Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Rheumatol Adv Pract ; 8(2): rkae021, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38560641

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The primary aim of the CHANGE survey is to determine the current state of gender equity within rheumatology, and secondarily, to review the physician perspective on bullying, harassment and equipoise of opportunities within rheumatology. Methods: The CHANGE e-survey is a cross-sectional self-reported questionnaire adapted from EULAR's gender equity in academic rheumatology task force. The survey was launched in January 2023; it is available in six languages and distributed widely via rheumatology organizations and social media. Eligible participants include rheumatologist physicians and rheumatology health-care professionals. Survey responses will undergo descriptive analysis and inter-group comparison aiming to explore gender-based discrimination using logistic regression, with subgroup analyses for country/continent variations. Conclusion: This e-survey represents a comprehensive global initiative led by an international consortium, aimed at exploring and investigating the gender-related disparities and obstacles encountered by rheumatologists and rheumatology health-care professionals across diverse communities and health-care environments. By pursuing this initiative, we aim to take the broader rheumatology community a step closer to understanding the underlying origins of inequities and their determinants. Such insights are pivotal in identifying viable interventions and strategies to foster gender equity within the field. Ultimately, our collective objective is to ensure equitable access to opportunities for every individual, irrespective of gender, thereby promoting inclusivity and fairness across the entire spectrum of professional practice and career development.

2.
Rheumatol Adv Pract ; 8(2): rkae028, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38524696

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) compared with those with non-IIM autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and without autoimmune diseases (controls) using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instrument data obtained from the second COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune disease (COVAD-2) e-survey database. Methods: Demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities, disease activity, treatments and PROMIS instrument data were analysed. Primary outcomes were PROMIS Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores. Factors affecting GPH and GMH scores in IIMs were identified using multivariable regression analysis. Results: We analysed responses from 1582 IIM, 4700 non-IIM AIRD and 545 nrAID patients and 3675 controls gathered through 23 May 2022. The median GPH scores were the lowest in IIM and non-IIM AIRD patients {13 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-15] IIMs vs 13 [11-15] non-IIM AIRDs vs 15 [13-17] nrAIDs vs 17 [15-18] controls, P < 0.001}. The median GMH scores in IIM patients were also significantly lower compared with those without autoimmune diseases [13 (IQR 10-15) IIMs vs 15 (13-17) controls, P < 0.001]. Inclusion body myositis, comorbidities, active disease and glucocorticoid use were the determinants of lower GPH scores, whereas overlap myositis, interstitial lung disease, depression, active disease, lower PROMIS Physical Function 10a and higher PROMIS Fatigue 4a scores were associated with lower GMH scores in IIM patients. Conclusion: Both physical and mental health are significantly impaired in IIM patients, particularly in those with comorbidities and increased fatigue, emphasizing the importance of patient-reported experiences and optimized multidisciplinary care to enhance well-being in people with IIMs.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430474

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of COVID-19 breakthrough infections (BIs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) using data from the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study. METHODS: A validated patient self-reporting e-survey was circulated by the COVAD study group to collect data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination in 2022. BIs were defined as COVID-19 occurring ≥14 days after 2 vaccine doses. We compared BIs characteristics and severity among IIMs, other autoimmune rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases (AIRD, nrAID), and healthy controls (HC). Multivariable Cox regression models assessed the risk factors for BI, severe BI and hospitalisations among IIMs. RESULTS: Among 9449 included response, BIs occurred in 1447 (15.3%) respondents, median age 44 years (IQR 21), 77.4% female, and 182 BIs (12.9%) occurred among 1406 IIMs. Multivariable Cox regression among IIMs showed age as a protective factor for BIs [Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.98, 95%CI = 0.97-0.99], hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine use were risk factors (HR = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.24-2.64, and HR = 3.79, 95%CI = 1.69-8.42, respectively). Glucocorticoid use was a risk factor for severe BI (HR = 3.61, 95%CI = 1.09-11.8). Non-White ethnicity (HR = 2.61, 95%CI = 1.03-6.59) was a risk factor for hospitalisation. Compared with other groups, patients with IIMs required more supplemental oxygen therapy (IIM = 6.0% vs AIRD = 1.8%, nrAID = 2.2%, and HC = 0.9%), intensive care unit admission (IIM = 2.2% vs AIRD = 0.6%, nrAID, and HC = 0%), advanced treatment with antiviral or monoclonal antibodies (IIM = 34.1% vs AIRD = 25.8%, nrAID = 14.6%, and HC = 12.8%), and had more hospitalisation (IIM = 7.7% vs AIRD = 4.6%, nrAID = 1.1%, and HC = 1.5%). CONCLUSION: Patients with IIMs are susceptible to severe COVID-19 BI. Age and immunosuppressive treatments were related to the risk of BIs.

