ABSTRACT
The Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a X-linked lysosomal storage disorder due to the deficiency in the α-galactosidase A enzyme. Cardiovascular mortality is a major cause of death in patients with AFD and sudden cardiac death (SCD) is one of the main causes of death. The storage of glycosphingolipid along with ionic channel impairment, inflammation and fibrosis are involved in the arrhythmogenesis. Some risk factors have been associated with ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) and SCD. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), cardiac fibrosis, non-sustained VTs seem to be the most important. Older age and male gender might be associated with higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias and SCD. Currently, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is recommended in patients with AFD who have survived a cardiac arrest secondary to VT/VF or who experienced sustained VT causing syncope or hemodynamic compromise, and have a life expectancy >1 year. ICD implantation is also recommended in patients considered to be at high risk (e.g., patients with severe LVH or fibrosis). The present review sought to summarize the risk of ventricular arrythmias in AFD, the indications for ICD, focusing on pathophysiology and analyzing the role of possible predictors of arrhythmias in preventing SCD, especially as primary prevention.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) are frequent in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. A decrease in device-detected P-wave amplitude may be an indicator of periods of increased risk of AHRE. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the association between P-wave amplitude and AHRE incidence. METHODS: Remote monitoring data from 2579 patients with no history of atrial fibrillation (23% pacemakers and 77% implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, of which 40% provided cardiac resynchronization therapy) were used to calculate the mean P-wave amplitude during 1 month after implantation. The association with AHRE incidence according to 4 strata of daily burden duration (≥15 minutes, ≥6 hours, ≥24 hours, ≥7 days) was investigated by adjusting the hazard ratio with the CHA2DS2-VASc score. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-mV lower mean P-wave amplitude during the first month increased from 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.15; P < .001) to 1.18 (CI, 1.09-1.28; P < .001) with AHRE duration strata from ≥15 minutes to ≥7 days independent of the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Of 871 patients with AHREs, those with 1-month P-wave amplitude <2.45 mV had an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.51 (CI, 1.19-1.91; P = .001) for progression of AHREs from ≥15 minutes to ≥7 days compared with those with 1-month P-wave amplitude ≥2.45 mV. Device-detected P-wave amplitudes decreased linearly during the 1 year before the first AHRE by 7.3% (CI, 5.1%-9.5%; P < .001 vs patients without AHRE). CONCLUSION: Device-detected P-wave amplitudes <2.45 mV were associated with an increased risk of AHRE onset and progression to persistent forms of AHRE independent of the patient's risk profile.
ABSTRACT
Background: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a routine and aspecific test that is still widely used. The reference-manual method for ESR determination is the Westergren method. The VES-MATIC 5 is a novel, fully automated, and closed system based on a modified Westergren method. This study conceived the aim of comparing two ESR analytical analysers, Test 1 and the VES-MATIC 5, with the reference method in routine practice. Methods: This study included 264 randomly analysed samples. A comparison between the two methods and Westergren was performed, and they were evaluated for inter-run and intra-run precision. In addition, we investigated possible interferences and different sensitivities to conventional analytes. Results: The comparison of methods by Passing-Bablok analysis provided a good agreement for both systems, with a better correlation for VES-MATIC 5 (p = 0.96) than Test 1 (p = 0.93), and sensitivity studies did not show any significant influence. Conclusions: The VES-MATIC 5 analyser demonstrated excellent comparability with the reference method, and it had better performance than Test 1. It can be employed in routine practice, bringing advantages such as a reduction in the probability of human error compared to the manual method, as well as an increase in operator safety and environmental protection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation has become an established treatment option for premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). The use of fluoroscopy exposes patients and medical staff to potentially harmful stochastic and deterministic effects of ionizing radiations. We sought to analyze procedural outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy using a "zero fluoroscopy" approach for catheter ablation of PVCs. METHODS: The