Epidemiologic features and therapeutic strategies of kerion: A nationwide multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Kerion is a severe type of tinea capitis that is difficult to treat and remains a public health problem. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the epidemiologic features and efficacy of different treatment schemes from real-world experience. METHODS: From 2019 to 2021, 316 patients diagnosed with kerion at 32 tertiary Chinese hospitals were enrolled. We analysed the data of each patient, including clinical characteristics, causative pathogens, treatments and outcomes. RESULTS: Preschool children were predominantly affected and were more likely to have zoophilic infection. The most common pathogen in China was Microsporum canis. Atopic dermatitis (AD), animal contact, endothrix infection and geophilic pathogens were linked with kerion occurrence. In terms of treatment, itraconazole was the most applied antifungal agent and reduced the time to mycological cure. A total of 22.5% of patients received systemic glucocorticoids simultaneously, which reduced the time to complete symptom relief. Furthermore, glucocorticoids combined with itraconazole had better treatment efficacy, with a higher rate and shorter time to achieving mycological cure. CONCLUSIONS: Kerion often affects preschoolers and leads to serious sequelae, with AD, animal contact, and endothrix infection as potential risk factors. Glucocorticoids, especially those combined with itraconazole, had better treatment efficacy.

HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugate FS-1502 in HER2-expressing metastatic breast cancer: a phase 1a/1b trial.

Currently approved HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) are associated with safety concerns. In this multicenter, single-arm, dose-escalation (phase 1a) and dose-expansion (phase 1b) phase 1 trial (NCT03944499), patients with HER2-expressing advanced solid tumors received FS-1502 (an anti-HER2 ADC) with a 3 + 3 design in phase 1a; patients with metastatic HER2-positive BC received FS-1502 at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in phase 1b. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and RP2D for phase 1a and objective response rate (ORR) for phase 1b. A total of 150 patients with HER2-expressing solid tumors (n = 5) and BC (n = 145) were enrolled (female, n = 146, 97.3%). One DLT each was reported at 3.0 and 3.5 mg/kg; the MTD was not reached. The RP2D was 2.3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. Five (3.3%) patients experienced pneumonitis; four (2.7%) had grade 3 reversible ocular events. Of 67 HER2-positive BC patients receiving the RP2D, the best ORR was 53.7% (95% CI, 41.1-66.0%), including PRs confirmed (confirmed ORR, 37.5%) and pending for confirmation. FS-1502 was well tolerated with limited ocular and pulmonary findings and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in HER2-positive BC patients.

BOLERO-5: a phase II study of everolimus and exemestane combination in Chinese post-menopausal women with ER + /HER2- advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The global BOLERO-2 trial established the efficacy and safety of combination everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) in the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER +), HER2-, advanced breast cancer (ABC). BOLERO-5 investigated this combination in a Chinese population (NCT03312738). METHODS: BOLERO-5 is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled, phase II trial comparing EVE (10 mg/day) or placebo (PBO) in combination with EXE (25 mg/day). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints included PFS per blinded independent review committee (BIRC), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), pharmacokinetics, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were randomized to EVE + EXE (n = 80) or PBO + EXE (n = 79). By investigator assessment, treatment with EVE + EXE prolonged median PFS by 5.4 months (HR 0.52; 90% CI 0.38, 0.71), from 2.0 months (PBO + EXE; 90% CI 1.9, 3.6) to 7.4 months (EVE + EXE; 90% CI 5.5, 9.0). Similar results were observed following assessment by BIRC, with median PFS prolonged by 4.3 months. Treatment with EVE + EXE was also associated with improvements in ORR and CBR. No new safety signals were identified in BOLERO-5, with the incidence of adverse events in Chinese patients consistent with the safety profile of both drugs. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety results of BOLERO-5 validate the findings from BOLERO-2, and further support the use of EVE + EXE in Chinese post-menopausal women with ER + , HER2- ABC. NCT03312738, registered 18 October 2017.

Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of SHR-A1811, a Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Directed Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Expressing or Mutated Advanced Solid Tumors: A Global Phase I Trial.

