Triheptanoin Did Not Show Benefit versus Placebo for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Movement Disorders in Glut1 Deficiency Syndrome: Results of a Randomized Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal movement disorders are common in Glut1 deficiency syndrome (Glut1DS). Not all patients respond to or tolerate ketogenic diets. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of triheptanoin in reducing the frequency of disabling movement disorders in patients with Glut1DS not receiving a ketogenic diet. METHODS: UX007G-CL301 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 crossover study. After a 6-week run-in, eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to the first sequence (triheptanoin/placebo or placebo/triheptanoin) titration plus maintenance, followed by washout and the opposite sequence titration plus maintenance. The placebo (safflower oil) matched the appearance, taste, and smell of triheptanoin. Open-label triheptanoin was administered in the extension. The frequency of disabling paroxysmal movement disorder events per 4 weeks (recorded by diary during maintenance; primary endpoint) was assessed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (children, n = 16; adults, n = 27) were randomized and treated. There was no difference between triheptanoin and placebo in the mean (interquartile range) number of disabling paroxysmal movement disorder events (14.3 [4.7-38.3] vs. 11.8; [3.2-28.7]; Hodges-Lehmann estimated median difference: 1.46; 95% confidence interval, -1.12 to 4.36; P = 0.2684). Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate in severity and included diarrhea, vomiting, upper abdominal pain, headache, and nausea. Two patients discontinued the study because of non-serious adverse events that were predominantly gastrointestinal. The study was closed early during the open-label extension because of lack of effectiveness. Seven patients continued to receive triheptanoin compassionately. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between the triheptanoin and placebo groups in the frequency of disabling movement disorder events during the double-blind maintenance period. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Outpatient management of prolonged seizures and seizure clusters to prevent progression to a higher-level emergency: Consensus recommendations of an expert working group.

OBJECTIVE: The management of prolonged seizures (PS) and seizure clusters (SC) is impeded by the lack of international, evidence-based guidance. We aimed to develop expert recommendations regarding consensus definitions of PS, SC, and treatment goals to prevent progression to higher-level emergencies such as status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: An expert working group, comprising 12 epileptologists, neurologists, and pharmacologists from Europe and North America, used a modified Delphi consensus methodology to develop and anonymously vote on statements. Consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "Agree"/"Strongly agree." RESULTS: All group members strongly agreed that termination of an ongoing seizure in as short a time as possible is the primary goal of rapid and early seizure termination (REST) and that an ideal medication for REST would start to act within 2 min of administration to terminate ongoing seizure activity. Consensus was reached on the terminology defining PS (with proposed thresholds of 5 min for prolonged focal seizures and 2 min for prolonged absence seizures and the convulsive phase of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) and SC (an abnormal increase in seizure frequency compared with the individual patient's usual seizure pattern). All group members strongly agreed or agreed that patients who have experienced a PS should be offered a REST medication, and all patients who have experienced a SC should be offered an acute cluster treatment (ACT). Further, when prescribing a REST medication or ACT, a seizure action plan should be agreed upon in consultation with the patient and caregiver. SIGNIFICANCE: The expert working group had a high level of agreement on the recommendations for defining and managing PS and SC. These recommendations will complement the existing guidance for the management of acute seizures, with the possibility of treating them earlier to potentially avoid progression to more severe seizures, including SE.

Exploratory study of blood biomarkers in patients with post-stroke epilepsy.