present retrospective, multicenter, observational study included 131 patients having undergone catheter ablation of PVCs using "zero fluoroscopy" between 2019 and 2020 in four centers compared with another group who underwent the procedure with fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Median age was 51.0 ± 15.9 years old; males were 77 (58.8%). Among the study population, 26 (19.8%) had a cardiomyopathy. The most frequent PVC origin was right ventricular outflow tract (55%) followed by the left ventricle (16%), LVOT and cusps (13.7%), and aortomitral continuity (5.3%). Acute suppression of PVC was achieved in 127 patients (96.9%). At 12 months, a complete success was documented in 109 patients (83.2%), a reduction in PVC burden in 18 patients (13.7%), and a failure was recorded in four patients (3.1%). Only two minor complications occurred (femoral hematoma and arteriovenous fistula conservatively treated). CONCLUSIONS: The PVC ablation with a "zero" fluoroscopy approach appears to be a safe procedure with no major complications and good rates of success and recurrence in our multicenter experience.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Ventricular Premature Complexes , Humans , Catheter Ablation/methods , Male , Ventricular Premature Complexes/surgery , Fluoroscopy , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , AdultABSTRACT
Limited data are available regarding venous thromboembolism (VTE), specifically deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), following right-sided ablations and electrophysiological (EP) studies. Compared to left-sided procedures, no guidelines on antithrombotic management strategies for the prevention of DVT and PE are available. The main purpose of the present European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey is to report the current management of right-sided EP procedures, focusing on anticoagulation and prevention of VTE. An online survey was conducted using the EHRA infrastructure. A total of 244 participants answered a 19-items questionnaire on the periprocedural management of EP studies and right-sided catheter ablations. The right femoral vein is the most common access for EP studies and right-sided procedures. An ultrasound-guided approach is employed by more than 2/3 of respondents. Intravenous heparin is not commonly given by the majority of participants. About 1/3 of participants (34%) routinely prescribe VTE prophylaxis during (mostly aspirin and low molecular weight heparin) and 1/4 of respondents (25%) commonly prescribe VTE prophylaxis after discharge (mostly aspirin). Of note, respectively 13% and 9% of participants observed at least one DVT and one PE related to right-sided ablation or EP study within the last year in their center. The present survey shows that only a minority of operators routinely gives intraprocedural intravenous heparin and prescribes VTE prophylaxis after right-sided EP procedures. Compared to left-sided procedures like atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, there are no consistent systematic antithrombotic management strategies.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Heparin , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Aspirin , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIMS: Infections resulting from cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation are severely impacting on patients' and on health care systems. The use of TYRXTM absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope has proven to decrease major CIED infections within 12 months of CIED surgery. The aim is to evaluate the impact of the envelope use on infection-related clinical events in a real-world contemporary patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on patients undergoing CIED surgery were collected prospectively by participating centers of the One Hospital ClinicalService project. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether TYRXTM absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope was used or not. Out of 1819 patients, 872 (47.9%) were implanted with an absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope and included in the Envelope group and 947 (52.1%) patients who did not receive an envelope were included in the Control group. Compared to control, patients in the Envelope group had higher thrombo-embolic or hemorrhagic risk, higher BMI, lower LVEF and more comorbidities. During a mean follow-up of 1.4 years, the incidence of infection-related events was significantly higher in the control compared to the Envelope group (2.4% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.007). The five-year cumulative incidence of infection-related events was 8.1% in the control and 2.1% in the Envelope group (HR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.14-0.80, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: In our analysis, the use of an absorbable antibiotic-eluting envelope in the general CIED population was associated with a lower risk of systemic and pocket infection.
Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Diseases , Pacemaker, Artificial , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Causality , Heart Diseases/complications , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In terms of safety and efficacy, cryoballoon ablation (CB-A) has become a valid option for achieving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients affected by symptomatic atrial fibrillation. However, CB-A data in octogenarians are still scarce and limited to single-centre experiences. The present multicentre study aimed to compare the outcomes and complications of index CB-A in patients older than 80âyears with a cohort of younger patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively enrolled 97 consecutive patients aged ≥80âyears who underwent PVI using the second-generation CB-A. This group was compared with a younger cohort of patients using a 1:1 propensity score matching. After the matching, 70 patients from the elderly group were analysed and compared with 70 younger patients (control group). The mean age was 81.4â±â1.9âyears among octogenarians and 65.2â±â10.2âyears in the younger cohort. The global success rate after a median follow-up of 23 [18-32.5] months was 60.0% in the elderly group and 71.4% in the control group (Pâ=â0.17). Phrenic nerve palsy was the most common complication occurring in a total of 11 patients (7.9%): in 6 (8.6%) patients in the elderly group and in 5 patients (7.1%) in the younger group (Pâ=â0.51). Only two (1.4%) major complications occurred: one (1.4%) femoral artery pseudoaneurysm in the control group, which resolved with a tight groin bandage, and one (1.4%) case of urosepsis in the elderly group. Arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the need for electrical cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm after PVI were found to be the only independent predictors of late arrhythmia relapses. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that CB-A PVI is as feasible, safe and effective among appropriately selected octogenarians as it is in younger patients.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Cryosurgery , Pulmonary Veins , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Octogenarians , Cryosurgery/adverse effects , Cryosurgery/methods , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Pulmonary Veins/surgeryABSTRACT
Thromboembolic events (TEE) associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are highly recurrent and usually severe, causing permanent disability or, even, death. Previous data consistently showed significantly lower TEE in anticoagulated patients. While warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is still used worldwide, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown noninferiority to warfarin in the prevention of TEE, and represent, to date, the preferred treatment. DOACs present favorable pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy profiles, especially among vulnerable patients including the elderly, those with renal dysfunction or previous TEE. Yet, regarding specific settings of AF patients it is unclear whether oral anticoagulation therapy is beneficial, or otherwise it is the maintenance of sinus rhythm, mostly achieved through a catheter ablation-based rhythm control strategy, that prevents the causal complications linked to AF. While it is known that low-risk patients [CHA2DS2-VASc 0 (males), or score of 1 (females)] present low ischemic stroke or mortality rates (<1%/year), it remains unclear whether they need any prophylaxis. Furthermore, the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for those individuals requiring cardioversion, either pharmacologic or electric, as well as peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing trans-catheter ablation that nowadays encompasses different energies, are still a matter of debate. In addition, AF concomitant with other clinical conditions is discussed and, lastly, the choice of prescribing anticoagulation to asymptomatic patients diagnosed with subclinical AF at either wearable or implanted devices. The aim of this review will be to provide an update on current strategies in the above-mentioned settings, and to suggest possible therapeutic options, finally focusing on AF-related cognitive decline.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Thromboembolism , Male , Female , Humans , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Warfarin , Anticoagulants , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & controlSubject(s)
Atrial Flutter , Catheter Ablation , Humans , Atrial Flutter/diagnosis , Atrial Flutter/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: After an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), long-term monitoring is recommended to start an anticoagulation therapy in patients with documented atrial fibrillation (AF). Literature is sparse about the AF burden following an ESUS, although this might have significant implications in terms of clinical management and therapeutic strategy. Our primary aim was to evaluate a possible association between early detection of AF (within 90 days from the ILR implantation) and higher AF burden. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study of 129 consecutive patients who received implantable loop recorders (ILRs) after an ESUS for detection of subclinical AF and their AF burden. Results: Mean age was 70.3 ± 10.4 years old (males: 51.9%). Atrial fibrillation was found in 40.3% of patients. Patients with AF were older, presented a higher CHAD2S2-Vasc Score and greater left atrial volume compared with patients without AF. The median AF burden was 1.2%; 59% of patients had the first AF episode within 90 days from the ILR implant while 41% experienced the first episode later than 90 days. The AF burden was significantly higher in the former group. Of note, the univariate analysis showed that only early AF detection was significantly associated with AF burden >1% (OR 20.0; 95% CI 1.68-238.6, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The early AF detection was found to be significantly associated with a higher burden of AF.