Delayed versus early delivery leads to similar outcome in selected cases of preeclampsia in the Finnish Genetics of Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Most guidelines recommend induction of labor after 37 weeks of gestation in preeclampsia. This study assessed the effect of interval between diagnosis of preeclampsia and delivery on maternal and perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 1637 women with preeclampsia recruited at five university hospitals in Finland was studied. Outcomes were compared in two groups according to the time interval between diagnosis of PE and delivery: delivery in less than 10 days (the early delivery group) and delivery at 10 days or later after the diagnosis (the delayed delivery group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal outcomes included significantly preterm delivery (delivery before 34 weeks of gestation), placental abruption, eclampsia and maternal intensive care or intensive monitoring for more than 24 h. Neonatal outcomes included small for gestational age, Apgar score of less than seven at the age of five minutes, umbilical artery pH < 7.05 and fetal death. RESULTS: No differences in frequency of preterm deliveries or maternal need for intensive care were observed between groups. Eclampsia and fetal death were rare, and their incidence did not differ between the groups. No maternal deaths were observed. Low Apgar score at five minutes of age was reported more commonly in the early delivery group, but there was no difference in fetal acidemia between groups. CONCLUSION: Early and delayed delivery lead to comparable outcomes in this cohort. Expectant management could be beneficial in women with an unripe cervix or preterm preeclampsia without severe features.

Validation of the Finnish Care register for Health Care diagnoses for preeclampsia, gestational diabetes and preterm delivery.

BACKGROUND: Centrally collected Finnish national health register data on adverse pregnancy outcomes are available for research, but the validity of the data is largely unknown. Our aim was to compare the diagnoses of preeclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes (GDM), and preterm delivery from hospital records with the registry based diagnoses from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care (FCR). Data on gestational age at delivery from the Medical Birth Registry (MBR) was also studied. METHODS: The Finnish Genetics of Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) Study cohort was used as a data source. Each diagnosis was ascertained from electronic hospital records. The validity of diagnoses obtained by record linkage of FCR and MBR was assessed against the classification previously confirmed independently by a research nurse and a study physician. RESULTS: Sensitivity of PE diagnoses in FCR was 80.3 % (95 % CI 78.3 % to 82.2 %) andspecificity 95.3 % (95 % CI 93.9 % to 96.4 %). Sensitivity for GDM was 64.1 % (95 % CI: 58.7 % - 69.3 %) and specificity 98.5 % (95 % CI: 97.9 % - 98.9 %), whereas sensitivity and specificity for preterm delivery were 32.4 % (95 % CI: 29.0 % - 36.0 %) and 99.7 % (95 % CI: 99.3 % - 99.9 %). Sensitivity of preterm delivery in the MBR was 99.1 % and specificity 99.9 %. CONCLUSIONS: FCR registry diagnoses for PE have satisfactory sensitivity and high specificity. Diagnoses for GDM and preterm delivery have lower sensitivity limiting their use in studies, and data from MBR should be preferred when studying preterm deliveries.

Twin birth: The maternal experience.

OBJECTIVE: Twin birth is a special setting for women giving birth, and the experience of childbirth can be different from singleton birth. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the childbirth experiences of twin mothers and singleton mothers. We also aimed to identify the risk factors of a negative childbirth experience in the whole study population. METHODS: All live diamniotic twin deliveries in the study hospital of at least 35+0 weeks of gestation with a plan of vaginal birth were included in this matched groups study from August 2015 to August 2019. For every twin birth, two singleton birth controls were selected and matched with parity, the actual mode of birth, and gestational weeks at birth. Six weeks after birth, a Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) was sent to mothers, and 72 twin mothers and 126 singleton mothers returned the questionnaire. RESULTS: The twin mothers' overall childbirth experience was positive. They reported a significantly lower opportunity to choose the birthing position (p < 0.001). Otherwise, there were no differences in the CEQ mean total scores between the study groups. Intrapartum cesarean section raised the risk of a negative childbirth experience and there was a high level of satisfaction with midwifery care among the whole study population. CONCLUSION: The overall maternal experience in planned vaginal twin birth was positive. Twin mothers felt less often able to choose their birthing position, otherwise the childbirth experience did not differ from that of singleton mothers.

