Discrepancies between ePrescriptions and dispensing in Belgium, 6 years after the launch of the electronic prescribing - a mixed-method study.

OBJECTIVES: The number of electronic prescriptions (ePrescriptions) grows steadily in Belgium as in other European countries. In the future, Belgium wants to dematerialize the ePrescription flow, removing all paper trails. A quality check of the digital content and implementation of national ePrescription guidelines in the field was conducted, comparing the content at both prescription and pharmacy side. METHODS: An explanatory mixed-methods design was applied. In a first phase, potential problems (warning flags) were identified by consulting stakeholders. Secondly, the warning flags were validated to problems (errors) in a random set of ePrescriptions collected in April 2019. In a third phase, explanatory interviews were held with various stakeholders in order to find explanations and to identify the initiators of these errors. RESULTS: In the first phase, 15 warning flags were identified to evaluate the quality of an ePrescription. In the second phase, a random selection of 11,798 ePrescriptions was validated. The most prevalent errors found, were the digital construction of the messages (18.88%), combined with lots of necessarily deemed substitutions by the pharmacist (3.39%) not following what was prescribed originally. In the third phase, stakeholders indicated that software of the prescriber and the use of inconsistent databases between prescriber and pharmacy can often be seen as the cause and initiator of these problems. CONCLUSIONS: Use of authentic medication databases and well-designed software systems have the potential to solve ePrescription problems. Focus should go to prevention instead of detection.

Detection of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients with the GheOP³S-tool: completeness and clinical relevance.

OBJECTIVES: The Ghent Older People's Prescriptions community Pharmacy Screening (GheOP3S-) tool was recently developed as an explicit screening method to detect Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing (PIP) in the community pharmacy. We aimed to validate the GheOP3S-tool as an effective screening method for PIP. METHODS: All patients admitted to the acute geriatric ward of the Sint-Vincentius hospital (Belgium) were consecutively screened for inclusion (≥70 years,≥5 drugs chronically). PIP prevalence was evaluated by applying the GheOP3S-tool on the complete medication history. For each PIP-item, clinical relevance of the detected item, relevance of proposed alternative and subsequent acceptance by the treating geriatrician and a general practitioner were evaluated. Additionally, contribution to the current admission and preventability was assessed by the geriatrician. The completeness of a PIP-screening with the GheOP3S-tool was evaluated through comparison with the adapted Medication Appropriateness Index (aMAI). RESULTS: We detected 250 GheOP3S-items in 57 of 60 included patients (95%) (median: four PIP-items per patient; IQR: 3-5). Both the geriatrician and the general practitioners scored the clinical relevance of the detected items 'serious' or 'significant' in over 70% of cases. Proposed alternative treatment plans were accepted for 79% of the PIP-items (n = 198). The aMAI detected 536 items, of which 145 were also detected by the GheOP3S-tool. A total of 119 PIP-items were additionally detected by the GheOP3S-tool. CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of the PIP-items detected with the GheOP3S-tool is high, likewise the acceptance rate of proposed alternatives.

[Medication screening by the community pharmacist in Belgium]. / Revue de la medication par le pharmacien d'officine en Belgique: pourquoi, comment et situation actuelle.

About 20% of the European population is older than 65 years. Because of multimorbidity (i.e. multiple chronic condition within a patient), older patients are often prescribed multiple drugs [i.e. polypharmacy). Both older age and polypharmacy significantly increase the risk for adverse drug events. International research showed that more or less 5% of all unplanned hospital admissions is related to the use of medication. About 70% of these drug related admissions happened in patients older than 65 years. Moreover, about half of the admissions could have been avoided. These preventable hospital admissions were caused by the intake of medication without an indication, problems with medication adherence, interactions and/or insufficient monitoring. We define this as (potential Drug Related Problems [DRPI. DRPs can occur on multiple occasions during the medication management process: prescribing, dispensing, intake and monitoring. When DRPs can be detected in an early stage, significant consequences can be avoided. To accomplish this, multiple strategies are possible. One of the possibilities is performing a periodic medication screening by the community pharmacist in patient groups at risk. During such a medication screening, the pharmacotherapy is critically evaluated in a systematic and structured way. The implementation of medication screening in first-line health care is currently limited. The community pharmacist is nevertheless ideally placed to perform this task. There is an important relation of trust between him and the patient and the community pharmacist has access to a full medication history. Furthermore, as an expert in drug-related issues, he possesses all necessary knowledge to perform the pharmacotherapeutic analysis.

[Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for patients with COPD: translated review of the recently published PHARMACOP trial]. / Efficacité des soins pharmaceutiques auprès de patients atteints de BPCO: compte-rendu de l'etude PHARMACOP récemment publiée.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Few well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCT) regarding the impact of community pharmacist interventions on pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD) have been conducted. We assessed the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical care program for patients with COPD. METHODS: The PHARMACOP-trial was a single-blind 3-month RCT, conducted in 170 community pharmacies in Belgium, enrolling patients prescribed daily COPD medication, aged > or = 50 years, and with a smoking history > or = 10 pack-years. A computer-generated randomization sequence allocated patients to intervention (n = 371), receiving protocol-defined pharmacist care, or control group (n = 363), receiving usual pharmacist care 11:1 ratio, stratified by center). Interventions, focusing on inhalation technique and adherence to maintenance therapy, were carried out at start of the trial and at one month follow-up. Primary outcomes were inhalation technique and medication adherence. Secondary outcomes were exacerbation rate, dyspnea, COPD specific and generic health status and smoking behavior. RESULTS: From December 2010 to April 2011, 734 patients were enrolled. 42 patients (5.7%) were lost to follow-up. At the end of the trial, inhalation score (Mean estimated difference [delta], 13.5%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 10.8-16.1; P < .0001] and medication adherence [(delta, 8.51%; 95% CI, 4.63-12.4; P < .0001) were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. In the intervention group, a significantly lower hospitalization rate was observed (9 vs 35 hospitalizations; Rate Ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64; P = .003). No other significant between-group differences were observed. CONCLUSION: The PHARMACOP-trial demonstrates that pragmatic pharmacist care programs improve both inhalation technique and medication adherence in patients with COPD and could reduce hospitalization rates. The protocolled intervention used in this trial was specifically designed for and evaluated in (Belgian) community pharmacies. This may facilitate future implementation in the Belgian context.