Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
J Patient Exp ; 10: 23743735231203115, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37789916

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This study evaluated patient preference of physician attire both before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic began. The primary outcome was patient preference of physician attire in 2017 compared to 2022 survey cohorts. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study performed at a single-site academic institution in the United States using patient survey materials. In total, 339 patients were included in the study, 161 from 2017 and 178 from 2022. Key Points: There was a statistically significant decrease in patient preference for formal attire in the clinical settings of primary care, hospital, and overall. Male patient preference for formal attire declined in primary care, emergency room, and overall; whereas female patient preference for formal attire declined in the hospital setting. For all genders, the odds ratio was statistically significantly lower in the settings of primary care clinic, hospital, and overall clinical settings. Conclusions: Patient preference for physicians wearing formal attire has decreased significantly since the COVID-19 global pandemic began.

2.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(7): 649-653, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093678

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chromoblastomycosis is an uncommon fungal infection of the skin caused by a variety of dematiaceous fungal species that is typically contracted through direct inoculation into the skin. OBJECTIVE: To collect and examine data pertaining to the clinical presentation and management of patients with chromoblastomycosis. METHODS: Through a retrospective study, a pathology medical record search was performed from January 2004 to December 2020 at a single institution. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients were identified. Seven of 9 cases occurred in solid organ transplant recipients. All cases were located on the extremities. Six of 9 cases were clinically suspected to be squamous cell carcinoma. Seven of 9 cases were treated with surgical excision. Six of 9 patients were treated with oral antifungal medication. Four of 9 patients had received combination therapy. Eight of 9 patients had no recurrence of the disease after treatment. CONCLUSION: Chromoblastomycosis presents as verrucous papules or nodules and may clinically and histopathologically mimic squamous cell carcinoma. Immunosuppression is likely a risk factor for the development of chromoblastomycosis. This study highlights the importance of clinical awareness of this disease's clinical presentation and prevalence in immunosuppressed patient populations.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Chromoblastomycosis , Dermatomycoses , Humans , Chromoblastomycosis/diagnosis , Chromoblastomycosis/drug therapy , Chromoblastomycosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy
3.
South Med J ; 116(3): 298-304, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36863052

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify self-reported stressors and coping mechanisms during the 2020-2021 application cycle by dermatology residency applicants. We hypothesized that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) would be the most reported stressor. METHODS: During the 2020-2021 application season, the Mayo Clinic Florida Dermatology residency program sent a supplemental application to each applicant requesting that they describe a challenging life situation and how they handled it. Comparisons of self-reported stressors and self-expressed coping mechanisms according to sex, race, and geographic region were performed. RESULTS: The most common stressors reported were academic (18.4%), family crisis (17.7%), and COVID-19 (10.5%). The most frequent coping mechanisms expressed were perseverance (22.3%), seeking community (13.7%), and resilience (11.5%). The coping mechanism of diligence was observed more often in females than in males (2.8% vs 0.0%, P = 0.045). First in medicine was more often observed in Black or African American students (12.5% vs 0%, P = 0.001), immigrant experience was more often observed in Black or African American and Hispanic students (16.7% and 11.8% vs 3.1%, P = 0.021), and natural disaster was reported more often in Hispanic students (26.5% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001) as compared with White applicants. By geography, applicants in the northeastern United States were more likely to report the COVID-19 pandemic as a stressor (19.5%, P = 0.049), and the natural disaster stressor was more often reported by applicants from outside the continental United States (45.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Stressors reported by dermatology applicants in the 2020-2021 cycle included academic, family crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The type of stressor reported varied by race/ethnicity and geographic location of the applicant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatology , Internship and Residency , Female , Male , Humans , Self Report , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Adaptation, Psychological
4.
Cutis ; 111(1): E8-E15, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36947776

ABSTRACT

Dermatology residency continues to be one of the most competitive specialties, with a match rate of 84.7% in 2019. We surveyed 475 dermatology applicants who applied to the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona, during the 2018-2019 application cycle and 629 dermatology applicants who applied to the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale; Rochester, Minnesota; and Jacksonville, Florida, during the 2019-2020 application cycle. The initial survey obtained application and demographic information. The follow-up survey obtained match data. The initial 2019 and 2020 surveys were completed by 149 and 142 dermatology applicants, respectively, and 112 and 124 applicants completed the respective follow-up surveys. Our survey finds that factors associated with matching included a higher US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, having a home dermatology program, and a higher number of interviews offered and attended. Some demographics had varying USMLE Step 1 scores but similar match rates.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Internship and Residency , Humans , United States , Surveys and Questionnaires , Florida , Minnesota
5.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 26(2): 169-175, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34541912

ABSTRACT

This review article examines evidence supporting the use of oral therapies in treating idiopathic, actinic, and metabolically induced skin hyperpigmentation. A thorough review of the literature regarding oral treatments for hyperpigmentation was systematically conducted through PubMed. Keywords used in the primary search include "Hyperpigmentation," "Melanosis" or "Melasma," "Lightening," "Oral," and "Therapeutics." The search was limited to the English language, and no timeframe restrictions were implemented. Numerous orally administered therapies have been proposed for the treatment of skin hyperpigmentation. There is an abundant body of literature demonstrating the efficacy of orally administered tranexamic acid, glutathione, isotretinoin, and proanthocyanidin. It is reasonable to expect that the most effective oral therapies will address known underlying causes of hyperpigmentation such as thyroid disease, diabetes, and hormonal imbalance. Improvement due to oral therapy of otherwise unresponsive skin hyperpigmentation or hyperpigmentation of unknown cause is less predictable. This review is limited by the strength of evidence contained within the available studies. Clinical studies investigating the treatments discussed within this article are limited in number, at times lack blinding in the study design, and are based on small sample sizes. Based on existing research, the most promising oral remedies for hyperpigmentation appear to be tranexamic acid, glutathione, isotretinoin, and proanthocyanidin. Additional studies to better establish safety and efficacy are necessary.