5.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(1): 127-139, 2024 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37084267

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Disease flares in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination period represent a prominent concern, though risk factors are poorly understood. We studied these flares among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). METHODS: The COVAD-1 and -2 global surveys were circulated in early 2021 and 2022, respectively, and we captured demographics, comorbidities, AIRDs details, COVID-19 infection history and vaccination details. Flares of IIMs were defined as (a) patient self-reported, (b) immunosuppression (IS) denoted, (c) clinical sign directed and (d) with >7.9-point minimal clinically significant improvement difference worsening of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PROMISPF10a score. Risk factors of flares were analysed using regression models. RESULTS: Of 15 165 total respondents, 1278 IIMs (age 63 years, 70.3% female, 80.8% Caucasians) and 3453 AIRDs were included. Flares of IIM were seen in 9.6%, 12.7%, 8.7% and 19.6% patients by definitions (a) to (d), respectively, with a median time to flare of 71.5 (10.7-235) days, similar to AIRDs. Patients with active IIMs pre-vaccination (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.03, 1.6, P = 0.025) were prone to flares, while those receiving rituximab (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1, 0.7, P = 0.010) and AZA (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.8, P = 0.016) were at lower risk. Female gender and comorbidities predisposed to flares requiring changes in IS. Asthma (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.05, 2.50, P = 0.028) and higher pain visual analogue score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.11, 1.27, P < 0.001) were associated with disparity between self-reported and IS-denoted flares. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of IIMs confers an equal risk of flares in the post-COVID-19 vaccination period to AIRDs, with active disease, female gender and comorbidities conferring a higher risk. Disparity between patient- and physician-reported outcomes represents a future avenue for exploration.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Myositis , Rheumatic Diseases , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Autoimmune Diseases/physiopathology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Myositis/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Rheumatic Diseases/physiopathology
6.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 83(1): 48-57, 2024 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36828585

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve data on treatment targets and outcomes in GCA/PMR as well as to identify the evidence for the effectiveness of a T2T-based management approach in these diseases. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the task force (29 participants from 10 countries consisting of physicians, a healthcare professional and a patient) developed recommendations, with consensus obtained through voting. The final level of agreement was provided anonymously. RESULTS: Five overarching principles and six-specific recommendations were formulated. Management of GCA and PMR should be based on shared decisions between patient and physician recognising the need for urgent treatment of GCA to avoid ischaemic complications, and it should aim at maximising health-related quality of life in both diseases. The treatment targets are achievement and maintenance of remission, as well as prevention of tissue ischaemia and vascular damage. Comorbidities need to be considered when assessing disease activity and selecting treatment. CONCLUSION: These are the first T2T recommendations for GCA and PMR. Treatment targets, as well as strategies to assess, achieve and maintain these targets have been defined. The research agenda highlights the gaps in evidence and the need for future research.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Comorbidity
7.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050004

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop international consensus-based recommendations for early referral of individuals with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). METHODS: A task force including 29 rheumatologists/internists, 4 general practitioners, 4 patients and a healthcare professional emerged from the international giant cell arteritis and PMR study group. The task force supplied clinical questions, subsequently transformed into Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format. A systematic literature review was conducted followed by online meetings to formulate and vote on final recommendations. Levels of evidence (LOE) (1-5 scale) and agreement (LOA) (0-10 scale) were evaluated. RESULTS: Two overarching principles and five recommendations were developed. LOE was 4-5 and LOA ranged between 8.5 and 9.7. The recommendations suggest that (1) each individual with suspected or recently diagnosed PMR should be considered for specialist evaluation, (2) before referring an individual with suspected PMR to specialist care, a thorough history and clinical examination should be performed and preferably complemented with urgent basic laboratory investigations, (3) individuals with suspected PMR with severe symptoms should be referred for specialist evaluation using rapid access strategies, (4) in individuals with suspected PMR who are referred via rapid access, the commencement of glucocorticoid therapy should be deferred until after specialist evaluation and (5) individuals diagnosed with PMR in specialist care with a good initial response to glucocorticoids and a low risk of glucocorticoid related adverse events can be managed in primary care. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first international recommendations for referral of individuals with suspected PMR, which complement the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology management guidelines for established PMR.