PURPOSE: SHR-A1811 is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody trastuzumab, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. We assessed the safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of SHR-A1811 in heavily pretreated HER2-expressing or mutated advanced solid tumors. METHODS: This global, multi-center, first-in-human, phase I trial was conducted at 33 centers. Patients who had HER2-expressing or mutated unresectable, advanced, or metastatic solid tumors and were refractory or intolerant to standard therapies were enrolled. SHR-A1811 was administered intravenously at doses ranging from 1.0 to 8.0 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity, safety, and the recommended phase II dose. RESULTS: From September 7, 2020, to February 27, 2023, 307 patients who had undergone a median of three (IQR, 2-5) previous treatment regimens in the metastatic setting received SHR-A1811 treatment. As of data cutoff (February 28, 2023), one patient from the 6.4 mg/kg group experienced dose-limiting toxicities (pancytopenia and colitis). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) included decreased neutrophil count (119 [38.8%]) and decreased WBC count (70 [22.8%]). Interstitial lung disease occurred in only eight (2.6%) patients. Serious AEs and deaths occurred in 70 (22.8%) and 13 (4.2%) patients, respectively. SHR-A1811 led to objective responses in 59.9% (184/307) of all patients, 76.3% (90/118) of HER2-positive breast cancer, 60.4% (55/91) of HER2 low-expressing breast cancer, and 45.9% (39/85 with evaluable tumor responses) of the 98 nonbreast tumors. CONCLUSION: SHR-A1811 exhibited acceptable tolerability, promising antitumor activity, and a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. The recommended phase II dose of 4.8 or 6.4 mg/kg was selected for various tumor types.

Serum HER2 Level Predicts Therapeutic Efficacy and Prognosis in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of serum HER2 (sHER2) in patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods: We analyzed the sHER2 levels of 200 patients with advanced breast cancer receiving first or second line treatment, the tissue HER2 (tHER2) level was also analyzed. Indicators of therapeutic efficacy and prognosis were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and time to progression (TTP). Results: The baseline sHER2 level was high in 132 patients and low in 68 patients. The high level of sHER2 is correlated with molecular subtype (p=0.016), visceral metastasis (p<0.001), liver metastasis (p<0.001), tissue HER-2 (tHER2) (p=0.001), and, among tHER2-low tumors (59 patients), the baseline sHER2 high level was associated with a higher proportion of brain metastasis. The ORR of patients with baseline sHER2 high level is higher than those with baseline sHER2 low level (p=0.026). The TTP of patients with baseline sHER2 low level is longer than the patients with baseline sHER2 high level (p=0.024). For patients with baseline sHER2 high level, a significant decrease in sHER2 after two cycles of treatment indicates higher ORR, DCR, and an extension of TTP. After multiple cycles of treatment, for patients with tHER-2 positive and baseline sHER2 high level, the DCR in the sHER2 decrease in the negative group was higher than that in the continuous positive group (p=0.037). Patients with a rapid decline type of sHER2 dynamic change curve had higher ORR and prolonged TTP compared with patients with other types of sHER2 dynamic change curve. There is no correlation between OS and sHER2 levels. Conclusion: Our study showed that patients with advanced breast cancer had a high level of sHER2 at recurrence, regardless of whether they are tHER2 positive or negative. Dynamic detection of sHER2 can help predict therapeutic efficacy and prognosis, regardless of whether tHER-2 is positive or negative.

HDAC inhibitors target IRS4 to enhance anti­AR therapy in AR­positive triple­negative breast cancer.

Triple­negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most malignant subtype of breast cancer. Androgen receptor (AR) has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for AR­positive TNBC; however, clinical trials have not yet produced an effective treatment. The present study aimed to identify a novel treatment regimen to improve the prognosis of AR­positive TNBC. First, a combination of an AR inhibitor (enzalutamide, Enz) and a selective histone deacetylase inhibitor (chidamide, Chid) was used to treat AR­positive TNBC cell lines, and a synergistic effect of these drugs was observed. The combination treatment inhibited cell proliferation and migration by arresting the cell cycle at the G2/M phase. Subsequently, next­generation sequencing was performed to detect changes in gene regulation. The results showed that the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway was significantly inhibited by the combination treatment of Enz and Chid. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed that the combination group was significantly enriched in KRAS signalling. Analysis of the associated genes revealed that insulin receptor substrate 4 (IRS4) may have a critical role in blocking the activation of KRAS signalling. In a mouse xenograft model, combination treatment also inhibited the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway by upregulating the expression of IRS4 and thereby suppressing tumour growth. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that combination treatment with Enz and Chid can upregulate IRS4, which results in the blocking of KRAS signalling and suppression of tumour growth. It may be hypothesised that the expression levels of IRS4 could be used as a biomarker for screening patients with AR­positive TNBC using Enz and Chid combination therapy.