INTRODUCTION: In addition to clinical factors, blood-based biomarkers can provide useful information on the risk of developing post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). Our aim was to identify serum biomarkers at stroke onset that could contribute to predicting patients at higher risk of PSE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a previous study in which 895 acute stroke patients were followed-up, 51 patients developed PSE. We selected 15 patients with PSE and 15 controls without epilepsy. In a biomarker discovery setting, 5 Olink panels of 96 proteins each, were used to determine protein levels. Biomarkers that were down-regulated and overexpressed in PSE patients, and those that showed the strongest interactions with other proteins were validated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in samples from 50 PSE patients and 50 controls. A ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of significant biomarkers to develop PSE. RESULTS: Mean age of the PSE discovery cohort was 68.56 ± 15.1, 40% women and baseline NIHSS 12 [IQR 1-25]. Nine proteins were down-expressed: CASP-8, TNFSF-14, STAMBP, ENRAGE, EDA2R, SIRT2, TGF-alpha, OSM and CLEC1B. VEGFa, CD40 and CCL4 showed greatest interactions with the remaining proteins. In the validation analysis, TNFSF-14 was the single biomarker showing statistically significant downregulated levels in PSE patients (p = 0.006) and it showed a good predictive capability to develop PSE (AUC 0.733, 95% CI 0.601-0.865). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Protein expression in PSE patients differs from that of non-epileptic stroke patients, suggesting the involvement of several different proteins in post-stroke epileptogenesis. TNFSF-14 emerges as a potential biomarker for predicting PSE.

Spanish consensus on the management of concomitant antiseizure medications when using cenobamate in adults with drug-resistant focal seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) associated with high rates of seizure freedom and acceptable tolerability in patients with focal seizures. To achieve the optimal cenobamate dose for maximal potential effectiveness while avoiding or minimizing drug-related adverse events (AEs), the administration of cenobamate with other ASMs must be managed through concomitant ASM load reduction. A panel of Spanish epilepsy experts aimed to provide a Spanish consensus on how to adjust the dose of concomitant ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in order to improve the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate. METHODS: A three-stage modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken, including six Spanish epileptologists with extensive experience using cenobamate. Based on current literature and their own expert opinion, the expert panel reached a consensus on when and how to adjust the dosage of concomitant ASMs during cenobamate titration. RESULTS: The expert panel agreed that tailored titration and close follow-up are required to achieve the best efficacy and tolerability when initiating cenobamate in patients receiving concomitant ASMs. When concomitant clobazam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and sodium channel blockers are taken at high dosages, or when the patient is receiving two or more sodium channel blockers, dosages should be proactively lowered during the cenobamate titration period. Other concomitant ASMs should be reduced only if the patient reports a moderate/severe AE at any stage of the titration period. SIGNIFICANCE: Cenobamate is an effective ASM with a dose-dependent effect. To maximize effectiveness while maintaining the best tolerability profile, co-medication management is needed. The recommendations included herein provide practical guidance for proactive and reactive management of co-medication in cenobamate-treated patients with DRE and a high drug load. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with epilepsy may continue to have seizures even after treatment with several different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Cenobamate is an ASM that can reduce seizures in these patients. In this study, six Spanish experts in epilepsy discussed the best way to use cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy. They provide practical guidance on when and how the dose of other ASMs might be adjusted to reduce side effects and optimize the use of cenobamate.

Antiseizure medication withdrawal in adult patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy: Performance of two seizure recurrence prediction models.

PURPOSE: Currently, there is a limited availability of tools to predict seizure recurrence after discontinuation of antiseizure medications (ASMs). This study aimed to establish the seizure recurrence rate following ASM cessation in adult patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) and to assess the predictive performance of the Lamberink and the Stevelink prediction models using real-world data. METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal study in IGE patients who underwent ASM withdrawal in a tertiary epilepsy clinic since June 2011, with the latest follow up in January 2024. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Clinical and demographic variables were collected, and the seizure recurrence prediction models proposed by Lamberink and Stevelink were applied and evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (mean age 33.15 ± 8 [20-55] years; 72.35 % women) were included. During the follow-up period, seizures recurred in 25 patients (53.2 %). Median time to recurrence was 8 months [IQR 3-13.5 months], and 17 patients (68 %) relapsed within the first year. None of the relapsing patients developed drug-resistant epilepsy. The only significant risk factor associated with recurrence was a seizure-free period of less than 2 years before discontinuing medication (91.7 % vs 40 %, p =.005). The Stevelink prediction model at both 2 (p =.015) and 5 years (p =.020) achieved statistical significance, with an AUC of 0.72 (95 % CI 0.56-0.88), while the Lamberink model showed inadequate prognostic capability. CONCLUSION: In our real-world cohort, a seizure-free period of at least 2 years was the only factor significantly associated with epilepsy remission after ASM withdrawal. Larger studies are needed to accurately predict seizure recurrence in IGE patients.