Increased Risk of Preeclampsia in Women With a Genetic Predisposition to Elevated Blood Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia causes significant maternal and perinatal morbidity. Genetic factors seem to affect the onset of the disease. We aimed to investigate whether the polygenic risk score for blood pressure (BP; BP-PRS) is associated with preeclampsia, its subtypes, and BP values during pregnancy. METHODS: The analyses were performed in the FINNPEC study (Finnish Genetics of Pre-Eclampsia Consortium) cohort of 1514 preeclamptic and 983 control women. In a case-control setting, the data were divided into percentiles to compare women with high BP-PRS (HBP-PRS; >95th percentile) or low BP-PRS (≤5th percentile) to others. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of BP-PRS on BP, we studied 3 cohorts: women with preeclampsia, hypertensive controls, and normotensive controls. RESULTS: BP values were higher in women with HBP-PRS throughout the pregnancy. Preeclampsia was more common in women with HBP-PRS compared with others (71.8% and 60.1%, respectively; P=0.009), and women with low BP-PRS presented with preeclampsia less frequently than others (44.8% and 61.5%, respectively; P<0.001). HBP-PRS was associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia (odds ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.5]). Furthermore, women with HBP-PRS presented with recurrent preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features more often. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that HBP-PRS is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, recurrent preeclampsia, and preeclampsia with severe features. Furthermore, women with HBP-PRS present higher BP values during pregnancy. The results strengthen the evidence pointing toward the role of genetic variants associated with BP regulation in the etiology of preeclampsia, especially its more severe forms.

Impact of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcome in spontaneous-onset breech labor at 32+0-36+6 weeks of gestation: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal and maternal outcomes in spontaneously onset preterm breech deliveries after trial of labor (BTOL) and intended cesarean section (BCS), and between BTOL and vertex control deliveries, in singleton fetuses at 32+0-36+6 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single center cohort study in a Finnish University Hospital including all spontaneous-onset preterm breech deliveries with 32 completed gestational weeks in 2003-2015. The study population comprised a total of 176 preterm breech and 103 vertex control deliveries, matched by gestational age and whether the mother had given birth vaginally before or not. Infants with severe malformations and antepartum fetal distress were excluded. Subgroup analyses were made in two cohorts according to gestational age. Main outcome measures were maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, low cord pH and Apgar score. RESULTS: No mortality was observed, and severe morbidity was rare. No difference in incidence of low cord pH or five-minute Apgar score was observed between the groups. Apgar scores at the age of one minute were comparable in the breech groups but more often low in the BTOL group compared to the vertex control group. 16.5% of neonates in the BTOL group, 23.3% in the BCS group and 7.8% in the vertex group needed intensive care. In logistic regression analysis, lower gestational age and being small for gestational age were associated with the need for neonatal intensive care. Being allowed a trial of labor was not associated with the need for neonatal intensive care. Maternal morbidity was similar across the groups, but median blood loss was more pronounced in the BCS group compared to the BTOL group. CONCLUSION: In breech deliveries at 32+0-36+6 gestational weeks, trial of labor did not increase neonatal morbidity compared to intended cesarean delivery. Infants born after a trial of labor in breech presentation display low one-minute Apgar score and need intensive care more often compared to vertex controls.