Subject(s)
Hyperpigmentation , Melanosis , Tranexamic Acid , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Humans , Hyperpigmentation/drug therapy , Melanosis/etiology , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use
6.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 113(6): 666-670, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34353623

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The field of dermatology is one of the least racially diverse specialties. We aimed to identify ways in which minorities become underrepresented within dermatology. METHODS: We surveyed dermatology applicants who applied to Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, AZ during the 2018-2019 application cycle and Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Scottsdale, and Jacksonville during the 2019-2020 application cycles. Underrepresented minorities (URM) were defined as Latino/Latina, African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. RESULTS: In total, 149 and 142 dermatology applicants completed the initial 2019 and 2020 surveys, 112 and 124 completed the follow-up surveys. The racial breakdown was 69.9% Caucasian, 23.7% Asian, 5.4% African American, 0.4% American Indian/Alaska Native, and 0.7% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Eight percent identified as Hispanic/Latino. Median Step 1 scores were lower for URM (p<0.01). URM had more publications (p=0.01). There were no observed differences in away rotations or interviews attended. URM were less likely to match (76.7%) vs. Whites (88.4%) and Asians (96.0%; p=0.03). CONCLUSION: URM are taking out more loans, pursuing research fellowships more often than their White counterparts, publishing more, completing the same number of away rotations and interviews, yet have lower match rates leading to underrepresentation in the field. It is important to realize how Step scores might reflect and reproduce disparities between different racial/ethnic backgrounds, in turn influencing the racial composition of dermatology residency programs.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Ethnicity , Black or African American , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Minority Groups , United States
7.
Int J Dermatol ; 61(2): 226-230, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34719024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A new trend includes taking a dedicated year away from medical school to complete a research fellowship. There is minimal data on the benefit of a gap year. We aimed to identify if a gap year makes a dermatology applicant more successful in The Match. METHODS: Dermatology applicants who applied to Mayo Clinic Arizona for the 2018-2019 application cycle and Mayo Clinic Rochester, Arizona, and Florida for the 2019-2020 application cycle were surveyed. RESULTS: In total, 291 dermatology applicants completed the initial survey, and 236 completed the follow-up survey. Ninety applicants took a gap year, 198 applicants did not. There was no significant difference in match rates. When comparing match rates at top dermatology residency programs, 40.6% of gap-year applicants matched to these residencies versus 19.0% of no gap-year applicants (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Applicants should weigh the opportunity costs before pursuing research gap years as they may not be universally helpful. Applicants who want to match at a top dermatology program may benefit from a research gap year. This data may have limited generalizability outside of the United States.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Internship and Residency , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Schools, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
8.
Skinmed ; 19(2): 137-141, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33938438

ABSTRACT

A 63-year-old woman from Central Florida presented to an outside clinic with a 2-year history of a progressive, asymptomatic cutaneous eruption and arthralgias. Her past medical history was significant for reported seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, for which adalimumab, methotrexate, and low-dose prednisone therapy were initiated 5 years prior. The skin eruption occurred shortly after a 4-week hospitalization during which these medications were withheld. At her initial outside evaluation, a biopsy was performed and interpreted as subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). She was treated with hydroxychloroquine without improvement. A repeat biopsy was reported as consistent with interstitial granulomatous dermatitis (IGD). There was no improvement with potent topical corticosteroids.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatitis/complications , Dermatitis/diagnosis , Female , Florida , Humans , Middle Aged , Prednisolone/therapeutic use
9.
Int J Dermatol ; 60(8): 986-990, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742703

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the development of skin cancer and the associated risk factors for non-White liver transplant (LT) recipients. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of newly diagnosed skin cancer postoperatively and to identify the risk factors for the development of skin cancer in non-White LT recipients. METHODS: We conducted an initial retrospective chart review of non-White LT patients who received a transplant at our center between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients in the study cohort, 32% were Black, 17% were Asian, 15% were White Hispanic, and 10% were Black Hispanic. One patient had a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer before transplant. No skin cancers were diagnosed during follow-up (median, 1.3 years; range, 17 days to 8.6 years). CONCLUSION: Our center's experience is consistent with the literature and suggests that the incidence of newly diagnosed skin cancer in non-White liver transplant recipients is low. Longer follow-up may provide additional insights into the specific risk factors for the posttransplant development of skin cancer.


Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Skin Neoplasms , Cohort Studies , Humans , Incidence , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology
10.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(6): 1057-1065, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654173

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Relatively few cutaneous head and neck melanoma (CHNM) patients with were included in the multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial II (MSLT-II). Our objective was to investigate whether immediate completion lymph node dissection completion of lymph node dissection (CLND) was associated with survival benefit for sentinel lymph node (SLN) positive CHNM using the National Cancer Database. METHODS: SLN positive patients with CHNM from 2012 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) only versus those who underwent SLNB followed by CLND (SLNB + CLND). The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 530 SLNB + patients, 342 patients underwent SLNB followed by CLND (SLNB + CLND). The SLNB only group had fewer positive SLN, less advanced pathologic stage, and a lower rate of adjuvant immunotherapy. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS between the two groups (51.0% vs 67%; P = .56). After adjusting for pathologic stage, there remained no difference in 5-year OS among patients with stage IIIA (63.0% vs. 73.6%, P = 0.22) or IIIB/IIIC disease (39.1% vs 57.8%; P = .52). Conclusions Using a large nationwide database, CLND was not shown to be associated with improved OS for patients with SLNB positive CHNM, validating the results of MSLT-II.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Melanoma/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...