ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de la formación entre iguales de la Escuela de Pacientes sobre la salud autopercibida y los hábitos de vida de las personas con enfermedades crónicas. DISEÑO: Descriptivo, transversal de evaluación cuantitativa pretest/postest. EMPLAZAMIENTO: Andalucía. PARTICIPANTES: Novecientos sesenta y cuatro pacientes con diabetes, fibromialgia e insuficiencia cardíaca participantes en la Escuela de Pacientes entre 2013 y 2015. INTERVENCIONES: Sesión de formación para formadores en autocuidados para personas con enfermedades crónicas. Mediciones principales: Se usó un cuestionario que midió salud autopercibida, limitaciones, dieta y actividad física. El análisis estadístico fue descriptivo, bivariante, de correlaciones y de ganancias netas. RESULTADOS: Tras realizar la formación se observó una mejoría de la salud, con menos limitaciones y mejor dieta y ejercicio físico, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas en función del sexo, enfermedad, nivel de estudios y estado civil. Se plantean propuestas de mejora de la estrategia formativa, con atención a las necesidades específicas de los colectivos más vulnerables: mujeres y personas con menor nivel educativo. CONCLUSIONES: El impacto de la formación fue positivo y diferencial en función de los perfiles de participantes. Se recomienda profundizar en los resultados, a través de metodología cualitativa, realizar mediciones postest posteriores y adaptar la estrategia formativa a la heterogeneidad de las necesidades de la población formada
OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of the peer-led training for chronic patients on their health status and behaviors. DESIGN: Descriptive, transversal pretest and posttest quantitative approach. PLACEMENT: Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred sixty-four patients with Diabetes, fibromyalgia and heart failure, trained at the School of Patients between 2013 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Peer-training intervention for self-efficacy for chronic patients. Main measurement: Self-reported health status, activity limitation, diet and physical activity. Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics, correlation coefficient and net gains for paired variables. RESULTS: Health status improved after the training, with less limitations and better diet and physical activity, with significant differences by sex, chronic illness, education level and marriage status. Improvement areas where identified for the training strategy, with special attention on the needs of more vulnerable groups (women, people with less education level). CONCLUSIONS: The peer training had a positive impact, with differences depending on social profiles. 1-year and 2-years posttest measurements are needed and a qualitative study is required in order to better evaluate the peer-led strategy and to adapt it to participants' needs and expectations
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease , Health Behavior , Health Status , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Services Needs and Demand , Peer GroupABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of the peer-led training for chronic patients on their health status and behaviors. DESIGN: Descriptive, transversal pretest and posttest quantitative approach. PLACEMENT: Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred sixty-four patients with Diabetes, fibromyalgia and heart failure, trained at the School of Patients between 2013 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Peer-training intervention for self-efficacy for chronic patients. MAIN MEASUREMENT: Self-reported health status, activity limitation, diet and physical activity. Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics, correlation coefficient and net gains for paired variables. RESULTS: Health status improved after the training, with less limitations and better diet and physical activity, with significant differences by sex, chronic illness, education level and marriage status. Improvement areas where identified for the training strategy, with special attention on the needs of more vulnerable groups (women, people with less education level). CONCLUSIONS: The peer training had a positive impact, with differences depending on social profiles. 1-year and 2-years posttest measurements are needed and a qualitative study is required in order to better evaluate the peer-led strategy and to adapt it to participants' needs and expectations.