Trends in Top Surgery Patient Characteristics, Wound Complications, and CPT Code Use by Plastic Surgeons: A Decade-Long Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming top surgery is becoming increasingly common, with greater diversity in the patients receiving top surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine national trends in patient demographics, characteristics, wound complication rates, and concurrent procedures in patients receiving gender-affirming top surgeries. METHODS: Patients with gender dysphoria who underwent breast procedures, including mastectomy, mastopexy, breast augmentation, or breast reduction by a plastic surgeon between 2013 and 2022, were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. These procedures were considered to be gender-affirming "top surgery." Univariate analyses were performed to examine trend changes in the patient population and types of additional procedures performed over the last decade. RESULTS: There was a 38-fold increase in the number of patients who received top surgery during the most recent years compared to the first 2 years of the decade. Significantly more individuals receiving top surgery in recent years were nonbinary (P < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in percentage of active smokers (P < 0.01) while there was an increase in percentage of patients with diabetes (P = 0.03). While there was a significant increase in the number of obese patients receiving top surgery (P < 0.01), there were no differences in postoperative wound complications between the years. Significantly more patients received additional procedures (P < 0.01) and had about a 9-fold increase in distinct number of additional CPT codes from 2013-2014 to 2021-2022. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that there has been (1) a significant increase in the number of top surgery patients from 2013 to 2022 overall and (2) a particular increase in patients with preoperative comorbidities, such as a higher body mass index and diabetes. Understanding current and evolving trends in patients undergoing surgical treatment for gender dysphoria can inform individualized care plans that best serve the needs of patients and optimize overall outcomes.

BREAST-Q Analysis of Reduction Mammaplasty: Do Postoperative Complications of Breast Reduction Surgery Negatively Affect Patient Satisfaction?

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty can provide symptomatic relief to patients suffering from macromastia, however complications such as dehiscence are common. It is unknown if the presence of complications may affect patient reported outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to (1) determine risk factors for development of complications, and (2) to examine the correlation between postoperative complications and patient reported outcomes in reduction mammaplasty. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients who received reduction mammaplasties (CPT19318) between 1/17-2/23 by thirteen surgeons. Breast cancer cases and oncoplastic reconstructions were excluded. Patients with >1 complication were grouped into the complications cohort. BREAST-Q-survey was used to assess satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 661 patients were included for analysis, and 131 patients developed at least one complication. Patients in the complication group had significantly higher average ages and body mass indexes, and a higher likelihood of hypertension and diabetes (p<0.01). Among 180 BREAST-Q responders, 41 had at least one complication. There were no significant differences between the two groups across survey outcomes. Although obese patients were more likely to develop infection and require revisions (p<0.01), no significant differences in subgroup analysis of patient-reported outcomes focusing on obese patients were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with postoperative complications of reduction mammaplasty. Patients with complications had similar postoperative Breast-Q satisfaction to patients without complications. While risk optimization is critical, patients and surgeons should be reassured that satisfaction may be achieved even in the event of a complication.

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount. METHODS: Herein, we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of Preventive Surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized. RESULTS: (1) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (2) surgical mitigation techniques. CONCLUSION: Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.