Acceptability of a Long-Acting, Multipurpose Vaginal Ring: Findings from a Phase I Trial in the U.S. and Dominican Republic.

Background: Women worldwide face risks from pregnancy, HIV, and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). To date, highly effective contraceptive methods provide no HIV/STI protection, and HIV prevention products, excluding condoms, provide no pregnancy protection. Intravaginal rings (IVRs) delivering antiretrovirals and contraceptives are a promising multipurpose prevention technology (MPT). Methods: Embedded within a Phase I randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we examined acceptability of continuous versus interrupted use of a 90-day MPT IVR among 47 low-risk women in Norfolk, Virginia and the Dominican Republic. A baseline survey assessed menstruation attitudes, risk perceptions and trial-related motivations. Follow-up surveys (M1/M3) examined user experiences with and preferences for IVR attributes; 18 women also participated in two in-depth interviews. Results: Most women rated the IVR's flexibility and smoothness (86%) and ease of insertion/removal (76%) as very acceptable. Fewer women similarly rated the IVR size (57%) and changes in color from menstruation (52%). Most participants experienced no changes or less bleeding. Those reporting more/heavier bleeding (20% M1, 15% M3) disliked the change. Overall, women preferred a 3-month (75%) to a 1-month IVR (7.5%) or a bimonthly injectable (10%). In qualitative interviews, women were willing to continuously use an IVR for 6-12 months, providing it did not "degrade" inside the body. Reasons for trial participation and prevention preferences, menstrual attitudes, and perceived IVR benefits and doubts varied by site. Conclusions: Findings provide strong evidence of demand for an MPT IVR that protects from pregnancy and HIV/STIs, lasts longer than 1 month, minimally disrupts menstrual bleeding, and is in women's control. numberClinicalTrials.gov: #NCT03279120.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable cabotegravir in low-risk HIV-uninfected individuals: HPTN 077, a phase 2a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cabotegravir (CAB) is a novel strand-transfer integrase inhibitor being developed for HIV treatment and prevention. CAB is formulated both as an immediate-release oral tablet for daily administration and as a long-acting injectable suspension (long-acting CAB [CAB LA]) for intramuscular (IM) administration, which delivers prolonged plasma exposure to the drug after IM injection. HIV Prevention Trials Network study 077 (HPTN 077) evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of CAB LA in HIV-uninfected males and females at 8 sites in Brazil, Malawi, South Africa, and the United States. METHODS AND FINDINGS: HPTN 077 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a trial. Healthy individuals age 18-65 years at low HIV risk were randomized (3:1) to receive CAB or placebo (PBO). In the initial oral phase, participants received 1 daily oral tablet (CAB or PBO) for 4 weeks. Those without safety concerns in the oral phase continued and received injections in the injection phase (Cohort 1: 3 injections of CAB LA 800 mg or 0.9% saline as PBO IM every 12 weeks for 3 injection cycles; Cohort 2: CAB LA 600 mg or PBO IM for 5 injection cycles; the first 2 injections in Cohort 2 were separated by 4 weeks, the rest by 8 weeks). The primary analysis included weeks 5 to 41 of study participation, encompassing the injection phase. The cohorts were enrolled sequentially. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included pharmacokinetics and events occurring during the oral and injection phases. Between February 9, 2015, and May 27, 2016, the study screened 443 individuals and enrolled 110 participants in Cohort 1 and 89 eligible participants in Cohort 2. Participant population characteristics were as follows: 66% female at birth; median age 31 years; 27% non-Hispanic white, 41% non-Hispanic black, 24% Hispanic/Latino, 3% Asian, and 6% mixed/other; and 6 transgender men and 1 transgender woman. Twenty-two (11%) participants discontinued the oral study product; 6 of these were for clinical or laboratory adverse events (AEs). Of those who received at least 1 CAB LA injection, 80% of Cohort 1 and 92% of Cohort 2 participants completed all injections; injection course completion rates were not different from those in the PBO arm. Injection site reactions (ISRs) were common (92% of Cohort 1 and 88% of Cohort 2 participants who received CAB LA reported any ISR). ISRs were mostly Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 2 (moderate), and 1 ISR event (Cohort 1) led to product discontinuation. Grade 2 or higher ISRs were the only AEs reported more commonly among CAB LA recipients than PBO recipients. Two Grade 3 (severe) ISRs occurred in CAB recipients, 1 in each cohort, but did not lead to product discontinuation in either case. Seven incident sexually transmitted infections were diagnosed in 6 participants. One HIV infection occurred in a participant 48 weeks after last injection of CAB LA: CAB was not detectable in plasma both at the time of first reactive HIV test and at the study visit 12 weeks prior to the first reactive test. Participants in Cohort 2 (unlike Cohort 1) consistently met prespecified pharmacokinetic targets of at least 95% of participants maintaining CAB trough concentrations above PA-IC90, and 80% maintaining trough concentrations above 4× PA-IC90. Study limitations include a modest sample size, a short course of injections, and a low-risk study population. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CAB LA was well tolerated at the doses and dosing intervals used. ISRs were common, but infrequently led to product discontinuation. CAB LA 600 mg every 8 weeks met pharmacokinetic targets for both male and female study participants. The safety and pharmacokinetic results observed support the further development of CAB LA, and efficacy studies of CAB LA for HIV treatment and prevention are in progress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Trial number: NCT02178800.