Predictive Model for Estimating the Risk of Epilepsy After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The RISE Score.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of seizures after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with a poorer functional and cognitive prognosis and less favorable quality of life. It would be of value to promptly identify patients at risk of epilepsy to optimize follow-up protocols and design preventive strategies. Our aim was to develop a predictive score to help stratify epilepsy risk in patients with aSAH. METHODS: This is a retrospective, longitudinal study of all adults with aSAH admitted to our center (2012-2021). We collected demographic data, clinical and radiologic variables, data on early-onset seizures (EOSs), and data on development of epilepsy. Exclusion criteria were previous structural brain lesion, epilepsy, and ≤7 days' follow-up. Multiple Cox regression was used to evaluate factors independently associated with unprovoked remote seizures (i.e., epilepsy). The best fitting regression model was used to develop a predictive score. Performance was evaluated in an external validation cohort of 308 patients using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: From an initial database of 743 patients, 419 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean age was 60 ± 14 years, 269 patients (64%) were women, and 50 (11.9%) developed epilepsy within a median follow-up of 4.2 years. Premorbid modified Rankin Score (mRS) (hazard ratio [HR] 4.74 [1.8-12.4], p = 0.001), VASOGRADE score (HR 2.45 [1.4-4.2], p = 0.001), surgical treatment (HR 2.77 [1.6-4.9], p = 0.001), and presence of EOSs (HR 1.84 [1.0-3.4], p = 0.05) were independently associated with epilepsy. The proposed scale, designated RISE, scores 1 point for premorbid mRS ≥ 2 (R), VASOGRADE-Yellow (I, Ischemia), surgical intervention (S), and history of EOSs (E) and 2 points for VASOGRADE-Red. RISE stratifies patients into 3 groups: low (0-1), moderate (2-3), and high (4-5) risk (2.9%, 20.8%, and 75.7% developed epilepsy, respectively). On validation in a cohort from a different tertiary care center (N = 308), the new scale yielded a similar risk distribution and good predictive power for epilepsy within 5 years after aSAH (area under the curve [AUC] 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.90). DISCUSSION: The RISE scale is a robust predictor of post-SAH epilepsy with immediate clinical applicability. In addition to facilitating personalized diagnosis and treatment, RISE may be of value for exploring future antiepileptogenesis strategies.

Risk assessment of long-term epilepsy after de novo status epilepticus with clinical and electroencephalographic biomarkers: The AFTER score.

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing epilepsy after de novo status epilepticus (SE) is nonnegligible. The individualized management of patients with high risk of subsequent epilepsy could improve long-term quality of life and cognitive impairment. We aimed to ascertain potential biomarkers of subsequent epilepsy and to construct a scoring system possessing predictive value for the diagnosis of post-SE epilepsy during follow-up. METHODS: The study data were obtained from a prospective registry of all SE episodes occurring in patients over 16 years attended in our tertiary center from February 2011 to April 2022. Clinical data, electroencephalography findings, treatment, and long-term clinical data were prospectively recorded. We selected SE patients at risk of developing epilepsy (acute symptomatic and cryptogenic etiologies with no previous history of epilepsy) and analyzed the risk of developing subsequent epilepsy. RESULTS: We included 230 patients. Median age was 65 years ± 16.9 SD and 112/230 (48.7 %) were women. One-hundred ninety-eight patients (86.1 %) had an acute symptomatic SE, whereas 32 patients (13.9 %) presented with a cryptogenic SE. A total of 55 patients (23.9 %) developed an unprovoked remote seizure and were diagnosed with epilepsy. After adjusting for identifiable confounders in a multivariable Cox regression analysis cryptogenic etiology (HR 2.24 [1.13-4.46], p = 0.022), first-line treatment initiation ≥1 h (HR 2.12 [1.03-4.36], p = 0.041], RDA/LPD/GPD EEG patterns (HR 1.88 [1.07-3.32], p = 0.028), and super-refractoriness (HR 2.90 [1.40-5.99], p = 0.004) emerged as independent predictors of post-SE epilepsy. Based on these findings, we constructed the AFTER score (1 point for each item) with a robust capability to predict post-SE epilepsy at 5 years (AUC 74.3 %, 95 %CI 64.3-84.3 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The AFTER score is a robust predictor of the development of epilepsy after new onset SE using clinical and electroencephalographic biomarkers (such as etiology, time to first-line treatment initiation, EEG pattern and super-refractoriness). Prospective studies are warranted to validate the score in other populations.

