treatment of humeral shaft nonunions with locked nailing evidenced 5 failures among 13 cases. The circumstances leading to the nonunion, the patient's condition, and the nailing method were not found to have a predominant effect explaining this outcome. Inversely, clinical data suggested that abnormal mobility of the nonunion appeared to result from play in the assembly. To check this hypothesis, we measured primary stability in three nailing models using cadaver bones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three nailing models, Seidel (S), Russel-Taylor (RT) and ACE were tested, each on 5 cadaver specimens. A 1 cm segmental resection was made in the mid third of the humerus to simulate an unstable nonunion. The nailing was performed in accordance with the instructions furnished by the manufacturers. The nailed specimens were placed in a testing device which alternatively applied a rotation force around the longitudinal axis (+/- 0.5 Nm), an axial compression-traction force (+/- 20 N) and a transverse shear force applied at the level of the osteotomy (+/- 20 N). RESULTS: This study demonstrated an instability of the three nails when submitted to a rotation force or a shear force: 14 to 28 degrees and 1.6 to 3.4 mm respectively for the RT nail; 8 to 20 degrees and 1 to 3 mm for the S nail; 5 to 15 degrees and 1.7 to 3.2 mm for the ACE nail. The ACE nail appeared to be more stable when submitted to compression-traction force; the S nail accepted a 0.05 to 0.65 mm play which reached 9.7 mm for the RT nail. This instability appeared to result from play in the locking systems. DISCUSSION: These findings would demonstrate that these nailing systems cannot, in themselves, provide satisfactory primary stability. The experimentally evidenced instability would contribute, probably in association with locally unfavorable physiological or biological conditions, to the failure rate observed when nailing is used alone. CONCLUSION: The locking system for tested nails would have to be modified to eliminate play in the assembly before continuing their use for the treatment nonunion of the humeral shaft.