Cardiotocography in breech versus vertex delivery: an examiner-blinded, cross-sectional nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The safety of vaginal breech delivery has been debated for decades. Although it has been shown to predispose infants to immediate depression, several observational studies have also shown that attempting vaginal breech delivery does not increase perinatal morbidity or low Apgar score at the age of five minutes. Cardiotocography monitoring is recommended during vaginal breech delivery, but comparative data describing differences between cardiotocography tracings in breech and vertex deliveries is scarce. This study aims to evaluate differences in intrapartum cardiotocography tracings between breech and vertex deliveries in the final 60 min of delivery. A secondary goal is to identify risk factors for suboptimal neonatal outcome in the study population. METHODS: One hundred eight breech and 108 vertex singleton, intended vaginal deliveries at term from a tertiary hospital with 5000 annual deliveries were included. Two experienced obstetricians, blinded to fetal presentation, neonatal outcome and actual mode of delivery, evaluated traces recorded 60 min before delivery. They provided a three-tier classification and evaluated different trace features according to FIGO (1987) guidelines. Factors associated with acidemia and low Apgar scores were identified by univariate and multivariable analyses performed with binary logistic regression. Student's T-test and chi-square test were used, as appropriate. RESULTS: Late decelerations were seen in 13.9 % of breech and 2.8 % of vertex deliveries (p = 0.003) and decreased variability in 26.9 % of breech and 8.3 % of vertex deliveries (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis complicated variable decelerations and breech presentation were identified as risk factors for neonatal acidemia and low Apgar score at the age of five minutes. Pathological trace and breech presentation were independent risk factors for low Apgar score at the age of one minute. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased variability and late decelerations were more prevalent in breech compared to vertex deliveries. Pathological trace predicts immediate neonatal depression and especially complicated variable decelerations may signal more severe distress. Further research is needed to create guidelines for safe management of vaginal breech delivery.

Maternal experiences of vaginal breech delivery.

BACKGROUND: The optimal mode of breech birth remains controversial. In Finland, a trial of vaginal delivery is possible if strict selection criteria are met. As clinical practice in managing vaginal breech birth differs from that in normal delivery, the birth experience may also be different. This cohort study compares the childbirth experience between term breech and vertex deliveries. METHODS: Intended vaginal term breech births from 2008 to October 2012 were included, and for every breech delivery, a vertex control was selected. The proportions of deliveries ending in a cesarean section and of mothers who had given birth vaginally before were equal in both groups. Three hundred eight mothers were sent the childbirth experience questionnaire and 170 returned it. RESULTS: The birth experience does not differ between breech and vertex births, except for aspects with respect to the choice of birthing position. Indications of an even more positive experience were observed in the breech group, with the exception of the choice of analgesia, but these were not statistically significant. Primiparity, emergency cesarean section, infant birth trauma and prolonged hospital stay were identified as risk factors for a negative birth experience. CONCLUSION: The birth experience of vaginal breech birth seems to be at least as positive as the vaginal vertex birth experience.

Selective vaginal breech delivery at term - still an option.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the neonatal outcome between planned vaginal or planned cesarean section (CS) breech delivery and planned vaginal vertex delivery at term with singleton fetuses. DESIGN: A cohort study. SETTING: Delivery Unit, Tampere University Hospital, Finland, with 5200 annual deliveries. POPULATION: The term breech deliveries over a period of five years (January 2004 to January 2009), a total of 751 breech deliveries, and 257 vertex controls. METHODS: The data were collected from the mother's medical records, including a summary of the newborn. In the case of neonatal health problems, the pediatric records were also examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity as defined in the Term Breech Trial. Low Apgar scores or umbilical cord pH as secondary end-points. RESULTS: There was no neonatal mortality. Severe morbidity was rare in all groups, with no differences between groups. The Apgar scores at one minute were lower in the planned vaginal delivery group compared with the other groups, but there was no difference at the age of five minutes. Significantly more infants in the vaginal delivery group had a cord pH < 7.05. There was one maternal death due to a complicated CS in the planned CS group and none in the other groups. Mothers in the planned CS group suffered significantly more often from massive bleeding and needed transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal delivery remains an acceptable option for breech delivery in selected cases.