8.
J Clin Med ; 12(24)2023 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38137611

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccination is well documented, but hesitancy among people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, often immunocompromised, remains high, partially due to a scarcity of data on safety over a longer term. We herein aimed to assess delayed adverse events (DAEs) occurring >7 days after COVID-19 vaccination in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) versus other rheumatic autoimmune diseases (rAIDs), non-rheumatic AIDs (nrAIDs), and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: Self-reported data were captured within the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD)-2 online survey, which comprised >150 centres and responses from 106 countries, between February and June 2022. Logistic regression analysis adjusting for important confounders (age, sex, ethnicity) was used to compare groups. RESULTS: Of 7203 eligible individuals, 882 (12.2%) patients had SLE, 3161 (43.9%) patients had rAIDs, 426 (5.9%) patients had nrAIDs, and 2734 (38.0%) were HCs. SLE patients had a median age of 39 years (IQR: 31-50); 93.7% were women. SLE patients reported, more frequently, major DAEs (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.0; p = 0.001) and hospitalisation (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.4-3.4; p < 0.001) compared to HCs, severe rashes (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3-4.2; p = 0.004) compared to people with rAIDS, and hospitalisation (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.9; p = 0.029) as well as several minor DAEs compared to people with nrAIDs. Differences were observed between vaccines in terms of frequency of major DAEs and hospitalisations, with the latter seen more frequently in patients receiving the Moderna vaccine. People with SLE with no autoimmune multimorbidity less frequently reported overall minor DAEs compared to SLE patients with comorbid nrAIDs (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-1.0; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Hospitalisations post-vaccination were more frequent in SLE patients than in HCs. Monitoring of SLE patients following COVID-19 vaccination can help in identifying DAEs early, informing patients about expected DAEs, and supporting patients, especially those with autoimmune multimorbidity.

9.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(8): 2797-2805, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637182

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore current management practices for PMR by general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists including implications for clinical trial recruitment. METHODS: An English language questionnaire was constructed by a working group of rheumatologists and GPs from six countries. The questionnaire focused on: 1: Respondent characteristics; 2: Referral practices; 3: Treatment with glucocorticoids; 4: Diagnostics; 5: Comorbidities; and 6: Barriers to research. The questionnaire was distributed to rheumatologists and GPs worldwide via members of the International PMR/Giant Cell Arteritis Study Group. RESULTS: In total, 394 GPs and 937 rheumatologists responded to the survey. GPs referred a median of 25% of their suspected PMR patients for diagnosis and 50% of these were returned to their GP for management. In general, 39% of rheumatologists evaluated patients with suspected PMR >2 weeks after referral, and a median of 50% of patients had started prednisolone before rheumatologist evaluation. Direct comparison of initial treatment showed that the percentage prescribing >25 mg prednisolone daily for patients was 30% for GPs and 12% for rheumatologists. Diagnostic imaging was rarely used. More than half (56%) of rheumatologists experienced difficulties recruiting people with PMR to clinical trials. CONCLUSION: This large international survey indicates that a large proportion of people with PMR are not referred for diagnosis, and that the proportion of treatment-naive patients declined with increasing time from referral to assessment. Strategies are needed to change referral and management of people with PMR, to improve clinical practice and facilitate recruitment to clinical trials.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Rheumatologists , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
J Autoimmun ; 126: 102780, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34923432

