[The process of community building by Community Social Coordinators: The possibility of enhancing social capital in a disaster-affected city].

Objectives　To build a healthy and safe community, it is important to provide direct services, such as health, medical, and social welfare services. However, it is also crucial to enhance the community's social capital by promoting self-help and mutual aid within the community. The development and utilization of resources/networks as well as community empowerment are possible methods to enhance social capital, but there is no conclusive method to facilitate effective coordination within the community. The purpose of this study is to clarify the community building process. This is achieved through qualitative research on community social coordinators (CSCs) who worked in an area that was significantly damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake.Methods　A qualitative approach was employed to assess 10 individuals who worked as CSCs in a city within Miyagi Prefecture. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, which were between 40-90 minutes in length. A modified grounded theory approach (M-GTA) was used to analyze the data obtained from the interviews.Results　The CSCs "built a relationship with the community," "assessed the community," and "intervened in the community." While assessing the community, they considered both its strengths and weaknesses, not limiting the fields it covered. To "solve the issues in the community," the CSCs "intervened in the community by themselves," "supported the autonomy of the residents," and "connected the residents to resources." This intervention was facilitated through "cooperation with the community" or "cooperation with other supporters."Conclusion　Three stages were observed in the community building process. First, the CSCs built a relationship with the community. They then assessed the community, and intervened as required. It was found that the intervention-which was based on the CSCs' assessment of the community's strengths and weaknesses-was facilitated by the cooperation of the community or that of other supporters. Additionally, the CSCs aimed to promote the autonomy of the residents.

Identification of disaster-vulnerable communities by use of census data prior to the Great East Japan Earthquake.

OBJECTIVES: The role of the community is becoming increasingly recognized as a crucial determinant of human health, particularly during a disaster and during disaster recovery. To identify disaster-vulnerable communities, we sought factors related to communities in need of support by using census information from before the Great East Japan Earthquake. METHODS: We identified vulnerable communities by using a needs-assessment survey conducted 6 to 12 months after the Great East Japan Earthquake in Ishinomaki City, Miyagi Prefecture, as indicated by higher proportions of households with at least 1 of 3 major support needs (medical, elderly, psychological, and dwelling environment). The associations between the need for support and 9 demographic characteristics of the community from census data prior to the Great East Japan Earthquake were examined for 71 communities by use of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The need for elderly support was positively associated with the proportions of aged people (odds ratio [OR]=1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.8) and one-person households (OR=1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.7), whereas the need for psychological support was associated with the proportion of people engaged in agriculture (OR=4.6; 95% CI: 1.0-20.7). The proportion of fisheries was negatively associated with the need for dwelling environment support (OR=0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The consideration of simple demographic characteristics from the census may be useful for identifying vulnerable communities and preparing for future disasters.