Health Disparities in the Appropriate Management of Cryptorchidism.

OBJECTIVE: To assess regional practices in management of cryptorchidism with regard to timely fixation by the current recommended age of 18 months. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed. Charts of all patients who underwent surgical correction for cryptorchidism by a pediatric general surgeon or urologist within a tertiary pediatric hospital in an urban setting were systematically reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 1209 patients with cryptorchidism. The median age of surgical correction was 3.7 years (IQR: 1.4, 7.7); only 27% of patients had surgical correction before 18 months of age. Forty-six percent of our patients were white, 40% were African American, and 8% were Hispanic. African American and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo timely repair (P?=?.01), as were those with public or no insurance (P?

Continuous compared with cyclic use of oral contraceptive pills in the Dominican Republic: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether continuous combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use leads to higher continuation and lower pregnancy rates over 12 months than cyclic use in a developing country setting. METHODS: We enrolled healthy women aged 18 to 30 years, in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. We randomly assigned women to cyclic or continuous use of OCPs. Participants made quarterly clinic visits for 12 months. During follow-up, we reviewed OCP adherence and continuation, side effects, and bleeding, and we tested for pregnancy. RESULTS: We enrolled 358 women (mean age, 22.7 years) and 335 (93.6%) completed the study. In intent-to-treat analyses, 77.6% of the continuous use group and 71.7% of the cyclic group continued OCPs at 12 months (P=.21). The main reason for OCP discontinuation in both groups was running out of OCPs or forgetting. Across all visits, 26.1% of women in the continuous use group and 22.3% of women in the cyclic group ever reported missing three or more OCPs in the past month (P=.43). In multivariable analyses, regimen was not associated with discontinuation, but both previous birth and perceived ease of use of OCPs decreased risk of discontinuation, whereas desire for reduced menstruation increased risk of discontinuation. Although more women reported amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding in the continuous use group, more women in the cyclic group found their bleeding patterns acceptable. Bleeding was not associated with discontinuation in multivariable analyses. Pregnancy rates at 12 months were similar (16.2% continuous and 17.4% cyclic). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous and cyclic OCP regimens were associated with similar 12-month continuation and pregnancy rates. Few factors predicted OCP discontinuation or pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00570440. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Investigación aplicada en salud pública: métodos cualitativos / Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research

La actividad científica con sus componentes de generación, diseminación e incorporación del conocimiento forma parte de las líneas de trabajo específico de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). La comunicación y la utilización de los resultados de la investigación son elementos de suma importancia para comprender la sinergia entre la salud y el desarrollo. La salud depende de una serie de factores determinantes, entre los que se incluyen las condiciones de vida y los comportamientos de las personas y de los grupos, que tienen lugar en un medio que es preciso conocer. Los métodos cualitativos de investigación son un instrumento formidable a disposición de la salud pública para estudiar e intervenir sobre tales factores determinantes. Ellos nos permiten abordar las interpretaciones culturales de la salud y la enfermedad, y conocer los comportamientos, creencias, actitudes y percepciones de los problemas de salud por parte de la población de una manera más adecuada y completa que usando exclusivamente métodos cuantitativos. Los métodos cualitativos son muy valiosos a la hora de poner en marcha nuevos programas de salud pública y tomar decisiones, muchas veces en contextos muy sensibles, sobre temas tales como planificación familiar, prevención de infecciones de transmisión sexual (entre ellas el VIH/SIDA), relaciones de género y otras cuestiones fundamentales de salud que se abordan en este libro...(AU)