Clinical and economic implications of epilepsy management across treatment lines in Spain: a real-life database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a chronic brain disease characterized by recurrent seizures. We investigated real-world management of epilepsy across treatment lines in Spain, including healthcare resource use (HRU) and associated costs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of real-life data from epilepsy patients prescribed antiseizure medication (ASM) between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were grouped according to their line of treatment (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th +) during the recruitment period. Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities and concomitant medications were analyzed during the baseline period (6 months before starting treatment line); antiepileptic treatments, concomitant medications, HRU and associated costs were analyzed during follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 5006 patients. Treatment duration decreased as treatment lines progressed (mean ± SD progression time: 523.2 ± 279.1 days from 1st to 2nd line, 351.6 ± 194.4 days from 2nd to 3rd line; 272.7 ± 139.3 days from 3rd to 4th + line). Significant HRU differences were found with subsequent treatment lines, including an increase in hospital admissions and patients on sick leave. Mean (95% CI) adjusted total costs per patient were €2974/year (2773-3175) in the 1st line and €5735/year (5043-6428) in the 4th + line. There was an increase in adjusted direct and total costs with subsequent treatment lines; the mean difference in total costs between cohorts was €2761 (p < 0.001). The highest direct costs were associated with epilepsy medication, days at the hospital and specialist visits. CONCLUSION: Our data revealed a progressive increase in the use of resources and associated costs across subsequent epilepsy treatment lines.

Prediction of long-term unprovoked seizures after status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: Possible long-term consequences of status epilepticus (SE) include cognitive and behavioral impairment and the development of chronic epilepsy. However, these aspects have not been systematically studied in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate long-term seizure recurrence after SE and the potential risk factors for their development. METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospective registry of all SE episodes occurring in adult patients who attended our center from February 2011 to April 2022. Clinical data, electroencephalographic findings, treatment, and long-term data were prospectively recorded. We performed a cross-sectional study of consecutive SE patients without previous epilepsy diagnosis, and analyzed the development of unprovoked remote seizures. RESULTS: A total of 849 patients were registered in the database. After excluding in-hospital mortality (198/849, 23.3%) and patients with prior epilepsy history (291/849, 44.7%), 360 patients (42.4%) with a first SE episode were included. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 56-79), and 176 patients (48.9%) were women. The median time to first-line treatment initiation was 2 h (IQR = .7-7.4), and it was correlated with SE duration (R = .375, p < .001). One hundred nine patients (30.3%) presented unprovoked seizures during a median follow-up of 1.8 years (IQR = .5-4.3). After adjusting for identifiable confounders in a multivariable Cox regression analysis, progressive symptomatic etiology (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-3.33, p = .011), time to first-line treatment initiation > 1.5 h (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.25-2.87, p = .003), and superrefractory SE (HR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.26-4.33, p = .007) were independently associated with a greater risk of unprovoked seizure recurrence. In contrast, older patients (HR = .99, 95% CI = .97-.99, p = .021) and an acute symptomatic etiology (HR = .44, 95% CI .28-.68, p < .001) were at lower risk of unprovoked seizure recurrence. SIGNIFICANCE: The etiology of SE, the delay in initiating SE treatment, and the presence of superrefractoriness have been identified as potentials factors associated with unprovoked remote seizures following a new onset SE. Therefore, prompt and appropriate management should be applied to avoid seizure recurrence.