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The clinical coexistence of two or more autoimmune diseases (ADs) fulfilling classification criteria is termed "overt polyautoimmunity" (PolyA), whereas the presence of autoantibodies unrelated to an index AD, without clinical criteria fulfillment, is known as "latent PolyA". We aimed to explore a new taxonomy of ADs based on PolyA. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 292 subjects, we evaluated the presence of PolyA in 146, 45, 29, 17, and 17 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) and systemic sclerosis (SSc), respectively, and 38 healthy controls. Clinical assessment, autoantibody profile (by autoantigen array chip), lymphocytes immunophenotype and cytokine profile (by flow cytometry) were evaluated simultaneously. A mixed cluster methodology was used to classify ADs. RESULTS: Latent PolyA was more frequent than overt PolyA, ranging from 69.9% in RA to 100% in SSc. Nevertheless, both latent and overt PolyA clustered together. Over-expressed IgG autoantibodies were found to be hallmarks for the identification of index ADs. The combination of autoantibodies allowed high accuracy in the classification of ADs. Three well-defined clusters based on PolyA were observed with distinctive clinical and immunological phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study indicates that ADs can be classified according to PolyA. PolyA should be considered in all studies dealing with ADs, including epidemiological, genetic, and clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Sjogren's Syndrome , Autoantibodies , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Autoimmunity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Sjogren's Syndrome/complications , Sjogren's Syndrome/diagnosis , Sjogren's Syndrome/epidemiology
11.
J Transl Autoimmun ; 4: 100115, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34485886

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the most common inflammatory disease in patients over 50 years. Information about the disease in Latin America (LATAM) is scarce. We aimed to evaluate a group of Colombian patients with PMR and to conduct a systematic review of PMR in LATAM. METHODS: A multicentric retrospective study was performed. Medical records of 256 PMR patients were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups, those fulfilling the 2012 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for PMR and those who did not (i.e., clinical diagnosis). A systematic literature review and meta regression was performed comparing Colombian vs LATAM patients. RESULTS: From 256 patients, 145 (56.6%) fulfilled the 2012 EULAR/ACR criteria, and 111 (43.3%) were classified by clinical diagnosis. Inflammatory bilateral shoulder pain, pelvic girdle aching, morning stiffness >45 min, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CPR), and Methotrexate (MTX) prescription were more common in the 2012 EULAR/ACR group. None of the included patients presented overt polyautoimmunity (PolyA), whereas up to 24% exhibited latent PolyA. In addition, these patients showed high frequency of malignancy (7.59%). In the meta regression analysis, Colombian patients exhibited lower ESR levels, and were less likely to develop giant cell arteritis (GCA) as compared to the rest of LATAM data. CONCLUSION: Patients with PMR in LATAM exhibit similar phenotypes from other cohorts worldwide. Malignancy, GCA and latent PolyA should be considered in the routine clinical follow-up of patients with PMR.

12.
Clin Rheumatol ; 40(4): 1581-1591, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32840702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic diseases are a reason for frequent consultation with primary care doctors. Unfortunately, there is a high percentage of misdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To design an algorithm to be used by primary care physicians to improve the diagnostic approach of the patient with joint pain, and thus improve the diagnostic capacity in four rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Based on the information obtained from a literature review, we identified the main symptoms, signs, and paraclinical tests related to the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis with peripheral involvement, systemic lupus erythematosus with joint involvement, and osteoarthritis. We conducted 3 consultations with a group of expert rheumatologists, using the Delphi technique, to design a diagnostic algorithm that has as a starting point "joint pain" as a common symptom for the four diseases. RESULTS: Thirty-nine rheumatologists from 18 countries of Ibero-America participated in the Delphi exercise. In the first consultation, we presented 94 items to the experts (35 symptoms, 31 signs, and 28 paraclinical tests) candidates to be part of the algorithm; 74 items (25 symptoms, 27 signs, and 22 paraclinical tests) were chosen. In the second consultation, the decision nodes of the algorithm were chosen, and in the third, its final structure was defined. The Delphi exercise lasted 8 months; 100% of the experts participated in the three consultations. CONCLUSION: We present an algorithm designed through an international consensus of experts, in which Delphi methodology was used, to support primary care physicians in the clinical approach to patients with joint pain. Key Points • We developed an algorithm with the participation of rheumatologists from 18 countries of Ibero-America, which gives a global vision of the clinical context of the patient with joint pain. • We integrated four rheumatic diseases into one tool with one common symptom: joint pain. It is a novel tool, as it is the first algorithm that will support the primary care physician in the consideration of four different rheumatic diseases. • It will improve the correct diagnosis and reduce the number of paraclinical tests requested by primary care physicians, in the management of patients with joint pain. This point was verified in a recently published study in the journal Rheumatology International (reference number 31).