ZDHHC9: a promising therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer through immune modulation and immune checkpoint blockade resistance.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify potential therapeutic targets based on the expression profiles of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in TNBC. METHODS: The Limma package was used to identify DEGs in TCGA and GEO datasets. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and western blotting were used to determine the expression of ZDHHC9 in TNBC tissues. Flow cytometry assay and tissue immunofluorescence analysis were used to detect infiltration of multiple immune cells in tumor tissue at different levels of ZDHHC9 expression. RESULTS: ZDHHC9 was identified as a key factor associated with resistance to ICB therapy through weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Subsequently, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and western blotting verified that ZDHHC9 expression was elevated in TNBC cancer tissues and that elevated expression of ZDHHC9 was associated with the poor survival of patients with TNBC. Analysis of data from several public datasets revealed that patients with high ZDHHC9 expression had an increased proportion of Ki-67 + breast cancer cells and tended to be basal-like breast cancer. In addition, in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that high expression of ZDHHC9 significantly predicted the efficacy and responsiveness of immunotherapy in TNBC. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that ZDHHC9 is a valuable marker for guiding the classification, diagnosis and prognosis of TNBC and developing specific targeted therapies.

Pyrotinib versus placebo in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel as first line treatment in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (PHILA): randomised, double blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-HER (human epidermal growth factor receptor) inhibitor), trastuzumab, and docetaxel compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for untreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial. SETTING: 40 centres in China between 6 May 2019 and 17 January 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 590 female patients (median age 52 (interquartile range 46-58) years) with untreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either oral pyrotinib (400 mg once daily) or placebo, both combined with intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg in cycle 1 and 6 mg/kg in subsequent cycles) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Randomisation was stratified by treatment history of trastuzumab in the (neo)adjuvant setting and hormone receptor status. Patients, investigators, and the sponsor's study team were masked to treatment assignment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator. RESULTS: Of the 590 randomised patients, 297 received pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel treatment (pyrotinib group), and 293 received placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel treatment (placebo group). At data cut-off on 25 May 2022, the median follow-up was 15.5 months. The median progression-free survival according to the investigator was significantly longer in the pyrotinib group than in the placebo group (24.3 (95% confidence interval 19.1 to 33.0) months versus 10.4 (9.3 to 12.3) months; hazard ratio 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.53); one sided P<0.001). Treatment related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 267 (90%) of the 297 patients in the pyrotinib group and 224 (76%) of the 293 patients in the placebo group. No treatment related deaths occurred in the pyrotinib group, and one (<1%; diabetic hyperosmolar coma) treatment related death occurred in the placebo group. Survival and toxicities are still under assessment with longer follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel showed superiority by significantly improving progression-free survival compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in patients with untreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. The toxicity was manageable. The findings support this dual anti-HER2 regimen as an alternative first line treatment option in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03863223.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of pyrotinib-based therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (PRETTY): A nationwide, prospective, observational study.

Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, has been approved for treating HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in China. We conducted a nationwide, prospective observational study to examine the real-world data of pyrotinib-based therapy in this population. Patients from 61 sites across China were included. Pyrotinib-based regimens were prescribed at local physician's discretion. Demographics, treatment patterns, prognosis and safety were evaluated. The primary outcome was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Of 1129 patients, pyrotinib-based therapy was prescribed as first-, second- and third- or later-line treatment in 437 (38.7%), 476 (42.2%) and 216 (19.1%) patients, respectively. Median rwPFS (mrwPFS) was 14.3 (95% CI, 13.3-15.2) months in the total population, with the longest mrwPFS of 17.8 (95% CI, 15.2-24.9) months in the first-line setting, followed by 14.4 (95% CI, 12.9-15.3) months in the second-line setting. Patients with third- or later-line treatment also achieved a mrwPFS of 9.3 (95% CI, 8.4-11.8) months. Patients with trastuzumab- or trastuzumab-pertuzumab-treated disease achieved a mrwPFS of 14.3 and 13.6 months, respectively. Dual HER2 blockade with pyrotinib plus trastuzumab showed a mrwPFS of 16.2 months in the total population, with data not mature in the first-line setting. For patients with baseline brain metastases, the mrwPFS was 11.7 months. The most common adverse event was diarrhea (any grade, 73.5%; grade ≥ 3, 15.3%). In real world, pyrotinib-based therapy shows promising effectiveness in the first-, as well as second- and later-line treatment, with acceptable tolerability. Further investigations regarding front-line use or novel combinations of pyrotinib might facilitate to maximize its anti-tumor potential.

Dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole versus placebo plus letrozole or anastrozole as first-line treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (DAWNA-2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Adding CDK4/6 inhibitor dalpiciclib to fulvestrant significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer progressing after endocrine therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no previous systemic therapy in the advanced setting. METHODS: DAWNA-2 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 42 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years, of any menopausal status, had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and had pathologically confirmed hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative untreated advanced breast cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral dalpiciclib (150 mg per day for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off) or matching placebo. Both groups also received endocrine therapy: either 2·5 mg letrozole or 1 mg anastrozole orally once daily continuously. Randomisation was using an interactive web response system (block size of six) and stratified according to visceral metastasis, previous endocrine therapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, and endocrine therapy partner. All investigators, patients, and the funders of the study were masked to group allocation. We present the results of the preplanned interim analyses for the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival, which was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who met the eligibility criteria by intention-to treat. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The superiority boundary was calculated as a one-sided p value of 0·0076 or less. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03966898, and is ongoing but closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between July 19, 2019, and Dec 25, 2020, 580 patients were screened and 456 were eligible and randomly assigned to the dalpiciclib group (n=303) or placebo group (n=153). At data cutoff (June 1, 2022), median follow-up was 21·6 months (IQR 18·3-25·9), and 103 (34%) of 303 patients in the dalpiciclib group and 83 (54%) of 153 patients in the placebo group had disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the dalpiciclib group than in the placebo group (30·6 months [95% CI 30·6-not reached] vs 18·2 months [16·5-22·5]; stratified hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·38-0·69]; one-sided log-rank p<0·0001). Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 271 (90%) of 302 patients in the dalpiciclib group and 18 (12%) of 153 patients in the placebo group. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (259 [86%] in the dalpiciclib group vs none in the placebo group) and leukopenia (201 [67%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported for 36 (12%) patients in the dalpiciclib group and ten (7%) patients in the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths occurred, both in the dalpiciclib group (deaths from unknown causes). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole could be a novel standard first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, and is an alternative option to the current treatment landscape. FUNDING: Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Entinostat, a class I selective histone deacetylase inhibitor, plus exemestane for Chinese patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Entinostat plus exemestane in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously showed encouraging outcomes. This multicenter phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of entinostat plus exemestane in Chinese patients with HR + ABC that relapsed/progressed after ≥1 endocrine therapy. Patients were randomized (2:1) to oral exemestane 25 mg/day plus entinostat (n = 235) or placebo (n = 119) 5 mg/week in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the independent radiographic committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The median age was 52 (range, 28-75) years and 222 (62.7%) patients were postmenopausal. CDK4/6 inhibitors and fulvestrant were previously used in 23 (6.5%) and 92 (26.0%) patients, respectively. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the entinostat and placebo groups. The median PFS was 6.32 (95% CI, 5.30-9.11) and 3.72 (95% CI, 1.91-5.49) months in the entinostat and placebo groups (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98; P = 0.046), respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 154 (65.5%) patients in the entinostat group versus 23 (19.3%) in the placebo group, and the most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia [103 (43.8%)], thrombocytopenia [20 (8.5%)], and leucopenia [15 (6.4%)]. Entinostat plus exemestane significantly improved PFS compared with exemestane, with generally manageable toxicities in HR + ABC (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03538171).