Number needed to treat and associated cost analysis of cenobamate versus third-generation anti-seizure medications for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is a serious neurological disease, ranking high in the top causes of disability. The main goal of its treatment is to achieve seizure freedom without intolerable adverse effects. However, approximately 40% of patients suffer from Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) despite the availability of the latest options called third-generation Anti-Seizure Medications(ASMs). Cenobamate is the first ASM approved in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS) in adult patients with DRE. The introduction of a new drug increases the number of therapeutic options available, making it important to compare it with existing alternatives in terms of clinical benefit and efficiency. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical benefit, in terms of the Number Needed to Treat (NNT), and the efficiency, in terms of Cost per NNT (CNT), associated with cenobamate versus third-generation ASMs used in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of FOS in patients with DRE. METHODS: The Number Needed to Treat data was calculated based on the ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom endpoints (defined as the percentage of patients achieving 50% and 100% reduction in seizure frequency, respectively), obtained from pivotal clinical trials performed with cenobamate, brivaracetam, perampanel, lacosamide, and eslicarbazepine acetate. The NNT was established as the inverse of the treatment responder rate minus the placebo responder rate and was calculated based on the minimum, mid-range Daily Defined Dose (DDD), and maximum doses studied in the pivotal clinical trials of each ASM. CNT was calculated by multiplying the annual treatment cost by NNT values for each treatment option. RESULTS: In terms of NNT, cenobamate was the ASM associated with the lowest values at all doses for both ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom compared with the alternatives. In terms of CNT, for ≥50% responder rate, cenobamate was the ASM associated with the lowest CNT values at DDD and lacosamide and eslicarbazepine acetate at the minimum and maximum dose, respectively. For seizure freedom, cenobamate was associated with the lowest CNT value at DDD and the maximum dose and lacosamide at the minimum dose. CONCLUSIONS: Cenobamate could represent the most effective ASM in all doses studied compared to the third-generation ASMs and the most efficient option at DDD for both ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom. This study could represent an important contribution towards informed decision-making regarding the selection of the most appropriate therapy for FOS in adult patients with DRE from a clinical and economical perspective in Spain.

Long-term biofiltration of gaseous N,N-dimethylformamide: Operational performance and microbial diversity analysis at different conditions.

N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) is an organic solvent produced in large quantities worldwide. It is considered as a hazardous air pollutant and its emission should be controlled. However, only a limited number of studies have been performed on the removal of gaseous DMF by biological technologies. In this paper, we evaluate the removal of DMF under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions in a lab-scale biofilter for 472 days. The results show that, at ambient temperature, the biofilter achieved an average removal efficiency (RE) of 99.7 ± 0.3 % at Inlet Loads (ILs) up to 297 ± 52 g DFM m-3 h-1 (Empty Bed Residence Time (EBRTs) of 10.7 s). However, a decrease in EBRT (6.4 s) led to an unstable outlet concentration and, thus, to a drop in the biofilter performance (average RE: 90 ± 9 %). Moreover, an increase in temperature up to 65 °C led to a gradual decrease in RE (till 91 ± 7 %). Microbial analysis indicates that once the microorganisms encountered DMF, Rhizobiaceae dominated followed by Alcaligenaceae. Afterwards, a strong decrease in Rhizobiaceae was observed at every increase in temperature, and at 65 °C, the taxa were more heterogeneous. Overall, our experimental results indicate that biofiltration is a promising technique to remove DMF from waste gas streams.

Proposed Recommendations for the Management of Depression in Adults with Epilepsy: An Expert Consensus.