Subject(s)
Rheumatic Diseases , Rheumatology , Algorithms , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Humans , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Rheumatologists
13.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 15(4): 326-330, oct.-dic. 2008. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-636784

ABSTRACT

La distrofia simpática refleja es un síndrome caracterizado por dolor local severo, desproporcionado, asociado a alteraciones de tipo vasomotor y cambios tróficos. Afecta las extremidades, apareciendo de forma relativamente frecuente luego de un trauma o cirugía, incluso aunque fuese menor. La presentación idiopática de este síndrome es mucho menos frecuente. A continuación se describe el caso de una mujer joven con distrofia simpática refleja idiopática y se presenta una revisión de la literatura con énfasis en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de esta entidad.


Reflex sympathetic dystrophy is characterized by intense and disproportionate local pain, associated with vasomotor and trophic changes. Extremities are commonly involved, especially when a trauma or surgery, even minor, has occurred. Likewise, spontaneous or idiopathic presentation of this syndrome is much less frequent. Here we describe the clinical picture of a young woman presenting with idiopathic reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Then we present a brief review, emphasizing on diagnosis and treatment of this disease.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy , Pain , Vasomotor System , Wounds and Injuries , Diagnosis , Extremities
14.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 14(4): 320-323, dic. 2007. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-636734

ABSTRACT

La asociación de gota y síndrome de Down (SD) es poco frecuente a pesar que ambas enfermedades son comunes en la población general. Más interesante aún es el hecho que la hiperuricemia sí es una característica frecuente entre las alteraciones metabólicas del SD. A continuación se informa el caso de un paciente de sexo masculino de 35 años con SD que consultó por artritis de tres años de evolución, inicial-mente en el quinto y luego en el primer dedo del pie izquierdo. Debido a la presencia de osteolisis severa en el primer y quinto dedo en la radiografía inicial del pie, se consideró patología tumoral, lo cual, sin embargo, fue descartado por ortopedia oncológica. Posteriormente se realizó el diagnóstico de artritis gotosa al encontrar hiperuricemia y confirmación de cristales de ácido úrico en una muestra de líquido extraída de un nódulo subcutáneo encontrado en el tobillo izquierdo. Este caso hace parte de los escasos informes que relacionan el SD y la gota. Adicionalmente el desarrollo de gota en este paciente tiene características inusuales como el sitio de inicio de la enfermedad y la severidad de la presentación. No es claro porque el desarrollo de gota en pacientes con SD es infrecuente.


The association between gout and Down Syndrome (DS) is very infrequent, in spite that both diseases are common in general population. Surprisingly, hyperuricemia is a common metabolic impairment in DS. In this report we describe a 35-years old man with DS presenting with arthritis in the fifth and then in the first toe of his left foot. Severe osteolysis of the first and fifth toe was seen by radiography. Because of this, neoplasm was suspected but later ruled out by oncologic orthopedist. After we found hyperuricemia a diagnosis of gout was made, and then confirmed by examination of a sample obtained from a subcutaneous node. This report is one of the few cases previously published. In addition, development of gout in this patient has unusual features like its onset in the fifth toe and its severity at presentation. In spite that hyperuricemia is common in DS, in not clear why these patients mostly do not develop gout.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Osteolysis , Arthritis, Gouty , Down Syndrome , Association , Uric Acid , Toes , Acro-Osteolysis , Diagnosis , Research Report
15.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 14(4): 297-309, dic. 2007. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-636732

ABSTRACT

La amiloidosis es un grupo de enfermedades cuyo común denominador es el depósito extracelular de fibrillas insolubles derivadas de proteínas en órganos y tejidos. De acuerdo a su etiología y al tipo de proteína depositada existen varias clases de amiloi-dosis. A pesar que la incidencia de amiloidosis sisté -mica secundaria (AA) ha disminuido notoriamente con el advenimiento de drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad (DMARD) y terapia biológica, continúa siendo el tipo de amiloidosis más frecuentemente observada por el reumatólogo. En este artículo revisamos la historia, clasificación, epidemiología, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la amiloidosis sistémica haciendo énfasis en las manifestaciones osteoar-ticulares que produce la enfermedad y en las distintas enfermedades reumatológicas que pueden originar una amiloidosis secundaria (AA). Así mismo publicamos un material fotográfico recopilado durante 20 años en diferentes centros de reumatología del país que es de gran ayuda para realizar el diagnóstico clínico de esta infrecuente patología.