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The association between QRS narrowing and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been investigated by several studies, but their findings remain inconclusive. Aim of our study was to explore the relationship between QRS Index and echocardiographic response to CRT. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective analysis included 326 consecutive patients (mean age was 70.0±10.1 years old; males 76.7%) who underwent CRT-D implantation in primary and secondary prevention between 2018 and 2020. The estimation of QRS shortening after CRT-D implantation was precisely assessed through the QRS Index, calculated as follows: [(QRS duration before implantation - paced QRS duration)/QRS duration before implantation]*100. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 12.7±4.5 months, 55.2% (180/326) of the patients showed an echocardiographic response to CRT. The median [25-75th] QRS Index was 3.85% [-14.1% - +13.9%]. The best predictive cut-off value of QRS Index was 1.40% (sensitivity 70.4%, specificity 64.5%, AUC 0.70). In patients with left bundle branch block, the median [25-75th] QRS Index was 9.85% [+3.87% - +16.7%]. In this subgroup, the AUC was 0.737 and the best predictive cut-off of QRS Index was 2.20% (sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 67%). The multivariable model showed that only left ventricular ejection fraction and QRS Index were independently associated with CRT response (respectively OR 0.92, CI 95% 0.86-0.98, P=0.01 and OR 1.057, CI 95% 1.026-1.089, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The QRS Index tightly correlated with CRT response. Only LVEF and QRS Index were independently associated with echocardiographic response to CRT.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left , Electrocardiography , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , EchocardiographyABSTRACT
AIMS: Recent studies suggest an association between epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study is to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of EAT in relation to atrial fibrillation burden after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). METHODS: This prospective single-centre study included patients undergoing CABG. The patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and collection of a bioptic sample containing right appendage and EAT during CABG for histological characterization. After surgery, clinical and telemetry data were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-six consecutive patients were enrolled. The mean postsurgical hospitalization was 7.9â±â3.7âdays. Twenty-two patients had at least one episode of atrial fibrillation. In the atrial fibrillation group, there was a bigger atrial volume, a higher degree of diastolic disfunction, a thicker layer of EAT and an older median age in comparison with the group that did not develop it. EAT with a cut-off of 4âmm was a predictor of atrial fibrillation with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.49 (confidence interval (CI) 1.09-2.04), 73% of sensibility and 89% of specificity. From the histological analyses, the patients with atrial fibrillation had a significantly higher percentage of fibrosis. At univariate analysis, atrial volume [OR 1.05, CI 1.01-1.09, Pâ=â0.022], E/A rate (OR 0.04, CI 0.02-0.72 Pâ=â0.29), the percentage of fibrosis (OR 1.12, CI 1.00-1.25, Pâ=â0.045) and age (OR 1.17, CI 1.07-1.28, Pâ=â0.001) were predictors of atrial fibrillation. At multivariate analysis, atrial volume (Pâ=â0.027), fibrosis (Pâ=â0.003) and age (Pâ=â0.039) were independent predictors of atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: Postcardiac surgical atrial fibrillation is frequent. EAT thickness, atrial volume, fibrosis and age are predictors of postcardiac surgical atrial fibrillation.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Prospective Studies , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Fibrosis , Adipose Tissue/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
AIMS: To explore the impact of the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in the ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias requiring transseptal catheterization (TSC), whilst analyzing the reduction in periprocedural complications and complications specifically related to TSC. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study collecting data from consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) and supraventricular ablation procedures that required TSC was performed in five Italian centers. Based on physician discretion, TSC was performed with or without ICE. Periprocedural complications, separating all complications from complications directly related to TSC, were collected. Independent predictors of periprocedural complications and TSC-related complications were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 2181 TSCs were performed on 1862 patients at five Italian centers from 2006 to 2021, in 76% of cases by AF ablation and in 24% by ablation of other arrhythmias with a circuit in the left atrium. Overall, 1134 (52%) procedures were performed with ICE support and 1047 (48%) without ICE. A total of 67 (3.1%) complications were detected, 19 (1.7%) in the ICE group and 48 (4.6%) in the no ICE group, p < 0.001. A total of 42 (1.5%) complications directly related to TSC: 0.9% in the ICE group and 3.1% in the no ICE group (p < 0.001). The independent predictors of all complications were age (OR 1,02 95% C.I 1.00-1.05; p = 0.036), TSC with the use of ICE (OR 0.27 95% C.I 0.15-0.46; p < 0.001) and AF ablation (OR 2,25 95%C.I 1.05-4.83; p = 0.037). The independent predictors for TSC complications were age (OR 1.03 95% C.I 1.01-1.06; p = 0.013) and TSC with the use of ICE (OR 0.24 95% C.I 0.11-0.49; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICE reduced periprocedural and TSC-related complications during electrophysiological procedures for ablation of left atrial arrhythmias.