INTRODUCTION: Experts agree that there is a need for protocols to guide health professionals on how to best manage psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy (PWE). We aimed to develop practical recommendations for key issues in the management of depression in PWE. METHODS: This was a qualitative study conducted in four steps: (1) development of a questionnaire on the management of depression in PWE to be answered; (2) literature review and, if evidence from guidelines/consensus or systematic reviews was available, drafting initial recommendations; (3) a nominal group methodology for reviewing initial recommendations and formulating new recommendations on those issues without available evidence; and (4) drafting and approving the final recommendations. A scientific committee (one neurologist and one psychiatrist) was responsible for the development of the project and its scientific integrity. The scientific committee selected a panel of experts (nine neurologists and nine psychiatrists with experience in this field) to be involved in the nominal group meetings and to formulate final recommendations. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were formulated. Four on the screening and diagnosis: screening and diagnosis of depression, evaluation of the risk of suicide, and diagnosis of depression secondary to epilepsy; nine on the management of depression: referral to a psychiatrist, selection of the antiseizure medication, change of antiseizure medication, antidepressant treatment initiation, selection of antidepressant, use of antidepressants during pregnancy, use of psychotherapy, antidepressant treatment duration, and discontinuation of antidepressant treatment; two on the follow-up: duration of the follow-up under usual conditions, and follow-up of patients at risk of suicide. CONCLUSION: We provide recommendations based on expert opinion consensus to help healthcare professionals assess depression in PWE. The detection and treatment of major depressive disorders are key factors in improving epilepsy outcomes and avoiding suicide risk.

Relationship between visuoperceptual functions and parietal structural abnormalities in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Progressive gray matter volume reductions beyond the epileptogenic area has been described in temporal lobe epilepsy. There is less evidence regarding correlations between gray and white matter volume changepres and multi-domain cognitive performance in this setting. We aimed to investigate correlations between volume changes in parietal structures and visuospatial performance in temporal lobe epilepsy patients. we performed a cross-sectional study comparing global and regional brain volume data from 34 temporal lobe epilepsy patients and 30 healthy controls. 3D T1-weighted sequences were obtained on a 3.0 T magnet, and data were analyzed using age and sex-adjusted linear regression models. Global and regional brain volumes and cortical thickness in patients were correlated with standardized visual memory, visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive parameters obtained in a per-protocol neuropsychological assessment. temporal lobe epilepsy patients had smaller volume fractions of the deep gray matter structures, putamen and nucleus accumbens, and larger cerebrospinal fluid volume fraction than controls. Correlations were found between: 1) visual memory and precuneus and inferior parietal cortical thickness; 2) visuoperceptual performance and precuneus and supramarginal white matter volumes; 3) visuospatial skills and precuneus, postcentral, and inferior and superior parietal white matter volumes; 4) visuoconstructive performance and inferior parietal white matter volume. Brain volume loss is widespread in temporal lobe epilepsy. Volumetric reductions in parietal lobe structures were associated with visuoperceptual cognitive performance.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive padsevonil in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: Results from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize efficacy, safety/tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of padsevonil (PSL) administered concomitantly with ≤3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) for observable focal seizures in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials. METHODS: The phase 2b dose-finding trial (EP0091/NCT03373383) randomized patients 1:1:1:1:1 to PSL 50/100/200/400 mg or placebo twice daily (b.i.d.). The phase 3 efficacy trial (EP0092/NCT03739840) randomized patients 1:1:1:1 to PSL 100/200/400 mg or placebo b.i.d. Patients with observable (focal aware with motor symptoms, focal impaired awareness, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic) focal seizures for ≥3 years, experiencing them ≥4 times per 28 days including during the 4-week baseline period despite treatment with ≥4 lifetime ASMs including current ASMs, were enrolled. RESULTS: In EP0091 and EP0092, 410 and 231 patients, respectively, were randomized and received at least one dose of trial medication. In patients in EP0091 on PSL 50/100/200/400 mg b.i.d. (n = 80/82/81/81, respectively) versus placebo (n = 81), outcomes included percentage reductions over placebo in observable focal seizure frequency during the 12-week maintenance period: 17.2%, 19.1% (p = 0.128), 19.2% (p = 0.128), 12.4% (p = 0.248); 75% responder rates (p-values for odds ratios): 13.8%, 12.2% (p = 0.192), 11.1% (p = 0.192), 16.0% (p = 0.124) versus 6.2%; 50% responder rates: 33.8% (p = 0.045), 31.7% (p = 0.079), 25.9% (p = 0.338), 32.1% (p = 0.087), versus 21.0%; TEAEs were reported by 82.7% (67/81), 78.3% (65/83), 74.4% (61/82), 90.1% (73/81) versus 78.3% (65/83). In patients in EP0092 on PSL 100/200/400 mg b.i.d. (n = 60/56/56, respectively) versus placebo (n = 54), outcomes included percentage reductions over placebo: -5.6% (p = 0.687), 6.5% (p = 0.687), 6.3% (p = 0.687); 75% responder rates: 15.3% (p = 0.989), 12.5% (p = 0.989), 14.3% (p = 0.989) versus 13.0%; 50% responder rates: 35.6% (p = 0.425), 33.9% (p = 0.625), and 42.9% (p = 0.125) versus 27.8%; TEAEs were reported by 80.0% (48/60), 78.9% (45/57), 83.1% (49/59) versus 67.3% (37/55). SIGNIFICANCE: In both trials, the primary outcomes did not reach statistical significance in any PSL dose group compared with placebo. PSL was generally well tolerated, and no new safety signals were identified.

