Report from the EPAA workshop: in vitro ADME in safety testing used by EPAA industry sectors.

There are now numerous in vitro and in silico ADME alternatives to in vivo assays but how do different industries incorporate them into their decision tree approaches for risk assessment, bearing in mind that the chemicals tested are intended for widely varying purposes? The extent of the use of animal tests is mainly driven by regulations or by the lack of a suitable in vitro model. Therefore, what considerations are needed for alternative models and how can they be improved so that they can be used as part of the risk assessment process? To address these issues, the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) working group on prioritization, promotion and implementation of the 3Rs research held a workshop in November, 2008 in Duesseldorf, Germany. Participants included different industry sectors such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, industrial- and agro-chemicals. This report describes the outcome of the discussions and recommendations (a) to reduce the number of animals used for determining the ADME properties of chemicals and (b) for considerations and actions regarding in vitro and in silico assays. These included: standardisation and promotion of in vitro assays so that they may become accepted by regulators; increased availability of industry in vivo kinetic data for a central database to increase the power of in silico predictions; expansion of the applicability domains of in vitro and in silico tools (which are not necessarily more applicable or even exclusive to one particular sector) and continued collaborations between regulators, academia and industry. A recommended immediate course of action was to establish an expert panel of users, developers and regulators to define the testing scope of models for different chemical classes. It was agreed by all participants that improvement and harmonization of alternative approaches is needed for all sectors and this will most effectively be achieved by stakeholders from different sectors sharing data.

Xenobiotic transport across isolated brain microvessels studied by confocal microscopy.

To identify specific transporters that drive xenobiotics from central nervous system to blood, the accumulation of fluorescent drugs was studied in isolated capillaries from rat and pig brain using confocal microscopy and quantitative image analysis. Luminal accumulation of daunomycin and of fluorescent derivatives of cyclosporine A (CSA) and ivermectin was concentrative, specific, and energy-dependent (inhibition by NaCN). Transport was reduced by PSC 833, ivermectin, verapamil, CSA, and vanadate, but not by leukotriene C(4) (LTC(4)), indicating the involvement of P-glycoprotein. Luminal accumulation of the fluorescent organic anions sulforhodamine 101 and fluorescein methotrexate was also concentrative, specific, and energy-dependent. LTC(4), chlorodinitrobenzene, and vanadate reduced transport of these compounds, but PSC 833 and verapamil did not, indicating the involvement of a multidrug resistance-associated protein (Mrp). Immunostaining localized P-glycoprotein and Mrp2 to the luminal surface of the capillary endothelium and quantitative polymerase chain reaction showed Mrp1 and Mrp2 expression. Finally, the HIV protease inhibitors saquinavir and ritonavir were potent inhibitors of transport mediated by both P-glycoprotein and Mrp. These results validate a new method for studying drug transport in isolated brain capillaries and implicate both P-glycoprotein and one or more members of the Mrp family in drug transport from central nervous system to blood.

Interactions of HIV protease inhibitors with ATP-dependent drug export proteins.

We used renal proximal tubules from a teleost fish (killifish; Fundulus heteroclitus), fluorescent substrates and confocal microscopy to study the interactions between human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors and drug-transporting ATPases. Both saquinavir and ritonavir inhibited luminal accumulation of a fluorescent cyclosporin A derivative (a substrate for P-glycoprotein) and of fluorescein methotrexate [a substrate for multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2)]. Of the two protease inhibitors, ritonavir was the more potent inhibitor of transport by a factor of at least 20. Ritonavir was at least as good an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein- and Mrp2-mediated transport as cyclosporin A and leukotriene C4, respectively. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein- and Mrp2-mediated transport was not due to toxicity or impaired metabolism, because neither saquinavir nor ritonavir inhibited transport of fluorescein on the renal organic anion system. Experiments with a fluorescent saquinavir derivative showed strong secretion into the tubular lumen that was inhibited by verapamil, leukotriene C4, saquinavir, and ritonavir. Together, the data demonstrate that saquinavir, and especially ritonavir, are potent inhibitors of P-glycoprotein- and Mrp2-mediated transport. The experiments with the fluorescent saquinavir derivative suggest that these protease inhibitors may also be substrates for both P-glycoprotein and Mrp2.