ABSTRACT
The present case describes a dilated cardiomyopathy associated with both antidromic and orthodromic atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardias supported by multiple right accessory pathways. Both right accessory pathways were successfully eliminated by catheter ablation and the patient progressively recovered during the follow up. The following etiologies might be involved: 1) primitive dilated cardiomyopathy (or post-inflammatory); 2) septal dyssinchrony due to ventricular pre-excitation; 3) tachycardiomyopathy.
Subject(s)
Accessory Atrioventricular Bundle , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated , Catheter Ablation , Pre-Excitation Syndromes , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome , Humans , Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome/complications , Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome/diagnosis , Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome/surgery , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/complications , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/surgery , Electrocardiography , Pre-Excitation Syndromes/complications , Accessory Atrioventricular Bundle/surgery , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
AIMS: The safety and efficacy of leadless intracardiac-permanent pacemaker (L-PM) have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, but data on comparisons with conventional transvenous-permanent pacemaker (T-PM) collected in a consecutive, prospective fashion are limited. The aim of this analysis was to compare the rate and the nature of device-related complications between patients undergoing L-PM vs. T-PM implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, multicentre, observational project enrolling consecutive patients who underwent L-PM or T-PM implantation. The rate and nature of device-related complications were analysed and compared between the two groups. Individual 1:1 propensity matching of baseline characteristics was performed. A total of 2669 (n = 665 L-PM) patients were included and followed for a median of 39 months, L-PM patients were on average older and had more co-morbidities. The risk of device-related complications at 12 months was significantly lower in the L-PM group (0.5% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.009). Propensity matching yielded 442 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, L-PM patients trended toward having a lower risk of overall device-related complications (P = 0.129), had a similar risk of early complications (≤30 days) (P = 1.000), and had a significantly lower risk of late complications (>30 days) (P = 0.031). All complications observed in L-PM group were early. Most (75.0%) of complications observed in T-PM group were lead- or pocket-related. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, the risk of device-related complications associated with L-PM implantation tended to be lower than that of T-PM. Specifically, the risk of early complications was similar in two types of PMs, while the risk of late complications was significantly lower for L-PM than T-PM.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Pacemaker, Artificial , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Equipment Design , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A better selection of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) might increase the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of the study was to investigate the association between the Strauss criteria, absence of S wave in V5-V6, the Selvester score and response to CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The retrospective analysis included all consecutive patients having undergone implantation of biventricular defibrillators in primary prevention between 2018 and 2020. The final analysis included 236 patients (mean age 69.7 ± 9.9; 77.5% of males). The Strauss criteria were significantly associated with CRT response (p < 0.01) with a sensitivity of 71.3% and specificity of 64.1%. The Strauss criteria along with the absence of S wave in V5 and V6 showed a sensitivity of 56.7%, a specificity of 82.6% and a positive predictive value of 90.5%. The Selvester score was significantly and inversely associated with CRT response (OR 0.818, 95% CI 0.75-0.89; p < 0.001). The multivariable model showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and QRS duration (≥140 ms in males and ≥ 130 ms in females) were independently associated with CRT response (respectively OR 0.92, CI 95% 0.86-0.98, p = 0.01 and OR 3.70, CI 95% 1.12-12.21, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Strauss criteria, especially in association with absence of S wave in V5 and V6, were able to increase specificity and positive predictive value for predicting CRT response. The Selvester score was inversely associated with CRT response. Finally, LVEF and QRS duration were independently associated with echocardiographic response to CRT.