Determination of the economically justifiable price of cenobamate in the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the economically justifiable price (EJP) of cenobamate to become a cost-effective alternative compared with third-generation anti-seizure medications in the treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) in adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in Spain. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis compared cenobamate with brivaracetam, perampanel, eslicarbazepine acetate, and lacosamide. Markov model simulation of treatment pathway over a 60-year time horizon is presented. We determined the effectiveness and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of health status and disutilities associated with treatment-related adverse events. Acquisition costs and use of medical resources were obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Base-case of cenobamate's EJP calculated applying a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €21,000/QALY. Analyses were performed at different thresholds, including dominant price scenario. Result robustness was assessed through sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Base-case shows that cenobamate's daily EJP of €7.30 is cost-effective for a threshold of €21,000/QALY. At a daily price of €5.45, cenobamate becomes dominant over all treatment alternatives producing cost-savings for the national health system (NHS). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of base-case findings. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with cenobamate produces incremental clinical benefit over third-generation ASMs, and at the base-case, EJP could represent a cost-effective option for the adjunctive treatment of FOS in adult patients with DRE in Spain.

Reponse of second-line treatment in focal status epilepticus: A tertiary hospital experience.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the response to various antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the treatment of focal status epilepticus (SE) in the established phase, and the effect of administering several ASMs prior to sedation. METHODS: All SE cases in patients aged > 16 years treated with non-BZDs ASMs were prospectively collected in our centre from February 2011 to April 2019. In total, 281 episodes were analysed. RESULTS: Median age at SE onset was 65.1 years; 47 % were focal motor and 53 % focal non-motor episodes. SE cessation was achieved in 79 % episodes with second-line drugs, whereas a third line (anesthetics) was required in 47 episodes. SE cessation was achieved in only 27 % with the first ASM, 48 % with the second, and 51 % with the third. Prompt resolution of the SE episode with a first or second ASM was associated with a better outcome than episodes requiring a larger number of drugs (p = 0.024). The first option in our sample was levetiracetam in 70 % of cases. Among the total of non-responding SE cases treated with levetiracetam as the first ASM option, 107 were subsequently given lacosamide (seizure cessation in 53.3 %) and 34 valproic acid (seizure cessation in 29.4 %) (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Our findings further support the notion that early termination of SE with a first or second ASM confers a better functional outcome. The large difference in response between the first ASM and consecutive ones suggests that the sum of different ASMs might be the key to resolving focal SE.

