Social distress among medical oncologists and other healthcare professionals during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread to every country around the world taking on pandemic proportions. Since 8 March 2020, the Italian government ordered a nationwide lockdown with unavoidable social isolation. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) represent the most physically and emotionally involved category. The aim of this study is to assess the social distress among HCPs in Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this online, totally anonymous survey, 24 multiple choice questions were posed to medical staff employed in the Italian Healthcare System during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection was performed from 30 March to 24 April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 600 HCPs completed the questionnaire. The majority of respondents expressed the fear of being at higher risk of contagion than the general population (83.3%) and the weighty concern of infecting their families (72.5%). An insufficient supply of personal protective equipment (PPE; P = 0.0003) and inadequate training about procedures to follow (P = 0.0092) were seen to significantly coincide with these worries. More than two-thirds declared a change in family organisation, which showed a significant correlation with the concern of infecting their relatives (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first Italian survey on social distress among HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The unavailability of PPE, screening procedures and adequate training strongly affected HCPs' emotional status. Although there was a predominance of oncologists (especially from the North of Italy), which impairs the generalisation of our findings, this survey underlined the social impact that this health emergency has had on HCPs.

Osimertinib beyond disease progression in T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients: a multicenter study of clinicians' attitudes.

BACKGROUND: In most cases, T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib developed "non-drugable" progression, as the patients with common EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with first-line osimertinib. In both settings, chemotherapy represents the standard treatment and local ablative treatments (LATs) are potential useful options in the case of oligo-progression. METHODS: We conducted a study on "post-progression" (pp) outcomes of T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib, according to the therapeutic strategy applied: osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs), "switched therapies" or best supportive care only (BSC). RESULTS: 144 consecutive patients were evaluated: 53 (36.8%) did not received post-progression treatments (BSC), while 91 (63.2%) patients received at least 1 subsequent treatment; 50 patients (54.9%) received osimertinib beyond disease progression [19 (20.9%) of them with adjunctive LATs] and 41 (45.1%) a switched therapy. Median ppPFS (progression-free survival) and median ppOS (overall survival) of patients who received osimertinib beyond progression vs. switched therapies were 6.4 months vs. 4.7 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.35-0.92), p = 0.0239] and 11.3 months vs 7.8 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-0.98), p = 0.0446]. Among patients who received osimertinib beyond progression with and without LATs median ppPFS was 6.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively [HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.68-1.18), p = 0.4560], while median ppOS was 20.2 months and 9.9 months, respectively [HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-1.03), p = 0.0748]. At the univariate analysis, the only factor significantly related to the ppPFS was the therapeutic strategy in favor of osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs). Moreover, the only variable which was significantly related to ppOS at the multivariate analysis was osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that in clinical practice, in case of "non-druggable" disease progression, maintaining osimertinib beyond progression (with adjunctive LATs) is an effective option.

The prognostic and predictive role of hyponatremia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastases.

PURPOSE: Hyponatremia and bone metastasis (BMs) are known as negative prognostic factors in patients affected by metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Hyponatremia is associated with higher risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture, but no data are available about the relationship between hyponatremia and bone metastasis. This study aims to analyze the prognostic impact of hyponatremia in NSCLC patients with bone metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data about advanced NSCLC patients. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were made using chi-square test. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled into the study. BMs were present in 264 patients (41%) at diagnosis, while hyponatremia appeared in 237 (37%) patients during the first-line treatment. Patients without BMs had a median overall survival (mOS) of 15.9 months (95% CI 14.1-17.9) versus 11.4 months (95% CI 9.4-13.4) for patients with BMs (p = 0.001). Eunatremic patients had a better outcome (mOS 16.3 months, 95% CI 14.6-18.0 vs 10.3 months, 95% I 7.6-12.8, p = 0.003). Considering the two variables, patients with BMs and hyponatremia had a mOS of 10.1 months (95% CI 4.3-15.9), patients with hyponatremia without BMs 11.9 months (95% CI 11.4-12.4), while mOS was 13.1 months (95% CI 12.0-14.2) for eunatremic patients with BMs versus 17.1 months (95% CI 15.2-19.1) in eunatremic patients without BMs (p = 0.0020). Hyponatremic patients developed metachronous BMs significantly earlier (3.73 vs 5.76 months, p = 0.0187). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that hyponatremia is an important prognostic factor and it should be necessarily considered to enhance the management of NSCLC patients with BMs.

Hyponatremia is a predictor of hospital length and cost of stay and outcome in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients, and it might be an indicator of poor prognosis and might have negative effects on hospitalization length and quality of life in non-malignant as well as in malignant diseases. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of hyponatremia on the length and on the cost of hospitalization as well as on outcome in cancer patients. METHODS: The present study includes 105 consecutive cancer patients hospitalized at our institution from June 2013 to December 2013. Data regarding age, sex, staging, histology, chemotherapy, and serum sodium levels at admission, during hospitalization, and at discharge were recorded and statistically analyzed. Impact of hyponatremia on length and cost of hospitalization and on outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: A significant difference in overall survival since the date of admission was observed between eunatremic and hyponatremic patients (p = 0.0255). A statistically significant correlation was also found between the length of stay and the detection of hyponatremia. At multivariate analysis, hyponatremia at admission, severity of hyponatremia, and stage of disease resulted independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, a patient with moderate or severe hyponatremia cost, in rate terms, 128 and 299 % more than a normonatremic patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of hyponatremia at the admission or during the hospitalization may represent a significant factor influencing the outcome and the length of hospitalization. Acting effective and timely on the normalization of sodium levels might have a positive effect on prognosis in this setting of patients, as well as on the length of stay in hospital, thus potentially resulting in savings.

Hyponatraemia is a predictor of clinical outcome for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: Hyponatraemia is one of the most common tumour-related electrolyte disorders. Several clinical, histological and serum factors have been found to influence prognosis, but, to date, there are no studies focusing on the prognostic role of hyponatraemia in mesothelioma. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic role of hyponatraemia in malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: We analysed 62 consecutive patients with histologically or cytologically proven advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma undergoing chemotherapy at our institution between January 2003 and September 2013. RESULTS: All patients received a first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. A second-line chemotherapy was administered to 29 patients. The onset of hyponatraemia (serum sodium <135 mEq/L) during the treatment was significantly related to a worsened median overall survival (7.93 vs 13.48 months; p = 0.0069). The occurrence of hyponatraemia during first-line chemotherapy (cutoff 135 and 130 mEq/L) was significantly associated to a shorter median progression-free survival (p = 0.0214). Results were also similar in the subgroup receiving a second-line treatment. At the multivariate analysis, including haemoglobin and sodium level at the beginning of first-line chemotherapy, age, gender, smoking habit, job exposure and performance status, only hyponatraemia was found to be an independent factor (p = 0.029). Hyponatraemia was also found to be a predictive factor for both first-line chemotherapy, being related to poorer response to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (p = 0.047) and second-line chemotherapy (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Our results show that hyponatraemia might be considered a negative prognostic parameter in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the association of hyponatraemia with the outcome of malignant pleural mesothelioma patients.