The mixed subtype has a worse prognosis than other histological subtypes: a retrospective analysis of 217 patients with metaplastic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is an aggressive subtype of all breast cancer. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features, treatments and prognoses of MpBC patients. METHODS: We collected the data from MpBC patients diagnosed at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from 2010 to 2017. Kaplan Meier curves and Cox regression model were used to evaluating clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. After removing baseline differences by propensity score matching (PSM), we analyzed the prognosis between MpBC patients and invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDC-NST) patients. RESULTS: A total of 217 MpBC patients were subsumed. Of all histological subtypes, 45.1% were mixed subtypes, followed by with mesenchymal differentiation (27.2%), pure squamous (15.2%) and pure spindle (12.4%) subtypes. 69.6% of MpBC were triple-negative, 25.3% and 6.5% were HR-positive and HER2-positive. MpBC patients had worse survival compared to IDC-NST patients, with 5-year RFS of 73.8 and 83.6% (HR = 1.177 95%CI (1.171-2.676) P = 0.0068), and 5-year BCSS of 79.0% and 89.7% (HR = 2.187 95%CI (1.357-3.523) P = 0.0013). In the multivariate COX model, AJCC stage, mixed subtype and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Mixed MpBC is more aggressive than pure and with heterologous mesenchymal differentiation subtypes. And whether squamous or spindle MpBC, mixed forms have shorter outcomes than pure forms. CONCLUSIONS: MpBCs are associated with poorer prognoses than IDC-NSTs. They are heterogeneous with different clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes between histological subtypes. Pure and with heterologous mesenchymal differentiation subtypes have more survival benefits than the mixed subtype.

Epidemiology and Aetiology of Tinea Capitis in Wuhan and Its Surrounding Areas from 2011 Till the Present: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Tinea capitis is still common in Wuhan, and there exists significant difference in its pathogen spectrum between this area and other parts of China. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the epidemiological characteristics of tinea capitis and changes of pathogen spectrum in Wuhan and its surrounding areas from 2011 to 2022, and further to present potential risk factors focusing on some major etiological agents. Briefly, a retrospective single-center survey was performed on 778 patients with tinea capitis from 2011 to 2022 in Wuhan, China. The isolated pathogens were identified to species level by morphological examination or by ITS sequencing. The data were collected and statistically analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Bonferroni method. Among all enrolled patients, the most common pathogen was Trichophyton violaceum in both child (310, 46.34%) and adult tinea capitis (71, 65.14%). There existed significant difference in pathogen spectrum between child and adult tinea capitis. Furthermore, black-dot type represented the most common type of tinea capitis for both children (303, 45.29%) and adults (71, 65.14%). Notably, the number of cases caused by Microsporum canis consecutively exceeded that caused by Trichophyton violaceum in children from Jan, 2020 to Jun, 2022. Additionally, we suggested a series of potential factors that might increase the risks of acquiring tinea capitis by focusing on several major agents. Considering the different risk factors related to specific pathogen, it was meaningful to adjust the measures against the spreading of tinea capitis according to the changes of pathogen distribution within recent years.

Clinical efficacy of fulvestrant versus exemestane as first-line therapies for Chinese postmenopausal oestrogen-receptor positive /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -advanced breast cancer (FRIEND study).

AIM: To compare the efficacies of exemestane and fulvestrant as first-line monotherapies for postmenopausal Chinese women having advanced oestrogen-receptor positive (ER+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-breast cancer (ER+/HER2- ABC) after a previous treatment for ≥2 years with an adjuvant non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, multi-centre, parallel-controlled phase 2 FRIEND study, 145 postmenopausal ER+/HER2- ABC patients were assigned into fulvestrant (500 mg on days 0, 14 and 28, and then at every 28 ± 3 days, n = 77) and exemestane (25 mg/day, n = 67) groups. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary outcomes were disease control rate, objective response rate, time to treatment failure, duration of response and overall survival. Exploratory end-points included gene mutation-related outcomes and safety. RESULTS: Fulvestrant was superior to exemestane regarding median PFS times (8.5 versus 5.6 months, p = 0.014, HR = 0.62, 95% confidence intervals: 0.42-0.91), objective response rates (19.5% versus 6.0%, p = 0.017) and time to treatment failure (8.4 versus 5.5 months, p = 0.008). The incidence of adverse or serious adverse events in the two groups was virtually identical. The most frequent mutations in 129 analysed patients were detected in the oestrogen receptor gene 1 (ESR1) (18/14.0%), PIK3CA (40/31.0%) and TP53 (29/22.5%) genes. Fulvestrant produced significant longer PFS times compared to exemestane but only for patients with an ESR1-wild type (8.5 versus 5.8 months) (p = 0.035), although there was a similar trend also for the ESR1 mutation without statistical significance. All patients with c-MYC and BRCA2 mutations had longer PFS times in the fulvestrant versus the exemestane group (p = 0.049, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Fulvestrant significantly increased overall PFS for ER+/HER2- ABC patients and was well tolerated. CLINICALTRIALS: NCT02646735, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02646735.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Metastases From Breast Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Study of 22 Patients.

