How smart is artificial intelligence in organs delineation? Testing a CE and FDA-approved Deep-Learning tool using multiple expert contours delineated on planning CT images.

Background: A CE- and FDA-approved cloud-based Deep learning (DL)-tool for automatic organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volumes segmentation on computer tomography images is available. Before its implementation in the clinical practice, an independent external validation was conducted. Methods: At least a senior and two in training Radiation Oncologists (ROs) manually contoured the volumes of interest (VOIs) for 6 tumoral sites. The auto-segmented contours were retrieved from the DL-tool and, if needed, manually corrected by ROs. The level of ROs satisfaction and the duration of contouring were registered. Relative volume differences, similarity indices, satisfactory grades, and time saved were analyzed using a semi-automatic tool. Results: Seven thousand seven hundred sixty-five VOIs were delineated on the CT images of 111 representative patients. The median (range) time for manual VOIs delineation, DL-based segmentation, and subsequent manual corrections were 25.0 (8.0-115.0), 2.3 (1.2-8) and 10.0 minutes (0.3-46.3), respectively. The overall time for VOIs retrieving and modification was statistically significantly lower than for manual contouring (p<0.001). The DL-tool was generally appreciated by ROs, with 44% of vote 4 (well done) and 43% of vote 5 (very well done), correlated with the saved time (p<0.001). The relative volume differences and similarity indexes suggested a better inter-agreement of manually adjusted DL-based VOIs than manually segmented ones. Conclusions: The application of the DL-tool resulted satisfactory, especially in complex delineation cases, improving the ROs inter-agreement of delineated VOIs and saving time.

AIRO Breast Cancer Group Best Clinical Practice 2022 Update.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most common tumor in women and represents the leading cause of cancer death. Radiation therapy plays a key-role in the treatment of all breast cancer stages. Therefore, the adoption of evidence-based treatments is warranted, to ensure equity of access and standardization of care in clinical practice. METHOD: This national document on the highest evidence-based available data was developed and endorsed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group.We analyzed literature data regarding breast radiation therapy, using the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) methodology (www.sign.ac.uk). Updated findings from the literature were examined, including the highest levels of evidence (meta-analyses, randomized trials, and international guidelines) with a significant impact on clinical practice. The document deals with the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer, local relapse, and metastatic disease, with focus on diagnosis, staging, local and systemic therapies, and follow up. Information is given on indications, techniques, total doses, and fractionations. RESULTS: An extensive literature review from 2013 to 2021 was performed. The work was organized according to a general index of different topics and most chapters included individual questions and, when possible, synoptic and summary tables. Indications for radiation therapy in breast cancer were examined and integrated with other oncological treatments. A total of 50 questions were analyzed and answered.Four large areas of interest were investigated: (1) general strategy (multidisciplinary approach, contraindications, preliminary assessments, staging and management of patients with electronic devices); (2) systemic therapy (primary, adjuvant, in metastatic setting); (3) clinical aspects (invasive, non-invasive and micro-invasive carcinoma; particular situations such as young and elderly patients, breast cancer in males and cancer during pregnancy; follow up with possible acute and late toxicities; loco-regional relapse and metastatic disease); (4) technical aspects (radiation after conservative surgery or mastectomy, indications for boost, lymph node radiotherapy and partial breast irradiation).Appendixes about tumor bed boost and breast and lymph nodes contouring were implemented, including a dedicated web application. The scientific work was reviewed and validated by an expert group of breast cancer key-opinion leaders. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal breast cancer management requires a multidisciplinary approach sharing therapeutic strategies with the other involved specialists and the patient, within a coordinated and dedicated clinical path. In recent years, the high-level quality radiation therapy has shown a significant impact on local control and survival of breast cancer patients. Therefore, it is necessary to offer and guarantee accurate treatments according to the best standards of evidence-based medicine.

A novel tool for assessing the correlation of internal/external markers during SGRT guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatments.