Interictal brain activity changes in temporal lobe epilepsy: A quantitative electroencephalogram analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) in the analysis of baseline activity in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and identify measures potentially associated with disease duration and drug resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of adult patients with TLE and controls who underwent video-EEG monitoring. Representative artifact-free resting wakefulness baseline EEG segments were selected for quantitative analysis. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) approach was used for the power spectral analysis, with computation of FFT power ratios and alpha-delta and alpha-theta ratios for both hemispheres. The resulting measures were compared between TLE patients and controls and their values as predictors of epilepsy duration and drug resistance analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine TLE patients and 23 controls were included. The TLE patients had a lower alpha-delta ratio in the posterior quadrant ipsilateral to the epileptic focus and a lower alpha-theta ratio in the ipsilateral anterior/posterior quadrants and temporal region. A younger age at onset and longer epilepsy duration correlated with a higher theta power ratio in the contralateral anterior and posterior quadrants and temporal region. No qEEG measures predicted drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative electroencephalography background activity may contribute to the diagnosis of TLE and provide useful information on disease duration. A lower alpha-delta and alpha-theta ratio may be reliable baseline qEEG measures for identifying patients with TLE. A higher contralateral theta power ratio may be indicative of longer epilepsy duration.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in focal-onset status epilepticus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used in the diagnostic work-up for status epilepticus (SE). The purpose of this study was to characterize MRI features in SE patients and determine their association with clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) findings. The mid-term consequences of baseline MRI features were also analysed. METHODS: This is a prospective study including consecutive patients with SE who underwent brain MRI within 240 h after SE onset. The MRI protocol included T1-weighted (T1WI), T2-weighted (T2W), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Follow-up MRI was performed after SE resolution in some patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients (56.7% men, mean age 58.3 years) were included. SE-related MRI abnormalities were seen in 31 (51.7%), manifesting as hyperintensities on T2W/FLAIR imaging (58.1%) and DWI (74.2%) sequences. Hippocampal and pulvinar involvement was seen in 58.0% and 25.8% of patients, respectively. MRI abnormalities were associated with a longer SE duration (p = 0.013) and the presence of lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) on EEG (p < 0.001). Amongst the 33 follow-up MRIs, nine (27.3%) showed mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), which was associated with severe clinical status (p = 0.031), hippocampal oedema (p = 0.001) and LPDs (p = 0.001) at baseline. A poorer clinical outcome was associated with baseline T2W/FLAIR imaging hyperintensities (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: MRI showed abnormalities in more than half of SE patients. A longer SE duration and LPDs on EEG were associated with SE-related MRI abnormalities and the development of MTS.

Long-term individual retention with cenobamate in adults with focal seizures: Pooled data from the clinical development program.

OBJECTIVE: We determined retention on open-label cenobamate therapy in the clinical development program to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in individuals with uncontrolled focal seizures. METHODS: Data from two randomized, controlled cenobamate studies and one open-label safety and pharmacokinetic study were pooled. Based on the percentage of participants remaining on treatment, retention rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. We performed two additional analyses to assess factors contributing to retention, stratifying a robust data set (through 2 years) by cenobamate modal dose and frequently used concomitant anti-seizure medications. Cenobamate discontinuations and treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized. RESULTS: Data from 1844 participants were pooled: 149 from a single-dose randomized trial, 355 from a multi-dose randomized trial, and 1340 from an open-label safety and pharmacokinetic study. Most participants from randomized trials continued in open-label extensions, and pooled data represent >95% of participants exposed to cenobamate. Baseline characteristics and disease and treatment histories were similar across studies. Median duration of cenobamate exposure was 34 months, with a median modal dose of 200 mg/day. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative cenobamate retention rates were 80% at 1 year and 72% at 2 years. Once participants reached the maintenance phase, retention rates were consistently high in participants receiving ≥100 mg/day cenobamate, and concomitant anti-seizure medications did not affect long-term retention. By 2 years, 535 (29%) had actually discontinued cenobamate; the most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (37.6%), withdrawal of consent (21.1%), and other (16.8%). SIGNIFICANCE: Treatment retention rates provide a proxy measure for long-term efficacy, safety, tolerability, and adherence. The consistently high retention rates we found suggest that cenobamate may be an effective and well-tolerated new treatment option for people with drug-resistant focal seizures.