Background. Breast carcinoma is the most common malignancy in women. Gastrointestinal metastasis is rarely found or diagnosed in patients with breast cancer. Methods. Clinicopathological features, treatment options, and prognosis were evaluated retrospectively for 22 patients with gastrointestinal metastases of breast carcinoma in Chinese women. Results. Presenting symptoms were non-specific: anorexia (21/22), epigastric pain (10/22), and vomiting (8/22), and 2 patients (2/22) presented with nonfatal hemorrhage. The first sites of metastases were skeleton (9/22), stomach (7/22), colorectal (7/22), lung (3/22), peritoneal (3/22), and liver (1/22). ER, PR, GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), and keratin 7 can effectively confirm the diagnosis, especially in the case of keratin 20 negativity. Histology showed mainly ductal breast carcinoma (n = 11) was the predominant source of gastrointestinal metastases in this study, and lobular breast cancer (n = 9) accounted for a considerable proportion. The disease control rate to systemic therapy was 81% (17 of 21 treated patients), and the objective response rate was 10% (2 of 21 treated patients). Median overall survival was 71.5 months (range, 22-226 months), median survival for distant metastases was 23.5 months (range, 2-119 months) and the median survival for the time of gastrointestinal metastases diagnosis was 6 months (range, 2-73 months). Conclusions. Performing the endoscopy with biopsy was crucial for patients with any subtle gastrointestinal symptoms and a history of breast cancer. It is important to distinguish primary gastrointestinal carcinoma from breast metastatic carcinoma in order to select the optimal initial treatment and avoid unnecessary surgery.

Molecular subtypes predict the preferential site of distant metastasis in advanced breast cancer: a nationwide retrospective study.

Objective: This study aimed to explore possible associations between molecular subtypes and site of distant metastasis in advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: 3577 ABC patients were selected from 21 hospitals of seven geographic regions in China from 2012-2014. A questionnaire was designed to collect medical information regarding demographic characteristics, risk factors, molecular subtype, recurrence/metastasis information, and disease-free survival (DFS). The cancers were classified into Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and Triple Negative subtypes. Chi-square test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to explore the associations between molecular subtypes and distant metastasis sites. Results: A total of 2393 cases with molecular subtypes information were finally examined. Patients with Luminal A (51.1%) and Luminal B (44.7%) were most prone to bone metastasis, whereas liver metastasis was more frequently observed in HER2-enriched ABC patients (29.1%).The cumulative recurrence and metastasis rates of ABC patients at 36 months of DFS were the most significant within molecular types, of which Triple Negative was the highest (82.7%), while that of Luminal A was the lowest (58.4%). In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and Triple Negative subtypes increased the risk of visceral metastasis by 23%, 46% and 87% respectively. In addition, Triple Negative patients had a higher probability of brain metastasis (HR 3.07, 95% CI: 1.04-9.07). Conclusion: Molecular subtypes can predict the preferential sites of distant metastasis, emphasizing that these associations were of great help in choices for surveillance, developing appropriate screening and cancer management strategies for follow-up and personalized therapy in ABC patients.

A Phase IIb, single arm, multicenter trial of sacituzumab govitecan in Chinese patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who received at least two prior treatments.

Refractory or relapsing metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has a poor prognosis. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate, targeting human trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2). This is the first report of SG's efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with mTNBC. EVER-132-001 (NCT04454437) was a multicenter, single-arm, Phase IIb study in Chinese patients with mTNBC who failed ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Eligible patients received 10 mg/kg SG on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day treatment cycle, until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the Independent Review Committee. Secondary endpoints included: duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Eighty female Chinese patients (median age 47.6 years; range 24-69.9 years) received ≥1 SG dose with a median of 8 treatment cycles by the cutoff date (August 6, 2021). Median number of prior systemic cancer treatments was 4.0 (range 2.0-8.0). ORR and CBR were reported 38.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.06-50.30) and 43.8% (95% CI, 32.68-55.30) of patients, respectively. The median PFS was 5.55 months (95% CI, 4.14-N/A). SG-related Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 71.3%, the most common were neutrophil count decreased (62.5%), white blood cell count decreased (48.8%) and anemia (21.3%); 6.3% discontinued SG because of TEAEs. SG demonstrated substantial clinical activity in heavily pretreated Chinese patients with mTNBC. The observed safety profile was generally manageable.

Pamiparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pamiparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCA1/2 m). METHODS: In this open-label, phase II, multicenter study in China (NCT03575065), patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC cohort) or hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- breast cancer (HR+/HER2- cohort) and ≤ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy received pamiparib 60 mg orally twice daily in 28-day, continuous cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) by independent review committee. RESULTS: In total, 88 patients were enrolled (TNBC cohort: 62; HR+/HER2- cohort: 26). Median age was 45.5 (range: 27-67) years, and 60 patients (68.2%) had received 1 or 2 prior lines of chemotherapy; 42 patients (47.7%) had previously received platinum chemotherapy. In the TNBC cohort, ORR was 38.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.4-52.3) and median duration of response (DoR) was 7.0 months (95% CI 3.9-not estimable). In the HR+/HER2- cohort, ORR was 61.9% (95% CI 38.4-81.9) and median DoR was 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-14.8). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, and ≥ Grade 3 TEAEs were hematologic (including anemia, decreased neutrophil count, and decreased white blood cell count). Overall, 64.8% of patients had TEAEs leading to dose reduction and 2.3% had TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Pamiparib showed encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with locally advanced and metastatic HER2- breast cancer with gBRCA1/2 m. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575065; July 2, 2018.

Real-world data for the renal safety of abemaciclib combined with bisphosphonate in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated the renal safety of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) with bisphosphonate as a treatment option for hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), especially with bone metastasis. METHODS: Data were collected from HR+/HER2- ABC patients who received abemaciclib with ET between March 2021 and May 2022 in a single medical center in China. We performed an analysis of the change in serum creatine (Cr) and creatine clearance (CrCl), time to first abnormal Cr value, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade of increased creatinine. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were included in the final analysis, with a median age of 56 years and a median weight of 65 kg. Any grade laboratory-assessing increased Cr occurred in 87.1% of patients, while CrCl rarely went down to 30 ml/min. Associations between start dose with grade of increased Cr and menopausal status with alert value, which is defined as creatinine clearance <30 ml/min, were indicated. CONCLUSION: This study shows that abemaciclib combined with bisphosphonate would be safe for renal function in HR+/HER2- ABC patients with bone metastases.

Tucidinostat plus exemestane for postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a long-term safety and overall survival update from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Background: The ACE study previously demonstrated that tucidinostat (chidamide), a subtype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, plus exemestane significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients with a manageable safety profile. The analysis of long-term safety and overall survival (OS) is presented here. Methods: ACE is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial comparing tucidinostat 30 mg/twice weekly plus exemestane 25 mg/day versus placebo plus exemestane 25 mg/day in postmenopausal patients with advanced, HR+ breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PFS, and OS was the secondary endpoint. Results: Of the 365 patients enrolled between July 2015, and June 2017, 244 were assigned to tucidinostat plus exemestane (tucidinostat group) and 121 to placebo plus exemestane group (placebo group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. The median follow-up from randomization to data cut-off (February 25, 2021) of this analysis was 26.5 months (range, 13.9-45.5 months). A total of 231 deaths (63.3%) from 365 patients occurred, including 155 deaths (63.5%) in the tucidinostat group and 76 deaths (62.8%) in the placebo group. The median OS was 30.3 months (95% CI, 26.7-36.7) in the tucidinostat group and 30.3 months (95% CI, 24.8-38.1) in the placebo group. The safety profiles of both tucidinostat and placebo groups remained consistent with those previously reported, and no new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. Neutropenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 51.6% of the patients in the tucidinostat group and 2.5% of the patients in the placebo group. Adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuations from any cause occurred in 28 (11.5%) patients in the tucidinostat group and 4 (3.3%) in the placebo group. Conclusions: Although tucidinostat in combination with exemestane had produced a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint PFS, the ACE study did not show a prolongation of the secondary endpoint OS in the tucidinostat combination regimen. Ongoing studies have been considered in terms of potential identification of what patient subpopulations could benefit most from the tucidinostat combination regimens in advanced HR+ breast cancer.