INTRODUCTION: An in-house developed tool was implemented and validated to investigate the skin surface, hepatic dome, and target displacement for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of thoracic/abdominal lesions using a Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) system combined with 4D- images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients with tumors near the hepatic dome undergoing SABR treatments were analyzed. For each patient, a planning 4D-CT and five 4D-CBCT images were acquired. The C-RAD technology was also used to register/monitor the position of the skin reference point (SRP) as an external marker representative of patient breathing. The 4D images were imported in the developed tool, and the absolute maximum height (Pmax,dome) of the hepatic dome on the ten respiratory phases was semi-automatically detected. Similarly, the contour of the skin surface was extracted in correspondence with the SRP position. The tool has been validated using an ad hoc modified moving phantom with pre-selected amplitudes and numbers of cycles. The Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were calculated. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the skin motion amplitude based on 4D-CBCT and the C-RAD in all the patients (0.90 ± 0.08). Similarly, the mean ± SD of Pearson correlation coefficients of skin and Pmax,dome movements registered by 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT were 0.90 ± 0.05 and 0.94 ± 0.05, respectively. The mean ± SD of Pearson correlation coefficients comparing the skin and Pmax,dome displacements within each imaging modality were 0.88 ± 0.05 and 0.90 ± 0.05 for 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT, respectively. The SRP displacement during the set-up imaging and the treatment delivery were similar in all the investigated patients. Similar results were obtained for the ad hoc modified phantom in the preliminary validation phase. CONCLUSION: The strong correlation between the tumor/ hepatic dome and skin displacements confirms that the SGRT approach can be considered appropriate for intra- and inter-fraction motion management in SABR therapy.

COVID-19 Pandemic-Adapted Radiotherapy Guidelines: Are They Really Followed?

BACKGROUND: In our department, we provided guidelines to the radiation oncologists (ROs) regarding the omission, delay, or shortening of radiotherapy (RT). The purpose was to reduce the patients' exposure to the hospital environment and to minimize the departmental overcrowding. The aim was to evaluate the ROs' compliance to these guidelines. METHODS: ROs were asked to fill out a data collection form during patients' first visits in May and June 2020. The collected data included the ROs' age and gender, patient age and residence, RT purpose, treated tumor, the dose and fractionation that would have been prescribed, and RT changes. The chi-square test and binomial logistic regression were used to analyze the correlation between the treatment prescription and the collected parameters. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six out of 205 prescribed treatments were included in this analysis. Treatment was modified in 61.1% of cases. More specifically, the treatment was omitted, delayed, or shortened in 7.9, 15.9, and 37.3% of patients, respectively. The number of delivered fractions was reduced by 27.9%. A statistically significant correlation (p = 0.028) between younger patients' age and lower treatment modifications rate was recorded. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed a reasonably high compliance of ROs to the pandemic-adapted guidelines. The adopted strategy was effective in reducing the number of admissions to our department.

Higher Biologically Effective Dose Predicts Survival in SBRT of Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicentric Analysis (PAULA-1).

AIM: The purpose of the present multicentric study was to review stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without chemotherapy (CHT) experience in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Endpoints were overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Several parameters' impact on these outcomes was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with LAPC undergoing SBRT+/-CHT were included. SBRT median BEDα/ß10Gy was 48.0 Gy (range=28.0-78.7). Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was fitted. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 15.0 months, 2-year OS, LC, DMFS were: 33.8% 55.4%, and 22.9%, respectively. Patients treated with BEDα/ß10Gy≥48 Gy showed improved OS (p=0.020) and LC (p=0.024). At multivariate analysis, BEDα/ß10Gy≥48 Gy was significantly associated to both higher OS (p=0.042) and LC (p=0.045), while post-SBRT CHT improved DMFS (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: SBRT proved to be tolerable and effective in LAPC. Moreover, BEDα/ß10Gy≥48 Gy was significantly correlated with improved OS and LC.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer: current perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Owing to highly conformed dose distribution, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has the potential to improve treatment results of radiotherapy (RT). Postoperative RT is a standard adjuvant treatment in conservative treatment of breast cancer (BC). The aim of this review is to analyze available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on IMRT in BC, particularly in terms of reduction of side effects. METHODS: A literature search of the bibliographic database PubMed, from January 1990 through November 2016, was performed. Only RCTs published in English were included. RESULTS: Ten articles reporting data from 5 RCTs fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in our review. Three out of 5 studies enrolled only selected patients in terms of increased risk of toxicity. Three studies compared IMRT with standard tangential RT. One study compared the results of IMRT in the supine versus the prone position, and one study compared standard treatment with accelerated partial breast IMRT. Three studies reported reduced acute and/or late toxicity using IMRT compared with standard RT. No study reported improved quality of life. CONCLUSION: IMRT seems able to reduce toxicity in selected patients treated with postoperative RT for BC. Further analyses are needed to better define patients who are candidates for this treatment modality.