Antineoplastic activity of products derived from cellulose-containing materials: levoglucosenone and structurally-related derivatives as new alternatives for breast cancer treatment.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. For this reason, the development of new therapies is still essential. In this work we have analyzed the antitumor potential of levoglucosenone, a chiral building block derived from the pyrolysis of cellulose-containing materials such as soybean hulls, and three structurally related analogues. Employing human and murine mammary cancer models, we have evaluated the effect of our compounds on cell viability through MTS assay, apoptosis induction by acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining and/or flow cytometry and the loss of mitochondrial potential by tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester staining. Autophagy and senescence induction were also evaluated by Western blot and ß-galactosidase activity respectively. Secreted metalloproteases activity was determined by quantitative zymography. Migratory capacity was assessed by wound healing assays while invasive potential was analyzed using Matrigel-coated transwell chambers. In vivo studies were also performed to evaluate subcutaneous tumor growth and experimental lung colonization. All compounds impaired in vitro proliferation with IC50 values in a range of low micromolar. Apoptosis was identified as the main mechanism responsible for the reduction of monolayer cell content induced by the compounds without detecting modulations of autophagy or senescence processes. Two of the four compounds (levoglucosenone and its brominated variant) were able to modulate in vitro events associated with tumor progression, such as migratory potential, invasiveness, and proteases secretion. Furthermore, tumor volume and metastatic spread were significantly reduced in vivo after the treatment these two compounds. Here, we could obtain from soybean hulls, a material with almost no commercial value, a variety of chemical compounds useful for breast cancer treatment.

All-trans retinoic acid and protein kinase C α/ß1 inhibitor combined treatment targets cancer stem cells and impairs breast tumor progression.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Blocking a single signaling pathway is often an ineffective therapy, especially in the case of aggressive or drug-resistant tumors. Since we have previously described the mechanism involved in the crosstalk between Retinoic Acid system and protein kinase C (PKC) pathway, the rationale of our study was to evaluate the effect of combining all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) with a classical PCK inhibitor (Gö6976) in preclinical settings. Employing hormone-independent mammary cancer models, Gö6976 and ATRA combined treatment induced a synergistic reduction in proliferative potential that correlated with an increased apoptosis and RARs modulation towards an anti-oncogenic profile. Combined treatment also impairs growth, self-renewal and clonogenicity potential of cancer stem cells and reduced tumor growth, metastatic spread and cancer stem cells frequency in vivo. An in-silico analysis of "Kaplan-Meier plotter" database indicated that low PKCα together with high RARα mRNA expression is a favorable prognosis factor for hormone-independent breast cancer patients. Here we demonstrate that a classical PKC inhibitor potentiates ATRA antitumor effects also targeting cancer stem cells growth, self-renewal and frequency.

Protein Kinase C Alpha (PKCα) overexpression leads to a better response to retinoid acid therapy through Retinoic Acid Receptor Beta (RARß) activation in mammary cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Retinoids have proved to be effective for hematologic malignancies treatment but till nowadays, their use as single agent for the solid tumor's management is still controversial. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), the main active metabolite of vitamin A, exerts non-genomic interactions with different members of the protein kinase C (PKC) family, recognized modulators of different tumor progression pathways. To determine whether a group of patients could become benefited employing a retinoid therapy, in this study we have evaluated whether PKCα expression (a poor prognosis marker in breast cancer) could sensitizes mammary cells to ATRA treatment. METHODS: PKCα overexpression was achieved by stable transfection and confirmed by western blot. Transfected PKC functionality was determined by nuclear translocation-induction and confocal microscopy. In vitro proliferation was evaluated by cell counting and cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. In vivo studies were performed to evaluate orthotopic tumor growth and experimental lung colonization. Retinoic acid response elements (RARE) and AP1 sites-dependent activity was studied by gene reporter assays and retinoic acid receptors (RARs) were measured by RT-qPCR. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that high PKCα levels improve the differentiation response to ATRA in a RAR signaling-dependent manner. Moreover, RARß expression appears to be critical to induce ATRA sensitization, throughout AP1 trans-repression. CONCLUSION: Here we propose that retinoids could lead a highly personalized anticancer treatment, bringing benefits to patients with aggressive breast tumors resulting from high PKCα expression but, an adequate expression of the RARß receptor is required to ensure the effect on this process.

A clinically relevant bi-cellular murine mammary tumor model as a useful tool for evaluating the effect of retinoic acid signaling on tumor progression.

BACKGROUND: The effect of retinoic acid (RA) on breast cancer progression is controversial. Our objective was to obtain information about breast cancer progression, taking advantage of the ER-negative murine mammary adenocarcinoma model LM38 (LM38-LP constituted by luminal (LEP) and myoepithelial-like cells (MEP), LM38-HP mainly composed of spindle-shaped epithelial cells, and LM38-D2 containing only large myoepithelial cells), and to validate the role of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) in each cell-type compartment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the expression and functionality of the RARs in LM38 cell lines. We analyzed cell growth and cell cycle distribution, apoptosis, the activity of proteases, motility properties, and expression of the molecules involved in these pathways. We also evaluated tumor growth and dissemination in vivo under retinoid treatment. RESULTS: LM38 cell lines expressed most retinoic receptor isotypes that were functional. However, only the bi-cellular LM38-LP cells responded to retinoids by increasing RARß2 and CRBP1 expression. The growth of LM38 cell sublines was inhibited by retinoids, first by inducing arrest in MEP cells, then apoptosis in LEP cells. Retinoids induced inhibitory effects on motility, invasiveness, and activity of proteolytic enzymes, mainly in the LM38-LP cell line. In in-vivo assays with the LM38-LP cell line, RA treatment impaired both primary tumor growth and lung metastases dissemination. CONCLUSION: These in-vivo and in-vitro results show that to achieve maximum effects of RA on tumor progression both the LEP and MEP cell compartments have to be present, suggesting that the interaction between the LEP and MEP cells is crucial to full activation of the RARs.