Amyloidosis is a generic term that refers to the extracellular tissue deposition of fibrils composed of low molecular weight subunits of a variety of proteins. Amyloidosis classification depends on its etiology and subtype of protein involved. Systemic secondary amyloidosis (AA) is the most frequent subtype seen on rheumatology services because rheumatoid arthritis is currently the most frequent cause of AA, although its incidence has been declined because a better treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). In this review we provide a general overview of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of the systemic amyloidosis, emphasizing on the rheu-matic manifestations of these disorders. Besides, we present a photographic material obtained in the last 20 years in several rheumatologic centers in our country that it has a crucial role in the diagnosis and follow-up of this infrequent pathology.


Subject(s)
Humans , Amyloidosis , Bone and Bones , Disease , Epidemiology , Diagnosis , Rheumatologists
16.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 14(2): 135-142, jun. 2007. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-636758

ABSTRACT

La osteoartritis es la enfermedad articular más frecuente. Su principal síntoma es el dolor con o sin limitación funcional de la articulación comprometida. El deterioro del cartílago articular es un elemento central en su patogénesis. En la práctica diaria el tratamiento se centra en aliviar el dolor y mejorar la funcionalidad, sin alterar el curso natural de la enfermedad. Durante los últimos años se han realizado avances importantes en el entendimiento de la compleja fisiopatología del cartílago que han permitido explorar nuevas opciones terapéuticas con el objetivo de modificar el curso de la enfermedad, especialmente en su fase temprana.


Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common arthropathy. It is characterized by pain with or without joint limitation. Degeneration of articular cartilage is an essential feature in its pathogenesis. In daily practice the treatment is directed to relief of pain and to improve joint function without modifying the disease itself. In the past few years, there have been important findings in the general understanding of the cartilage and its central role in the development of OA. New therapeutic options, especially those directed to modify the natural course, are under investigation in early OA.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Osteoarthritis , Therapeutics , Cartilage , Pain , Signs and Symptoms , Joint Diseases
17.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 14(1): 54-65, ene. 2007. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-636751

ABSTRACT

La presencia de enfermedad reumatológica en el embarazo no es infrecuente. Este hecho se favorece por la mayor prevalencia de enfermedades reumáticas en mujeres en edad fértil. El efecto del embarazo en la enfermedad reumatológica varía de acuerdo a la enfermedad; en algunos casos se tiende a exacerbar la patología de base, mientras que en otros tiende a remitir. Independiente de cuál sea la situación, la enfermedad reumática en el embarazo siempre representa un desafío importante para el equipo médico tratante. El tratamiento de cada condición difiere del estándar porque muchos medicamentos poseen efectos adversos para el embarazo y adicionalmente, en los estudios clínicos con frecuencia se excluye a la población obstétrica por lo que muchas de las recomendaciones en este grupo de pacientes provienen de observaciones clínicas. El conocimiento preciso del problema y la inclusión del médico reumatólogo en el equipo de tratamiento son pasos fundamentales para obtener un mejor resultado materno-fetal. En este artículo analizamos las enfermedades reumáticas más frecuentes y su relación con el embarazo.


The association between rheumatic diseases and pregnancy is not uncommon. This is due to the high prevalence of the rheumatic diseases among young women. The effect of pregnancy on any rheumatic disease is unique to each rheumatologic condition; in some cases pregnancy is the trigger for a flare-up, while in other cases the disease tends to go to remission. Independent to the clinical scenario, rheumatic diseases on a pregnant women is always a challenge for the medical team. Treatment for each condition differs from the standard of care, because many drugs may have serious side effects on pregnancy. Besides, obstetric population is commonly excluded from clinical trials, so most recommendations are made by expert opinion and clinical observations. The precise understanding of this situation and the participation of a rheumatologist in the medical team are essential elements to achieve the best outcomes. In this paper we review the most frequents rheumatic diseases and its relation with pregnancies.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy , Rheumatic Diseases , Pathology , Therapeutics , Pregnant Women , Long Term Adverse Effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...